Sunday, April 27, 2025
29.9 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2733

“I’m just an ordinary man” — Chee Soon Juan addresses public’s perception in interview

Singapore — Opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan, who never shies away from speaking up about his political convictions, shifted gears and shed more light on his personal life in a recent interview with the Robb Report, a Singapore-based luxury lifestyle publication.

In the interview, Dr Chee, 58, addressed the public’s perception of him and shared that if people really got to know him they would find out that he is just an ordinary man.

He told Robb Report’s Allisa Noraini:

“I don’t have two horns sticking out from my head. I’m just an ordinary man with his own set of worries, aspirations, insecurities, strengths and weaknesses — I’m going through the processes any typical human being would go through in life. I’m no different from anyone else, but it’s only natural for everyone to have his or her own views on various matters.”

Dr Chee said he would have continued to teach and pursue research — his first love — if he had not joined the political fray. He added that he would have told his younger self not be be “too anxious in trying to figure out what he’d want to achieve in life” since he was very concerned about how life would turn out when he was a young adult.

Pointing out that “it’s really not about the destination, but the journey itself”, he added: “The various experiences gained from the journey will guide you to make the best decisions for yourself.”

The opposition veteran, who has seen more than his fair share of struggles since he joined politics in 1992, also shed light on how he motivates himself. Describing how it is not always easy to find purpose, Dr Chee, who is known for his perseverance, said:

“I can’t lie that sometimes in life, when you’re running on empty, you do need to manufacture hope. But at some point, it’s important to stop wallowing in self-pity and feeling sorry for yourself.

“You’ve always got to find a way forward, and if there seems to be no way forward, you’ve just got to grab a machete and bash your way through until you find a path for yourself. Eventually, you’ll be reminded of your purpose again and the excitement that comes with it.”

He added: “For my case, that’ll be to change the society and mindsets of the people. And automatically, I’d find myself getting back into the swing of things.”

Dr Chee told the Robb Report that he loves to read and do physical activities like riding his bicycle to unwind. He also described how he juggles his duties as a father with his political life.

Providing valuable tips on parenthood, like the need to learn how to allow children to chart their own path forward, the father of three said: “Unlike schoolwork, where one has model answers to refer to, being a parent is, many a time, a case of trial and error. Just keep your fingers crossed that you are doing the right thing.

“But here’s one thing I’ve discovered: As a parent, you’ve got to resist the temptation of wanting your children to be who you want them to be. You’ve just got to learn to let go and let them discover their own paths in life. And it’s through a lived experience that they begin to also figure out what’s important for themselves.”

When the publication asked who he would pick if he could have a meal with anyone in the world, Dr Chee said that he dreams of having a private moment with Mahatma Gandhi or Nelson Mandela to learn about their fears and insecurities.

He also entertained the possibility of getting to know someone infamous, like Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin, to try to understand their psyche and whether they regretted the things they did.

The SDP Secretary-General added that he would enjoy cooking for Makansutra founder K F Seetoh and that he considered inviting Mr Seetoh to try the mashed potatoes he made to raise funds for a grassroots initiative at Bukit Batok SMC, the ward he contested in this year’s General Election.

On a more serious note, Dr Chee said that he is not afraid of showing who he really is because he deeply values authenticity. He said: “…I just want people to see me for who I am and for all my thoughts. I’d like to be able to show people this genuine side of me, and while some may not agree with my values, at least they’re informed of how I work.”

The politician further said that he would like to be remembered as “someone who cared” when he leaves this world. He said, candidly: “This may sound a little vain and nebulous, but when I leave this world, I’d like to be remembered as someone who cared — in whichever way you choose to see it.”

Read the interview in full HERE.

/TISG

Paul Tambyah remembers J. B. Jeyaretnam on his 12th death anniversary

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chairman Paul Tambyah remembered the late opposition legend J. B. Jeyaretnam on his 12th death anniversary and called the political icon a “lion” in a Facebook post published on Wednesday (30 Sept).

Earlier that day, the Facebook page of SDP mascot ‘Danny the Democracy Bear’ shared an old video of SDP chief Chee Soon Juan paying tribute to Mr Jeyaretnam on his first death anniversary. Re-posting the video on his own Facebook page, Prof Tambyah wrote: “We lost a lion”

We lost a lion

Posted by Paul Tambyah on Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Mr Jeyaretnam, who had crossed swords with Singapore’s founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew in his prominent legal career well before Singapore gained independence, made his first foray into politics in 1971. He led a group of lawyers who took over the Workers’ Party (WP), which had been founded in 1957 by Singapore’s former Chief Minister, David Marshall, but had become a fairly small and insignificant party during the 1960s.

He became the party’s Secretary-General and first stood for parliamentary elections in the 1972 general election, when he contested the Farrer Park constituency and lost to the PAP’s Lee Chiaw Meng with 23.1 per cent of the vote. At the 1976 general election, he contested Kampong Chai Chee, and lost to the PAP’s Andrew Fong with 40.1 per cent of the vote.

In 1977, he contested a by-election in Radin Mas and was defeated by PAP candidate Bernard Chen with 29.4 per cent of the vote. He then contested Telok Blangah at a 1979 by-election and the 1980 election, losing to the PAP’s Rohan bin Kamis both times by 38.8 per cent in 1979 and by 47.0 per cent in 1980.

Despite being defeated at the polls so many times, Mr Jeyaretnam persevered and in 1981, at a by-election in Anson Single Member Constituency, he defeated PAP candidate Pang Kim Hin to become Singapore’s first opposition Member of Parliament (MP) with 51.9 of the vote in a three-corned fight.

He was re-elected as the constituency’s MP at the 1984 general election, with a larger vote share of 56.8 per cent.

Mr Jeyaretnam was subsequently brought down by a series of charges which he claimed were politically motivated to remove him from Parliament and prevent him from taking part in future elections. Two months after his 1984 re-election, Mr Jeyaretnam and the WP’s then-chairman Wong Hong Toy were charged for allegedly misreporting party accounts.

In 1986, Senior District Judge Michael Khoo found him innocent of all charges but one. The prosecution appealed the decision to the High Court. Chief Justice Wee Chong Jin ordered a retrial in a different district court. At the retrial, Jeyaretnam was declared guilty of all charges.

The judge sentenced him to three months’ imprisonment (later commuted to one month) and fined him S$5,000 – a sentence sufficient to disqualify him from serving in Parliament and prevent him from standing in parliamentary elections for a period of five years. He was also disbarred as a lawyer in a separate proceeding.

When Mr Jeyaretnam called for an enquiry into the transfer, alleging that Chief Justice Wee Chong Jin and Attorney-General Tan Boon Teik were “beholden” to Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, the allegation was dismissed as “scandalous”.

Mr Jeyaretnam exercised his right to appeal his disbarment to the Privy Council, which duly reversed the disbarment in 1988, noting:

“Their Lordships have to record their deep disquiet that by a series of misjudgements, the appellant and his co-accused Wong, have suffered a grievous injustice. They have been fined, imprisoned and publicly disgraced for offences of which they are not guilty.
“The appellant, in addition, has been deprived of his seat in Parliament and disqualified for a year from practising his profession. Their Lordships order restores him to the roll of advocates and solicitors of the Supreme Court of Singapore, but, because of the course taken by the criminal proceedings, their Lordships have no power to right the other wrongs which the appellant and Wong have suffered.
“Their only prospect of redress, their Lordships understand, will be by way of petition for pardon to the President of the Republic of Singapore.”

Following the decision of the Privy Council, Mr Jeyaretnam wrote to President Wee Kim Wee to ask that the convictions be removed. However, the Singapore government strongly condemned the judgment and President Wee, on the advice of the Cabinet, refused to remove the convictions. The opposition politician hence remained disqualified from Parliament until 1991.

Though Mr Jeyaretnam was barred from contesting the 1988 general election, he spoke at election rallies held by the Workers’ Party during the campaign. Mr Lee Kuan Yew commenced proceedings for slander against Mr Jeyaretnam for remarks he made at one such rally.

Mr Jeyaretnam lost the court case and was ordered to pay damages of S$260,000 plus costs to Mr Lee. He also lost an appeal against the judgment. He had wanted to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, but to do that, he had to obtain Mr Lee’s consent before the hearing by the Court of Appeal. Mr Lee did not give his consent.

In 1995, Mr Jeyaretnam wrote an article in the WP newsletter, The Hammer, in which he alleged that a number of those involved in an event called the Tamil Language Week were government “stooges”. For this, he was sued twice for libel by Indian PAP leaders, resulting in total damages of S$465,000 and S$250,000 in court costs.

Mr Jeyaretnam was unable to contest the 1991 general election as it was held a few months before his parliamentary ban expired. At the 1997 general election, Mr Jeyaretnam stood as a WP candidate in Cheng San GRC but lost with 45.2 per cent of the vote. He was, however, selected for a Non-Constituency MP position due to his score at the polls.

After the 1997 general election, 11 defamation suits were filed against Mr Jeyaretnam for saying a party member had made police reports against then-Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong. Mr Goh alleged that, as a result of this, his “reputation, moral authority and leadership standing have been gravely injured both local and internationally”.

During cross-examination in court, Mr Goh likened Jeyaretnam’s statement to throwing a Molotov cocktail. However, on further questioning, he also stated that “it has been a good year” for him and his standing as a leader had not been injured. Mr Jeyaretnam was nevertheless found liable and ordered him to pay damages of S$20,000.

Mr Goh described these damages as “derisory” and appealed. On appeal, the damages were raised to S$100,000 plus S$20,000 in court costs.

In 2001, after an instalment on his damages was overdue, Mr Jeyaretnam was declared bankrupt. As undischarged bankrupts are barred from serving in Parliament, he therefore lost his NCMP seat and his seat was declared vacant by the Speaker on 24 July 2001.

He was also disbarred and was unable to stand as a candidate in the 2001 general election. In October 2001, he resigned as Secretary-General of the Workers’ Party and was replaced by Low Thia Khiang. Shortly after he stepped down as party chief, Mr Jeyaretnam left the party.

To earn money to pay off his debts, Jeyaretnam sold copies of his book ‘Make it Right for Singapore’ on the streets and also authored another book, The Hatchet Man of Singapore (ISBN 9810485131), describing his legal trials.

On 25 October 2004, Mr Jeyaretnam appealed for an early discharge from bankruptcy so that he could contest in the next general election. Representing himself during the two-hour hearing at the apex court, Mr Jeyaretnam appealed on the grounds that he wanted another chance to contribute to society and offered to pay one-third of the more than S$600,000 he still owed his claimants.

Mr Jeyaretnam was discharged from bankruptcy in May 2007 after paying S$233,255.78. He was reinstated to the bar in September that year.

On 18 June 2008, Mr Jeyaretnam founded a new political party, the Reform Party (RP), and took on the role of Secretary-General. He planned to stand as a candidate for the party in future elections but did not get a chance to do so as he passed away three months after the party was formed, at the age of 82. His son, Kenneth Jeyaretnam, has led the RP since his father’s passing.

Pritam Singh credits Lee Li Lian for kickstarting Mid Autumn event in Aljunied division nearly a decade ago

Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh credited party member Lee Li Lian for kickstarting the Mid Autumn community event at the Eunos division of Aljunied GRC nearly a decade ago, in a Facebook post published on Thursday (1 Oct).

Sharing photos from the Mid Autumn Celebration from two years ago, Mr Pritam recalled how Eunos has been holding this community event for several years but cannot do so this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuring his followers that the event will be back, the Leader of the Opposition thanked Ms Lee for kickstarting the community initiative.

He wrote: “Happy Mid-Autumn Festival to all Singaporeans and friends who celebrate this auspicious day! For many years, Team Eunos has celebrated the day with residents at the open plaza in Eunos Spring. But COVID-19 has put paid to many community activities.

“I miss looking forward to meeting residents and children who all enjoy the lantern walk around this estate. But my memories of each celebration, every year are still fresh (Thank you Lee Li Lian 李丽连 for kick-starting this community event in Eunos in 2011!)

“We’ll be back. Until then, blessings and all good tidings to one and all once again on the occasion of the Mid-Autumn Festival!”

Happy Mid-Autumn Festival to all Singaporeans and friends who celebrate this auspicious day! For many years, Team Eunos…

Posted by Pritam Singh on Thursday, October 1, 2020

Ms Lee, who has a background in finance, joined the Workers’ Party (WP) more than a decade ago and was elected into the WP’s Central Executive Committee (CEC) in 2008 after some time volunteering on the ground. She was fielded as a WP candidate for the first time in the 2011 general election and contested Punggol East Single Member Ward (SMC).

Punggol East SMC was freshly carved out of the neighbouring Pasir Ris-Punggol Group Representation Constituency (GRC) ahead of the election. The WP’s new candidate faced off with Michael Palmer, a People’s Action Party (PAP) incumbent who had served as one of the Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC MPs prior to the election.

Ms Lee ultimately lost to Mr Palmer, who was later made Speaker of Parliament, but garnered an impressive 41.01 per cent of votes – a remarkable feat for a fresh face standing in a single member ward.

In December 2012, however, Mr Palmer resigned from his parliamentary posts due to an extra-marital affair with an employee of the People’s Association (PA) and his ward was left vacant.

In the ensuing by-election, Ms Lee was picked as the WP’s choice to contest the ward and she faced a rare four-cornered contest, with new PAP candidate Koh Poh Koon – a colorectal surgeon who had just joined the PAP three months prior – and two other opposition parties joining the fray.

In a historic upset, Ms Lee emerged the victor at the polls with 54.50 per cent of the vote and became Singapore’s first female opposition politician to control a single member ward. The win also marked the second time since 1981 that the WP had captured a parliamentary seat after a by-election.

Ms Lee was fielded to defend her seat in the 2015 General Election, which was held months after Singapore’s founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew passed. The PAP fielded six-term MP and Deputy Speaker of Parliament Charles Chong in Ms Lee’s ward and the WP was narrowly defeated with 48.24 per cent of the vote compared to the PAP’s 51.76 per cent.

Although Ms Lee was offered a Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) position since she received one of the best scores among opposition candidates who failed to clinch a ward, she declined the offer and the seat went to the WP’s candidate for East Coast GRC, Daniel Goh.

Mr Chong retired from politics ahead of the 2020 general election and the hotly contested Punggol East SMC was absorbed into the new Sengkang GRC. Ms Lee, who had remained an active WP member after the last election, was spotted walking the ground in the ward and was widely expected to be fielded as part of the WP’s team in Sengkang.

Although Ms Lee was prominent in the WP’s pre-election campaign, she ultimately did not contest Sengkang GRC or any other ward. Instead, she helped the WP team contesting in Sengkang – He Ting Ru, Jamus Lim, Raeesah Khan and Louis Chua.

The opposition party pulled off what seemed like an impossible feat at Sengkang when it emerged the victor at the polls. Following the election, it was announced that the new Sengkang GRC MPs would be running their own town council and that Ms Lee will serve as one of the town councillors.

Netizens comment on how S’pore police are ‘so gentle’ when handling intoxicated individuals

0

Singapore – A rather entertaining video of a presumably intoxicated man at a coffee shop surrounded by four police officers trying to get him to cooperate is circulating online. Netizens have pointed out that the public “should be glad our police are so gentle,” as the same treatment can’t be expected in other countries.

On Friday (Oct 2), a Facebook user shared a video in Complaint Singapore’s page of a what looked like an intoxicated man surrounded by Singapore Police Force (SPF) officers trying to get him to cooperate. The 29-second video showed the man in a pink shirt and black pants that were pulled down a tad too low, repeatedly avoiding the hold of an officer.

At one point in the footage, it appears as if the man wanted to get a pack of cigarettes on the nearby table. However, he was unable to do so as the four officers succeeded in escorting him out of the area.

Members from the online community highlighted in their comments that the officers handled the situation “gently” and the same wouldn’t happen in other countries such as the United States or Hongkong. “We should be glad that our police are so gentle,” commented Facebook user Chew JC. He mentioned how if a similar situation happened in another country such as the US, it would likely result in the man being pinned to the ground with a gun aimed at his head.

Facebook user Sean Yee agreed with the sentiment and noted that the incident might not have been serious enough to warrant an arrest. “Probably just noisy or drunk, pull them away, send them home.”

Meanwhile, a few netizens commented that it was a “bad idea” for coffee shops to sell alcoholic beverages as intoxicated customers could disrupt other diners or pose risks to public safety.

Photo: FB screengrab/Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab/Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab/Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab/Complaint Singapore

Watch the video here.

Sylvia Lim clarifies that WhatsApp message about Careshield Life is not fully attributable to her

Workers’ Party (WP) chairman Sylvia Lim has clarified that the contents of a WhatsApp message about the Careshield Life scheme cannot be fully attributed to her, although the message makes it seems like she is the source behind the entire text.

The WhatsApp message, which is circulating among various groups, quotes extracts of a speech Ms Lim made in Parliament in July 2018 but also includes parts written by someone else without making a distinction that Ms Lim did not write those parts.

In a Facebook post published on Sunday (4 Oct), Ms Lim wrote: “It has come to my attention that a WhatsApp message is circulating about CareShield, quoting extracts of a speech I made in Parliament in July 2018 on MOH’s CareShield Life Motion.

“Please note while the parts with direct quotes on Mr K’s case and the onerous nature of the 3 ADL test are correct, there are other parts of the message, particularly some mathematics on premiums, that were written by someone else. These parts should not be mistaken to have come from me.”

Good morning.It has come to my attention that a WhatsApp message is circulating about CareShield, quoting extracts of…

Posted by Sylvia Lim on Saturday, October 3, 2020

The WhatsApp message covers a notable speech Ms Lim made on the Ministry of Health’s CareShield Life Motion amid public backlash against public healthcare insurance schemes like Eldershield and Careshield Life in 2018.

On the back of the revelation that the authorities collected a hefty S$3.3 billion in premiums and only paid out S$133 million to policyholders, Ms Lim shared the story of an elderly resident who was denied help from Eldershield until it was too late.

The opposition MP revealed that the resident, an amputee who was suffering from advanced kidney failure, was an Eldershield policyholder until the scheme revoked his benefits since he could “partially” perform six activities of daily living (ADLs).

The Government considers individuals severely disabled and will pay out insurance benefits when they can to three out the following six ADLs: washing themselves; dressing themselves; feeding themselves; using the toilet by themselves; moving indoors by themselves; moving from a bed to an upright chair by themselves.

Even though the resident was so sick that he could only do these activities “partially,” the authorities decided to discontinue his benefits.

When Ms Lim stepped in to appeal the decision on the resident’s behalf, she was told that the resident must fill out more paperwork. Since the resident was languishing in a hospice at this time, his daughter had to do the necessary. A month after the authorities decided to restore his Eldershield benefits, the resident died.

Ms Lim shared in Parliament:

“This resident, Mr K, was suffering from an advanced stage of kidney failure and already had his leg amputated earlier due to diabetes. The insurer later decided to discontinue Mr K’s Eldershield benefits as the insurer’s panel doctor had assessed that he could perform all of the six activities of daily living “although partially”.
“When I appealed on his behalf for a re-assessment, the insurer wrote back to him to fill up another claim form. Meanwhile he was admitted to a hospice. When I saw him there, he requested me to write to the insurer to say that he would not be filling up the form as he was in the hospice.
“Eventually, his daughter filled up the form, and I understand that the hospice doctors assisted to get his Eldershield benefits restored. But within a month, he was dead.”

The resident’s brother, Facebook user GJ GJ, spoke up on social media and said that his brother passed away in May this year. Revealing that they belong to a low-income family, GJ shared that his sister-in-law went “from one institution to another and (kept) getting turned down bec we never met their protocol”.

Adding that his young nieces who are in their 20s were the ones who kept the household running, GJ added that the paperwork his family had to fill out before receiving help was unbelievable and that his brother struggled before he passed.

Expressing concern for other ailing policyholders like Mr K, Lim asked in Parliament:

“Mr Speaker, I do not know what rigorous standard is applied to determine if a potential ElderShield claimant is disabled enough. When I read about the ElderShield premiums in the billions that have been collected over the years, it struck me how Mr K and his family have apparently been abandoned in their time of need. Is the experience of Mr K an aberration? If this is going to be the experience that will be carried over to CareShield Life, it would be unacceptable.
“I am concerned that the “3-ADLs test”, which will exclude disabled persons facing high medical and care costs, would leave them in a lurch. By the time a person is unable to do 3 ADLs, one is in dire straits. One is either headed towards a nursing home or needs someone to provide care full-time. Before one reaches this stage, if Careshield can give some payouts, then it is likely that the disabled person can continue to be looked after at home with some part-time help. The payouts will fulfill a very important gap, to enable the disabled person to age in place and not tie up another nursing home bed.”

Lim stressed that the new Careshield Life scheme – a mandatory scheme which was imposed on all adults age 30 and above from this year – must review eligibility requirements for payouts so that policyholders receive adequate care and assistance and are not abandoned in their time of need despite paying exorbitant premiums for years:

“I would like to emphasize the point that CareShield Life will be a compulsory scheme, and young Singaporeans will have to pay 37 years of premiums. With this looming fact in mind, CareShield must have meaningful coverage, and my view is that the “3-ADLs test” needs to be reviewed and readjusted to serve this end.”

Former Senior Minister of State for Health Chee Hong Tat responded to Ms Lim that increasing payouts and lowering the claims criterion could make premiums more expensive.

Mr Chee also claimed that the Government is not making “profits” even after it collected S$3.3 billion in Eldershield premiums and only paid out S$133 million and said: “This balance amount is not profit, it is to meet future liabilities.”

Elderly amputee who was denied Eldershield benefits dies weeks after authorities reconsidered his case

Are Tan Chuan-Jin and Lim Wee Kiak claiming that mainstream media is biased towards WP?

Netizens are asking whether ruling party MPs Tan Chuan-Jin and Lim Wee Kiak are claiming that mainstream media is somehow biased towards the Workers’ Party (WP), after the pair lamented about the choice of words publications used in headlines about an adjournment motion ballot Mr Tan conducted this week.

On 14 Sept, Ms Lim filed an Adjournment Motion in Parliament to examine the issues that arose from the court case involving ex-domestic helper Parti Liyani who was acquitted on appeal for theft in a case brought by her former employer, then-Changi Airport Group Chairman Liew Mun Leong.

On Tuesday evening (29 Sept), however, Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin revealed that Ms Lim lost the random ballot deciding on the motions raised in the House. A motion filed by People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Louis Ng, calling for protection against secondhand smoke in homes, won the ballot.

The results of the ballot sparked backlash against the way parliamentary motions are selected. The response to the random ballot appears to have riled Mr Tan up and he published multiple rebuttals against the backlash.

In his first update, Mr Tan expressed surprise over how “some folks choose to spin a false narrative about this process” and called it “disrespectful” to run-down the issues that others are speaking on.

Asserting his hope that the backlash is borne out of “passion and ignorance” rather than a deliberate intention to spread misinformation, the Speaker said rather defensively: “You do not change processes at anyone’s whim and fancy, and just because some of you want only your outcome because you believe it to be right.”

While some agreed with Mr Tan’s point of view, other observers felt that the Speaker got needlessly personal against critics.

Mr Tan then published two more posts on Thursday touching on the same matter. He re-posted slides published by the ‘Parliament of Singapore’ Facebook page about what an adjournment motion is and asked netizens to share the post.

When one netizen commented and suggested that the method of allotment needs to be reviewed, Mr Tan snapped back: “do you even bother to read about options available?”

He also refuted the notion that MPs are denied the chance to speak on important issues in a separate post and highlighted the various ways issues can be aired in Parliament. He wrote: “There are various ways in which issues can be aired in Parliament. The Adjournment motion is one route.

“Some seem to take issue with it and the way it is managed. But from the strident calls and accusations made by some, it appears that they believe that MPs are denied the chance to air topics of importance and it is left to the vagaries of chance.

“I assume many of these folks do follow Parliamentary debates and proceedings closely. Perhaps they might have forgotten about a more substantive route to take. MPs can move motions beyond just the Adjournment Motion route.”

There are various ways in which issues can be aired in Parliament. The Adjournment motion is one route. Some seem to…

Posted by Tan Chuan-Jin on Wednesday, September 30, 2020

While some netizens understood Mr Tan’s position, others felt that the way he worded his message seemed a little too passive aggressive.

Meanwhile, fellow ruling party MP Lim Wee Kiak piped up in the comments section and suggested that the problem lies in the choice of words publications used when they covered the issue. He wrote in a comment that drew 90 reactions on Facebook:

“The problem is the choice of words used by the media. The headlines read as Sylvia Lim’s motion was not picked. People misunderstood that parliament did not pick her motion for debate. It should be “balloted but was not successful in the ballot”.”

Mr Tan responded, “Lim Wee Kiak perhaps so. Then it also betrays their bias in the way they chose to report it.” His reply drew 60 reactions on the social media site.

Netizens responding to the exchange have asked whether the MPs are referring to the way mainstream media covered the story. The Straits Times (ST) reported that Ms Lim’s motion was “not picked” while TODAY similarly reported that her motion was “not selected”.

The notion that ST and TODAY could be biased towards an opposition party surprised netizens, given the ties between the government and mainstream media.

TODAY’s parent company Mediacorp is fully owned by Singapore sovereign wealth fund Temasek Holdings, which is run by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s wife, Ho Ching. There is also a strong public perception that Singapore Press Holdings (SPH), which publishes ST, is the “mouthpiece of the Government”.

US diplomatic cable leaked by WikiLeaks several years ago caused a stir after it quoted former ST bureau chief for the US as saying that SPH’s “editors have all been groomed as pro-government supporters and are careful to ensure that reporting of local events adheres closely to the official line”.

Responding to the exchange between Mr Tan and Dr Lim, netizens expressed disbelief that the MPs appear to be calling mainstream news publications biased towards the WP. Some netizens felt that Mr Tan came across as arrogant while others recalled how Dr Lim was the one who said that ministerial pay helps politicians maintain “dignity”:

Tan Chuan-Jin gets defensive in response to backlash for not picking Sylvia Lim’s adjournment motion

“Emo Chuan” strikes again: Tan Chuan-Jin appeals for sympathy by posting critical post about himself online

Straits Times carries forum letter urging local newspapers to be “independent and unbiased in reporting the news”

BLINKS are in love with BLACKPINK’s Lovesick Girls MV

0

The love for BLACKPINK’s latest music video is overwhelming on Twitter. The South Korean girl group dropped their much-anticipated first full album The Album on October 2 as well as the stunning music video for their title track Lovesick Girls. 

Jennie did the production of the song while Jennie and Jisoo participated in writing its lyrics. Fans of BLACKPINK, known as BLINKS, have been celebrating the group’s long-awaited album and shared their favourite moments from the music video on Twitter.

Here are some of the tweets about the MV.

The girls all look out-of-this-world beautiful!

 

Fans are also loving the song’s lyrics

Lovesick Girls by BLACKPINK broke records by hitting millions of views within release. Picture: Instagram

BLACKPINK has broken the record for being the fastest Korean female group to achieve over 10 million views on YouTube with their music video Lovesick Girls.

The quartet surpassed the 10 million views mark in just 52 minutes after the music video was uploaded at 12pm on October 2. BLACKPINK previously held the same record for their song Ice Cream featuring Selena Gomez, which amassed 10 million views in two hours and 55 minutes.

The group has been enjoying massive success following the release of their much-anticipated record The Album today.

BLACKPINK currently holds the number one spot on the US iTunes singles and albums charts, making them the second Korean girl group to do so after Loona.

The Album includes six new tracks from Blackpink, including the song Bet You Wanna featuring American rapper Cardi B.

In other news, BLACKPINK will be starring in Netflix’s first K-pop original documentary BLACKPINK: Light Up the Sky. The documentary is directed by Caroline Suh and it will feature exclusive interviews with BLACKPINK members Jennie, Jisoo, Lisa and Rosé who are best known for their catchy hits like How You Like That, Kill This Love, and Ddu-du Ddu-du. 

It will chronicle their meteoric rise to global fame. The documentary will also feature never-before-seen footage of the members as young trainees under YG Entertainment.

BLINKS will get a glimpse of the recording process of the group’s album and watch the members riding out the highs and lows of K-pop stardom.  BLACKPINK: Light Up the Sky culminates with Blackpink’s 2019 historic performance at Coachella in California, where they became the first K-pop girl group ever to perform at the popular music festival.

BLACKPINK has collaborated with some international artists recently including Lady Gaga and Selena Gomez.

Li Shengwu among those who support PJ Thum amid police case

Founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s grandson Li Shengwu appears to be among those who support historian Dr Thum Ping Tjin who is being investigated by the police for possibly breaching the Parliamentary Elections Act (PEA).

Last month, the Elections Department’s (ELD) filed a police report against Dr Thum’s socio-political website New Naratif over an alleged breach of the PEA during the July election.

The ELD, which is under the Prime Minister’s Office, said that five paid Facebook advertisements New Naratif put up during the election period contravened the PEA since the publication was not authorised by any candidate or election agent in the General Election to conduct election activity.

The police summoned Dr Thum, the website’s founder and managing director, for investigations at Clementi Police Station on 21 Sept. The interview reportedly lasted about four-and-a-half hours. Police officers subsequently escorted the historian to his home, where they seized his laptop and mobile phone.

Several prominent individuals and organisations, including two political parties, came forward to express concerns over the action. An open letter signed by 52 academic experts on Southeast Asia was also sent to PM Lee, this week.

Lee Hsien Yang’s eldest son Li Shengwu, a Harvard academic, is among those who expressed support for Dr Thum amid the investigation. Mr Li reposted a video Dr Thum made on the day he was interviewed by the police and had his possessions seized on his personal Facebook page:

Shengwu is no stranger to action by the authorities himself. In 2017, Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) initiated legal proceedings for contempt of court against him over a private Facebook post he had published amid the Oxley Road dispute between his father and his uncle, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

The 35-year-old was eventually fined S$15,000 after being found guilty in the court case. He paid the fine in order to “buy some peace and quiet” but insisted that this does not mean he admits guilt.

Academics around the world call on PM Lee to drop case against New Naratif in open letter

SDP’s Paul Tambyah: “We badly need an independent election department”

Rapper Subhas Nair stands in solidarity with PJ Thum in wake of police report by ELD

Non-profit arts group asks whether LO Pritam Singh will raise PJ Thum issue in Parliament

SDP expresses concern over Elections Department’s action against socio-political site

International Press Institute condemns ELD’s police report against New Naratif

Activist claims the police seized PJ Thum’s laptop to “strike fear” and disrupt his life

Police seize PJ Thum’s laptop after Elections Dept lodges report against New Naratif

Workers’ Party Sengkang team asks public what they want to see at Rivervale Mall

Singapore – The Workers’ Party Sengkang team took to social media to ask residents what they wanted to see at Rivervale Mall, noting they were open to suggestions.

On Saturday (Oct 3), the elected parliamentarians for Sengkang GRC, Chua Kheng Wee and Jamus Lim were spotted at Rivervale Mall for their walkabout. “Had a great start to the weekend catching up with residents of Rivervale together with Jamus Lim at Rivervale Mall this morning,” wrote Mr Chua in a Facebook post.

He asked the public what they would like to see at the mall, adding they were open to suggestions.

Mr Lim also shared the post, and the two received much praise from netizens. “Never seen MPs kneel down while talking to residents except for Sengkang MPs,” commented Facebook user Haris Johar. Many noted how the team works tirelessly, holding walkabouts nearly every day.

Photo: FB screengrab
Photo: FB screengrab

“Sengkang residents really hit the jackpot by voting for WP,” said Facebook user Aston Tay.

Photo: FB screengrab

“Usually I only see walkabout before elections, but WP have proven something else,” observed Facebook user Valentinoz Teo. Others wondered where their respective MP from the People’s Action Party was.

Photo: FB screengrab
Photo: FB screengrab
Photo: FB screengrab

Netizen Nicholas Neo, one of the residents who met with Mr Lim and Mr Chua, also commented on the post highlighting how “down to earth and genuine” the experience was, “unlike previous MPs who had a whole gang of cameramen and entourage like some wayang going on.”

Photo: FB screengrab

Meanwhile, the public also provided suggestions, given the opportunity. Many requested for more food variety in the mall and to remove or upgrade the Food Junction area because the food offerings were limited and expensive. A few also suggested a pet grooming shop and a movie theatre.

Photo: FB screengrab
Photo: FB screengrab
Photo: FB screengrab
Photo: FB screengrab

Facebook user Hui Yi Yon admitted having to go to Punggol to a Sheng Siong supermarket as the supermarket in Rivervale Mall was becoming more and more expensive. “Cheaper and more variety of groceries please,” asked the resident.

Photo: FB screengrab

Had a great start to the weekend catching up with residents of #rivervale together with @jamuslim at Rivervale Mall this…

Posted by Chua Kheng Wee 蔡庆威 on Friday, October 2, 2020

Read related:

Ex-PAP MP Lam Pin Min draws intense criticism for officiating Sengkang community project in place of elected WP MPs

Li Huanwu proudly shares his mother’s reaction to his coming out on social media

Li Huanwu proudly shared links to his mother’s interview with Yahoo News on his Facebook page, making special mention of the comments she made about LGBT people in Singapore.

Born in 1986, Li Huanwu is the second of three sons born to Lee Suet Fern and Lee Hsien Yang – founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s youngest son and current Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s younger brother.

Li Huanwu publicly came out of the closet in 2018 and married his longtime partner Heng Yirui in May last year. Huanwu’s parents and brothers were in attendance at the wedding that was held in South Africa.

In a rare interview about her personal life, Lee Suet Fern spoke about her reaction when her son first came out to her. She said, candidly: “He did come to me because I’m closest to him and I’m not sure I handled it very well initially. Although I rapidly realised that it was tough for him and that he needed our love and support.

“And I’ve learnt a lot in the process. Huanwu is our child and we love and support him unconditionally, wholeheartedly and unreservedly. He has made every one of us in our family better persons. We think he was hugely courageous to have come out.”

Referring to Section 377A of the Singapore penal code which criminalises sexual relations between men, Lee Suet Fern said: “We know that for him and for other gay people, they face discrimination all the time. And in Singapore, they also face the Sword of Damocles of criminality. That’s tough.”

She added: “At the end of the day, at the heart of it all, whether you’re gay or not each of us just wants to be accepted and loved for who we are. And we love Huanwu.”

Li Huanwu published two Facebook posts sharing his mother’s interview. Linking to the longform interview on Thursday evening (1 Oct), he wrote: “My mother, in her own words (There’s parts of the interview video that aren’t in the text, including a portion on LGBT people in Singapore)”

He subsequently shared a direct link to the video in which his mother spoke about her reaction when he came out to her. Watch the video here:

This is the direct video link.

Posted by Li Huanwu on Thursday, October 1, 2020

My mother, in her own words.(There’s parts of the interview video that aren’t in the text, including a portion on LGBT people in Singapore)

Posted by Li Huanwu on Wednesday, September 30, 2020