Monday, April 28, 2025
27 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2734

Caught on cam: Another fight breaks out at Bedok 85

0

Singapore — A rainy night did not stop a fight from breaking out at Bedok 85, with one man repeatedly targeting another.

A video of the incident began circulating on social media on Saturday (Oct 3). Facebook page All Singapore Stuff shared the footage with the caption: “Bunch of men at Bedok 85 tried to gang up on a guy in black. End up is they kena hentam (get beaten) instead. They should have picked on someone their own size.”

It happened at the Fengshan Market and Food Centre in Bedok North Street 4, better known as Bedok 85. The man in black is seen hurrying towards a group. A fight breaks out but it is mainly between that man and a man in the group who is in white and black. Earlier, the cameraman can be heard commenting: “Ok, fight. Ok, fight. Fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, Joe!”

Just as the men in the group think the fight is over, the man in black rushes and rains more blows on the man in white and black. He then rushes off in the direction from which he had appeared.

People online highlighted the irony that the Bedok Police Divisional Headquarters and the Bedok North NPC are just around the corner.

Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff
Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff
Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff

Others suggested that alcoholic drinks not be served in coffee shops during the pandemic to prevent such incidents.

Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff
Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff
Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff

One person pointed out that this was not the first fight here. It was only about a month ago that another Bedok 85 scuffle among three men resulted in swollen faces and bloody noses.

Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff
Photo: FB screengrab / All Singapore Stuff

Fight at Bedok 85

Bunch of men at Bedok 85 tried to gang up on a guy in black. End up is they kena hentam instead. They should have picked on someone their own size<Reader's Contribution by Chen>

Posted by All Singapore Stuff on Friday, October 2, 2020

S$300 Grocery Vouchers: Is it safe to distribute them by mail?

0

Singapore — The Government has begun mailing Grocery Vouchers to people living in 1-room and 2-room HDB flats but a Facebook user has raised concerns about whether this is a safe way to do so.

It seems that there have been cases of letter boxes being tampered with and the vouchers, which are considered as good as cash, being stolen.

On Saturday (Oct 3), Facebook user Muhd Hxrry Hxmzxh uploaded a post in Complaint Singapore’s page with the caption, “Do you think that it is safe for the grocery vouchers to be mail(ed) to our mailbox?”

All Singaporeans aged 21 and above, who live in 1-room or 2-room HDB flats and do not own more than one property, will receive the Grocery Vouchers.

The support scheme is a part of the GST (Goods and Services Tax) Voucher benefits that have been disbursed to Singaporeans during the month of August since 2012. This year, 1.4 million Singaporeans will be receiving their GSTV benefits amounting to S$570 million distributed through various support schemes such as a one-time cash top-up of up to S$300 credited directly into their bank accounts beginning Aug 1.

The Grocery Vouchers will be delivered this month and in December 2020. Another batch of vouchers worth S$100 is scheduled to be delivered in 2021, according to the Ministry of Finance (MOF) website. The vouchers can be used at participating supermarkets, such as FairPrice, Giant, Prime and Sheng Siong.

Based on the photo that Muhd Hxrry Hxmzxh provided in his post, the vouchers are already being disbursed. However, an unfortunate situation confirming his question on the mode of delivery was shared by Facebook user Nueng Tjoeklhe-Bambang Soejono.

She posted a screenshot of a comment by someone who had seen four elderly women crying while looking at their broken letterbox. The anonymous individual was on the way to collect the vouchers. This person said: “When I approached them, they said their voucher has been stolen. One of them literally begging for people to find the person who did this.”

Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore

Nueng Tjoeklhe-Bambang Soejono added that she felt sad for the elderly women.

Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore

Some of those who agreed that it might not be safe to mail the vouchers suggested that those eligible for them should collect them, for example from the CC.

Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore
Photo: FB screengrab / Complaint Singapore

/TISG

What happens if a US presidential candidate exits the race?

0

by Chris Lefkow

A US presidential nominee has never died or had to withdraw from a White House race this close to an election.

But President Donald Trump’s hospitalization for coronavirus just a month from the November 3 vote has raised the question of what happens if such an event should occur.

Trump is 74 years old and while his opponent Joe Biden is reportedly in relatively good health at 77 he is the oldest Democratic nominee ever.

Here is a look at some of the potential scenarios in the event a nominee exits the race:

– Delay the presidential election? –
Unlikely. Congress set the date for the election and this one has already been scheduled, as per US law for the Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

Both the Republican-controlled Senate and the Democratic-majority House of Representatives would have to agree on a postponement.

“I don’t see it happening,” said Capri Cafaro, a former Democratic member of the Ohio state senate who teaches at American University. “It is unlikely a Democratic majority would want to postpone the election.”

Even during the Civil War between the North and South, the 1864 election was held as scheduled with Abraham Lincoln winning another term.

– Can a candidate be replaced? –
Trump’s Republican Party and Biden’s Democratic Party both have rules outlining how to fill a vacancy on the presidential ticket should one occur.

In the case of Trump’s GOP, the 168 members of the Republican National Committee could vote to select the replacement.

The RNC could also reconvene its national convention of more than 2,500 delegates to select a new candidate but time pressure probably makes this unworkable.

A simple majority would be all that is needed to choose a new candidate in either scenario.

In the case of the Democrats, a new presidential nominee would be selected by the nearly 450 members of the Democratic National Committee.

– Can a replacement candidate be on the ballot? –
Probably not. “The problem at this point is that we are so far along in this 2020 election that not only have people cast ballots, ballots have already been printed,” Cafaro said.

“You really don’t have enough time to reprint ballots which say Mike Pence or Kamala Harris,” she said, referring to the Republican and Democratic vice presidential nominees respectively.

More than 3.1 million Americans have already cast their ballots, according to a tally kept by the US Elections Project at the University of Florida.

In addition, deadlines for ballot access vary from state to state and they have already passed in most cases.

– What about the Electoral College? –
While the United States holds a popular vote, the president is elected by an absolute majority of the 538 members of the Electoral College.

In every state but two (Nebraska and Maine), the candidate winning the majority of the popular vote in that state wins all that state’s electors.

Nothing in the Constitution obliges electors to vote in one way or another but the Supreme Court ruled in July that states could fine so-called “faithless electors” who do not respect the popular vote.

The members of the Electoral College will gather in their respective states on December 14 and vote for president and vice president.

In the event a candidate dies or withdraws before the Electoral College casts its votes, things could get messy.

Individual state laws come into play but each party could theoretically direct its electors to vote for a replacement candidate.

On January 6, 2021, Congress will certify the results, with the winner being sworn in as president on January 20.

cl/dw

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Trump says feels ‘much better’ but next few days ‘the real test’

0

US President Donald Trump said in a video released on Twitter Saturday night that he was feeling “much better” in his battle against the coronavirus — but the next few days would be “the real test.”

The 74-year-old assured the public of his progress hours after a source with knowledge of the president’s condition had warned his vital signs were worrying, with the next 48 hours critical.

“I came here, wasn’t feeling so well,” said Trump, who is being treated at Walter Reed military medical center near Washington following his Covid-19 diagnosis.

“I feel much better now, we’re working hard to get me all the way back.”

It was unclear whether the undated video, apparently filmed at Walter Reed, had been made before or after the dire warnings about his health, which US media later said came from White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.

That message contrasted with a more optimistic assessment from his doctors, such as White House physician Sean Conley who characterized Trump as mobile, fever-free for 24 hours and with an improving cough and less nasal congestion and fatigue.

Sporting a blue blazer and white dress shirt, but more casual than usual without a tie, Trump predicted a quick recovery.

“I think I’ll be back soon and I look forward to finishing up the campaign the way it was started,” Trump said.

“We’ll be seeing what happens over those next couple of days,” Trump said, adding “I guess that’s the real test.”

The president added that he’d had “no choice” other than to work from his hospital suite rather than cocooning himself in his bedroom for his recovery.

Trump has all the capabilities of White House communications in a special suite at the hospital that allows him to carry out his normal duties.

“I was given that alternative: stay in the White House, lock yourself in, don’t ever leave. Don’t even go to the Oval Office, just stay upstairs and enjoy it,” Trump said.

Trump added that this would have involved seeing no one in person, which was not his approach to the presidency.

He also thanked global heads of state “for their condolences… they know what we’re going through.”

bur-bfm/ft

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Trump and Biden outline competing visions for US economy

0

by Julie CHABANAS / Chris STEIN

One US presidential candidate wants to raise taxes, the other lower them. One will pursue an ongoing trade war, the other may throttle back tensions. And neither will get much done without Congress’s approval.

The proposed economic policies of President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden offer starkly different views of the world’s largest economy and its global role, ahead of the tense November 3 election.

Biden’s agenda is aimed at poorer Americans and includes a number of policies that would mark a sharp departure from Trump’s time in office, while building on the policies of Barack Obama, whom he served as vice president.

Trump, by comparison, has offered what analysts complain are few details on his plan, other than a vow to bring back the comparatively good economy and the record low employment Americans experienced until March, when the coronavirus pandemic ended that.

“I would categorize the Biden plan as really being about an expansion of existing social programs,” said John Ricco, a senior analyst at the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Wharton Budget Model.

“In contrast, the Trump plan, to the extent that such a plan exists, is… sort of taking the same themes that the administration pursued in the last four years.”

The extent to which either candidate can get what they want will depend on which party controls Congress, which is currently split between the Republican-controlled Senate and the Democrat-controlled House.

With polls showing the former vice president ahead and many key Senate races leaning toward the Democrats, analysts are cautiously warming to the possibilities offered by a Biden victory — assuming Democrats win the Senate.

“Democratic control of the House, Senate and White House would produce the largest changes in policy, but if Republicans retain the Senate or White House, we expect limited new federal policies, fiscal or otherwise,” JP Morgan said in a note.

– The race upended –
Biden’s economic platform has centered on the slogan of “build back better,” with promises of creating jobs via infrastructure and clean-energy improvements funded by $4.1 trillion in taxes over the next decade, most of it levied on big business and the rich.

Trump has vowed to restore what he calls “the greatest economy in history,” the period from his 2017 inauguration up until March; after a decade of economic expansion, unemployment was at a 50-year low.

Polls have shown voters thus far siding with Biden as the United States grapples with the world’s worst coronavirus outbreak. Then on Friday the race was upended when Trump reported he had contracted the virus.

The two men’s platforms appear aimed at benefiting different sectors of the economy, said Mark Zandi and Bernard Yaros, economists at Moody’s Analytics.

Biden’s platform is targeted at the poor and middle class, whose “tax bill will remain roughly the same as it is today, but they are significant beneficiaries of increased government spending on education, healthcare, housing, a plethora of other social programs and a larger economy,” Zandi and Yaros wrote.

A Trump presidency would likely see the extension of tax cuts passed by Congress in 2017, and “the benefits largely go to higher-income households and businesses, while government spending is scaled back on healthcare and a range of social programs,” they wrote.

– Control of Congress is key –
If the Democrats manage to take Congress and the White House, Moody’s predicts that full employment, as seen before the pandemic, could return as soon as the second quarter of 2022. If Republicans get the same control, full employment would be restored only in early 2024.

However, Moody’s most likely scenario is that neither Trump nor Biden wins the White House and Congress, and employment isn’t restored until sometime in 2023.

While much of their economic policies are aimed at winning individual Americans, businesses are eyeing the two candidates’ differing approaches to trade and in particular to China, with which Trump has pursued a trade war.

More than 3,400 businesses from all sectors, including heavyweights like Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, Home Depot and Ralph Lauren, have sued the Trump administration over customs duties on Chinese exports to the United States.

A President Biden could reverse those policies, but Ricco points out that he may only go so far.

“Both candidates are envisioning a platform in which there’s a lot more skepticism towards free trade,” he said. “The tools to get there are different.”

cs-jul/bbk

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Trump ‘much better’ but WH doctor says ‘not yet out of the woods’

0

by Daniel WOOLLS

US President Donald Trump posted a video Saturday from the hospital where he is battling Covid-19, saying he was improving and would be “back soon” — but acknowledged that the crucial coming days would be “the real test.”

“I came here, wasn’t feeling so well. I feel much better now,” Trump, 74, said from his business suite at the Walter Reed military medical center near Washington.

“We’re working hard to get me all the way back… I think I’ll be back soon and I look forward to finishing up the campaign the way it was started.”

Appearing relaxed in an open-collar shirt and blue suit jacket, Trump acknowledged there was uncertainty about the course of the disease, which can hit recovering patients hard with no warning.

“I’m starting to feel good. You don’t know over the next period of a few days, I guess that’s the real test, so we’ll be seeing what happens over those next couple of days.”

Trump’s wife also tested positive but he said her symptoms were not as bad as his own.

“Melania is really handling it very nicely. As you’ve probably read, she’s slightly younger than me, just a little tiny bit,” he joked about the 50-year-old first lady.

Late Saturday, White House doctor Sean Conley said Trump was “not yet out of the woods,” but that the medical team is “cautiously optimistic.”

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said Trump’s condition had them worried on Friday, but that he had since improved.

“Yesterday morning, we were real concerned… he had a fever and his blood oxygen level had dropped rapidly,” Meadows told Fox News late Saturday.

Meadows said there was never a risk Trump would have to hand over power to Vice President Mike Pence, after a day of conflicting reports and confusion over the leader’s actual fitness.

“He’s made unbelievable improvements from yesterday morning, when I know a number of us, the doctor and I, were very concerned,” Meadows said.

His comments echoed remarks by Conley, who said Trump had “made substantial progress since diagnosis, and remained “fever-free and off supplemental oxygen.”

Trump had completed a second dose of therapeutic drug remdesivir and had spent “most of the afternoon conducting business,” Conley added.

Conley was evasive when asked earlier whether the president had received supplementary oxygen at any point since falling ill, only confirming that he hadn’t received any at the hospital or on Thursday — the day of his positive test.

Several US media outlets said Trump was on oxygen at the White House on Friday before being admitted to Walter Reed.

– ‘White House cluster –
Conley added to the confusion by suggesting that Trump had been diagnosed on Wednesday — not on Thursday, per the official account — but he later said he had misspoken.

Soon after Trump arrived at the hospital, Conley said in a memo the president was starting a course of remdesivir and had received an eight-gram dose of an experimental antibody cocktail.

Neither Trump’s doctors nor the White House explained why the president was taking unproven drugs if his progress was satisfactory.

Trump’s optimism over his recovery prospects has been tempered by news that more people close to the president have tested positive for the coronavirus.

They included campaign advisor Chris Christie, who was among several aides that helped Trump prepare for the first presidential debate who have since announced positive tests.

Christie and a number of senators and Trump aides are also among a growing list from the president’s orbit to have tested positive after attending an event in the White House Rose Garden last weekend.

The so-called “White House cluster” includes the president’s wife Melania, close confidante Hope Hicks, former White House top aide Kellyanne Conway, campaign manager Bill Stepien and Republican senators Thom Tillis and Mike Lee.

Another close aide, Nicholas Luna, one of the “body men” who accompanies the president round the clock, had also tested positive, CNN reported.

Heightening the sense of crisis at the heart of power in America, a third Republican senator, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, announced on Saturday that he had tested positive.

– ‘False sense of comfort’ –
Public health experts have expressed alarm at the outbreak linked to the September 26 celebration of conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

“They relied too much on diagnostic testing. We know that these tests have a very high false negative rate,” said Ali Nouri, president of the Federation of American Scientists.

“By simply relying on these diagnostics to determine who gets to come in and out of the White House, and by not requiring other protections, like social distancing and masks, they created a false sense of comfort for the White House.”

Democrats have called for Barrett’s Senate confirmation hearings to be postponed after several Republican senators tested positive, but judiciary committee chair Senator Lindsey Graham said they would go ahead.

Trump — who is well behind his 77-year-old Democratic election rival Joe Biden in the polls — has been forced to freeze or rework much of his campaign ahead of a potentially messy vote on November 3.

Biden has made Trump’s frequent downplaying of the Covid-19 crisis and mixed messaging on mask-wearing a central campaign theme.

The former vice president, who stood on a stage with Trump for 90 minutes during their ill-tempered first debate Tuesday, announced that he and his wife Jill tested negative Friday.

Biden reminded voters during the debate that he has pushed consistently for a serious approach to the coronavirus, which has killed more than 208,000 Americans, unlike his opponent who has mocked the Democrat for his rigorous use of masks.

bur-acb/bfm/mtp/tom

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

WP clarifies that Sylvia Lim has not abandoned her “Justice for All” parliamentary motion

Singapore — The Workers’ Party (WP) has clarified that Chairman Sylvia Lim has not abandoned an adjournment motion she had planned to raise pertaining to the Parti Liyani court case.

On Sept 14, Ms Lim had filed an adjournment motion in Parliament to examine the issues that had arisen after former domestic helper Parti was acquitted on appeal of theft in a case brought by the family of her former employer, Mr Liew Mun Leong.

Through the motion, entitled “Justice For All: Enhancing Equity In The Criminal Justice System”, Ms Lim, a lawyer, intended to “discuss aspects of the criminal justice system and the challenges faced by persons of less means in navigating it”. She also planned to propose specific suggestions to improve the system.

On Tuesday evening (Sept 29), however, Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin announced that Ms Lim had lost the ballot on the motions raised in the House. A motion filed by People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Louis Ng, calling for protection against secondhand smoke in homes, won the ballot.

The result of the ballot sparked criticism of the way the motions are selected. Mr Tan responded with multiple rebuttals of the criticism. Mr Ng, when urged by the critics to withdraw his motion and give way to Ms Lim, said he would also speak on the Parti Liyani case in Parliament.

On Thursday (Oct 1), Law Minister K Shanmugam announced that a Ministerial Statement he was planning to deliver next week on the court case would be postponed to November since the internal reviews by the police and the Attorney-General’s Chambers would take a few more weeks to conclude.

On Friday (Oct 2), the WP said Ms Lim would not seek any further ballot of the adjournment motion since Mr Shanmugam had announced that his Ministerial Statement on the case had been postponed to November.

The party said: “Appreciating the premium on Parliament’s time, WP will coincide its contribution to the debate with the Ministerial Statement as far as practicable. WP Chair MP Sylvia Lim will therefore not seek any further ballot in October of the adjournment motion filed by her.”

Asserting that its aim was “to seek enhancements to a justice system that should work for all”, the party added that the strong public interest in the case bode well for a critical public discussion on how disadvantaged individuals could adequately navigate the criminal justice system.

While the party said that Ms Lim would not apply for further ballot in the month of October — since the Ministerial Statement would only be delivered in November — some took the statement to mean that the WP Chairman had abandoned her motion totally.

Clarifying that this was inaccurate, the opposition party said in a statement on Saturday (Oct 3): “The Workers’ Party notes that some media reports in the last 24 hours may have given the misimpression that WP Chair Sylvia Lim has abandoned re-filing of her Adjournment Motion entitled ‘Justice For All: Enhancing Equity In The Criminal Justice System’. This is not accurate.”

Hinting that Ms Lim may re-file her motion next month, the WP said: “Our earlier statement stated that Ms Lim would not seek to have her adjournment motion re-balloted for October, since the Minister for Law has confirmed that he would make a Ministerial Statement on the Parti Liyani case and answer questions raised by MPs in November.

“The WP stated that it would coincide its contribution to the debate with the Ministerial Statement on the matter, as far as practicable i.e. in November.”

It added: “We are closely monitoring developments and will consider all procedural options for participating in the Parliamentary debate in November.”

????????? ???? ??? ???????' ?????????????????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ????…

Posted by The Workers' Party on Saturday, October 3, 2020

No motion on Parti Liyani in the next Parliament sitting

Tan Chuan-Jin gets defensive in response to backlash for not picking Sylvia Lim’s adjournment motion

Louis Ng says he will also touch on Parti Liyani case in the face of calls for him to give way to Sylvia Lim

Rare interview: Lee Suet Fern “incredibly proud” of her husband Hsien Yang and sons

Singapore — In a rare interview with Yahoo News, Lee Suet Fern says the family feud  between her husband Hsien Yang and his elder brother Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister, has brought her immediate family closer.

In the interview, which was conducted over three meetings, Suet Fern recalled how she fell in love with Hsien Yang and how he put her first throughout their relationship.

Suet Fern’s connection to the Lees goes back decades, from the time her father, Professor Lim Chong Yah, tutored Hsien Loong, and later Hsien Yang, for their A-Level examinations. Although Suet Fern and Hsien Yang were contemporaries in National Junior College, they drew closer while they were studying at Cambridge University.

Recalling how Hsien Yang would take long cycle rides between their respective colleges to see her, sometimes multiple times in one day, she told Yahoo’s Nicholas Yong with a laugh:

“Yang was one of many young men who turned up at my door. I joke that he didn’t have much choice, there were so few girls in Cambridge in the 70s. He jokes that I fell for him, largely because he cooked so well for me. He also claims that he was persistent enough that, over time, the others just gradually fell away.”

The romance bloomed and led to marriage in July 1981, when she was 23 and he 24. Sharing that their marriage took place quickly, mere days after she took her final law exams and returned to Singapore, Suet Fern said: “I think that we married young, perhaps as a result of some amount of parental pressure.”

She also recalled how their wedding, which involved a small ceremony at the Barker Road Methodist Church and a large reception at the Istana, was an “impersonal” one where she “shook hands with hundreds of people I did not know”.

She shared that the bridal car was her husband’s first car, a Honda Civic, and that she wore lipstick that she had purchased at a Boots store in England as there was no one to do her make-up or hair. After the ceremony, Hsien Yang cooked his bride a steak for dinner.

Yahoo reports that Suet Fern’s tone was “playful, almost girlish” when she spoke about her romance with Hsien Yang. Referring to her husband’s time as a brigadier-general in the Singapore Armed Forces, she giggled and told the publication: “I loved him in uniform. I thought he was so handsome. I used to think, oh my goodness, what a heartthrob.”

On whether she had second thoughts about marrying into the famous Lee family, Suet Fern said: “I was young, I was in love, and I thought, then as I think now, that Yang’s a really special individual. I never married the family, I married him.”

Likewise, Hsien Yang remained devoted to his wife and put her first. When the couple were living in Cairnhill Mansions after their marriage, Suet Fern confided in her husband about how lonely she felt when he was away for military training and how frightened she was of her mother-in-law, Kwa Geok Choo.

Instead of dismissing her feelings, Suet Fern said her husband “just gave me every assurance that it was him that I married and not his mother, and that he would always put me first”.

Suet Fern said that she also had “huge support” from her husband in her career and said: “It takes a special man to allow his wife to work all night in the office. And he often put up with a house not being perfect, and he never complained.”

Aside from not complaining, Hsien Yang also pitched in to share the load of caring for their sons while his wife struggled with the demands at work and parenting. She said with a laugh that Hsien Yang initially did not know how to change a diaper: “He did an awful job and he kept saying, ‘Be patient with me. I’m a Lee. I need to learn this’. And he got better and better.”

Suet Fern revealed that the bonds within her immediate family have been strengthened in the past few years, amid the Lee family feud that erupted after patriarch Lee Kuan Yew passed away in 2015.

In June 2017, a dispute among his three children over his last will spilled into the public domain. Hsien Yang and his sister Wei Ling accused their elder brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, of abusing state organs for his benefit.

Hsien Loong denied the accusations. His siblings subsequently offered a ceasefire.

Hsien Yang’s eldest son, Shengwu, was later accused of contempt of court by the Attorney-General’s Chambers over a private Facebook post. Shengwu, a Harvard academic, was eventually fined S$15,000, which he paid in order to “buy some peace and quiet” while maintaining that he did not admit guilt.

The AGC also lodged a complaint against Suet Fern for her involvement in Lee Kuan Yew’s will. She was censured by a Disciplinary Tribunal for grossly improper professional conduct in the case and appealed against the decision to the Court of Three Judges. Judgment has been reserved on the case.

Referring to the initial accusations her husband and sister-in-law had levelled against their brother in 2017, Suet Fern told Yahoo: “I didn’t wake up like everybody else and was absolutely surprised.” 

When asked how she feels about her family being in the spotlight, the lawyer said: “What has happened in terms of publicity is something we don’t welcome at all. We clearly don’t like (the attention) but this is what has happened.”

While she indicated that she “hopes that there will be fairness and justice” with regard to her appeal, Suet Fern revealed that her immediate family has emerged “better and stronger” from the saga.

Expressing pride over the way her sons responded to the saga with maturity and thoughtfulness, she said: “We’re closer than we’ve ever been before. And I’m incredibly proud of my husband and my sons, in different ways. I love that our sons have stood by their father and me throughout.

“I’ve learned that they are strong, very wise, mature and thoughtful, have better insights on Singapore and the world than I would have ever imagined. We have come to deeply value their perspectives.” /TISG

Michael Tao claims Alex Man flushed tens of thousands of dollars in toilet during a raid

0

There would be a time in your life when you panic and did something silly which you regret later. Former Hong Kong actor Alex Man and fellow actor Michael Tao who saw it has lived to tell this tale. According to Michael, it sounded like a scene from an action film. This dramatic incident involved a police raid and tens of thousands of dollars being flushed down in the toilet, and it happened in 1987 when the actors were filming TVB series Genghis Khan in China.

Recalling the incident during a guest appearance on veteran Hong Kong producer Yang Shaohong and actress Elena Kong’s radio show last Saturday (September 26), Michael revealed that they were not allowed to bring big amounts of cash into the country at that time and had to exchange HK$100 for 30 yuan coupons to spend. To manage it, the actors had to pretend that they did not have cash and did not declare it at the customs.

Michael Tao saw Alex Man flush down tens of thousands of cash down the toilet. Picture: YouTube

Everyone did not declare except one very honest actor who admitted that he had brought more than HK$10,000 (SGD$1,800) with him. It was all good until the police suddenly raided their premises one day when the cast and crew were eating. Michael said that everyone was frantic and that Alex scrambled to flush his money down the toilet.

“Everyone was really afraid. [We] didn’t know if we would go to jail, so we decided to flush the money down the toilet. Little did we expect to clog the toilet, so everyone had no choice but to leave immediately.”

When asked how much money they flushed away, Michael replied: “Over tens of thousands of dollars.”

Born on August 26 1963, Michael Tao Dai Yu is a Hong Kong television actor.

Michael entered the acting industry in the 80s, affiliating with TVB. It was during this period that he earned the name “Housewife Killer” due to his overwhelming popularity amongst housewives (who arguably constitutes a majority of television viewing audiences in Hong Kong), solidifying his position as a first-tier television actor in TVB.

Michael later moved over to rival ATV in 1997 after problems over his contract with TVB. His ATV series Flaming Brothers successfully defeated the TVB rival show at the time, a landmark for ATV. Apart from filming ATV series, Tao has also filmed in China and Singapore. He returned to TVB in 2004 and has starred in several television series since. Once again, problems with his contract resulted in Tao leaving TVB in 2009. /TISG

Rare interview: Li Shengwu felt like the first grandson to Mr and Mrs Lee

Singapore — In another part of a rare interview with Yahoo News, Lee Suet Fern recalled that her eldest son’s birth in 1985 felt to her in-laws Lee Kuan Yew and Kwa Geok Choo like it was the birth of their first grandson, even though they already had a grandson, Li Yipeng, who was about three years old at the time.

She said with a laugh: “They’re very traditional. They wanted a male grandson, and this was the male grandson they were waiting for. My mother-in-law clucked with pleasure.

“Shengwu’s birth was the biggest event for them on a personal level. Mama was thrilled, Papa was thrilled. They were deliciously, deliriously happy. It meant a lot to them. It felt to them like a first, although my brother-in-law did have a son with his first wife.”

Eldest son Hsien Loong married his first wife, Wong Ming Yang, in 1978. Their daughter,  Xiuqi, was born in 1981. Three weeks after giving birth to their first son, Li Yipeng, Wong died of a heart attack at the age of 31 in October 1982.

Li Yipeng was born with albinism, a genetic condition.

In 1985, the same year Shengwu was born, Hsien Loong married Ho Ching, a fast-rising civil servant. They have two sons. Hongyi was born in 1987 and Haoyi in 1989.

Meanwhile, Hsien Yang and Suet Fern had two other sons after Shengwu: Huanwu was born in 1986 and Shaowu in 1995.

Three years younger than Li Yipeng, Shengwu was closest in age to his younger brother, Huanwu, and his cousin, Hongyi.

Shengwu and Hongyi were once described as “very close” and were both in the west coast of the United States at one point as Shengwu was pursuing his PhD at Stanford University and Hongyi was working at Google in Silicon Valley.

However, cracks in their relationship became public in 2017 — the year the Lee family feud spilled into the public domain and the year the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) initiated legal action against Shengwu over a private Facebook post during the feud.

In December 2017, Shengwu said he was no longer on speaking terms with Hongyi but that they remained Facebook friends.

Shengwu subsequently decided to remove Hongyi from his Facebook friends list. He wrote on Facebook: “I will continue to be active on Facebook, and will continue to regard my friends-only Facebook posts as private. However, I have removed my cousin Li Hongyi from my Facebook friends list.”

Hongyi responded in a Facebook post of his own and asked his cousin to leave him out of grievances with the authorities. He wrote: “I don’t know what’s going on between you and the government, but I’ve got nothing to do with it. Could you please leave me out of this?”

Hongyi, saying that he had “really tried to not be involved as far as possible”, added: “If there’s something I’ve done that’s led you to believe otherwise, I would be happy to talk with you about it. It’s a bit disconcerting to be repeatedly publicly accused of undermining democracy without understanding why.” 

He added: “I would prefer not to have done this over public Facebook posts. But I suppose that’s how we communicate nowadays.”

Although the exact origins of the rift remain unclear, there is speculation that their relationship fractured around the time the Oxley Road dispute broke out in 2017.

That year, Hsien Yang and his sister Lee Wei Ling accused their elder brother Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister, of using state organs against them and of abusing his power to preserve their family home, against their father’s willed desire to demolish the house, in order to bolster his grip on power.

The younger siblings also accused Hsien Loong of grooming Hongyi for politics. Hongyi responded that he really had no interest in politics.

Shengwu, however, said Hongyi’s comments on a potential entry into politics were “vague”: “He only said he has no interest in politics, but my uncle Lee Hsien Loong also once said he wasn’t interested in politics when he was in his 20s. These words can easily be taken back.”

Although the younger siblings offered a ceasefire, the family appears to remain estranged. In 2018, Hsien Loong said that the family feud remained unresolved and that his siblings had not communicated with him.

He added: “Perhaps one day, when emotions have subsided, some movement will be possible.”

Hsien Yang responded that Hsien Loong had not made any effort to reach out to resolve matters in private. He said: “Our brother says he is unsure that the feud is solved. Notwithstanding his public statements, Hsien Loong has made no attempt to reach out to us to resolve matters in private.

“Meanwhile, the Attorney-General is busy prosecuting Hsien Loong’s nephew for his private correspondence. The AGC’s letters make repeated reference to the family feud.” 

Shengwu was eventually fined S$15,000 after being found guilty in the contempt of court case. He paid the fine in order to “buy some peace and quiet” but insisted that this does not mean he admits guilt.

The AGC also lodged a complaint against Suet Fern to the Law Society, accusing her of being involved in the preparation of her father-in-law’s last will while her husband was one of the beneficiaries.

Suet Fern was censured by a Disciplinary Tribunal for grossly improper professional conduct in the case and appealed against the decision to the Court of Three Judges. Judgment has been reserved on the case.

Rift between Lee cousins widens: Shengwu removes Hongyi from his Facebook friends list