Wednesday, May 7, 2025
31.3 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 394

G-Dragon shuts down IG rumours: “It’s not me” behind viral Instagram account

0

KOREA: According to Allkpop, G-Dragon addressed rumours surrounding the viral Instagram sub-account ‘8lo8lo8lowme’ during his appearance on MBC FM4U’s Kim Eana’s Starry Night on Nov 18.

In a candid chat with DJ Kim Eana, he dismissed speculation that he runs the account, which has drawn attention for sharing casual snapshots resembling his daily life.

G-Dragon explained, “I’m also trying to figure out who this person is. First of all, it’s not me. I have no idea who they are, but they seem to be somehow connected to me.”

Mysterious individual

When Kim Eana observed that the photos appeared to be taken from close proximity, G-Dragon admitted:

“I can’t determine exactly who it might be. It seems to involve different individuals at different times. I also check the account when new posts go up.”

Adding a layer of intrigue, G-Dragon shared that he refers to the mysterious individual as “Romy.” He explained, “When I message them asking, ‘Who are you?’ they read the messages but never reply. It’s puzzling.”

Speculation about account operator

The account in question, named ‘팔로팔로미’ (8lo8lo8lowme), has amassed over 540,000 followers and exclusively follows G-Dragon.

Its name refers to a phrase G-Dragon popularized a decade ago in an LG Uplus ad campaign promoting the company’s broadband LTE-A service.

Despite its apparent connection to his brand, G-Dragon denies involvement, leaving fans speculating about the account’s true operator.

G-Dragon, whose real name is Kwon Ji Yong, is a multi-talented South Korean rapper, singer, songwriter, and entrepreneur, often called the “King of K-pop.”

Born on Aug 18, 1988, in Seoul, South Korea, G-Dragon rose to fame as the leader of the iconic boy band BIGBANG, which has achieved global success and is considered one of the best-selling boy bands in the world.

 

Customs crackdown sees 80% spike in fines as over 13,000 travelers hit with $3.47M penalty for duty evasion

0

SINGAPORE: In a crackdown on undeclared goods, Singapore Customs fined 13,099 travelers across air, land, and sea checkpoints in the first ten months of 2024, recovering a total of $3.47 million in penalties.

According to the latest Singapore Business Review report, this marks a significant increase compared to last year, when 7,193 individuals were caught and fined $2.3 million.

Detecting and deterring violations

The enforcement efforts, conducted in partnership with the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA), are part of ongoing checks aimed at detecting and deterring violations at all entry points into Singapore.

Among the 13,099 cases this year, 46 offenders faced the maximum fine of $5,000 for failing to make correct or complete declarations to Customs.

Common violations involved various goods, including commercial items, apparel, health and food products, cigarettes, and alcohol.

Under Singapore’s Customs Act, all goods brought into the country, whether by residents or foreign visitors, are subject to Goods and Services Tax (GST), regardless of whether the items have already been taxed in the country of origin.

A spokesperson from Singapore Customs stated, “This revenue is rightfully owed to Singapore, and collecting it is crucial to ensuring a fair, competitive environment for local businesses that comply with these taxes.”

“The responsibility lies with all incoming travelers to accurately declare any goods in their possession and pay the required duties and/or GST.”

Declaration of taxable goods encouraged

Failure to declare dutiable or taxable goods can result in hefty penalties. For serious violations, individuals may face fines of up to 20 times the amount of duty, and GST evaded or even jail sentences of up to two years.

Travelers are encouraged to avoid penalties by declaring any dutiable or taxable items in advance through the Customs@SG Web Application, which allows for pre-arrival declarations and payments up to three days before entry.

Alternatively, payments can be made in person at Customs Tax Payment Offices at various checkpoints, where Customs officers are available to assist with the process.

With stricter enforcement and greater awareness, Singapore Customs aims to ensure compliance and protect the integrity of its customs system.

Singapore stocks rose as trading began on Tuesday—STI gained 0.3%

0

SINGAPORE: Singapore stocks rose as trading began on Tuesday, Nov 19, after global markets posted mixed results overnight.

The Straits Times Index (STI) gained 0.3%, or 12.35 points, to 3,744.9 as of 9:02 am, as reported by The Business Times.

In the broader market, 67 stocks gained, while 25 fell, with 62.8 million securities valued at S$65.1 million traded.

Salt Investments led the trading volume. Its share price stayed flat at S$0.004, with 31.7 million shares exchanged.

Other heavily traded stocks included Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, which gained 2.4%, or S$0.06, to S$2.58, and Genting Singapore, which dropped 0.7%, or S$0.005, to S$0.77.

Banking stocks saw mixed movement in early trading. DBS climbed 0.3%, or S$0.12, to S$42.52, and UOB inched up 0.1%, or S$0.05, to S$36.53. Meanwhile, OCBC edged down 0.1%, or S$0.01, to S$16.43.

Wall Street closed with mixed results on Monday as investors awaited Nvidia’s earnings later in the week and showed increased interest in electric vehicle maker Tesla following reports suggesting President-elect Donald Trump might ease regulations on self-driving vehicles.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.1% to 43,389.6, while the S&P 500 gained 0.4% to 5,893.62. The Nasdaq Composite Index rose 0.6% to 18,791.81.

In Europe, shares faced pressure from declines in real estate stocks, while investors closely monitored European Central Bank policymakers for clues on the future direction of interest rates. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index slipped 0.1% to 502.84. /TISG

Read also: Singapore stocks showed little movement at Monday’s open amid global market losses

Featured image by Depositphotos

Singaporean congratulates all HDB owners because “HDB in the 70s cost $10K; today $700K (up 7000%)”

SINGAPORE: A recent post comparing the increase in prices of an HDB unit and that of satay caused a bit of a stir on social media, and commenters debated, among other things, whether it’s best to save or spend.

In a post on the Complaint Singapore Facebook page, group member Bernard Yu posted a photo of a man at an eatery. In the background was a stall sign that indicated the price of satay.

Mr Yu wrote, “15 cents satay in 1977. HDB in the 1970s cost around $10,000. Today satay $1. (Up 700%) HDB $700,000+ (up 7000%). Congrats to all HDB owners.”

For one commenter, the “moral of the story” is to “start investing as early and as young as possible.” However, not everyone agreed with this. “Invest after inflation 7000 per cent? What’s the point?

Better spend while you have it,” a group member replied.

Another group member wrote that he wished his father would have bought more HDB units when they only cost $9300. Of course, way back then, salaries were also much smaller, as others pointed out.

One wrote that the monthly salary for a hotel chef was only $280 in the 70s. One commenter had a “simple” explanation: “Land is finite, so property values will increase more.”

Another chimed in to say that in the 1980s, his father earned S1,000 each month working as a supervisor and could buy a four-room HDB unit for $20,000.

He now works as a supervisor and earns $3,000 monthly, but a four-room unit costs $700,000.

However, the comparison between the prices of housing and satay may be overly simplistic, as not everything increases in price at the same pace.

Historically, housing prices have risen faster than inflation, meaning housing becomes more expensive over time, even when adjusting for the effect of inflation.

Here is one example from the US:

“Since 1963, the first year for which the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has data on housing prices, the Consumer Price Index has risen from 30.44 to 303.294, an increase of 896 per cent.

During that same time, the median sales price of a home rose from $17,800 to $436,800, an increase of 2,353.93 per cent.”

However, in the last few years, inflation and housing prices have increased not just in Singapore but practically everywhere else in the world, in no small part due to the COVID-19 pandemic. /TISG

Read also: HDB reports S$6.775B deficit for FY2023, higher than FY2022

Singapore VEP users with unpaid fines will be notified at land checkpoints

SINGAPORE: If you’ve signed up for Malaysia’s Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) and have outstanding fines, you’ll be informed about it at the two land checkpoints at Johor Bahru.

An official quoted in Malaysia’s The Star said, “So far, this is a good way to get foreign-registered vehicle drivers to pay up for outstanding summonses which are in the hundreds of thousands of ringgit over the years.”

In August, officials said that Singaporean drivers top the list of foreign offenders with unpaid outstanding traffic summonses in Malaysia, followed by drivers from Brunei and Thailand.

Read related: Singaporeans owe Malaysia over S$1M in traffic fines; tops list as the biggest foreign traffic offender

Singaporean offenders owe the Malaysian authorities an estimated RM3.5 million, or around S$1,041,970, though running after offenders have been challenging.

But now, it’s likely easier to track vehicles registered in Singapore, according to Mothership, since these will have RFID (radio frequency identification) tags.

VEP users will now be reminded of their outstanding Road Transport Department (JPJ), and police summonses through variable message signage (VMS) displays at the land checkpoints.

The JPJ has been reminding foreign-owned vehicles to register for the VEP. Among the 20,000 Singapore vehicles the authorities have checked, “a few hundred” reminders have been sent to their owners.

Foreign-registered vehicles entering Malaysia have been required to carry Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) tags since Oct 1, but securing the tag has not been easy for some.

The Star reported that over 150,000 vehicle owners have thus far registered for VEPs, and officials have received around 1,000 VEP applications daily.

While vehicles registered in Singapore can still come into Johor without the tag, their owners who have not applied for it will be given a warning.

Those who want to obtain a VEP tag may do so at Woodlands or at one of three VEP centres in Johor: Danga Bay, Iskandar Puteri, and Skudai.

The Star quoted a member of the Singapore National Private Hire Vehicle Association (NPHVA) as saying that he hopes one more venue will be opened in Singapore for applying and installing the tags by TCSens, the private vendor appointed by JPJ to handle the VEPs.

He added that there are workshops charge fees between S$100 and S$150 to help people get their VEPs. /TISG

Read also: “I got my VEP, and it was easy!” — Technopreneur Loo Cheng Chuan shares how he did it, saying the process is “very efficient” and “quite cool” 

‘Well, it’s about time!’ — Singaporeans cheer MOM’s new dormitory design for migrant workers in SG

SINGAPORE: After the Ministry of Manpower released new designs for a government-owned dormitory for migrant workers at Tukang Innovation Lane on Sunday (Nov 17), local Reddit users expressed their approval.

The dormitory is scheduled to open in the first quarter of 2026.

Over Facebook and Instagram, Manpower Minister Tan See Leng shared a short clip of a tour of the dorm, calling it “another step forward in our multi-year roadmap to uplift migrant workers’ living, healthcare and social environment.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Tan See Leng (@tanseeleng)

The dorm looks impressive indeed, with spacious, well-lit and airy areas for sleeping, bathing, and cooking, a far cry from photos of small and unhygienic-looking living facilities that made the news in 2020 when COVID-19 infections broke out and spread among migrant workers.

Unlike other facilities, only 12 workers will share a room in this dorm. And instead of only 3.5 sq m of living space, each worker will have 4.2 sq m.

They will also have WIFI and bathroom facilities in each room.

MOM said it held consultations among workers, non-governmental organisations, industry associations and an advisory panel of industry experts in drawing up the blueprints for the designs.

According to a report in The New Paper, the dorm at Tukang Innovation Lane is one among seven that are being constructed in conformity with higher standards.

Another dorm owned by MOM is located at Sengkang West and is scheduled for completion in 2028.

By 2040, all dorms must meet these standards.

MOM also said that the new dorms were designed in view of future public health threats.

Netizens reacting to the new dorm design on Reddit welcomed the positive developments, applauding the various improvements and even the availability of WIFI, as this would allow workers to communicate with their families back home.

One Reddit user said it’s about time for the re-design and added that some of the facilities he had seen in the past “were borderline inhumane.”

“We’re building our country on the backs of these humans; the least the Govt could do is treat them like humans,” they added.

“This is awesome, props to the people who made this happen,” another wrote.

Others pointed out that having migrant workers live better is better for Singapore in the long run, and investing in upgraded living conditions will pay off eventually.

“What an improvement!” another wrote, adding that workers would have a better rest and sleep environment. /TISG

Read also: Burmese man in Singapore shocked at ‘the amount of sacrifices’ SG’s migrant workers have to go through to survive

Customer who got charged $6 instead of $1.50 for side order wonders, “If no one checks, how many “mistakes” does the stall make in one day?”

SINGAPORE: A man took to social media, sounding somewhat frustrated after being overcharged for a meal and told that it would take a while for his refund to be given to him.

He ordered lontong topped with tempeh ikan bilis and was charged S$11 for a total of S$19, including S$0.50 for a takeaway container. “Wow, seriously, the lontong cost more than the rice set?” he wrote.

In a Nov 18 (Monday) post on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page, Mohammed Fauzi Mokhtar wrote that at Hajah Maimunah MINI at Tampines, he had ordered a rice meal with sambal goreng pengantin, sambal kentang, ikan bilis & Telor dadar that cost S$7.50.

After Googling the store’s phone number, he called them to inquire about the prices since his ikan bilis was just a side order, not an a la carte one.

A staff member requested that he send a photo of the food and the receipt given to him via WhatsApp and said she would check with the outlet manager about it.

Upon doing so, she told Mr Mohammed that they realized a mistake had been made and that he should only have been charged S$1.50 for the ikan bilis, not S$6.

What appeared to trouble the customer was that the stall could only issue a refund on Thursday since the company’s finance department would only do so on that date.

“I was pondering if no one checks (s) & (gives) feedback, one day, one outlet staff may make how many mistakes x how many outlets (in their) daily operation,” he added.

While some commenters on Mr Mohammed agreed that the store could have refunded his money more timely, others said that the fact that the company admitted the mistake and promised to refund him was enough “service recovery.”

One wrote that since the outlet belongs to a chain of stores, processing a refund may take some time.

“They have a system to do things; as long as they refund you in the end, then it’s good enough,” the commenter wrote.

The Independent Singapore has contacted the customer and HJH Maimunah for further comments or updates. /TISG

Read also: S$17.50 meal at hot pot stall shocks diner; she regrets not reading the food reviews first before ordering

SG worker claims his boss and HR are pressuring him with “not achievable” PIP goals to avoid granting him paternal leave & benefits

0

SINGAPORE: A Singaporean worker revealed on social media that his boss and HR tried to pressure him to quit after learning his wife was pregnant, seemingly to avoid granting him the company’s generous paternity benefits.

In a post shared on the Facebook page NUSWhispers, the worker stated that he had been with the company for four years and was consistently recognized as a top performer throughout his tenure.

However, in January, he ‘mistakenly’ informed his boss about his wife’s pregnancy. Shortly after, his boss and HR approached him, raising concerns about his performance for the first time.

Despite his proven track record, they claimed he had been underperforming in recent months and threatened to place him on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).

“The company has massive paternal benefits, and it goes up to 2 additional months on top of what our government gives us for fathers,” he explained.

“I was shocked that this happened to me, and my boss went through all lengths to do this,” he added.

In May, the PIP was officially implemented on him. According to the worker, the plan was filled with unrealistic and unattainable goals, setting him up for failure.

“I told her that the things she cited inside the PIP are not achievable within the short term,” he wrote.

Moreover, his boss made several nasty comments about him and his character. “She claims that I have a lot of character problems that I need to resolve, and I need a change of attitude to work,” he said.

As time went on, the worker’s situation worsened.

His boss began to berate him during one-on-one meetings, nitpicking even the most minor mistakes, some of which dated back a year, and criticizing every aspect of his work, regardless of the context.

“I had to be on the ball in all of my work, yet she managed to find fault at the slightest “mistake” when the problem is she disagrees with the way I do my work,” he explained further.

The worker also noted that HR seemed complicit in the situation, agreeing with his boss’s methods and not stepping in to intervene.

In July, his wife unexpectedly gave birth to their daughter prematurely, prompting him to take his government-mandated paternity leave.

During this period, his boss reassigned his core responsibilities to a colleague and insisted that he immediately resume the PIP upon returning from his two-week leave.

However, feeling that the two weeks were too short, especially with the need to support his wife’s newborn daughter and manage family responsibilities, he requested to use the company’s additional paternity leave, which HR has approved.

When he returned in October, his team was supportive and excited about the arrival of his daughter, but his boss remained hostile.

“She resumed the PIP immediately. She came off as passive-aggressive at me during team meetings and manipulated my team that I am such a liability when I went on such a long leave,” he said.

“This poison has been taking a toll on my entire mental and emotional health. I will probably lose my job at the end of this month. I tried going to job interviews, but I had already lost my motivation,” he lamented.

Unsure of what to do next, the worker reached out to netizens for advice, asking, “So dear NUS peeps, what should I do from now onwards?”

“Nothing much you can do. Many ladies face the same discrimination for taking maternity leave”

In the comments section, many were outraged by the way the company treated him after he shared the news of his wife’s pregnancy.

Several netizens felt the boss unfairly used the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to push him out, especially since he had been a top performer before.

One netizen said, “This is bullying and an abuse of power that she’s doing. HR is just admins. Go to MOM (Ministry of Manpower) to launch a report.

It’s very unreasonable of her. Doesn’t make sense either that you performed well in the past 4 years, and suddenly you have attitude problems and stuff.”

Some netizens also advised him to carefully document every interaction with his boss and HR, including any instances of passive-aggressive behaviour or mistreatment, in case he needed to take legal action or seek external support.

One netizen commented, “The way you are forced out (if you are forced out) is ridiculous, and I believe illegal.

Please keep all records and information at all times so that you have the proof that you are unfairly treated and terminated despite your efforts to work to the best of your ability.”

A few others urged the worker not to bother reporting the issue to the authorities, as it might not result in any significant change and suggested he leave his job immediately.

They pointed out that such behaviour—manipulating or mistreating employees over personal matters like pregnancy—is unfortunately common in many workplaces.

They also noted that women, in particular, often face similar discrimination due to pregnancy.

One netizen expressed, “Nothing much you can do. Many ladies face the same discrimination when taking maternity leave.

You also can’t get much from the authorities because if you are being let go, which sounds like you are, it’s ‘officially due to poor performance’ and NOT paternity/maternity leave.”

Workplace Discrimination in Singapore

The Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) launched its Workplace Harassment and Discrimination Advisory (WHDA) in 2019 and identified maternity discrimination as the most prevalent form of workplace discrimination.

In 2023, Channel News Asia reported that WHDA had handled 218 cases of maternity-related discrimination since its inception.

These cases ranged from inappropriate job interview questions to wrongful dismissals, denial of bonuses, and outright harassment. In 2022 alone, maternity discrimination accounted for 85% of the advisory’s caseload.

Fathers have also reported workplace discrimination. Research by Indeed, which surveyed 1,000 working parents in Singapore, found that nearly one-third (32%) felt they had been mistreated at some point in their careers due to having a child.

This sentiment was further echoed by seasoned professionals, with 65% of business owners, 44% of senior management, and 43% of c-suite executives reporting similar experiences.

If you or someone you know is experiencing pregnancy or gender discrimination at work, reach out to WHDA for support by calling 6777 0318 (Mon-Fri, 10 am-6 pm) or emailing [email protected] for help.

Read also: When men ask women at work, “What are you wearing right now?” instead of “What are you working on right now?”

Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

Maid says her employer makes her work even on her day off before going out at 9:30am, and she’s also told to be back by 6:30pm to start work again

SINGAPORE: A maid shared on social media that her employer requires her to complete numerous chores before being allowed to go out at 9:30 am on her day off and then expects her to work again as soon as she returns at 6:30 pm.

In her post on the Facebook group ‘MDW in Singapore’ on Monday (Nov 18), she explained that her responsibilities before going out include cleaning the car, sweeping the garden and the floors inside the house, mopping by hand (instead of using a mop stick), dusting, and washing any dishes left in the sink.

She also handles the laundry and sometimes has to wash clothes by hand.

After returning at around 5:30 or 6:30 pm, although she no longer needs to cook since her employer buys dinner, she is expected to wash a lot of dishes, clean the kitchen, wash and scrub two toilets, make all the beds, and check and change the bins in the rooms.

“There are also times that they do baking; at that time, I have to work until 12 to 1:30 am.

I never complained about it, but a few weeks ago, my ma’am wanted me to cook for dinner on my day off, and it made me sad and hurt as well,” she lamented.

“Helpers have too little power to deny the employer’s demands.

I felt that my day off had no meaning since I had to do everything except cooking lunch. It’s unfair for me to do so many things on my day off,” she added.

Despite her contract with her employer ending in a few months, she couldn’t shake the feeling that she was being mistreated.

She also confessed that she never really had the heart to complain about her chores on her day off or the fact that she had to buy her own breakfast and toiletries because her employers weren’t “that bad” and never complained about her work either.

She was happy that they were satisfied with her performance. However, the recent dinner incident made her more sensitive to her situation, causing her to feel that changes were necessary.

Seeking guidance, she asked the community, “I have been working as a helper for 10 years, and this is my first time experiencing something like this. I don’t know how to handle this situation.

Can you guys give me any good advice? Am I being too calculative? I don’t want to have a bad record. Nowadays, it’s really hard to find a good employer while having a bad record.”

“If you have to work, then it’s not a day off.”

In the comments section, many netizens urged her to stand up for herself and explain to her employers how the additional chores on her day off were affecting her mental health and overall job satisfaction.

One netizen said that it was unfortunate her situation had continued for so long and suggested that now, with her contract nearing its end, would be the right time to inform her employer that she expects her days off to be fully free if they plan to renew her contract.

She added, “If they get upset and want to send you home and not allow a transfer – just be prepared and accept it. Rather than continue in this situation, start looking for another employer before you are sent home.”

Another netizen commented, “Learn to be assertive and talk to your employer, explaining that it is your day off and you have the right to decline housework. Set boundaries and say no.

Your employer will expect you to follow the same routine because they think you’re okay with it.”

Others suggested that she try to seek compensation for the work she does on her day off. One netizen expressed, “You need to talk to your employer about your issues.

A day off is a day off—it’s a day of rest. That’s why it’s called a day off. If you have to work, then it’s not a day off. You can ask them to pay you for the day if they ask you to clean and cook.”

MOM: Domestic helpers are entitled to one rest day per week

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) states that employers must provide their domestic helpers one rest day each week, with a mutual agreement between the employer and the helper on when that day off will be.

This rest day can be one full day or split into two half days. The domestic helper may also choose to spend her rest day at home.

If the employer requires the helper to work on her rest day, such as to care for an elderly parent or look after the children, this is acceptable as long as the helper agrees.

In such cases, the helper must either be compensated with at least one full day’s wage or receive a replacement rest day within the same month.

Also, the employer has to ensure the helper gets at least one rest day a month that can’t be swapped or compensated, so she has guaranteed time off to rest.

If the domestic helper is unable to take her rest day in a particular month, it can be deferred for up to one month, meaning the rest day should be taken by the end of the following month.

Read also: Woman worried after 88 yo grandma’s room becomes ‘dangerously slippery’ due to downstairs neighbour’s aircon

Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

Couple who’s been house hunting in Singapore for years until their “salary ceiling burst” asks, “Why is it so difficult to secure a house in SG?”

SINGAPORE: A woman who’s been trying to buy a home with her boyfriend for years took to social media to ask other Singaporeans, “Why is it so difficult to secure a house in SG?”

Sharing her experience on the Facebook page ‘NUSWhispers,’ the woman explained that she and her boyfriend started applying for an HDB flat as soon as they were eligible.

“I’m so disappointed. My bf and I have been house hunting for the longest time. From the time we could apply BTO until the salary ceiling burst,” she wrote.

Hoping for better luck with private property, she and her boyfriend also spent two years trying their hand at new condo launches but kept getting bad queue numbers.

By the time it was their turn, only the huge and pricey 4- or 5-bedroom units were left.

“Already, we started early. Already we saved up from not having a wedding and honeymoon, all money pumped into the house, but still can’t get anything,” she said.

With no financial support from their families, they were left considering the resale market, which they described as ‘not cheap’ either.

“Feels like either we should have gotten married at 22, or else the more we wait, the more we get penalised. Does everyone just start off married life with a ton of debts to have a place to call their own?” she asked.

“The problem is, it’s difficult to find one that is cheap and good enough for you”

In the comments section, many netizens were baffled by the woman’s plight, stating that if they hit the salary ceiling, it would mean they could easily afford private property.

They also pointed out that there is no shortage of available HDB properties, contrary to what she seemed to suggest in her post.

One netizen said, “Salary ceiling burst and act as if cannot afford housing? Such irony.”

Another commented, “You say resale is expensive, but you don’t want a condo either.

The problem isn’t that it’s difficult to find a house. The problem is it’s difficult to find one that is cheap and good enough for you. In other words, the problem is you.”

Some also encouraged her to explore resale properties, pointing out that not all are priced around a million.

One netizen shared her experience, saying she got married at 24, bought a three-bedroom resale flat, and later upgraded to a five-room one. She advised, “Just at least speak to an agent and understand options?”

Despite the criticism, a few netizens empathised with the woman’s frustrations, acknowledging that finding an affordable, decent home in Singapore can be tough.

One netizen commented, “I ballot for 2-rm BTO since 37 & only got it when I’m 47 (my 25th ballot)!”

HDB income ceiling in Singapore

In 2019, the Housing Development Board (HDB) raised the income ceilings for purchasing new flats.

New HDB Flats: The income ceiling for families or couples applying for new HDB flats was raised from $12,000 to $14,000.

Executive Condominiums (ECs): The income ceiling for families or couples buying Executive Condominiums (ECs) from developers was raised from $14,000 to $16,000.

Resale HDB flats: There are no income restrictions when it comes to resale properties.

The income ceilings are designed to ensure that a significant portion of the population can access affordable housing options within their financial reach.

According to the Ministry of National Development, about 8 in 10 Singaporeans are eligible to apply for a BTO flat with a current income ceiling of $14,000.

On the other hand, around 9 in 10 Singaporeans qualify for an Executive Condominium (EC) with an income ceiling of $16,000.

Read related: BTO frenzy: October launch sees record 33,983 applicants, singles drive demand for two-room Flexi flats

Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)