Wednesday, May 14, 2025
24.9 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2753

Trump-touted Covid-19 antibody treatments: what we know

0

by Issam AHMED

Two US companies have applied for emergency approval for their lab-produced antibodies against Covid-19 — and President Donald Trump has signaled his strong backing based on the fact he was treated with one of them.

Here’s what we know about the treatments and why the perception of political interference at the Food and Drug Administration may have eroded public trust.

– What are they? –
The therapies developed by Regeneron and Eli Lilly are called “monoclonal antibodies,” a relatively new class of drugs that are best known for treating certain types of cancer and autoimmune disease.

Our own immune systems produce antibodies, which are infection-fighting molecules, and vaccines teach our bodies to be prepared to make the right ones for particular pathogens.

Another potential strategy is to give a patient fighting a disease the antibodies of someone who has already recovered. This is known as convalescent plasma, but it’s hard to procure plasma on a big enough scale to use it very widely.

Regeneron and Lilly have developed “cocktails” of antibodies based on the most effective ones they have discovered. In the case of Regeneron, one of these came from a person and the other from a mouse with a genetically-modified human-like immune system.

They all work by binding to and distorting a surface structure of the SARS-CoV-2 virus called the “spike protein” that it uses to invade human cells.

The host immune cells that produce the antibodies can be cultured in a lab to produce the desired antibodies en masse.

Antibodies can’t be ingested in a pill and instead have to be transfused using a drip. In theory they could be used to immunize people too, but unlike vaccines the protection would be highly transient.

– Are they safe and effective? –
Both companies have released some early data based on a few hundred non-hospitalized patients in clinical trials, with both claiming their treatments reduced viral load and recovery time.

One particularly eye-catching figure came from Lilly’s mid-stage trial, which showed the rate of Covid-related hospitalization and emergency visits was 0.9 percent for patients treated with its therapy versus 5.8 percent on placebo.

That result however was for Lilly’s “combination” treatment of two antibodies, whereas it has so far only applied for emergency approval for a “monotherapy” of one antibody, because it has greater stocks of it and more safety data available.

Both companies said their trials haven’t produced any serious safety concerns so far.

Trump, who was diagnosed with Covid-19 last week and was treated with Regeneron’s version, has made it clear he is a big fan. “It really did a fantastic job, I want to get for you what I got,” he said in a video.

– Were fetal tissues used in Regeneron’s treatment? –
They weren’t used to create the antibodies, but cells derived from a human embryonic kidney in the 1970s were used to produce virus “pseudoparticles” with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, in order to test out the treatment.

Last year the Trump administration ended federal funding for most new scientific research on fetal tissue from elective abortions.

A Regeneron spokeswoman told AFP that the original documents about the cells made no mention of how they were obtained.

– Can the FDA be trusted? –
The president’s comments, based on his personal experience rather than data, heighten fears for the integrity of the regulatory process.

In theory, the FDA operates independently from the White House, but its decision to issue an emergency use approval (EUA) in March for the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine touted by Trump raised serious concerns.

No clinical trials have yet found in favor of using hydroxychloroquine against Covid-19, and the EUA was later withdrawn over safety fears.

The evidence standard used to grant emergency approval for the antiviral remdesivir was much greater — a final stage trial involving more than a 1,000 patients.

More than 6,000 patients were studied in a British trial that showed the steroid dexamethasone lowered mortality rates in hospitalized Covid-19 patients, which in turn led to US authorities recommending it.

But the FDA has also given an EUA for convalescent plasma, despite there being no trial data in its favor yet — so approval of monoclonal antibodies does seem likely.

FDA chief Stephen Hahn restored some independent experts’ faith when his agency on Wednesday released its guidelines for approving a Covid-19 vaccine.

The document said that makers need at least two months of follow-up data from patients after receiving their final dose, which makes it unlikely there will be an injection on the market before the November 3 election — something Trump has repeatedly sought.

ia/ft

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Trudeau fears ‘disruptions’ in event of tight US vote result

0

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday his government feared “some disruptions” if the result of the US presidential election is close, and that Ottawa is preparing for “any outcomes.”

“We view all the polarization in the United States with some concern,” Trudeau said in French, referring to the country’s political discord less than a month until the November 3 election between President Donald Trump and Democrat Joe Biden.

“We’re all watching the US election with close attention because of its potential impact on the Canadian economy and on Canadians,” Trudeau said at a news conference.

“We’re certainly all hoping for a smooth transition or a clear result” in the vote, he said.

“If it is less clear, there may be some disruptions and we need to be ready for any outcomes,” he said, without elaborating.

Trump has questioned the integrity of mail-in ballots, which are popular this election due to the Covid pandemic, and he has refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power if he loses the vote.

Trudeau, who has an often stormy relationship with Trump, generally refrains from commenting on political happenings in Canada’s powerful neighbor.

“We will not be interfering or engaging in any way in their electoral processes and that includes commenting on their electoral processes,” he said.

The United States is Canada’s largest trading partner, with Can$2.4 billion (US$1.8 billion) flowing across the border each day.

et/jl/acb/bfm

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Trump should be able to resume ‘public engagements’ from Saturday, doctor says

0

President Donald Trump should be able to resume “public engagements” from Saturday, the White House physician announced Thursday, saying the US leader has responded “extremely well” to Covid-19 treatment.

“Saturday will be day 10 since Thursday’s diagnosis, and based on the trajectory of advanced diagnostics the team has been conducting, I fully anticipate the President’s safe return to public engagements at that time,” Trump’s doctor Sean Conley said in a statement.

Trump spent three days in the hospital before returning to the White House on Monday evening. The White House has become a Covid-19 hotspot, with dozens of people close to Trump testing positive.

“Overall he’s responded extremely well to treatment, without evidence on examination of adverse therapeutic effects,” Conley said.

Since his diagnosis, Trump has received an experimental antibody treatment, the antiviral drug remdesivir and the steroid dexamethasone.

With only 26 days to go until the November 3 election, the president is keen to get back on the campaign trail to rally his base, with polls showing him trailing Democratic challenger Joe Biden.

acb/bfm

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Former Trump fundraiser charged with illicit lobbying on 1MDB, China

0

A former leading fundraiser for President Donald Trump has been indicted on a charge that he illegally lobbied the US government to drop its probe into the Malaysia 1MDB corruption scandal and to deport an exiled Chinese billionaire.

Elliott Broidy was charged in Washington federal court with one count of conspiracy to act as an unregistered foreign agent after allegedly agreeing to take millions of dollars to lobby the Trump administration.

The indictment, made public Thursday, said Broidy was recruited in 2017 by an unnamed foreign national, understood to be Malaysian Low Taek Jho, to pressure US officials to end their investigation of a scandal engulfing then Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak.

The scandal involved the theft of over $4.5 billion from state investment fund 1MDB, and Low was allegedly central to moving and hiding some of the stolen funds.

At the time Broidy was national deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee after having been a major fundraiser for Trump’s successful 2016 presidential campaign.

After being recruited by Low, Broidy personally asked Trump to invite Najib to play golf during the Malaysian leader’s September 2017 visit to the United States, the indictment said.

The goal was to give Najib a chance “to attempt to resolve the 1MDB matter” with the US leader, the document said.

The golf game never happened, and Low was indicted in 2018 for his role in siphoning off billions from 1MDB.

Low, who has also been charged in Malaysia over the scandal, has consistently denied any wrongdoing. His current whereabouts are unknown.

In addition, in May 2017 Low introduced Broidy to a Chinese state minister, and they discussed Beijing’s desire that Washington deport an exiled Chinese tycoon, the indictment said.

It did not name either person, but the tycoon is known to be Guo Wengui, a prominent dissident businessman.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Chinese official was Sun Lijun, at the time Beijing’s powerful vice minister of public security.

The indictment describes Broidy’s intense lobbying of the White House, the Justice Department and law enforcement on behalf of the Chinese, including contacts with but not direct discussions with Trump.

The object of the lobbying conspiracy, the indictment said, was “to make millions of dollars by leveraging Broidy’s access to and perceived influence with the president and his administration.”

The indictment came just weeks after a key partner of Low and Broidy, Hawaii businesswoman Nickie Mali Lum Davis, pleaded guilty to a charge of illegal lobbying both on the 1MDB case and the Guo case.

Guo remains in the United States, where he has continued to campaign against Beijing authorities, working closely with another longtime Trump associate, Steve Bannon.

Bannon was arrested in August while aboard Guo’s yacht off the coast of Connecticut and charged with defrauding donors to a Mexican border wall project.

pmh/acb/sr/hg

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Sandara Park speaks up on YG Entertainment’s strict 5-year dating ban

0

Former 2NE1 member Sandara Park was featured as a guest on KBS Joy programme called Love’s Intervention recently where she opened up about her former agency YG Entertainment’s 5-year long dating ban rule and how that impacted her past love life.

Sandara shared that she has been in ‘non-tact (non face-to-face contact) relationship even before the coronavirus outbreak. The reason is because Sandara was too busy with her work commitments.

On the topic of YG Entertainment’s ‘no dating rule’, the 36-year-old singer dished out that she was once reprimanded by the management team for being in a relationship, back when Sandara was still a trainee.

Sandara Park was reprimanded for dating. Picture: Instagram

“My manager took away my phone. And after I made my (K-pop) debut, there was a 5-year-dating ban rule implemented,” Sandara told the MCs. She then admitted that she abided by the rules, stating, “I really didn’t date because they told me not to.

The 36-year-old is more open to dates these days. Dara said, “Only recently have I made up my mind to date actively. All I need to do is be more assertive. I would like to take this opportunity to apologise to my ex-boyfriends,” making everyone on set burst into laughter.

Born on November 12, 1984, Sandara Park, known also as Dara is a South Korean singer, actress and TV presenter.

She rose to fame in the Philippines as a contestant on the talent show Star Circle Quest in 2004, after which she had a successful acting and singing career before returning to South Korea in 2007. She made her South Korean debut in 2009 as a member of the K-pop group 2NE1, which went on to become one of the best-selling girl groups of all time before their disbandment in 2016.

Park is one of the most popular South Korean celebrities in the Philippines, where she is known by fans as the Pambansang Krung-Krung (National Crazy Personality). She is considered an influential figure in the Korean Wave, and has been called the “BoA of the Philippines”, in reference to South Korean singer BoA who also experienced great success abroad.

 

Why WP’s Yee Jenn Jong filed adjournment motion at last moment when he was NCMP

Singapore — In the midst of criticism of the balloting process of an adjournment motion filed by Workers’ Party (WP) Chairman Sylvia Lim last week, WP politician Yee Jenn Jong has recounted how he took great pains to file an adjournment motion at the last possible moment to avoid having to go through the ballot process back when he was a Non-Constituency MP (NCMP).

Mr Yee recalled on Facebook last Thursday (Oct 1) that he was the first to file an adjournment motion in the 12th Parliament of Singapore and that his motion was filed 11 months after that term commenced:

“When I was in the 12th parliament (2011-2015), I was the first to for that term. It was for 10 Sep 2012, 11 months after parliament had convened. Yup, not a single MP use this mechanism for 11 months.”

The opposition politician described the lengths he went to in a bid to avoid competition. Mr Yee filed his adjournment motion minutes before the cut-off time on the last day of the deadline to file such motions. He said that he was afraid that others might file adjournment motions to compete with him if he made his submission to early:

“For the adjournment motion I had filed, I went to Parliament House and waited at the library until 4.25 pm to email the Clerk of Parliament of my intention to file. Then I went to the Clerk’s office just below the library to hand in my printed request. 430 pm is the cut-off time for filing and it must be filed I think 3 working days before the sitting.
“I filed on the final day allowed for filing, a few minutes before cut off. I did so because I did not want to risk having to go for a ballot if I submitted my request too early and others start filing.
“This was because I was due to fly off on 10 Sep 2012 as a representative of Singapore’s parliament for an Asean parliamentarian gathering. I requested to delay my flight by a day. I did not want to risk my adjournment motion not be selected if there was to be a ballot. I had to travel and skip the sitting on 11 Sep.”

Only two days before Mr Yee’s post, Ms Lim lost a random ballot to pick an adjournment motion for Parliament this week. She had filed an adjournment motion on Sept 14 on the issues surrounding the court case involving former maid Parti Liyani.

On Sept 29, Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin announced that Ms Lim had lost the ballot of the adjournment motions filed for House. A motion filed by People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Louis Ng, calling for protection against secondhand smoke in homes, won the ballot.

The result of the ballot sparked criticism of the way a motion is selected. Mr Tan responded with multiple rebuttals of the criticism. Mr Ng, when urged by the critics to withdraw his motion and give way to Ms Lim, said he would also speak on the Parti Liyani case in Parliament.

Referring to the recent ballot, Mr Yee commented that he does not remember ever having five motions up for ballot. He wrote on Facebook: “Perhaps there were a rare few times with more than one wanting to use the adjournment motion mechanism, but I do not recall ever having 5 at one time. Could be a new record.”

Mr Yee also set out why adjournment motions can be useful for MPs to call attention to issues since they have 20 minutes to speak without a prolonged debate afterwards.

On the back of comments by Mr Tan that MPs have an array of avenues to raise issues, Mr Yee pointed out that there is a time limit when MPs want to highlight issues through parliamentary questions (PQs). Revealing that the Speaker would interrupt him and ask  him to hurry up when he tried to make a case when posing PQs to ministers, Mr Yee said:

“In any case, I am sure the Minister’s statement on this hot topic will be well debated upon. There is a limitation though when asking a Minister questions, on how long you can have to present your case. Technically, it should not be to make a speech in response to a Minister’s statement but to ask questions for clarifications.

“I had tried before to make a case or make a proposal when asking questions and the Speaker would interrupt and tell me to get to my question quickly. So a proper speech such as through an adjournment motion or a motion is better to lay out the points.”

Read his post in full here:

Adjournment motion – What is it?An adjournment motion allows an MP to speak for up to 20 minutes and a political…

Posted by Yee Jenn Jong 余振忠 on Wednesday, 30 September 2020

WP clarifies that Sylvia Lim has not abandoned her “Justice for All” parliamentary motion

Are Tan Chuan-Jin and Lim Wee Kiak claiming that mainstream media is biased towards WP?

Tan Chuan-Jin gets defensive in response to backlash for not picking Sylvia Lim’s adjournment motion

Louis Ng says he will also touch on Parti Liyani case in the face of calls for him to give way to Sylvia Lim

No motion on Parti Liyani in the next Parliament sitting

WP MP Louis Chua to Govt: Give people an idea of what to expect in Phase 3

Singapore — Opposition Workers’ Party MP Louis Chua has asked the Government to give the people an idea of what to expect when the country enters Phase 3 of its phased reopening instead of keeping them largely unaware of what adjustments they should make after Phase 2.

Phase 3 is expected to be the “new normal” until a vaccine or treatment is found for Covid-19.

Mr Chua, a member of the WP team elected to Sengkang GRC in this year’s elections, asked Health Minister Gan Kim Yong in Parliament on Monday (Oct 5) where the country stands in the Government’s risk assessment in determining when to move into Phase 3.

Echoing comments Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat made in a Ministerial Statement the same day, Mr Gan responded that the Multi-ministry Task Force is still working on a roadmap towards Phase 3 and that more details will be announced in the coming weeks.

Through supplementary questions, Mr Chua highlighted the importance of giving additional parameters and guidance to businesses and individuals on what they can expect in that phase. He said in a subsequent Facebook post: “This is to help us make plans in advance, rather than taking a passive wait-and-see approach with low visibility into the future.”

Mr Chua also asked whether an improved risk assessment guide can be provided since the country has been at the DORSCON Orange level since February and expects to remain in it for some more time, even though the number of daily Covid-19 cases have dropped off since hitting a peak of 1,426 cases in April.

He said on Facebook: “Further, I’ve also highlighted that we have been in DORSCON Orange since 7 February earlier this year.

“The Circuit Breaker period, the peak in daily Covid-19 cases at 1,426 on 20 April and the upcoming Phase Three re-opening are all part of DORSCON Orange…with Minister Gan stressing that we will maintain DORSCON Orange for the time being, could a more useful and timely risk assessment guide be provided to residents instead?”

I asked the above question in Parliament yesterday, and the summary of Minister Gan’s response is that the MTF is still…

Posted by Chua Kheng Wee 蔡庆威 on Monday, 5 October 2020

YG Entertainment removes scenes of BLACKPINK’s Jennie in ‘sexy’ nurse outfit

0

BLACKPINK’s agency YG Entertainment has announced that they will be removing scenes of Jennie dressed in a ‘sexy’ nurse outfit in the girl group’s Lovesick Girls music video following complaints from a South Korean medical union.

YG Entertainment released a statement today after the Korean Health and Medical Workers Union condemned Jennie’s outfit, which included a form-fitting white dress, red high heels and a cap with a heart symbol, for promoting a ‘sexual stereotype’ of nurses.

“We have decided to edit out all of the scenes with the nurse uniform in BLACKPINK’s Lovesick Girls music video and we will replace the video as soon as possible.

“While working on the music video for a long time, we did not expect this issue to be raised because (the scenes) had no specific intention to them. We feel greatly responsible for this and will consider it an opportunity to deeply learn.

“We relay our apologies to the nurses who felt discomfort and we once again express our respect to all healthcare workers who are working hard for the sake of the health of the citizens,” said YG Entertainment based on translations by Soompi.

BLACKPINK’s Jennie wears a nurse outfit in music video Lovesick Girls. Picture: YouTube

The South Korean medical union had called out YG Entertainment for giving a ‘derogatory portrayal’ of nurses in BLACKPINK’s latest music video which has garnered over 120 million views on YouTube since its launch on October 1. A translation of the union’s statement from October 5 by Soompi revealed its concerns about “distorted” representations of healthcare workers in the media.

“In a real hospital, not the ones in the media, nurses are fighting at the frontlines of Covid-19 and taking on the risk of infection for the safety and survival of the citizens.

“There has been a climate of heroising nurses as well, but there are still those who call nurses with ‘hey’ or ‘young lady’ and let out their stress on them or exercise their power on them.

“Furthermore, nurses are the healthcare workers who are the most frequently exposed to sexual abuse.

“If the media continues to show a distorted image of nurses, situations like these will only get worse,” said the union.

In the past, YG Entertainment had to edit a BLACKPINK music video post-release following condemnation from certain groups. The agency axed scenes from BLACKPINK’s How You Like That music video which showed Lisa with a statue of the deity Ganesha after fans from Hindu-majority India accused them of using religion as a profitable aesthetic.

Netizens ask whether PAP MP’s cat ban argument can be used to get the Govt to repeal S377A

Some netizens are asking whether a question People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Louis Ng asked in Parliament with regards to the ban on cats in public housing can be applied to get the Government to repeal Section 377A of Singapore’s penal code.

A man found to have committed an act of “gross indecency” with another man could be jailed for up to two years under Section 377A – a British colonial-era legislation that was adopted into Singapore’s penal code. Although the law is very rarely enforced here, the Government is hesitant to repeal Section 377A despite repeated calls for it to do so from several quarters.

Another rule that the Government is hesitant to abolish even though it is rarely enforced is the Housing Development Board’s (HDB) ban on pet cats in HDB units. According to HDB’s rules,

“Cats are not allowed in flats. They are generally difficult to contain within the flat. When allowed to roam indiscriminately, they tend to shed fur and defecate or urinate in public areas, and also make caterwauling sounds, which can inconvenience your neighbours.”

HDB’s ban on cats is as old as the first public housing flats has been in force since 1960. While the authority had initially banned all animals from HDB flats, it later relaxed rules and allowed flat buyers to keep certain dogs and other small animals. The ban on cats, however, was upheld.

Today, the cat ban is not actively enforced but the authority does act against errant flat owners and their pet cats that have been flagged as public nuisances.

Interestingly, several ruling party politicians have published photos of themselves with their constituents’ pet cats during house visits despite the Government’s reluctance to repeal the rule in the face of appeals for it to do so over many years.

The cat ban was one of the many issues Nee Soon GRC MP Louis Ng raised in Parliament, this week. Mr Ng, who is the founder of animal rescue group ACRES, has spoken out on this issue at least thrice in Parliament in 2020 alone.

In Parliament on Tuesday (6 Oct), Mr Ng appealed: “The policy of not allowing the keeping of cats in HDB flats has to be reviewed and changed. I’ve spoken up about this for more than a decade now.”

Pointing out that HDB’s policy “does not make sense” since it allows homeowners to keep dogs – which also shed fur, defecate and urinate in public places – Mr Ng asserted that HDB’s concerns can be “easily addressed” through methods like sterilisation which ensures that cats do not make caterwauling sounds.

Mr Ng also highlighted that the Ministry of National Development (MND) once indicated to him that there is a lot of flexibility in the way the policy is administered. It said earlier, “when HDB receives a complaint, they go down and investigate. If the cat is not causing any disamenities, the resident will not be asked to remove the cat”.

Mr Ng asked: “I appreciate this reply but my question then is what is the point of having a rule that we do not actively enforce?”

This question has captured the attention of some netizens, who pointed out that the same question is relevant when it comes to whether Section 377A should be repealed:

The latest social initiative against Section 377A, the Ready4Repeal campaign, gained immense traction last year and even drew support from establishment figures like former attorney-general Walter Woon and distinguished diplomat Tommy Koh, but failed to effect change.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong subsequently quashed all hope that Section 377A will be repealed in Singapore anytime soon, as he asserted that the law criminalising gay sex will be around “for some time.”

Asserting that Singapore has been open to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community, he said: “You know our rules in Singapore. Whatever your sexual orientation, you are welcome to come and work in Singapore. But this has not inhibited people from living, and has not stopped Pink Dot from having a gathering every year.

“It is the way this society is: We are not like San Francisco, neither are we like some countries in the Middle East. (We are) something in between, it is the way the society is.”

Pink Dot rebutted PM Lee’s views and asserted that “Pink Dot’s existence is not proof of Singapore’s inclusiveness to the LGBTQ community”. The group added: “Pink Dot exists precisely because members of the LGBTQ community in Singapore continue to face discrimination and inequality in a multitude of ways, on a daily basis.”

Declaring that Section 377A is a key cause of the discrimination the LGBTQ community faces in Singapore, Pink Dot said: “This discrimination that we face is borne from Section 377A, along with its trickle-down effects to other laws and policies that govern our society at large.”

Pink Dot further said that it is “more than just a convenient deflection against uncomfortable questions about the LGBTQ community in Singapore.”

Noting that PM Lee’s response shows that “he might not have a full understanding of the discrimination that takes place in Singapore,” the campaign team invited him and his colleagues to attend Pink Dot at Hong Lim Park on Saturday so that they can “truly make an effort to understand what the LGBTQ community go through on a daily basis.”

Pink Dot rebuts PM Lee’s views and invite him to attend the LGBT pride gathering

PM Lee quashes all hope that S377A will be repealed anytime soon, says the law will be around “for some time”

“It’s immoral!” – FCBC Senior Pastor Nina Khong denounces Lee Hsien Yang’s attendance at Pink Dot

SDP’s call to repeal Section 377A 12 years ago recirculates online

SPCA urges HDB to repeal cat ban once again

Peeping Tom gets 6 weeks jail for filming teenager in her HDB flat shower

SINGAPORE – A man was given a six-week jail sentence on Wednesday (October 7) after he used his smartphone to record a teenage girl while she was in the shower.

31-year old Teo Jing Zhi pleaded guilty in court to intentionally insulting the victim’s modesty on the evening of November 8, 2018.

According to a report in TODAY, the victim, who cannot be named in order to protect her identity, was 18 years old at the time the crime took place.

Mr Teo happened to be biking in the HDB estate where the teenage girl was living when he heard the sounds of her shower, which caused him to look for it, finding her in the bathroom of her ground-floor flat.

This is when the accused decided to pull out his phone to video her without her knowledge. The victim saw a hand holding up a mobile phone through her bathroom’s window louvres. She immediately screamed for help, causing Mr Teo to flee the premises.

Her brother heard her call for help and immediately went in search of the assailant, but he wasn’t able to find anyone when he got outside.

This prompted him to call the police. Initial investigations into the case led the police to CCTV footage that showed Mr Teo lurking around the back of the teenage victim’s flat, which happened to be close to the kitchen toilet window.

The CCTV footage also showed that Mr Teo had remained in that location for around three minutes before biking away. The footage also allowed the authorities to identify him, and eventually apprehend him.

According to Deputy Public Prosecutor Joseph Gwee, the accused deleted any footage he had taken of the victim from his phone.

DPP Gwee was pushing for an eight-week jail term because of a number of aggravating factors in the case.

He explained that there was a major degree of intrusion into the teenager’s privacy, citing “The victim was fully nude as she was showering and the offence had taken place in the sanctity of her own home, where she should have expected to have been safe.” / TISG