Home News Workers’ Party Pritam Singh questions MRHA's clarity of application

Workers’ Party Pritam Singh questions MRHA’s clarity of application

Pritam was of the opinion that under the Act, ministers and the Cabinet will have considerable powers, thus, the clarity in which it will be applied and the neutrality that must be shown by the government is of utmost importance

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

The ruckus regarding the Maintenance of Religious Harmony (Amendment) Act (MRHA) brought 23 MPs raising issues on how the law will be carried out with Workers’ Party Pritam Singh questioning its appropriate application.

With the forthcoming modifications, Pritam was of the opinion that under the Act, ministers and the Cabinet will have considerable powers, thus, the clarity in which it will be applied and the neutrality that must be shown by the government is of utmost importance.

He warned against the general public seeing religious leaders alongside politicians, which may potentially create and ferment tension within religious groups and between religious adherents of varying political persuasions.

He also highlighted that all political leaders should be mindful of how their involvement in religious events, such as large-scale prayer events or any gatherings may have huge effects, especially during the run-up to the general election.

- Advertisement -

Pritam added that the state has to ensure it can remain as a neutral arbiter in matters on faith.

Pritam stressed that “As we enter the 4G era, this House must ensure that the public space continues to be secular and safe space for all Singaporeans regardless of creed.”

Mr Shanmugam also noted religious bodies such as PERGAS (Singapore Islamic Scholars & Religious Teachers Association) and the NCCS (National Council of Churches of Singapore) had previously voiced opposition to matters such as the building of casinos and the approval of online gambling, without being censured.

“I don’t think we can completely deny them (religious organisations) the right to express some views on some pieces of legislation,” he said, noting however this had to be done without being partisan and political.

The changes to the 27-year-old Act – aimed at allowing the Government to deal more effectively with issues such as the growing influence of social media and the threat of foreign religious interference – were passed on Monday (Oct 7). -/TISGFollow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

- Advertisement -

Calvin Cheng cautions: “The PAP needs to remember how to be a political party”

Singapore -- Former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Calvin Cheng took to social media to say that the era of Lee Kuan Yew-style politics was over. In a Facebook post on Tuesday (Apr 13), Mr Cheng wrote about politics in Singapore. “For half...

Those who recover from Covid-19 may be at risk for blood clotting: S’pore study

Singapore – According to a study by the Nanyang Technological University (NTU), people who have recovered from Covid-19 may face risks of blood clot formation due to an overactive immune response. Covid-19 patients, especially those with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions, may be at...

Tan Cheng Bock and Goh Chok Tong were apparently from the same CCA in RI

Singapore -- Known to have been close friends once, Dr Tan Cheng Bock and Mr Goh Chok Tong recently attended the same scouting event at Raffles Institution, indicating that they were likely from the same CCA as well. In a Facebook post...
Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

Theindependent