Is Track II Diplomacy Dead in Singapore?

Singapore hired Dr Huang Jing with full knowledge of his ties and modus operandi. The sacking comes as a surprise to people who are close to him.

Huang Jing was a Lee Foundation Professor on US-China relations at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy

According to industry analysts, Singapore is the worst place to be a property developer, the worst place to be a tech start-up, and the worst place to be a software programmer. Add to that growing list, the worst place to be a Track II diplomat or lobbyist.

Singapore has proscribed Dr Huang Jing, a US citizen and top professor at its Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP). He will be summarily expelled, his permanent resident status torn up, and his directorships in several state-linked companies dissolved if he doesn’t resign from them voluntarily. The communique from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) adopts a security narrative: the professor was “an agent of influence of a foreign country”, engaged in subversion and interference in Singapore’s domestic politics.

Now let us tell you why this narrative is a giant fail and colossal joke, and what could be actually happening.
Diplomat, Spy, or Lobbyist? Track II Diplomacy in a nutshell

Of course the security narrative is improbable, implausible, and doesn’t add up. Not even to the world of diplomacy, spycraft, or international relations.

Yet a cursory scan of Dr Huang Jing’s career and publications reveals he is a pro-China “China hand” with a decades-long involvement in Track II diplomacy and lobbying at several policy institutes and think tanks in America and South Korea, and a foreign economics analyst for China’s state-owned Xinhua News Agency. Some even openly state his credentials as a key actor in Track II diplomacy and multilateral dialogues.  And that’s where the narrative from Singapore Ministry Home Affairs starts to break down entirely.

One thing about being a spy: you can’t be one if you’re recognized as a spy wherever you go.
One thing about being a diplomat or international lobbyist: you can only be one if you’re recognized as such wherever you go.

And it’s clear from historical record that Dr Huang Jing is a China analyst involved in lobbying and track II diplomacy.

Track II diplomacy, in a nutshell, is diplomacy conducted by unofficial, informal, or non-governmental actors and agents. That is, diplomacy conducted between non-diplomats. No war hawks or peace doves, just scientific, cultural, and economic analysts and lobbyists from each side speaking freely on a wide range of issues – something that cannot take place within formal diplomacy. No formal negotiations, whatever views proposed are seen as not necessarily the official stand of respective governments.

Track II diplomacy was “invented” as a way to resolve crises. Since then, it was further developed as a way to normalise relations and improve mutual understanding through regular dialogue. And yes, to ultimately persuade governments to adjust various policies and policy directions. Very openly acknowledged and studied in the literature and various institutes conducting Track II Diplomacy as lobbying. Whether or not such lobbying is successful depends on how convincing the lobbyist’s arguments are, vis-a-vis the arguments of other lobbyists.

Put crudely, Track II diplomacy is all about lobbying. Of course it’s Dr Huang’s key skill set and very clearly stated in his CV and previous appointments. When the government of Singapore luridly accused Dr Huang Jing of being a foreign agent who “engaged prominent and influential Singaporeans… to influence their opinions in favour of that country… recruited others in aid of his operations”, were they accusing Dr Huang of being a lobbyist and Track II diplomacy actor working in a public policy institute?

Track II diplomacy can only exist in a country that has a certain freedom of speech to allow lobbying, robustness of debate to prevent one-sided lobbying, independent thinking to critically analyse debates, and a commitment to guaranteeing the safety of such diplomacy. By expelling Dr Huang, the Ministry of Home Affairs risks sending a signal that one, some, or quite possibly all of these are no longer true in Singapore.
And that’s how much of a clown show this looks, if we were to buy into the official narrative.
Because if that’s the official narrative, enjoy seeing Dr Huang Jing be deported to the USA, where he will continue to lead a free life and worse, continue to gain fellowship and academic appointments to other think tanks and research institutions in the USA and across the world. It would be highly embarrassing to Singapore. Probably more embarrassing than seeing Dr Shorvon being vindicated in London’s High Court.
So what really happened?
Singapore has its own track II diplomacy think tanks and research institutes, some of whom have members or chairmen who publish articles in the Straits Times Op/Ed pages. Public lobbyists, if you will.
Short of monumental incompetence, in Singapore failing to understand what Track II diplomacy is, we can only speculate on what the real clown show was.
Published with full permissions from Illusio


    • Source: watapps
      Author: not known
      In that interview, Prof Huang outlined the three failures of Lee Hsien Loong as prime minister of Singapore:

      1) Trying to be the leader of ASEAN by getting all the other members to sign a joint declaration against China in the South China Sea dispute

      2) Taking the lead in convincing the other ASEAN members to join the TPP

      3) Thinking that Hillary would win the presidency, he started to badmouth Trump during an interview in New York City.

      Finally when he was not invited to the inauguration meeting to launch the One Belt One Road (OBOR), his defense minister declared that Singapore supports the OBOR initiative.

      The interview must have infuriated LHL so much that he decided to ban Prof Huang from Singapore.

  1. Mr Huang in my opinion is not smart. He did not realise that he is still an employee in his department even though he has the knowledge of ties and modus operandi. He never read Chinese history. No body will be smarter than the Emperor even the Emperor is stupid. His speech and outmost intelligent ruin himself for trying to outsmart the Emperor. In the olden era, he could be drag out to be beheaded immediately.

  2. How many of them we pay high salary but working for foreigner???Just look around you can even Smell its. Many PRC Indian and Philipino are the main culprits!!!

  3. Track II is not about diplomacy in my understanding. Track II is to enable scholars to debate, argue, and fight, if necessary, and then come to some understanding, so they could advise the diplomats.

Comments are closed.