Wednesday, May 7, 2025
31.3 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 433

S’poreans wonder if Grab’s full return to office is a ‘retrenchment exercise’ or ‘indirect layoffs’

SINGAPORE: It’s back to pre-pandemic days for the employees of Grab Singapore beginning from Dec 2. The company told workers they will need to go back to the office full time, five days a week, at a town hall meeting on Thursday (Oct 24).

“Increasing face-to-face collaboration will accelerate progress and enhance integration across our ecosystem and business units,” Anthony Tan, the company’s CEO, wrote in an email.

He added that going back to work every day aligns with Grab’s goals to achieve more for its mission as well as drive faster growth.

The gap between the announcement allows employees to have an adjustment period before full-time work-from-office starts on the first Monday of December, especially for those with personal or caregiving duties.

“We understand that this may feel like a significant shift after three years of hybrid work, and it may require adjustment for some of us,” CNA quotes Mr Tan as saying in an email.

However, flexible hours are not completely off the table for Grab employees with special circumstances.

Mr Tan’s email said that workers with urgent personal or family situations may request to work offsite or from their homes.

CNA reported that the move to a full WFO situation for Grab does not come as a surprise, as the company appears to have been getting its employees more and more ready for it beginning last year.

An employee quoted by CNA said that Grab had become stricter regarding working from the office, saying that the company had warned of disciplinary action for those who fail to comply with return-to-work orders.

Grab appears to be following in the footsteps of other tech companies that have implemented full WFO, including Amazon.

Amazon announced in September that the hybrid scheme it put in place during Covid days would end by Jan 2, 2025.

“We’ve decided that we’re going to return to being in the office the way we were before the onset of COVID,” Amazon CEO Andy Jassy wrote.

Some commenters on Reddit wondered, however, if the move to full WFO is a “retrenchment exercise.”

One said that the current market is in favor of the employers, who are in the position to demand that workers be physically present.

Another opined that if this is so, it may be to the disadvantage of employers since only employees who can’t find work elsewhere are guaranteed to stay.

“Every time companies do ‘indirect layoffs’ like this, they are getting rid of their capable workers that can find other jobs,” another opined. /TISG

Read also: Can Amazon’s back-to-office announcement mean layoffs are coming? Singaporeans weigh in

Shrinkflation: Diners are saying KFC chicken pieces are smaller than condiment packets

0

SINGAPORE: Over the past week, a couple of netizens online have complained that the chicken pieces at KFC have shrunk, though prices have not.

A Facebook user named Kenneth Tan posted on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page a photo of the breakfast he ordered at the popular fast food chain, where the piece of chicken isn’t very big.

He held a packet of chili sauce beside the chicken piece, and the condiment packet was even longer.

For comparison’s sake, Mr Tan also posted a photo of the image of the meal offer, which showed a chicken piece that was significantly bigger, even longer than the diameter of the pancakes in the meal, quite unlike the meal Mr Tan was served.

FB screengrab/ COMPLAINT SINGAPORE/ Kenneth Tan

The post author wrote that he was unsurprised that KFC has “so few customers,” and asked whether he received a chicken nugget rather than an actual chicken piece.

A number of commenters on Mr Tan’s post wrote that they noticed the same, not only with KFC but also with other fast food companies such as Burger King.

However, the majority of commenters took KFC to task for what they perceived as smaller portions of its food servings.

“Even the original chicken seems to be smaller than before, for a price at $4.35 per piece,” wrote one.

Another noted that its takeaway mashed potato and coleslaw are only half the size they used to be.

“Everything about KFC has shrunk. Not worth it,” a Facebook user wrote.

In a Reddit Singapore thread, another netizen posted a photo of a chicken drumstick that was roughly the same length as a chili sauce packet.

Reddit screengrab/ u/NappyPika

The post author asked, “How’s everyone’s experience with shrinkflated food / fast food / restaurant 😅?”

One commenter wrote that the only thing he still enjoys are the S$5 combo specials available on weekdays, and other than that, prices at KFC have gotten expensive.

However, a Reddit user answered by saying that the S$5 bowl has “shrunk like 20 per cent from the last time” and that their rice buckets, which used to be meal-sized, are now only snack-sized.

“Visit every other fast food chain and you will be surprised their chicken is all bigger than KFC’s,” wrote another.

The Independent Singapore has reached out to Mr Tan, as well as to KFC, for further comment or updates. /TISG

Read also: “So-called butter” — Diner shocked at tiny pieces of butter served at $41M Tampines coffee shop; says “shrinkflation had seriously set in Singapore”

S’porean asks what salary is liveable for 2024, but others say it depends on one’s lifestyle

SINGAPORE: When a local Reddit user asked what others on the platform considered to be a liveable salary in 2024, they did not get a direct answer.

Instead, netizens said this depends on one’s lifestyle choices.

“Given the high cost of living, what is considered as a liveable salary in Singapore? We can include or exclude mortgage in the discussion,” wrote u/oieric on r/askSingapore on Friday (Oct 25).

“Livable is all dependent on your lifestyle,” wrote a Reddit user in the most upvoted comment, adding that some people are able to support a housewife and three children on a monthly salary of S$3,000.

This would mean, however, that their family would need to live on a tight budget, where even hawker food would be considered a salary.

The commenter added that nevertheless, they know someone in this situation who finds joy in this situation, though they make no unnecessary purchases and consume no beverages except for water. Neither do they go on holiday or own high-end phones.

This prompted another Reddit user to note that they live healthier lives than others who drink soda and eat junk food.

Read related: Man with a wife and kid asks if there’s a way to survive in Singapore on his S$1.9K take-home salary; Singaporeans say, “It’s impossible!”

A woman who had quit working for some years to raise a child said that her family made it on her husband’s salary of S$6,000 a month.

She found it very fulfilling to stay home with the baby, although their lifestyle was somewhat constrained. Those years, however, taught her that “quality of life doesn’t need to come from spending money.”

Another commenter wrote that the amount of salary is not the issue, instead, it’s people’s spending habits.

They added that “lifestyle creep” is a reality and is something everyone should look out for.

“Humans are quite flexible tbh. You make do with the income that you have,” wrote another.

A Reddit user whose combined take-home income with their spouse is around $6266 said that they believe a minimum take-home pay that would still allow people to live a life would be S$3500.

Interestingly, they wrote that “food does take up a good chunk” of their monthly expenses.

One opined that the median income would be a good benchmark for livability, writing, “That means a comfortable income will be approx S$4,400 before excluding CPF / including employer CPF.” /TISG

Read also: “Have salaries inflated, or fresh grads are just delusional?” — HR asks after SG jobseekers with only 1-year experience ask for $5.5K salary now

GrabFin head who drove drunk offered to be road safety ambassador instead of serving jail time

0

SINGAPORE: A Grab director with a previous record of misdeeds on the road was involved in a case of drink driving on Aug 17, 2023, and ended up crashing into a traffic light.

Wong Wenbin, 42, was given a 12-day jail sentence and slapped with a fine of S$$5,000. He is also not allowed to drive for 36 months, reported The Straits Times on Oct 24.

Wong is the head of GrabFin, the company’s fintech arm.

What caught the attention of Singaporeans on Reddit is that in mitigation, Wong’s lawyer suggested an alternative to a jail term, as well as the judge’s snappy and sharp answers to him.

The lawyer asked for 120 hours of community service for Wong instead of the GrabFin director being sent to prison, suggesting that he could be an ambassador for road safety for the purpose of influencing others.

Saying this would allow Wong to “make an impact in society,” the lawyer added that “when someone does something wrong, he is in a position to help other people to not make the same mistake as him.”

The judge on Wong’s case did not appear to be amenable to the suggestion, however, asking the lawyer what was stopping Wong from volunteering to be an ambassador of road safety even without a court order.

The lawyer acknowledged that he had made a “slightly unusual” request, but added that the traffic light his client had bumped into had been fixed by the next morning and hadn’t caused inconvenience to many motorists.

District Judge Shawn Ho then told him that he did not see this as a mitigating factor, and credited the quick repair to the Land Transport Authority.

Wong had at least 63 microgrammes of alcohol in 100ml of breath, while the prescribed limit is 35 microgrammes.

ST added that the prosecution had sought two to four weeks for Wong, calling him a serious offender because he had driven while drunk and was the cause of an accident less than an hour after consuming his last drink.

He also has a previous record for failing to stop at a red light as well as speeding.

For the offence of drink driving, Wong could have been fined between $2,000 and $10,000 or given a jail sentence of as long as a year. Two years is the maximum jail time and S$20,000 is the maximum fine for repeat offenders.

Singaporeans commenting on the story also drew attention to Wong failing to take a Grab home when he was drunk, despite his being an executive with the company. /TISG

Read also: GrabGrab delivers chicken rice to Loh Kean Yew in Denmark, but not everyone is amused

S’poreans shocked & dismayed at clinic that provided teleconsultations lasting 1 minute or even less

SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Health announced on Thursday (Oct 24) that it intends to revoke the licence of a medical clinic that had provided short teleconsultations, with some lasting only a minute.

MOH said that MaNaDr Clinic is no longer able to provide outpatient medical services in a clinically and ethically appropriate manner.

Moreover, 41 doctors who had given teleconsultation services at the clinic are being referred by MOH to the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) for inquiries into possible professional misconduct.

MOH had already had MaNaDr Clinic stop its outpatient medical services via teleconsultation by Aug 16 and carried out investigations afterwards.

It discovered that “a very large number of cases” seen by doctors at the clinic involved teleconsultations with video calls lasting one minute or even less. Despite these short teleconsultations, doctors still prescribed medications and issued medical certificates (MCs).

MOH said this raised issues about the safety and quality of the care the clinic’s doctors provided to their patients — whether the medicines prescribed and MCs issued by the doctors were based on sound medical grounds. Some patients had even been given several MCs within a short time.

The ministry also found that the doctors kept questionable and poor documentation of their patients’ consultations.

“Based on these findings, there is reason to believe that there is an entrenched culture of disregard for the applicable clinical and ethical standards within MaNaDr Clinic,” MOH added.

As for the 41 doctors referred to the SMC, 13 had worked as locum practitioners giving teleconsultations at MaNaDr Clinic but at the same time were employed by MOH Holdings or public healthcare facilities.

MOH cited their breach of employment terms as they had conducted secondary clinical activities without their employers’ consent and added that most had provided teleconsultations while on active duty in public healthcare institutions.

The ministry’s full statement on MaNaDr Clinic may be found here.

Commenting on a local Reddit thread, Singaporeans expressed shock and dismay at the news about MaNaDr Clinic. One called it “really quite an extreme case of malpractice by a clinic”.

Another noted how helpful teleconsultations are for people with limited mobility, such as disabled individuals, and said that “black sheep” such as MaNaDr Clinic’s doctors “severely abused the system”.

One commenter said that what the clinic’s physicians had done had “set back telemedicine a few years”.

A Reddit user, however, raised the point that this type of breach of conduct from physicians could have been avoided if the “culture of distrust” among employers towards employees diminished and if employees were encouraged to take a proper recuperation period when they did fall ill. /TISG

Read also: Workers seek more understanding from bosses on telemedicine MCs

AEW offloads Admirax in Woodlands for S$155M to family office; Bendemeer Centre sparks bidding war with S$145M price tag

0

SINGAPORE: The industrial property scene in Singapore is buzzing. A hot prospect on the market is Admirax, a seven-storey light industrial gem in Woodlands. Global real estate investment manager AEW is reported to be selling it for approximately S$155 million to a family office.

This building, per the report of the Business Times, boasts a nearly 80% occupancy rate across its 476,480 square feet of lettable space, drawing attention from savvy investors. The anticipated net yield of around 6%, based on current rental income, makes this an attractive investment.

Admirax and its diverse tenant mix

Located at 8 Admiralty Street, Admirax operates on a 60-year leasehold that commenced in October 2000, leaving a healthy 36 years on the clock.

Its diverse tenant mix includes urban farming innovator Sustenir and the medical device manufacturer Quasar Medical, along with amenities like a food court and childcare facilities, making it a vibrant hub for businesses.

Having undergone significant upgrades in 2021 after AEW acquired it from BlackRock for S$142 million, Admirax features modern enhancements that elevate its appeal.

Knight Frank has been instrumental in brokering this sale.

Bendemeer Centre

In parallel, Bendemeer Centre, situated on the city fringe, is also generating buzz. The expression of interest (EOI) exercise for its sale closed on October 23, with an asking price of S$145 million and a healthy number of bids already in the mix.

This seven-story property, adjacent to Bendemeer MRT station, offers 170,000 square feet of lettable space and is currently 70% occupied.

Originally purchased for S$88 million in 2015, the property has seen renovations that enhance its marketability. With a 99-year leasehold initiated in March 1966, it still has about 40 years left, promising ample opportunity for growth. Tenants include tech firms like chipmaker MaxLinear and internet service provider ViewQwest, contributing to a projected net yield just below 5% if fully leased.

Both Admirax and Bendemeer Centre share a crucial advantage: they sit on sites not regulated by JTC Corporation. This opens doors to a broader range of tenants, including those ineligible for JTC sites, significantly enhancing their market appeal.

As Singapore’s industrial property landscape evolves, these prime offerings are set to attract keen investors ready to capitalize on the shifting economic tides.

Travellers at Singapore’s Changi Airport can now breeze through immigration in just 10 seconds!

0

SINGAPORE: Travellers at Singapore’s Changi Airport are now able to clear immigration in as little as 10 seconds, thanks to the airport’s advanced facial recognition and iris biometric technology.

The Edge Singapore reported that since the introduction of full facial scanning on Sept 30, the average immigration clearance time for travellers has decreased by 60%, from 25 seconds to just 10, according to a statement posted on Thursday (Oct 24) by Singapore’s Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA).

Changi Airport, often ranked among the world’s best airports, now offers passport-less clearance at all four terminals.

For Singapore residents, including permanent residents and long-term pass holders, this means they can use facial and iris biometrics for both arrivals and departures, bypassing the need to show a passport.

However, foreign visitors must still present documentation upon arrival in Singapore but can use passport-less clearance for departure.

According to the ICA, as of Oct 15, close to 1.5 million travellers have already used the passport-less system to clear immigration. The airport has reported 49.9 million passengers passing through its terminals in the year up to September, a sign that Changi’s passenger traffic is returning to pre-pandemic levels. 

From July to September this year, Changi Airport’s passenger traffic rose to 16.8 million—a 10% increase from the same period last year—bringing numbers to 97.4% of third-quarter 2019, pre-pandemic levels. /TISG

Read also: Kuala Lumpur International Airport surpasses Singapore’s Changi Airport in getting ranked 4th most Instagrammable Airport in the world

Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

Bangladeshi, who has worked for 27 years without a day off in Malaysia, has 3 successful kids: A judge, a doctor and an engineer

0

MALAYSIA: In a remarkable demonstration of hard work and sacrifice, Abu Bakar, a 70-year-old cleaner in Malaysia, has devoted 27 years to his job without taking a single day off, all to provide for his family back in Bangladesh. His tireless efforts have paid off, as his children have risen to impressive heights—one is a judge, another a doctor, and the third an engineer.

In a report published by the South China Morning Post, Bakar, originally from Bangladesh, left his hometown 31 years ago, lured by the promise of better job opportunities in Malaysia. Speaking to Humans of Kuala Lumpur, he reflected on his journey, noting that he was ready to take on any work others might shy away from.

7-days-a-week of hard work for 27 years

For nearly three decades, Bakar has worked seven days a week, diligently sending most of his earnings back home to cover his children’s education and living expenses.

Although his exact salary remains undisclosed, the average cleaner’s monthly pay in Malaysia is around 1,640 ringgit (approximately US$400). In contrast, a family of four in Bangladesh faces monthly expenses of about US$1,200, excluding rent, raising questions about how the family manages.

Bakar shared, “I haven’t returned to Bangladesh since I came here. I miss my family, and they miss me too, but everything I’ve done has been for my children’s better future.” His daily routine is simple: he wakes up, showers, has breakfast, works, calls his family, and rests.

His sacrifices have not gone unnoticed. Bakar’s children have achieved remarkable success, with his daughter now serving as a respected judge and his two sons becoming a doctor and an engineer. “I’m truly grateful for what my children have achieved,” he said proudly.

What keeps him going? 

Recently, Bakar was able to return to Bangladesh for a reunion with his family, a long-awaited moment since he left when his youngest son was just six months old.

His story has captured the hearts of many online, drawing admiration for his dedication. One social media user commented, “What an incredible role model! His unwavering faith and love for his family have kept him going all these years.”

However, his story has also sparked debate. While many celebrate his sacrifices, some critics have pointed out that his children should have brought him home sooner, asserting, “No parent should suffer for their kids’ success.”

Abu Bakar’s journey serves as a powerful reminder of the dignity of labour and the lengths to which parents will go to ensure a brighter future for their children.

Seoul is spending $327 million to stop loneliness epidemic

SOUTH KOREA: Loneliness has reached epidemic proportions in South Korea, especially among middle-aged men. Many of them are dying alone, and it often takes days or weeks before family or friends find their bodies.

In Korean these lonely deaths are called “godoksa” and it appears that loneliness has become such a big problem in the country that the government is spending some 451.3 billion won (about USD$327 million) to combat it, according to a CNN report.

The government aims to spend this money with a five-year plan to “create a city where no one is lonely”.

The new initiatives include a counselling service hotline that will be operational 24/7, as well as in-person visits and consultations.

The mayor of Seoul, Oh Se-hoon, said in a press release, “Loneliness and isolation are not just individual problems, but tasks that society must solve together. The city will mobilize all of our municipal capacity to help lonely people heal and return to society.”

Some of the plans that the city is intending to carry out include expanding psychological services and green spaces; providing nutritional meal plans for middle-aged and elderly residents, providing a dedicated search system to identify isolated residents who need help and conducting activities to encourage people to venture outside and connect with others.

These include activities like gardening, recreational activities, and book clubs.

According to the Ministry for Health and Welfare, the number of lonely deaths had gone up to 3,661 last year from 3,559 in 2022. More than 84% of them were male and more than half were men in their 50s and 60s.

A psychology professor at Myongji University, An Soo-Jung, said that in some cultures, loneliness occurs when people have relationships that are not fulfilling. In Korea, the feeling of loneliness comes when an individual feels unworthy or lacks purpose.

Other factors contributing to loneliness include a rise in single-person households, a decline in social interactions outside of work and family and an “achievement-oriented” culture, which makes people who haven’t achieved their goals feel lonely.

“When we all pursue the same values excessively, we end up losing ourselves. Our society demands highly collective social living but often fails to respect the individual – meaning people struggle to deal with solitude or the feeling or failure,” said An.

Efforts that South Korea has made in the past include the Lonely Death Prevention and Management Act. The government also passed a law allowing reclusive youth to obtain financial support amounting to USD475 a month to help them with living expenses and to re-enter society.

An said that she is not sure if “expanding physical connections will fundamentally solve the problem of loneliness… it’s not something that can be easily changed by a single policy”. The reason is that there are complex, culturally specific factors at play.

“We need to cultivate the ability to care for both ourselves and others. But our life in society is so tough, so it feels like we lack the time to even care for ourselves.”

Musk vs Ambani: Billionaires in a tug of war over India’s satellite internet

INDIA: Billionaires Elon Musk and Mukesh Ambani are both in a battle over India’s satellite internet. Satellite broadband provides internet access anywhere within the satellite’s coverage which makes it a good option for remote areas.

India announced recently that satellite spectrum for broadband would be given administratively rather than through auction. India said that this is in keeping with international norms.

According to a BBC report, satellite internet subscribers in India are expected to reach two million by 2025. Ambani’s Reliance Jio currently dominates the market and they have partnered with Luxembourg-based SES Astra, a leading satellite operator.

Musk’s Starlink, on the other hand, has 6,419 satellites in orbit and four million subscribers in 100 countries. Musk has been trying to launch these services in India since 2021.

Technology analyst at Counterpoint Research, Gareth Owen says that administrative allocation would ensure satellite spectrum is fairly distributed among qualified players, giving Starlink a chance to participate in the race.

However, Ambani says that an auction would result in fair competition, especially since there are no clear legal provisions in India on how satellite broadband services can be offered directly to people.

Musk posted on X that the spectrum “was long designated by the ITU as a shared spectrum for satellites“.

Reuters reported on Oct 14 that Mukesh Ambani was lobbying the government to reconsider its position to which Musk responded on X, stating, “I will call [Mr Ambani] and ask if it would not be too much trouble to allow Starlink to compete to provide internet services to the people of India.”

Owen suggests that the reason Ambani may be resisting the administrative pricing method is because he may want to outbid Musk in an auction to potentially exclude Starlink from the Indian market.

The chairman of Bharti Airtel, Sunil Mittal, is also supporting the auction route.

Mobile data in India is currently the cheapest globally at 12 cents per gigabyte.

Technology analyst Prasanto K. Roy says, “A price war [with Indian operators] is inevitable. Musk has deep pockets. There’s no reason why he cannot offer a year of free services in [some] places to gain a foothold in the domestic market.”.

However, it may not be easy as Starlink costs almost 10 times more than major Indian broadband providers.

Owen says that Musk could have a first-mover advantage, but “satellite markets are notoriously slow to develop.”

”Businesses will never switch completely to satellite unless there is no terrestrial option. Terrestrial networks will always be less expensive than satellite, except in thinly populated regions,” added Owen.