Sunday, May 4, 2025
28.8 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 595

Netizen slammed for wishing that Singapore never gained independence from Britain

0

SINGAPORE: A netizen has been slammed on Reddit for expressing a controversial opinion regarding Singapore’s independence from Britain.

The netizen, whose remarks were posted on Wednesday (Jul 10) on the SingaporeRaw subreddit, suggested that Singapore would have been better off if it had never gained independence from Britain since their values “are so much more superior.”

“How I wish Singapore did not gain independence from the United Kingdom,” he said. “Singapore would have been a much more civilized country by now.”

His statement immediately drew strong reactions from fellow Redditors, who argued vehemently that remaining under British rule would not have led to positive changes and could have been detrimental instead.

One user asked him if he was sure of his opinion, and if he was ready to deal with the same issues the UK is facing.

Another user dismissed the idea of Britain taking back Singapore, writing, “They are currently going through an economic crisis and they cannot perform more violence in the 21st century to resource extraction under the name of civilizing a country.”

The OP argued that the British people are better at preserving wealth than Singaporeans, and pointed to the aristocrats and landed gentry in the UK.

However, one commenter, upon reading these opinions, suggested that those who feel this way should just “leave Singapore” and stop complaining online about such issues.

Singapore severed its ties with the British Empire and briefly joined Malaysia before finally gaining independence in 1965.

Despite its small size and lack of natural resources, Singapore flourished into a major manufacturing and financial center with the help of Lee Kuan Yew. Singapore’s GDP per capita has also skyrocketed since the 1960s, according to World Bank Group data.

Josh Kurlantzick, a senior fellow for Southeast Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), said:

“Some of the biggest sectors domestically — shipbuilding, electronics, banking, and now they’re very involved in private banking — got their start because Lee Kuan Yew and the government specially directed state funds into those areas.”

The late conservative economist Milton Friedman also once hailed Singapore as a prime example of how to do development right.

Beyond its economic success, a 2024 poll by Foreign Policy showed that Singaporeans generally outperform Americans and Britons in healthcare, education, and corruption control.

Their findings show that 93 percent of Singaporeans are satisfied with their healthcare system, which is higher than the 75 percent satisfaction rate in the US and 77 percent in the UK.

Singaporeans also tend to be healthier and live longer than their counterparts in the US and UK. Just two decades ago, life expectancy in all three places was nearly identical. Now, the average lifespan in Singapore is 84 years, surpassing that of Americans at 76 years and Britons at 80 years.

In education, students from Singapore regularly excel in comparison to their American and British counterparts.

For instance, in the year 2022, a significant 41 percent of Singaporean high school students achieved the highest scores in math exams across OECD nations, in contrast to just 7 percent of their American peers and 11 percent of their British counterparts.

Furthermore, Singapore consistently outshines the United States and the United Kingdom in terms of upholding the rule of law and managing corruption, as reported by the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators. In 2017 and 2022, Singapore even ranked the highest (achieving the highest percentile rank of 100.0) out of more than 200 countries and territories, in terms of government effectiveness.

Read also: Singapore: Top business travel destination in Asia Pacific

 

“What am I working for?” – Young Singaporean depressed over “work work work” daily grind

0

SINGAPORE: A 25-year-old Singaporean recently took to social media to express his frustration with the relentless daily grind, revealing that he is “part of the statistics of youths with depression.”

He described his routine: “Wake up at 5am, do menial things, then commute, then work for 8 hours, then commute. Then enjoy my 3 hours of free time in 24 hours, which is half spent on doing necessary things/responsibilities. Maybe an hour to myself, which by then I just want to rest.”

Weekends offer little relief. He explained that two days aren’t enough, with one day often spent resting and the other trying to socialise, which leaves him even more exhausted. “Socialising feels so tiring, I force myself to do it because I need to and it’s good for my mental health, but man. I end up so tired, and don’t have enough time to recuperate by myself,” he said.

“Working feels so bleak. What am I working for? Just to survive?” he questioned. He pointed out that many jobs still offer salaries below S$2,000. He also expressed concerns about the future job market, citing the rise of AI and mass layoffs in various industries.

“Do we really need 8 hours to work? How much of it is actually working? I feel like I only spend 4-5 hours actually being productive,” he pondered. He lamented the stark contrast between school holidays and adult working life, questioning why adults don’t get more time to rest.

He stated, “I feel like a cog in a machine. Work work work with no end or goal in sight.”

Pointing to Singapore’s work culture, he noted, “We aren’t a nation that rests. We aren’t a happy nation. A safe, but unhappy and tired nation.”

Will anything change for this country? I feel not. Feels hopeless,” he added.

The young man’s post struck a chord with many netizens, who shared their own struggles and advice.

One person suggested working in a job he likes or aiming for early retirement by saving diligently. Another noted the benefits of working flexible jobs like Grab or food delivery, where there’s no boss to report to.

One commenter shared that after leaving Singapore, he felt much happier. “People act like life in Singapore is amazing and that everywhere else is worse but it’s not true. Why not try making plans to leave and see if life can be better elsewhere,” he suggested. He shared that he was a heavy alcoholic at 25 due to similar feelings of despair but found happiness after moving abroad.

The 25-year-old Singaporean who posted mentioned he tried living in Brunei before, finding the slower pace appealing but missing the comfort of family and friends. “Not having family and friends around was far worse since even going home had nothing going for me,” he admitted. Despite his frustrations, he acknowledged feeling slightly better, appreciating having a job, although he wished for broader changes in Singapore.

A mental health professional chimed in, criticising Singapore’s systemic issues and arguing that employees are undervalued and overworked. “Unless you’re a civil servant, most people simply do not feel safe in their workplace,” he commented. He argued that “Singapore is just not a humanistic society, I won’t expect to find deeper meaning and purpose here, other than just work, eat and shop till you drop.”

Another commenter provided a more philosophical perspective, comparing human life to that of ants and trees, suggesting that life’s meaning is what we make of it. “Life ain’t easy. So why make it harder slogging through the details? Have fun while you’re at it. Find the things that pique your interest. In the end, we spend a few decades on earth,” he added. /TISG

Read also: Senior citizens lament about lack of job opportunities in Singapore; they complain that companies look at age, not skills

Featured image by Depositphotos

Tanjong Pagar resident calls people sleeping in void decks an “eyesore”

SINGAPORE: A resident of Tanjong Pagar has taken to crowdsourcing for solutions on social media after finding it problematic that people were sleeping at the void decks in his estate.

In a post on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page on Wednesday (July 10), Facebook user Rin Lexign asked “if anyone has ways to stop people from sleeping for long periods at void deck at Blk 32 Margaret Drive.”

The Facebook user added that the people who sleep at the void deck at the HDB block also drink beer and often leave beer cans and bottles in the area.

They claim that the Tanjong Pager Town Council and the police have been informed but that they cannot keep on calling the police regarding the matter.

“It is an eye sore & not safe for residents where there are drunken men around. As there is also no CCTV at the corner, many people are always hiding at this void deck area drinking beer and smoking,” Rin Lexign added.

The Facebook user also posted photos of two men sleeping on the benches, as well as a picture of some bottles and cans.

Commenters on the post wrote that one solution could be to remove the benches and to redesign the void deck. However, one netizen wrote that when benches were removed from the void deck where they live, beer-drinkers took to taking discarded chairs or beer crates “and had the audacity to chain them to bicycle racks for their use,” which cleaners then removed,

“Most of us don’t mind if it’s workers from nearby work areas resting, sleeping at the void deck during their breaks. At least they don’t dirty the place or make us feel unsafe,” the netizen added, showing that there is not just one type of person who sleeps on benches at void decks.

Some of the people who do so may actually be homeless. While Singapore has a high rate of homeownership due to government policies of providing affordable housing, there are still some people who end up on the streets.

Some commenters sought compassion for potentially homeless individuals, instead of calling them “eyesores.”

CNA reported last year that according to a nationwide street count from 2022, there were 530 rough sleepers. In 2021, the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy conducted a study that found that there were 420 homeless in shelters.

“Despite growing public attention in recent years, the size of the homeless population in  Singapore has always been unknown. Measuring homelessness in a systematic and transparent way enables us to provide guidance for policy and service planning,” said LKYSPP’s Dr Ng Kok Hoe in 2019. /TISG

Read also: Amid reports that SG will have even more millionaires in 2025, NUS group underlines the homelessness problem

Woman regrets not allowing foreign worker to use her bathroom

0

SINGAPORE: A woman took to social media to share her regret over not allowing a foreign worker to use her bathroom, expressing that she wished she had been more accommodating.

In a post on r/SingaporeRaw on Wednesday (Jul 10), she mentioned that she was working from home when a foreign worker conducting NEA mosquito checks in the lift lobby knocked on her door.

“He was very urgent and asked if he could use my house toilet to pee,” she recalled.

Since her first instinct was to not let a stranger into her house, she refused and went back to work without much thought.

However, after her work ended, she felt guilty about her decision. Reflecting on the interaction, she couldn’t shake the feeling that she had missed an opportunity to help someone in need.

“I thought back about it… I feel bad….” she said. “Has this happened to anyone before?”

“HDB homes are not public toilets.”

In the comments section, opinions were divided. One netizen empathized with the foreign worker’s urgency, suggesting that the woman should have assisted him, especially since he had just helped with mosquito checks.

Another netizen said, “You’re fine.. As long as you’re ok being treated the way you treated others, especially in emergencies..”

However, others disagreed, and stated that she was right in exercising caution because she is a woman and it might not be wise to let an unfamiliar man inside.

One netizen advised, “If you’re a lady it’s best you don’t let him in. But if you are a man and don’t allow him in, that’s a bit stupid because it probably took him lots of guts to knock on the door and ask.”

Another commented, “HDB homes are not public toilets.”

A third netizen said, “…if you don’t feel comfy, don’t. If you feel bad, you can try next time.”

Read also: “Look at the crazy hut and the blockage of the stairwell” — Singaporeans left perplexed after seeing “sauna” at HDB

Featured image by Depositphotos

Rumours that Ong Ye Kung may be fielded at Aljunied GRC arise as he returns to his former ground for National Day Dinner

SINGAPORE: Health Minister Ong Ye Kung’s return to Workers’ Party-held (WP) Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC) for a National Day Dinner has sparked questions about whether he is simply supporting the People’s Action Party (PAP) branch chairmen there or whether he will be re-fielded in the ward to wrest the opposition stronghold back to the ruling party.

Mr Ong, a former civil servant who had served as Principal Private Secretary to Lee Hsien Loong as well as NTUC Assistant Secretary-General, made his political debut as part of the PAP’s 5-man team for Aljunied GRC in the 2011 General Election. In a watershed victory, the WP won the ward, marking the first time in Singapore’s history when the PAP lost a GRC in an election.

Following the 2011 election, Mr Ong continued to work at the labour movement before moving on to Keppel Corporation. He returned as a PAP candidate in the 2015 election but was fielded as a candidate contesting in Sembawang GRC, which was widely considered “safer” for him.

The PAP team won with 72% of the vote and Mr Ong was elected to Parliament, under the leadership of anchor minister Khaw Boon Wan. He was again fielded in Sembawang GRC in the 2020 general election.

Now, more than a decade since he contested the ward, Mr Ong is returning to Aljunied GRC for a National Day Dinner scheduled to take place on 27 July.

The event is being hosted by one of the PAP’s unelected branch chairpersons in Aljunied GRC and supported by the People’s Association, alongside grassroots organisations in the constituency. Tickets are priced at $36 per seat.

Some Singaporeans responding to the event asked why Mr Ong is headlining a National Day Dinner in the ward and asked whether he will be fielded as the anchor minister at Aljunied GRC in the looming election.

Others, however, forecast that he is making the appearance to bolster support for the PAP team in the ward and that fielding a high-profile fourth-generation leader like Mr Ong is an opposition stronghold could likely be a “suicide mission”.

Several reasons underpin the skepticism surrounding Mr Ong’s potential candidacy in Aljunied GRC. The WP has solidified its presence in the area since its landmark victory in 2011, making it a formidable opponent. Mr Ong’s established political career in Sembawang GRC also makes it a less risky and more advantageous position for him to maintain.

Historically, the PAP’s strategy has typically involved deploying prominent figures to constituencies where their success is more assured, thereby consolidating their influence and leadership within the government. The political capital required to mount a successful challenge in Aljunied GRC could be significant, and the stakes for a high-profile loss are considerable.

As the National Day Dinner approaches, the question of whether Mr Ong’s appearance in Aljunied GRC signals a broader strategy for the upcoming elections or merely represents support for local PAP efforts remains a topic of keen interest.

TISG/

“It can be a thankless job” — Fathers in Singapore expose the realities of being stay-at-home dads

0

SINGAPORE: Singaporean fathers have recently taken to an online forum to expose the realities of being stay-at-home dads, sharing the often-overlooked struggles, sacrifices, and societal stigma they endure.

The discussion started after one Reddit user asked: “Stay-at-home dads/husbands of Singapore, what made you decide to stay at home?

For example, did you plan for it right from the beginning of your relationship, or did you see that your wife was earning more than you and hence decide it was the best arrangement?”

This question sparked a flood of responses from stay-at-home dads or those who knew them, who felt compelled to share their stories.

Many explained that they chose to stay home and become the primary caregiver because their wives earned significantly more than them.

However, they quickly found out that this path, though rewarding, wasn’t without its challenges. Some even dubbed this as “an endless and thankless job.”

Still, there were a few who said their choice wasn’t driven by financial reasons. One user shared that he decided to become a stay-at-home dad because he grew up not knowing his own father, who was always busy working two jobs.

He said he rarely saw him as a child and couldn’t relate to him when he finally retired to spend more time with the family. “I didn’t want to repeat that. I wanted to know my children and for them to know me,” he said.

Another user shared that her father retired in his mid-50s because he wanted to spend more time with her, as his job involved a lot of travel. Her mum, who earned well, was supportive of this choice.

She said that her father did everything—cooking, cleaning, and even taking her to doctors’ appointments since she had endometriosis at a young age.

Despite being from a different generation, he embraced being a modern dad and never regretted his decision to stay home. He valued the time spent with her and helped care for his mother and mother-in-law as they aged.

“I was an only child and a miracle child so his priorities shifted after I was born,” she continued.

“Staying at home definitely isn’t for everyone but I know it must have been hard for him in the 2000s to do so since it wasn’t considered manly at the time.”

Reflecting on her experience growing up with a stay-at-home dad, she wrote, “As the child of a stay at home dad, I loved it. I know financially we were lucky enough for him to do so, so for that I am grateful.”

A third user shared that he chose to stay home mainly due to health reasons.

He wrote, “My wife makes a decent wage compared to what I did, we don’t have too many expenses, and it’s been better for my health.

It was actually her idea, I do the cooking, cleaning, and running errands, she has more time to focus on a career that’s working out well for her.”

Moreover, some revealed that even though times are changing and traditional gender roles are becoming less strict, fathers in Singapore still deal with the stigma of stay-at-home dads.

One user shared that his friend decided to be the primary caregiver at home because his wife earned more than double his salary.

He continued, “They have two young kids and weren’t keen on a helper staying with them.

They faced some challenges in the early years, especially from his in-laws as they felt he was mooching off their daughter, but it worked out pretty well in the end.”

Read also: “If I could, I would throw you out of my house because you are an embarrassment,” father berates daughter for poor A-level results

Psychologist suggests limiting screen time may not curb social media addiction for younger kids

SINGAPORE: Responding to the Government’s recent announcement that it will implement measures to deal with device usage, especially given the negative effects of screen time for youngsters, a medical doctor has suggested that limiting usage time may not entirely alleviate the issue.

In a forum letter published by The Straits Times, Dr Amy Lim emphasized that while reducing screen time could alleviate some negative effects on younger children’s brain functioning, it may not adequately address the root causes of social media addiction in adolescents.

Dr Lim explained that humans are inherently drawn to social information due to evolutionary traits that prioritize social living and dynamics. Social media platforms exploit this by providing an endless stream of social content, which keeps users, especially adolescents, engaged and often addicted.

She pointed out that this overconsumption of distant social information can lead to unhealthy social comparisons and unrealistic standards. In contrast, social information from immediate family and friends has more significant behavioural, cognitive, and emotional impacts.

Advocating for a more nuanced approach to managing social media addiction, Dr Lim suggested that social media settings should prioritize content from users’ closer social circles. By aligning social media use with human psychology, the negative impacts could be mitigated without losing the potential benefits of these platforms.

“Having settings that prioritize social information from family and friends in closer degrees of connection is one way to regulate the intake of social information by our psychology,” she advised.

While acknowledging the good intentions behind screen time limitations, Dr Lim highlighted that these measures might inadvertently prevent users from reaping the positive aspects of social media. She called for interventions that help users filter and prioritize their consumed content, ensuring that social media remains a source of positive community, connection, and relevant information.

Read her letter in full HERE.

TISG/

Singapore stocks opened with steady gains on Thursday—STI rose by 0.6%

0

SINGAPORE: Singapore stocks opened with steady gains on Thursday, July 11, mirroring the strong gains seen in global markets overnight.

The Straits Times Index (STI) rose by 18.97 points, or 0.6%, reaching 3,337.15 by 9:01 am, The Business Times reports.

The broader market also showed a positive trend, with 74 gainers outnumbering 24 losers, after 49.3 million securities worth S$63.2 million were traded in the early hours.

Among the most actively traded stock by volume was Yoma Strategic Holdings. Its shares climbed by S$0.002 or 1.9% to S$0.105, with 9.3 million securities changing hands.

Insurtech firm V2Y Holdings also attracted significant attention. After requesting a trading halt on Monday, the company resumed trading in large volumes following the announcement of its proposed S$2 million placement. V2Y shares jumped by S$0.003 or 20% to S$0.018, reflecting strong investor confidence in the company’s future prospects.

LifeBrandz, a food and beverage group, saw brisk trading activity as well. Despite the high volume of transactions, its share price remained flat at S$0.003.

The local banking sector also opened higher. DBS Group Holdings advanced by S$0.30 or 0.8% to S$38.45. United Overseas Bank (UOB) increased by S$0.12 or 0.4% to S$33.22, and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation (OCBC) climbed by S$0.08 or 0.5% to S$15.31.

On Wednesday, Wall Street saw major indices reach fresh records amid growing expectations for upcoming interest rate cuts. The S&P 500 increased by 1% to 5,633.91, marking its sixth consecutive record high. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index climbed by 1.2%, ending at its seventh straight record at 18,647.45. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also rose 1.1% higher to close at 39,721.36.

European markets followed suit, with broad-based gains observed across the continent as investors closely monitored comments from US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell during his second day of testimony. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index rose by 0.9% to 516.42, buoyed by strong performances in the real estate sector. /TISG

Read also: Singapore stocks continued their upward trend on Wednesday—STI gained 0.3%

Featured image by Depositphotos

COE prices expected to climb as demand for Chinese electric vehicles rises

SINGAPORE: Market analysts are forecasting a short to medium-term increase in the price of a successful Certificate of Entitlement (COE) as demand for electric vehicles (EV) in Singapore rises, particularly driven by Chinese manufacturers.

Industry experts told CNA that they have noted a significant uptick in the adoption of electric vehicles within Singapore, with Chinese brands leading the charge. Data reveals that BYD, a prominent Chinese EV maker, represented over 40% of all new electric vehicle registrations in the first half of this year.

The market is expected to become even more competitive with the anticipated entry of other Chinese EV brands such as Xpeng and Zeekr.

An electric vehicle business information company highlighted that the influx of new brands into Singapore’s EV market is likely to intensify competition for COEs, thereby driving up prices.

The rising interest in EVs is not solely due to local consumer preferences but also a strategic pivot by Chinese automakers. Faced with tariffs imposed by the European Union and the United States, these manufacturers are increasingly targeting more welcoming markets like Singapore.

Vantage Automotive, the authorized distributor for BYD in Singapore, reported robust sales figures, selling approximately 1,400 electric vehicles last year and surpassing 2,000 units sold so far this year. This surge indicates the growing acceptance and popularity of electric vehicles among Singaporean drivers.

Conversely, non-Chinese EV brands are struggling to gain traction in the local market. Komoco Motors, the Singapore agent for South Korea’s Hyundai, attributed its stagnant electric car sales to rising inflation, a limited COE quota, and the competitive pricing of Chinese-made EVs.

As more Chinese electric vehicles populate Singapore’s roads, the demand for COEs is expected to soar, inevitably leading to higher prices.

TISG/

Fresh grad urged against accepting job that was rescinded then re-offered with 20% paycut

SINGAPORE: A foreign worker seeking to work in Singapore has been advised to decline a job that was offered to him before being rescinded and re-offered with a sizeable pay cut.

The worker, a 23-year-old fresh graduate, took to Reddit and revealed that he was offered a position in Singapore with a salary of S$3,000 per month before withdrawing the offer under the pretext that they could not “manage to apply” for an Employment Pass for him.

A few days later, however, the company re-offered the same position to him with a slashed salary of S$2,400 a month, explaining that they will apply for an S Pass instead.

The young man shared that most likely will reject the offer because the pay may not be enough for him to cope with rental fees and the high cost of living in Singapore. He, however, sought advice from Singaporeans before officially declining the role because he is “pretty desperate to get a job.”

Most commenters urged the young man to listen to his gut and decline the job.

One comment, with over 100 upvotes, advised: “Don’t take it. Think about the impact that taking a 20% haircut will have down the line when you negotiate a pay raise or for another job.”

Another top comment echoed, “Don’t lowball yourself bro. They are testing you to see how low you will bend for them.”

Others, however, pointed out that the company could be offering a lower salary because they would have to fork out close to $600 monthly for the S Pass levy if they hire him.

One commenter, kwpang, said: “The company’s budget didn’t change. A portion of it just went to your SPass monthly levy. They’re not lowballing you. You don’t have to force yourself to accept it either. Just explain to them nicely that the drop in money is too much, and you won’t be accepting. It’s not really anyone’s fault.”

Others advised that the young man should make a decision based on how scarce he thinks job opportunities are.

One commenter said, “How confident are you in finding a higher pay role? If you are confident, reject the offer and continue finding or nego your way out. If you are not confident and lack of money, I say go for it. Take the job, gain experience and try next time once a better opportunity arise.”

The young man expressed confidence in being able to land another job with the pay package he is seeking and revealed that he has another freelance role and is not in such a rush to find another job as soon as possible.

TISG/