Monday, May 5, 2025
26.7 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 590

BLACKPINK Lisa accused of plagiarising her first solo music video, ROCKSTAR, from Travis Scott’s “FE!N” music video

0

Lisa from BLACKPINK released her debut single, “ROCKSTAR,” last month. This was her first release after starting her own label, Loud Company. The single has generated significant excitement, heralding her debut as a global pop artist.

In “ROCKSTAR,” Lisa presents a daring new image. The music video, filmed in her hometown of Thailand, rapidly exceeded 100 million views, underscoring her global impact.

Lisa’s decision to compensate local night market vendors for filming further amplified the buzz.

The Thai Tourism Authority announced plans to create a walking tour in Bangkok’s Yaowarat area, where the video was shot, in response to the video’s popularity.

Photo: Instagram/Lisa

Accused of plagiarism

However, accusations of plagiarism in the “ROCKSTAR” music video dogged Lisa’s solo endeavour.

Gabriel Moses, the video director and producer, compared a sequence in Lisa’s video and a clip from Travis Scott’s “FE!N” music video on social media.

“They (Lisa’s team) contacted my editor for this scene,” he asserted. “‘No’, my editor replied, but they still went ahead and produced it.”

Because “FE!N,” released in July last year, and “ROCKSTAR,” released this June, have parallels, Gabriel Moses has sought an official statement from Lisa’s team by the end of this month.

Thai media, which had enthusiastically welcomed Lisa’s new single, also reported on the plagiarism allegations.

Khosod, a Thai media has reported that ‘ROCKSTAR’ by Lisa has been accused of copying the music video for Travis Scott’s ‘FE!N’. ‘FE!N’ was directed by Gabriel Moses. Based on the two videos, there seems to be a copy.

Awaiting response

With the original director seeking a response to the accusations of plagiarism, all eyes are on Lisa’s team to see if they will issue an official statement.

Lisa, whose full name is Lalisa Manoban, is a multifaceted performer known for her dancing, rapping, and singing talents as a member of the globally acclaimed K-Pop group BLACKPINK.

As the group’s youngest member, she is celebrated for her outstanding dancing skills as the main dancer.

Pritam Singh skips Team Eunos durian trip for the first time in 11 years to attend climate resilience conference

SINGAPORE: When the Workers’ Party Eunos Team went on its annual durian trip this year, there was one notable absence, Pritam Singh, who has been representing Eunos in Parliament for over a decade.

For the first time in 11 years, Mr Singh skipped the trip, but for a good reason, as he attended a conference on climate resilience about the role of legislators in Southeast Asia in Kuala Lumpur.

 

The WP Secretary-General and Leader of the Opposition shared photos from the conference in posts on Facebook and Instagram on Saturday (July 13), writing that he had been pleased to meet old friends at the Malaysian Parliament, which hosted the conference.

However, he added that it was also a pleasure to meet Pita Limjaroenrat of Thailand’s Move Forward Party. The parliamentarian who studied in New Zealand and the United States has been outspoken about environmental issues.

“Global warming is a major issue because it poses a danger to the stability of the modern world. It is the government’s ultimate enemy rather than just a national security issue,” Mr Limjaroenrat said early in 2023.

FB screengrab/Pritam Singh

“I shared with Pita that he had many supporters in Singapore and wished him well. But more than the parliamentarians, it was some of civil society contributions at the conference that stood out,” wrote Mr Singh.

“For example, the impact of climate change on the poorer and less well-off segments of society like indigenous peoples and vulnerable people – labourers, outdoor workers, fishermen, etc. was constantly highlighted and acutely focused upon.”

Read related: Workers’ Party reiterates concern over climate change and seeks to engage in dialogue with citizens

He added that there had been many perspectives that he had found useful and would bring back to the WP Policy Team as they review proposals on climate change for the manifesto for the upcoming General Election.

While the date for the GE has yet to be announced, it must be held by Nov 23, 2025, and there has been some speculation that it could be called for in as early as four months.

Mr Singh also wrote that the WP has some ideas already but would welcome more and encouraged members of the public to reach out. He ended his post by expressing that the Eunos team had not been far from his thoughts.

“Back to durians, I was in Malaysia, so I did partake too. But I did miss the company of the Eunos residents who were in Yong Peng, Johor more. Next time!” /TISG

Read also: 5 WP MPs attend SG Climate Rally at Hong Lim Park

Singapore stocks started the week on a positive note—STI rose by 0.2%

0

SINGAPORE: Singapore stocks started the week on a positive note on Monday, July 15, reflecting global trends from the previous week.

The Straits Times Index (STI) rose by 6.04 points or 0.2% to reach 3,503.82 by 9:01 am, as reported by The Business Times. Market activity showed 86 gainers compared to 48 losers after 58 million securities valued at S$55.7 million were traded.

Pacific Radiance, a shipbuilding and repair company, was the most actively traded stock in the morning session. Its shares surged by 6.5% or S$0.002 to S$0.033, with 3.6 million securities traded.

Similarly, HGH Holdings, a concrete manufacturing company, saw robust trading as its stock price climbed 14.3% or S$0.002 to S$0.016 early in the trading day.

Media entertainment company mm2 Asia also enjoyed a notable gain of 6.3% or S$0.001 to S$0.017 amid heavy trading volumes.

Singapore’s banking sector also showed positive momentum on Monday’s open. DBS Group Holdings rose by 0.3% or S$0.10 to S$38.03, while OCBC and UOB saw increases of 0.5% to S$15.36 and 0.2% to S$33.13, respectively.

Last Friday, Wall Street ended higher amid expectations that the US Federal Reserve may reduce interest rates in September.

The S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed by 0.6% on Friday, closing at 5,615.35, 18,398.44, and 40,000.9, respectively.

In Europe, stocks also advanced on Friday due to robust earnings reports and optimism among global investors regarding the potential rate cut by the Fed. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index closed nearly 0.9% higher at 524.08. /TISG

Read also: Singapore stocks open higher on Friday morning following latest GDP data—STI rose by 0.5%

Featured image by Depositphotos

Fresh grad in toxic workplace asks if she should sign a contract to pay 1-month salary to her recruiter if she quits within first 3 months

SINGAPORE: A fresh grad took to social media to share that a recruiter has been pressuring her to sign a contract that would penalize her with one month’s salary if she left her job within the first three months.

In her post on r/askSingapore, she mentioned that she had already signed the employment contract and was in her first week at her new job when the recruiter unexpectedly presented her with this “additional contract.”

“The reason why I find this to be an issue is because in the first week that I was working, I’ve already noticed that management/higher ups tend to be quite condescending towards my supervisor/people in my department and openly berating them,” she explained.

“I’ve overheard them saying things like ‘how come you don’t know?’ and ‘I don’t know how I am going to teach you all how to do this, you guys learn on your own’.”

To add to her stress, she discovered that almost everyone in her department communicated in Mandarin, leaving her struggling with the language barrier.

While she was willing to learn the language, she feared she might end up “becoming a punching bag” for her coworkers and bosses if she didn’t learn it fast enough.

“I’m not very used to speaking mandarin in general so there’s already quite a few terms that I’m not familiar with and I already feel like I am being ostracized by my colleagues,” she explained further.

“My friend suggested for me to just ignore the recruiter and not sign the contract since I’ve already secured the employment; however I’m not too sure if I would be allowed to do that,” she added.

“I would appreciate it if anyone can give any input on this situation or if they have any similar experiences,” she asked for advice.

“Don’t sign anything with the recruiter, it’s not how it works.”

In the comments section, the Redditors thought it was fishy for the recruitment agency to ask her to sign such a contract.

One individual mentioned that the only recruiters who do this are the shady types that place foreign employees and take a portion of their pay.

He added, “They receive commission from the employer, not the employee… It’s really nasty of them to try and scam a fresh grad.”

Another explained, “The recruitment company is paid after 3 months, if you leave before that, the recruiter has to send in a replacement. It is not necessary to sign the contract with the recruiter.”

A third individual commented, “Don’t sign anything with the recruiter. It’s not how it works. As for the work culture, it sounds pretty toxic SMEish. the words are all too familiar.”

Should job seekers have to pay for recruitment services?

According to recruitment agencies, Reedglobal and CGP Singapore, job seekers do not have to pay recruiters anything.

Typically, it’s the employer who covers the cost of recruitment services. They pay the agency to hunt down and secure the right candidate, and this fee is paid once the candidate has been hired and starts working.

If a recruiter tries to get you to pay upfront or pushes you to sign an “additional contract” that says you have to cough up a month’s salary if you quit within three months, it’s a red flag.

That’s not how things usually go in the industry, so it’s smart to question why they’re asking for that before you agree to anything.

Moreover, numerous Singaporean job seekers have shared on online forums that they have encountered this “penalty clause” many times before. Apparently, some recruitment agencies do insert this clause from time to time.

However, these job seekers said they did not agree to such demands and had the clause deleted before signing the contract.

One Singaporean shared, “I just told the agent I don’t agree to these terms, since anyways I also accepted the offer from the employer liao.

Agent says ok she can waive. Like the others said, if you find something you do not agree with, bring it up to them. If you can strike off, strike off. Else, can negotiate.”

Another Singaporean offered advice to those who come across such a clause, saying:

“Just delete that clause and refuse to sign the contract if the clause is not deleted on grounds that the clause is not a market norm. Ask the recruitment agency whether they had inserted the clause with your employer’s knowledge and consent.”

Read also: “I’m starting to draw the line now” – Man grows tired of financially supporting his single parent

Featured image by Depositphotos

“No bonus for me despite working for SME for two years, but my boss got another new car!” — Employee feels unappreciated 

SINGAPORE: Despite dedicating two years to working in his current company, one Singaporean worker claims he has not received any bonus payout.

Taking to r/askSingapore, he shared that he has done countless projects for an SME in the personal care industry’s Research and Development (R&D) sector and that the products he developed are now even out in the market.

“I’m not earning any commission from my products at all which question my abilities in the company. They mentioned that if the retail team hits a target we can get a bonus and to reward the staff. But guess what, no news, nothing.”

Things got even more frustrating for him when his boss showed off a new car.

Feeling unappreciated, he’s now questioning where he stands and his future with the company.

“It makes me question my role in the company. What should I do? The thing is, I enjoy doing what I’m doing now because it’s something that I’m insanely passionate about!

But the downside is the market for my field is niche and not in demand in sg. What should I do?”

“Start updating your resume and send those CVs out.”

In the comments section, one user shared why many experienced Singaporeans avoid working for SMEs. He explained that these companies often have a bad reputation for dishonesty, especially regarding money. Bosses at SMEs frequently tell their employees that the company isn’t making enough money to “avoid handing out bonuses.”

He added, “Few months later, they moved into a new condo and bought new cars.”

Another user commented, “Very common stories from my friend who worked in SMEs. Companies tell employees little or no bonus because the company is not doing well. Meanwhile the bosses or the owners can change cars every year.”

A third user said, “Strong stink… The boss definitely wanna keep you down financially and make you think you should be grateful to the boss for having a job. But well, since you’ve gone without bonus for 2 years, I’m sure the boss thinks this can continue forever.”

Meanwhile, several users also encouraged him to start looking for a new job.

One user advised him, “Start updating your resume and send those CVs out. The Job market is tight, so start early.”

He also suggested that the Singaporean worker do his research and avoid SMEs as much as possible since they will undoubtedly make “grand promises” during interviews but later introduce conditions that make it difficult to receive bonuses. He also said that his current boss likely won’t be concerned if he leaves, as they can easily find another unsuspecting candidate to replace him, continuing the cycle.

Read also: Intern claims SME asked them to work despite being on MC

Young Singaporean allegedly surveyed on satisfaction level with Govt and how it handles US-China relations

SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user wrote that they were surprised to have recently been visited by a person conducting a survey on behalf of the government on young adults in their twenties.

The questions involved respondents’ satisfaction with the government’s actions on certain social issues.

The Redditor wrote in a July 9 post on r/askSingapore that they were surprised with the survey-taker, as they thought surveys from the government usually came from companies such as market research and public opinion firm IPSOS.

The woman who showed up at their door was from a company called Ascentiq, an independent full-service research firm based in Singapore instead.

Since the woman had a pleasant manner and was not looking to sell financial products, the post author decided to help her hit her KPI, adding that there was no financial incentive to participate in the survey.

They added that they were asked to indicate, on a scale of one to 10, their level of satisfaction with the following:

Cost of Living, Inflation, Cost of Public Transportation, Transportation Connectivity, Healthcare Services, Healthcare Subsidies, Confidence in the Govt, Foreign policies, Immigration, Faith in SPF, Faith in our judicial system, Independence of Media in Singapore, Neighbourhood Amenities, and other issues.

However, what was more surprising were questions regarding Singapore’s relations with China and the United States, such as how much the post author likes China and America and how well they believe the government has managed relations with the two economic superpowers.

“Was anyone surveyed too? I’m actually a bit WOWed because I never thought I probably would be part of the statistic on the upcoming result when the Straits Times reports, ‘Most of young adults satisfied/not satisfied with the Govt: Survey’,” they added.

One commenter on the post wrote that they have a neighbour who works as a surveyor for IPSOS, but in the post author’s case, surmised that maybe the government had outsourced the survey to another agency or that the survey taker could also be representing another organization to research on the overall satisfaction of Singaporeans towards the government.

Another Reddit user who said their mother conducts surveys as a part-time job wrote, “they do ask straight-shooter questions once in a while.”

A commenter who had recently been surveyed said the survey-taker had been from the research organization RySense, and they received a S$10 voucher from NTUC afterwards. However, the survey was not about China.

Another had been surveyed two days in a row regarding the government’s role in family counselling and their perception of the police force.

The Independent Singapore has reached out to Ascentiq for further comment. /TISG

Read also: S’poreans least satisfied with cost of living: Blackbox survey on government satisfaction

“Am I underpaid?” — Uni grad with honours degree from overseas university asks as his uncle pays him only $2.6K/month

SINGAPORE: A man who graduated with an honours degree from an overseas university opened up on an online forum about his current job situation.

He revealed that despite his academic achievements, he earns a modest S$2,600 monthly working for his uncle.

Providing context to his role, he explained that he helps with customer service and project management. He also does some admin work from home—working seven hours a day, five days a week.

He then asked others in the forum, “Is this underpaid? My uncle says I’m learning the ropes quickly, and I’ve taken on a lot more responsibilities since I joined 6 months ago.

I’m wondering if I should ask for a raise, and if so, what would be a fair pay?”

In the comments section, many agreed that he was being underpaid and taken advantage of by his uncle.

They argued that he deserved a salary of at least S$3,500, especially considering today’s median salary for fresh graduates is around S$4,000.

One user noted that S$2,600 was what fresh graduates made 18 years ago, which made him curious about the young man’s career ambitions at his uncle’s company.

He wondered if the young man saw himself moving up in the company, maybe even taking charge someday, and what kind of salary he might expect then.

He added, “Most of the time, working with family is great as you can be quite relaxed while you learn the ropes.

If you’re going to hang on for another year or so, you can note this experience down in your resume and use it to your advantage. Good luck.”

Another user explained that working in a family business is always tricky because you can either end up being underpaid or overpaid.

He then said, “This is typical of family run biz… If the business is like one of those multi million worth kind, and you have the future prospect of taking it over, then up to you to see if you wanna risk it out for another 20 years before they hand it over to you.

But if your intent is to jump back into the workforce, better leave asap.”

On the flip side, others disagreed and argued that the man isn’t underpaid because he has an admin job and works from home five days a week.

They pointed out that administrative roles are often considered among the lowest in a company’s hierarchy and sometimes don’t require a university degree.

A few even suggested he might be overpaid, especially considering he works “shorter than normal hours.”

One user added, “Your job scope is just simple admin work and it’s a family business. You’re probably being paid at the top of the pay scale already.

Unless you can become a director or something it’s best to move on because you’re not learning much from just doing general admin work.”

Another commented, “6 months already, asking for a raise doesn’t feel right. Maybe you want a salary correction instead but that should have been done in salary negotiations, not post commencement.

Customer Service and Admin are pretty generic responsibilities that you don’t need a degree for.”

Read also: Majority of netizens optimistic about their future in Singapore but some make back up plans to move abroad

NUS team develops new therapy to treat late-stage cancer in pets, with potential for use in humans

SINGAPORE: National University of Singapore (NUS) researchers from the Department of Biochemistry and NUS Centre for Cancer Research (N2CR) at the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine have pioneered a groundbreaking treatment using stem cell precision engineering technology.

This novel approach aims to deliver drugs directly to tumour sites in dogs and cats suffering from late-stage cancer, providing new hope for pets with no other treatment options available and showing potential for use in human patients.

Under the leadership of Associate Professor Too Heng-Phon, the research team modified mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to target cancerous tumours.

These engineered cells are equipped with a potent ‘kill-switch’—cytosine deaminase—that produces a high, localized concentration of the cancer-killing drug 5-fluorouracil within the tumour environment.

The ‘kill-switch’ also activates anti-cancer immunity by triggering the cancer’s innate cGAS-STING and related pathways, stimulating the immune response and suppressing tumour growth.

To date, this innovative treatment has been administered to nearly 100 dogs and cats with various conditions, including perianal adenoma, lung metastasis, and sarcoma.

Most of these animal patients have shown positive responses, ranging from full recovery and cancer remission to an improved quality of life.

Remarkably, no significant side effects have been observed, likely due to the localized action of the therapeutic cells within the tumour environment.

For example, one dog with a tumour around its eye did not lose its sight, demonstrating the precision of the treatment in sparing surrounding healthy tissues.

Further observations revealed that some dogs with recurrent cancers experienced no relapse or side effects, underscoring the effectiveness of the engineered therapeutic cells in combating cancer while minimizing adverse effects.

Unlike traditional chemotherapy, which often causes harmful side effects and is limited by dosage constraints, the MSCs deliver high treatment concentrations directly to the affected areas, reducing toxicity in the rest of the body.

However, the team found that remnants of tumours remained after a few rounds of treatment in some late-stage cancer cases.

To address this, they enhanced the treatment by utilizing the MSCs’ payload to amplify the cGAS-STING and related pathways, which are critical for delivering chemotherapy drugs like 5-fluorouracil in activating anti-cancer immunity.

They also incorporated the expression of interferon beta—a cytokine known to recruit and facilitate T-cell activation for anti-cancer immunity.

Proper regulation of interferon beta is crucial, as excessive amounts in the bloodstream can cause side effects, but the correct dosage can effectively target cancer cells.

NUS Medicine

Associate Professor Too said, “We are making the treatment more efficient by modifying cells that are like ‘hunter killers’ where they home in on the tumours and destroy only these tumours and not other healthy parts of the body.

This explains why there are no side effects. Drugs in chemotherapy usually lead to some level of side effects.

Our treatment taps on the body’s own biological system, which treats the tumour with no significant toxicity—this surpasses what drugs in chemotherapy can do.”

In January 2024, Associate Professor Too and senior research fellows Dr Sarah Ho and Dr Woo Jun Yung from the Department of Biochemistry and N2CR at NUS Medicine established AGeM Bio Pte Ltd.

The company aims to validate the manufacturing processes of the enhanced treatment to prepare it for human use, with an estimated completion date by the third quarter of 2025.

The team plans to commence the first phase of human clinical trials by the end of 2025, collaborating with clinicians from the National University Hospital (NUH) to deliver intratumoral injections of the engineered MSCs to a small group of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, a severe form of brain tumour.

Subsequent trials will involve larger groups of patients to further assess the treatment’s efficacy and refine the approach.

/TISG

Lawrence Wong expresses shock at alleged attempted assassination of Trump

SINGAPORE: Singapore Premier Lawrence Wong has publicly condemned the alleged assassination attempt involving former US President Donald Trump, labelling it as a deplorable act of violence.

In a statement released on social media this afternoon (14 July), Mr Wong asserted that violence is never a solution, no matter what differences there may be. He wrote:

“I was shocked to hear about the assassination attempt on Mr Donald Trump. I am relieved to hear reports that he is safe and recovering well.

Our thoughts are also with the family of the deceased and those injured and impacted by the senseless attack. We should never resort to violence regardless of any differences of views.”

The incident occurred during a campaign rally near Butler, Pennsylvania. Mr Trump, the 45th President of the United States and the presumptive Republican Party nominee for the 2024 presidential election, was shot in the upper right ear.

The shooter, identified as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, managed to fire eight rounds from an AR–15–style semi-automatic rifle before being neutralized by a Secret Service Counter Assault Team sniper.

Witnesses and law enforcement officials reported that Crooks had positioned himself on a roof outside the rally venue.

After Mr Trump was shot, he immediately ducked to the ground and was quickly surrounded by Secret Service personnel.

Despite bleeding from his right ear, Mr Trump reportedly rose to his feet and pumped his fist into the air, shouting “fight, fight” before being rushed to a vehicle by the Secret Service.

He was subsequently taken to a hospital, where he was treated and released in stable condition before departing for New Jersey. Unfortunately, the shooting resulted in the death of a rally attendee and left two other attendees critically injured.

The incident is being thoroughly investigated as an attempted assassination. This marks a grim milestone as the first time a former or current U.S. president has been injured in such an attack since then-President Ronald Reagan was shot in 1981.

It is also the first attempted assassination of a presidential candidate since George Wallace in 1972.

SG worker asks for help after her former employer refuses to pay her last month’s CPF despite deducting the amount from her salary

SINGAPORE: A former employee of a company took to social media to share that her previous employer had failed to fulfil one of the essential obligations companies should adhere to when making CPF contributions.

In her post on r/askSingapore, she explained that after she left her job last year, her boss didn’t pay her last month’s CPF, even though they had already deducted it from her salary.

She tried contacting the company multiple times to resolve the payment issue, but they ignored her. 

Eventually, she turned to the CPF board and filed a report, hoping it would expedite the process. However, six months later, the issue still hasn’t been resolved.

“I sent a few emails to CPF looking for a possible timeline, they updated me that after investigation, CPF demanded payment from the employer but apparently she has been ignoring it,” she said.

“So they now issued a summon letter for an interview, but still cannot give me an approximate timeline.”

Although she is not in a hurry to receive the money, as it will go into her CPF account, she is concerned that the process is taking much longer than expected.

She then asked others in the community, “Anyone has a similar experience?”

“Now that the case is with the CPF Board, let them handle it.”

In the discussion thread, the Singaporean Redditors assured her that the CPF board doesn’t let things slide when it comes to missed contributions.

They explained that the board will persistently send reminders to her employer and escalate to an investigation if these reminders go unanswered.

Her employer will also be contacted to cooperate in the investigation, ensuring she will eventually receive her CPF contributions unless her employer declares bankruptcy.

However, they cautioned that these procedures may take some time and advised her to be patient.

One Redditor, who had a similar case, advised her to “regularly email her CPF investigation officer to remind the officer about her case and ask for an update.”

Another added, “It will take awhile, but now that the case is with the CPF Board, let them handle it. Your previous employer will pay your CPF + accrued interest + late interest charges. Or risk a fine and/or jail.”

On a different note, some Redditors expressed disbelief at her employer’s negligence towards CPF obligations.

One Redditor wrote, “I’m struggling to understand how dumb someone has to be to ignore CPF. Like you are literally stealing from the government. Not the employee.”

One Redditor added, “Even my China ex-boss got scared and paid up right after I threatened to report to CPF when they didn’t pay me my last salary and credit my CPF.

Your ex-boss is just playing with fire. People who run a business wouldn’t wanna get into trouble for this kinda stuff.”

Read also: Pregnant admin staff laments she is unhappy at work but needs the job for CPF contributions

Featured image by Depositphotos