Sunday, May 4, 2025
30.3 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 3997

The unexpected rise of Islamists as kingmakers in Malaysia

Indonesia saw the rise of Islamists who used a slipup by an otherwise popular political figure allied to President Joko Widodo or Jokowi to galvanise support among in the vastly Muslim populated country.

This caused some Australian media to play the cards of insecurity, placing Indonesia on a short list of nations where extremism is on the rise.

The Aussie publication altogether said Indonesia was on a potential no-go destination for tourists list due to heightened security risks.

Since the Ahok incident in Indonesia, there was a calm in the region, until Malaysia witnessed its own Islamic resurgence after the May 9 defeat of the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition.

The coalition headed by Najib Razak was seconded by the Party Islam Se-Malaysia or PAS, which broke off from almost two decades of alliance with the opposition. But the BN defeat has strengthened the PAS, instead of burying it along with the Umno.

While most analysts sent the PAS to the dustbin of history, saying it will lose out in the role of the third force against the Barisan and the Pakatan Harapan, the Islamists surprised everyone.

True it is the Islamists were the third force, contesting under the Gagasan Sejahtera, a conservatism movement uniting all those who believe Islam should be the dominant force in Malaysian politics.

It won enough seats to have a strong posture in the August Parliament of Malaysia, where various fractions are still juggling for influence in the Pakatan government.

The PAS won 18 seats, mostly in the Malay belt of Kelantan, Terengganu and Kedah.

It garnered 2 million votes which represent 17% of the number of votes cast on that historic day.

The PAS is headed by Hadi Awang, who is not given much credit by his detractors but is actually a fine politician.

Hadi took the gambit to give tacit support to Najib Razak despite the amount of evidence against the latter in the 1MDB affair in particular.

He pressed on with another bold move, that of pitting his party against both the Umno and the Pakatan in various seats across the country. PAS contested in 158 seats, a feat it never achieved before, albeit it is claimed most of the money it spent came from dubious sources, that is from Najib Razak and the 1MDB.

The gambit paid-off, Today the 18 PAS MP’s could eventually play the role of Kingmaker!

With the Pakatan Harapan shaky – hit by the sudden resignation of Anwar Ibrahim’s daughter Nurul Izzah from both party and government posts this week – there is definitely something fishy.

The ongoing fight between Minister of Economy Azmin Ali (a former blue-eyed boy of the Anwar Ibrahim faction) and whistleblower Rafizi Ramli does not make the PKR look good.

The infighting and the instability within the PKR prompted Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad to state he does not know what is wrong with Anwar’s party. Azmin Ali is now said to be close to the Mahathir camp in Parliament.

However, it is certain the PKR is not buying Dr Mahathir’s leniency regardng Umno MP’s leapfrogging into his party, the Bersatu Party.

Bersatu won 13 seats in the May elections, but it has the full support of the Warisan in Sabah. The Sabah party won 8 Parliamentary seats. But with the Umno MP’s now flocking to the Bersatu, it is causing an imbalance in the Pakatan.

Nurul Izzah believes the Bersatu’s move (thus Dr Mahathir’s) to allow Umno defectors in his party is a betrayal of the people’s wish.

The Umno in its totality gave blind support to Najib Razak. According to PKR insiders, the Umno MP’s joining the Pakatan is not acceptable. The wave of discontent, which could turn to dissent, might hit the Mahathir regime soon.

Democratic Action Party leader Lim Kit Siang said the ex-Umno MP’s must admit to abetting the 1MDB scandal before they are allowed in the Pakatan Haparan circle.

While this was playing out, a thicker cloud hangs over Malaysia’s politics. A meeting between Dr Mahathir and two PAS MP’s has shattered the Islamists.

The party leaders are at odds, in what could turn out to be a master plan by Dr Mahathir to destabilise the Islamists who are tipped to support Anwar Ibrahim in an eventual leadership bid in Putrajaya.

Dividing the PAS and causing confusion in their midst would shake their confidence, but with Hadi Awang firmly in control of the party’s base and leadership, Dr Mahathir may be in for a major surprise,

He has silently placed his party in a strategic position.

Prior to the May 9 elections, Hadi is said to have negotiated a deal with the Umno-Barisan of Najib Razak. Put an Islamic law amendment bill to vote before the elections and the PAS will join the alliance with four ministerial posts guaranteed.

Najib played Hadi out. He did all he could to delay the final vote in Parliament, in a volte-face that Hadi could not tolerate. However, Hadi bit the bullet and went into the elections is yet another strategic move, that is playing the third force card instead of being seen in alliance with the Umno.

This paid off for the Islamists and with their comfortable number of MP’s they might play the card of Kingmaker by offering their support to Anwar – most likely – than to Dr Mahathir – in the less likely event – and change the political landscape in Malaysia.

In the numbers game, Anwar has the tacit support of the Amanah and the DAP and with his party’s lead role in Pakatan, he is not troubled by Dr Mahathir’s move.

That is because the old man risks finding himself surrounded by Umno betrayers who supported Najib in the 1MDB scandal and that will not look good on Dr M at all.

After the fracas caused by the Ahok scandal in Indonesia, the rise of the Islamists is now confirmed in Malaysia.

But will Dr M play the cards to the extent of risking a sudden downfall since it will be almost impossible for him to garner a majority in the Parliament in the event he postures himself against Anwar?

One week is a long time in politics, and since May 9, Malaysia had many long weeks but the high noon showdown within the Pakatan is yet to materialise!

Netizens whack Chee Soon Juan for mocking the use of sandbags to deal with the monsoon season

Dr Chee Soon Juan, the secretary-general of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) shared a critical post about the innovation of the nation, after the Public Utilities Board (PUB) announced that sandbags would be amongst some of the measures to help cope with the monsoon season.

In a Facebook post on December 13, Dr Chee wrote, “I said this many times before, we’re good at buying and adopting technology but not in creating it. To join the ranks of truly knowledge-based, aka innovative, economies, we cannot continue with authoritarian governance”.

“We must let the people go; political control and creativity are sworn enemies”, he added.

https://www.facebook.com/cheesoonjuan/photos/a.10150092386688849/10158490793598849/?type=3&theater

Dr Chee’s post was met with much resistance from netizens, who said that even countries such as Switzerland, ranked top on the Global Innovation Index (GII), uses sandbags in order to prevent floods.

Many said that a lot of money was spent on Singapore’s drainage and water system, so the use of sandbags, a cheap alternative seemed rather ironic. Many also added that Singapore being a Smart nation and using sandbags had little to do with innovation or creativity. Others said that technology would not help much in solving the problem of flooding.

 

https://www.facebook.com/shutdowntrs/photos/a.1438069629738857/2248580745354404/?type=3&theater

The post slamming Dr Chee read: “Even the most innovative country in the world, Switzerland uses sandbags for flood prevention. So what is wrong with Singapore using sandbags? Does he think using smart technology can eradicate flooding by stopping rain and floods?”

However, there were some who got more technical and added that sandbags might not be the best solution for Singapore’s drainage system.

________________________________________________________________________

[email protected]

Vile mother performed sex acts on her own four-year-old son and sent photos to male friend

A vile mother, who has been described as “sick and twisted” by the local authorities in Foley, Alabama, has been accused of performing sex acts on her own four-year-old son before sending pictures of the assault to a male friend.

The authorities were tipped off to the assault by a concerned source. Investigations led to the arrest of the 30-year-old mother, Krystal Sanspree, and her 32-year-old friend Corey Ashton Steele. Both are facing multiple child sexual abuse charges.

According to the local press, Sanspree sent four photos of herself performing sex acts on her little boy after Steele asked for the pictures. The police report that the child has since been relocated to a safe place.

While investigations by the Foley Police Department and the Baldwin County Department of Human Resources are ongoing, federal investigators have launched a probe into whether the child abuse images were sold elsewhere or shared with others.

Sanspree has since been charged with sexual abuse of a child less than the age of 12, sodomy first degree, four counts of production of child pornography and four counts of disseminating child pornography.

The mother could face additional charges in the ongoing investigation. She reportedly faces life in prison without parole, if convicted.

Steele, in the meantime, has been charged with criminal solicitation of a Class B felony, solicitation of sodomy, four counts of possession of child pornography and four counts of solicitation of child pornography. Both Steele and Sanspree are being held in custody.

Echoing the police’s views that the crimes are “sick” and “twisted”, Assistant District Attorney Kristi Hagood told NBC:

“It doesn’t matter what the age, you are corrupting innocence when this happens. It’s a horrific crime. It truly does shock the conscience. There aren’t enough words to describe how bad this is.”

Hospital staff fulfills wish of lung cancer patient and makes engagement ceremony happen

0

UPDATE: The love story that warmed the hearts of thousands online has unfortunately come to an end when Mr. Pang peacefully passed away on Friday (December 28) at 1:21am. He planned on registering his marriage with Ms. Koh on January but did not make it to the New Year. Ms. Koh, his friends and family are grateful for everyone’s support and are asking for privacy in this time of mourning. Ms. Eileen Tan, who shared the engagement party via Facebook, has also posted the recent news on her profile.
https://www.facebook.com/leentan.88/posts/1966982096703543

 

Singapore – The following story is one that will reassure everyone that true and unconditional love does indeed exist. Mr. Pang Wing Kwong or as his friends call him “Roy”, is a businessman that has been diagnosed with terminal lung cancer. It was two years ago when he was informed of the news that he had stage four lung cancer. He met the love of his life, Ms. Koh Soh Kuan who works in an insurance company, in a tea appreciation event eight years ago.

Not letting the C-word get the best out of him, he mustered up his confidence and did something that not all men are strong enough to do. Mr. Roy asked Ms. Koh to block off her schedule for November 17 so that she could join him in a cancer group meeting that was happening that day. Little did she know that that was only a decoy and he was really planning on popping the question that day. Ms. Koh has made Mr. Roy the happiest man by saying yes.

Photo: Facebook screengrab

She shares that throughout their many years together, they never let work and other obligations stop them from spending time. Even after the diagnosis was given, they would still meet up for lunch and stay connected.

The staff of Mount Elizabeth Hospital, having learned of Mr. Roy’s wishes, quickly got to work in making his engagement ceremony happen. They made the impossible happen by pulling off a full-blown event that had over 50 guests and family on December 15. There were flowers and balloons, cake and other delicacies prepared by the hospital’s chef, a pastor to officiate the event, and a beautiful soon-to-be married Ms. Koh who was surprised at the whole thing.

The hospital nurses said that Mr. Pang is a “kind and grateful person” and they all love him very much so when they found out he wanted to hold the party in the hospital, they could not help but to fulfill his wish.

Thanks to Ms. Eileen Tan and her 40-minute live recording of the engagement party which she posted on Mr. Roy’s profile, the whole world was able to share in this wonderful occasion.

Countless people also shared their congratulations and best wishes to the lovely couple and reaffirmed the existence of true love through their comments.

Kelvin Wong, a wedding photographer, has also extended his services for free because of the truly touching story of the couple.

Taxi driver tries to pick a fight, caught on video punching another’s car window

0

Patrick Lim, a regular poster on Facebook shared a video of an altercation with a taxi driver. The video posted on December 14, in the evening, earned 59 comments, 60 shares and the unending ire of many FB users.

In the video, a taxi driver can be seen trying to incite the man inside the car, presumably another taxi driver, to alight and fight him.

While Patrick’s motive of posting the video was not certain, netizens speculated and came up with their theories. One commenter said that if he was asking for netizens’ support, he could have posted the entire video and not just a portion of the incident as this confuses the viewer of what the altercation was all about. Another commenter wondered why the poster did not report either to the Land Transport Authority (LTA) or to the company, and instead, posted the video on FB. The video post did not have an accompanying caption about the clash which infuriated netizens.

Road Rage Singapore

<Reader Contribution>What did the driver do, why the taxi driver in such a rage? <Credits: Patrick Lim>

Posted by All Singapore Stuff on Sunday, 16 December 2018

Based on Singaporean law, the two parties in the video can be penalised for three acts of public misbehaviour. They could be charged with public nuisance, fighting in public, and or disorderly behaviour in public.

Public nuisance is committed when a person causes common injury, danger or annoyance to the public or people in the vicinity. This offense is defined under section 268 and punishable under section 290 of the Penal Code with a maximum fine of $1,000.

As of press time, commenting netizens continue to inquire what the whole story was believing that they could provide more informed opinions if they know what the clash was all about.

TISG attempted to contact Patrick Lim for further comments but has not received any response yet as of press time.

Today’s top tech news, December, 17: Is a global Vietnamese smartphone on its way?

0

Plus, Traveloka goes on an acquisition spree and Tencent shuts down QQ for the web

Vietnam’s Vingroup launches smartphone it hopes can compete on global level — [Bangkok Post]

Vingroup, a Vietnamese conglomerate and the country’s top company by market value, launched a smartphone brand last Friday, according to the Bangkok Post.

The phones, called Vsmart, are made in Vietnam at factories that produce 5 million phones annually in the beginning.

Vingroup named Russia and Spain as two specific markets it wants to target. The Spanish connection is because Vingroup owns 51 per cent of a Spanish technology company called BQ. But, Vingroup eventually hopes Vsmart can become a global phone brand.

The phones will use Qualcomm chips and will run the Android operating system.

The company also got into domestic car-making just two months ago.

Tencent plans to shut down the web version of its QQ service — [Abacus]

In the grande scheme of things, it is not overly important, but the decision by Tencent to kill the web version of QQ marks the death of Social Media 1.0 in China.

Abacus is reporting that QQ eventually gave way to WeChat but it is safe to say that a lot of WeChat’s original user base came from people migrating between the two Tencent services.

The official announcement was made four years ago, but now that it is actually here, it is generating increased attention — similar to when Club Penguin shut down but on a much larger scale.

QQ is still alive on mobile, and as has happened across the history of social media, it has attracted a large teenage user base who are avoiding WeChat because their parents are on it. It still has 800 million users.

Traveloka acquires three competitors — [e27 via DailySocial]

Indonesian traveltech giant Traveloka has acquired its rival PegiPegi and other Southeast Asian online travel agencies (OTAs), according to a report by DailySocial.

It stated that in January, Japanese tech company Recruit Holdings has sold its traveltech subsidiaries PegiPegi (Indonesia), Mytour (Vietnam), and TravelBook (the Philippines) for US$66.8 million to a Singapore-based shell company named Jet Tech Innovation Ventures Pte Ltd.

When contacted by e27, a Traveloka spokeperson said that as part of the company’s corporate policy, it will not comment on rumour or speculation in the market.

12 suddenly becomes Shopee’s lucky number — [KR-Asia]

Shopee sold over 12 million items in Southeast Asia over the December 12/12 holiday discount day, according to KR-Asia.

The company, which is under Sea Group, is seen as a rising e-commerce player — especially because its parent company has made it a crucial pillar of its corporate strategy.

According to the article, it is now the top player in Vietnam. It is a mobile-first platform whereby 90 per cent of the transactions are facilitated via the phone.

Insurance giant Aviva partners IMDA in Singapore to offer cloud computing for employees — [Press Release]

Aviva, the global insurance company, is partnering with the Singapore Infocomm Media Development Authority to offer its employees cloud computing courses.

The goal is to help up-skill and train employees so they are future-proofed for the ever-changing economy.

In general, the Singapore government has placed an emphasis on re-training its population as it pursues a Smart Nation economic blueprint.

Photo by Joshua Rawson-Harris on Unsplash

The post Today’s top tech news, December, 17: Is a global Vietnamese smartphone on its way? appeared first on e27.

Source: E27

Do you want Amos Yee back in Singapore – Yee or Nay?

The 20-year old Singaporean blogger and former YouTuber who currently seeks asylum in the United States may just get deported for his views that are pro-pedophilia.

The very woman who spurred Yee on to seek asylum in the States – Melissa Chen has now turned on him, and she aims to get him deported because she says he is “a stain on the human race”.

In a recent video she uploaded to her Facebook page, Chen said that because of Yee’s blatant pro-pedophilia stance, Melissa said, “I am compelled to say Amos needs to be deported from the United States, and if he, in the process, gets sent back to jail in Singapore for going AWOL on National Service, I would find it extremely difficult to actually sympathise with that.”

https://theindependent.sg.sg/melissa-chen-the-activist-who-helped-amos-yee-seek-asylum-in-the-us-now-wants-him-deported-says-he-is-a-stain-on-the-human-race/

Amos Yee’s mother, Mary Toh, mostly supports her son through all of this.

Should Yee get deported from the United States, he may be sent back to Singapore, because the 20 year-old has not served the mandatory two years of National Service (NS) yet.

TISG polled netizens on Facebook and asked, “If Amos Yee gets deported from the US, do you want him back in Singapore?”

https://www.facebook.com/TheIndependentSG/posts/1338659002942405?__xts__[0]=68.ARAatZKnDaR8MLmMlIl8u2cDHONdsu3eIjOZz5xBepKtXEGvCnYtAGFoyAU52_jRNPutLGgrEGwmvsb9T-8v_PHbJPcxrQWMxA-apo_-LrPWQvmUan1UR9Z4KzAoFhXiTYmCJagApfEqXjLdT1UxnP3Pw4OTcSZqAVeRE-jqjGNidU6SIfZlbYKBS2imRiPAoIybrRz-2uBGqJPczA1blpa3kGmTOXLvILppkgcEacyLNUAXqvtvCIZ_Ir6CL2x9dQ1LDaUXhw-KU8UX1Hbuow07RFqcHGN6xKhHdeLKYH7H9_5rOvD_amYWN4-EacDJ7wYuJQj6FKoFRj1uHXgzJwhTE-Wq6bMSYg&__tn__=-R

84 per cent of the 1,300 people who answered said that they do not want him back.

Those who did want him back, simply wanted him to serve NS and face the consequences for his previous actions.

So, the question is,

Yee or nay?

________________________________________________________________________

[email protected]

“Kampung Spirit” of umbrella-sharing in Pasir Ris draws dissenting opinions from netizens

0

Now is the year 2018 and not 1960s or 1970s, yet the “Kampung Spirit” of Singaporeans is still alive amidst modernisation and urbanisation.

In a small cluster of flats across four blocks in Elias Park area in Pasir Ris, umbrellas are shared among the residents–a step to rekindle a faith in humanity. However, not everyone has the same positive outlook on the said initiative after it was uploaded on Reddit r/singapore.

Some netizens doubted that it would never last long and some are even cynical that it is not sustainable given that there are people who have bad behaviours of not returning those umbrellas to their sharing spots even after they are done using.

Two netizens even predicted the fate of all the umbrellas in this kind of community sharing situation.

On the other side, some believed that this umbrella-sharing initiative would really work out, as this is not the first time the “kampung spirit” is transpired in the community. The same thing also happened in Woodlands, Tampines, Boon Lay, and Sembawang according to a handful of netizens.

For the Singaporeans, “Kampung Spirit” is a sense of social cohesion in a community and a sense of neigbourliness that can be traced back during the post-second World War where the citizens are living rural kampongs or villages due to a big housing problem.

In the book Kampong Spirit – Gotong Royong: Life in Potong Pasir, 1955-1965 by Josephine Chia, it is accounted as: the coming together of the community to help and sustain each other. Multi-racial communities lived in the kampong like an extended family where everyone’s doors were kept open, neighbours kept a look-out for each other, and the children played with one another without any thought of discriminating against the others for being of a different race. This is the kampong spirit at its best.

Will the umbrella-sharing be successful or will it just be a passing thing for the community in Pasir Ris? Does the “Kampung spirit” still touch the lives of the people or it is just a thing of the past and a part of history? These remain to be open-ended questions. And the answers are yet to unfold in the coming days.

Fintech and blockchain pitches can be so ugly, but here’s some communication advice for fundraising startups to get the point across

0

Pitching is communication. Pitching is a conversation. Make it enjoyable.

I remember the first ever startup pitch contest that I organized in 2013 in Dubai. I invited representatives of six big VCs in the Middle East who were sold a promise to see the dawn of the most innovative financial services. A startup accelerator — the partner of the company at the time — preselected top 10 startups to pitch their ideas at our event.

Those were raw, poorly prepared and very confusing presentations. There were too many details way too early — before investors and myself could actually understand why it’s worth listening to the details.

Last week, five years later, I was listening to fintech and blockchain startups during a pitch competition, and I heard equally horrible pitches. I heard unnecessarily complicated and confusing content, full of sophisticated technical details that were thrown at investors in weird order.

All the pitches I have heard in between during these five years at various fintech and blockchain conferences around the world – New York, Barcelona, London, Hong Kong, LA, Moscow – they have been more or less the same. Take any ICO pitch competition today — most startups pay an incredible price to pitch their ideas from stage, and still they give long, tiring, technical, and irrelevant speeches.

I have done some research and talked to startups, accelerators, and investors to find out if that’s only my perception, or it’s more common.

Here is what I have learned:

  • 90% of the startups don’t invest time or money into preparation. They prepare the pitch internally and never get an independent expert’s feedback on whether this pitch can sell their idea and their vision.
  • Most startups think their idea is special, unique, genius, and only the selected few can grasp it. Therefore, they don’t care about making it simple, because it’s too complicated and it’s not designed for the average brain anyway.
  • Most accelerators admit they don’t focus on communication training. Startups receive very little or no training that would help them sell their ideas to investors and to convince people at conferences and meetups.
  • Many investors want one clear sentence that explains the idea. And if they’re interested, they like asking questions themselves. Most startups talk way too much and miss the opportunity to create a dialogue. Both during personal meetings and when pitching on stage.

When you hear so many bad pitches so often, it slowly becomes the new normal. And the investors’ fatigue in 2018, as many have noticed, is partially caused by the fact that the ICO market is highly saturated. However, I believe another important reason is that startups can’t communicate the value of their ideas clearly — neither to institutional investors, nor to the public.

Everyone claims today that THEIR startup will make blockchain technology one step closer to being massively adopted, and yet they fail to explain to the masses how.

If any of these startups succeed in their communication strategies, we wouldn’t be talking about blockchain only in small communities at very specific conferences that are being attended by the very same people every month… Let’s be honest – the masses still have no idea, and blockchain today exists predominantly at conferences designed to profit from startups who pay to pitch and raise money.

Also read: 6 reasons why your ICO won’t raise more than $3M

And even given this opportunity, many startups totally ignore it and fill their time on stage with meaningless and confusing pitches.

So, what are the startups missing and what are the key ingredients to a great pitch that results in investments?

I have pitched to investors worldwide and I’ve made millions of mistakes. I have also trained teams and business owners to communicate their ideas and values to international partners, clients and investors, and I am sharing what matters most for tangible results.

1. Well-known advice obviously doesn’t work

If I start looking for guidance on how to pitch, all advice revolves around “know your why” and “practice your elevator pitch”.

Everybody knows this, yet everybody’s pitch is boring. Because everyone tries to put too many smart words in one short sentence assuming that the audience will figure it out.

The point is not just to keep it short. The point is to keep it short AND clear. 

And I am going to give now a horrible advice — but often “making it clear” means spending extra time and adding more words. Words like “imagine”, “you”, “red”, “Mercedes”, “family”… All the words that people can easily imagine and relate to. Phrases like “Computational platform”, “disruptive ecosystem”, “decentralized world”, “self-serving analytics”, “digital productivity”, “microservice architecture”, etc … are damn hard for a human brain to imagine.

And now think about the brain that has been listening to pitches all day non-stop … These words are smart (and many think they are self-explanatory), but they don’t mean what you think they mean to everyone. They have become buzzwords and need explanation. It makes no sense to practice your pitch until you figure out how to avoid buzzwords and tell your story with simple words that everyone can relate to. Such messages will truly stand out.

A message full of technical words will most likely be immediately forgotten. And if you need another convincing reason — remember that many investors today are very international, and English is not always their first language. The more complicated your talk is, the easier you lose their attention. When people don’t understand, they instinctively drift away because no one likes to feel stupid.

2. The goal of your pitch is not to hear “I am investing half a million, please take my money!” from the audience right after your finish talking. Your goal is to make sure people remember your idea. 

Because if people remember your idea, they can tell it to someone else. A person in the room might not be the investor (and again, let’s be realistic, big whales rarely make it to the pitch competitions and big conferences), but they might know investors or work for big investors. Make your messages memorable so that people can spread them. People can only remember what they understand. And they easily understand what they can imagine. Many startups focus exclusively on messages like “We are amazing” and “You should invest now”, which makes them sound needy rather than inspired by their own ideas. Always focus on clarity, i.e. learn to clearly explain the idea, the value, the market, and the exit strategy. And practice giving a clear answer to “Why did you start this business?”.

Also read: How to write a PR pitch for your white paper

3. Practice differently. Most people think that “practicing” equals “memorizing” your pitch. This is totally wrong.

When you’re telling me the text you’ve memorized you sound like you’re reading it, and the worst pitch you can imagine is the one that people read on stage, or when people sound as if they are reading. This is an easy strategy to be awarded the nomination “Most boring and annoying speaker ever”. Practicing means getting high quality feedback and improving.

Don’t practice with someone from your team. These people are biased. 

They know more about your product than investors who will see you for the first time in their lives. Get feedback from mentors who know what investors want and perfect your pitch until it becomes clear and until you learn to be confident with yourself pitching your business. That’s another big reason why startups get rejected. They beg for money, they say “thank you for your time” hundred times in one meeting, and they can’t own the room. Get a badass mentor or a coach who will help you sound more confident, especially if English is your second language.

Good feedback also helps you restructure your message. I have seen enough cases when startups had to make a pivot. What they considered “innovation” did not get investors’ interest. And what they considered unimportant was suddenly what investors were looking for.

4. People respond to energy, not to words

Learn to master your voice, learn to make pauses, learn to be loud enough. You don’t need to be acting, you simply need to feel comfortable talking to people both from stage and face to face. It’s horrible to admit but most startups think a pitch is a monologue. No, it’s a conversation. You’re not simply delivering a text you’ve memorized, you’re building the connection with people right now. You must know how to get their attention, how to hold it, and how to make them remember your big idea.

Practicing the delivery of your talk is extremely important. Every good leader I know is a good public speaker. Every pitch that is done by a CTO is always a disaster (at least in my experience). A CTO might be the most knowledgeable person in the team, but with zero communication skills. It’s simply not their job, and it makes more sense to train a person on the team whose job is all about communication.

5. Don’t be afraid to sell

It’s quite amusing to watch how startups at the fundraising stage are disgusted at the idea of selling anything and how they sound almost apologizing for asking for money. A startup must be able to masterfully sell their idea to both their clients and investors. I don’t mean “manipulate” when I say “sell”. A good sales result to me is when people recognize the value and approach you saying they need what you have NOW. And NOT when you push them to make a purchase. If you can’t sell you can’t inspire people. And if this is a case, hire someone who can.

6. Don’t be afraid to repeat yourself

Important ideas need to be repeated if you want people to remember them. Experience shows that people actually start paying attention and get the importance of the message after they hear it more than three times.

Also read: Pro pitch deck tips for beginners

7. Learn to answer questions. Learn to prepare for unexpected or “stupid” (as you may think) questions. 

I remember being the only woman in the room and asking a question about the relevance of the presented technology. The presenter suggested that mobile apps are dying out and no one uses or needs them any more. I asked whether this claim is backed by any research and where this assumption comes from. I received a very aggressive answer that sounded more or less like “Girl, you have no idea and you’ll never be able to grasp it, so don’t waste my time.”

Investors invest in people, not in their ideas. Ideas are worth nothing if there are no people who can bring them to life. People who are unable to communicate can’t build relationships. And business is all about people building strong, long-lasting relationships with their clients, partners, and investors.

Some investors also taught me a very good lesson. Before making a decision to invest in a certain company they like spending a few days with the team. They take part in their brainstorming sessions, have lunch with them, go to meetings with them, and watch them from the distance. They watch how they communicate: both internally and externally. It’s the one criterion that you can’t demonstrate on your website. You can only feel it once you’re there. Investors make a positive decision if they’re inspired by working with you, i.e. if your communication results in meeting deadlines and building a great community.

8. Don’t mention local complications to investors who look for global opportunities

I was recently listening to a Dutch company pitching their solution, and they spoke about a very local financing problem in the Netherlands. None of what they said was relevant to me (I have never lived in this county) and to investors, who were from Switzerland and China (and were expecting global fintech innovations). Irrelevant information immediately blocks our perception, and people are simply not listening anymore, even if they are still looking at you.

9. Remember that your goal is not to receive a commitment from an investor right now, right after your pitch. Your goal is to get a private meeting.

Just like with the first job interview. You goal is not to get a job offer, but to get a second interview. Building relationships takes time and you need to first invest your energy in this relationship. Always talk about exit strategies. So many startups are obsessed with the numbers they want to raise that they forget about investors’ needs and expectations.

These are the most overlooked aspects of pitching to investors or clients. I honestly believe startups need more communication training. In the era of fast approaching automation and smart technologies, we are losing the talent to communicate.

And pitching is communication. Pitching is a conversation. Make it enjoyable.

—-

e27 publishes relevant guest contributions from the community. Share your honest opinions and expert knowledge by submitting your content here.

Photo by Joshua Ness on Unsplash

The post Fintech and blockchain pitches can be so ugly, but here’s some communication advice for fundraising startups to get the point across appeared first on e27.

Source: E27

Workers’ Party: MND’s press release on AHTC from its external auditor is, “unfortunately, selective and incomplete”

According to a statement released by the Workers’ Party over the weekend, they claim that the Ministry of National Development (MND)’s “press release on the qualification received by AHTC from its external auditor is, unfortunately, selective and incomplete”.

Their press release, shared on their website, as well as social media, stated that, “In describing AHTC’s amber rating for Corporate Governance, MND’s press release states a “(f)ailure to maintain updated accounts and records of expenses…incurred in a timely manner. This was also the reason why the auditor had qualified AHTC’s financial statements””.

They go on to add, “What MND omits to say on this observation, but was included by AHTC’s external auditor, is that the expenses in question “are found to have been taken up into expenses and the related payables during the financial year” and that “there are no material misstatements found in the expenses and related payable transactions during the financial year””.

The last line of their press release also read, “We believe MND’s specific reference to 7 consecutive years is deliberately calculated to lower the esteem of AHTC in the public eye”.

TISG reached out to Workers’ Party chief Mr Pritam Singh, who declined to comment any further, and said that the media release on the AHTC website expanded on their reason/s.

The full press release can be found here.

________________________________________________________________________

[email protected]