Wednesday, April 30, 2025
32.1 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2730

WP MP Louis Chua to Govt: Give people an idea of what to expect in Phase 3

Singapore — Opposition Workers’ Party MP Louis Chua has asked the Government to give the people an idea of what to expect when the country enters Phase 3 of its phased reopening instead of keeping them largely unaware of what adjustments they should make after Phase 2.

Phase 3 is expected to be the “new normal” until a vaccine or treatment is found for Covid-19.

Mr Chua, a member of the WP team elected to Sengkang GRC in this year’s elections, asked Health Minister Gan Kim Yong in Parliament on Monday (Oct 5) where the country stands in the Government’s risk assessment in determining when to move into Phase 3.

Echoing comments Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat made in a Ministerial Statement the same day, Mr Gan responded that the Multi-ministry Task Force is still working on a roadmap towards Phase 3 and that more details will be announced in the coming weeks.

Through supplementary questions, Mr Chua highlighted the importance of giving additional parameters and guidance to businesses and individuals on what they can expect in that phase. He said in a subsequent Facebook post: “This is to help us make plans in advance, rather than taking a passive wait-and-see approach with low visibility into the future.”

Mr Chua also asked whether an improved risk assessment guide can be provided since the country has been at the DORSCON Orange level since February and expects to remain in it for some more time, even though the number of daily Covid-19 cases have dropped off since hitting a peak of 1,426 cases in April.

He said on Facebook: “Further, I’ve also highlighted that we have been in DORSCON Orange since 7 February earlier this year.

“The Circuit Breaker period, the peak in daily Covid-19 cases at 1,426 on 20 April and the upcoming Phase Three re-opening are all part of DORSCON Orange…with Minister Gan stressing that we will maintain DORSCON Orange for the time being, could a more useful and timely risk assessment guide be provided to residents instead?”

I asked the above question in Parliament yesterday, and the summary of Minister Gan’s response is that the MTF is still…

Posted by Chua Kheng Wee 蔡庆威 on Monday, 5 October 2020

YG Entertainment removes scenes of BLACKPINK’s Jennie in ‘sexy’ nurse outfit

0

BLACKPINK’s agency YG Entertainment has announced that they will be removing scenes of Jennie dressed in a ‘sexy’ nurse outfit in the girl group’s Lovesick Girls music video following complaints from a South Korean medical union.

YG Entertainment released a statement today after the Korean Health and Medical Workers Union condemned Jennie’s outfit, which included a form-fitting white dress, red high heels and a cap with a heart symbol, for promoting a ‘sexual stereotype’ of nurses.

“We have decided to edit out all of the scenes with the nurse uniform in BLACKPINK’s Lovesick Girls music video and we will replace the video as soon as possible.

“While working on the music video for a long time, we did not expect this issue to be raised because (the scenes) had no specific intention to them. We feel greatly responsible for this and will consider it an opportunity to deeply learn.

“We relay our apologies to the nurses who felt discomfort and we once again express our respect to all healthcare workers who are working hard for the sake of the health of the citizens,” said YG Entertainment based on translations by Soompi.

BLACKPINK’s Jennie wears a nurse outfit in music video Lovesick Girls. Picture: YouTube

The South Korean medical union had called out YG Entertainment for giving a ‘derogatory portrayal’ of nurses in BLACKPINK’s latest music video which has garnered over 120 million views on YouTube since its launch on October 1. A translation of the union’s statement from October 5 by Soompi revealed its concerns about “distorted” representations of healthcare workers in the media.

“In a real hospital, not the ones in the media, nurses are fighting at the frontlines of Covid-19 and taking on the risk of infection for the safety and survival of the citizens.

“There has been a climate of heroising nurses as well, but there are still those who call nurses with ‘hey’ or ‘young lady’ and let out their stress on them or exercise their power on them.

“Furthermore, nurses are the healthcare workers who are the most frequently exposed to sexual abuse.

“If the media continues to show a distorted image of nurses, situations like these will only get worse,” said the union.

In the past, YG Entertainment had to edit a BLACKPINK music video post-release following condemnation from certain groups. The agency axed scenes from BLACKPINK’s How You Like That music video which showed Lisa with a statue of the deity Ganesha after fans from Hindu-majority India accused them of using religion as a profitable aesthetic.

Netizens ask whether PAP MP’s cat ban argument can be used to get the Govt to repeal S377A

Some netizens are asking whether a question People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Louis Ng asked in Parliament with regards to the ban on cats in public housing can be applied to get the Government to repeal Section 377A of Singapore’s penal code.

A man found to have committed an act of “gross indecency” with another man could be jailed for up to two years under Section 377A – a British colonial-era legislation that was adopted into Singapore’s penal code. Although the law is very rarely enforced here, the Government is hesitant to repeal Section 377A despite repeated calls for it to do so from several quarters.

Another rule that the Government is hesitant to abolish even though it is rarely enforced is the Housing Development Board’s (HDB) ban on pet cats in HDB units. According to HDB’s rules,

“Cats are not allowed in flats. They are generally difficult to contain within the flat. When allowed to roam indiscriminately, they tend to shed fur and defecate or urinate in public areas, and also make caterwauling sounds, which can inconvenience your neighbours.”

HDB’s ban on cats is as old as the first public housing flats has been in force since 1960. While the authority had initially banned all animals from HDB flats, it later relaxed rules and allowed flat buyers to keep certain dogs and other small animals. The ban on cats, however, was upheld.

Today, the cat ban is not actively enforced but the authority does act against errant flat owners and their pet cats that have been flagged as public nuisances.

Interestingly, several ruling party politicians have published photos of themselves with their constituents’ pet cats during house visits despite the Government’s reluctance to repeal the rule in the face of appeals for it to do so over many years.

The cat ban was one of the many issues Nee Soon GRC MP Louis Ng raised in Parliament, this week. Mr Ng, who is the founder of animal rescue group ACRES, has spoken out on this issue at least thrice in Parliament in 2020 alone.

In Parliament on Tuesday (6 Oct), Mr Ng appealed: “The policy of not allowing the keeping of cats in HDB flats has to be reviewed and changed. I’ve spoken up about this for more than a decade now.”

Pointing out that HDB’s policy “does not make sense” since it allows homeowners to keep dogs – which also shed fur, defecate and urinate in public places – Mr Ng asserted that HDB’s concerns can be “easily addressed” through methods like sterilisation which ensures that cats do not make caterwauling sounds.

Mr Ng also highlighted that the Ministry of National Development (MND) once indicated to him that there is a lot of flexibility in the way the policy is administered. It said earlier, “when HDB receives a complaint, they go down and investigate. If the cat is not causing any disamenities, the resident will not be asked to remove the cat”.

Mr Ng asked: “I appreciate this reply but my question then is what is the point of having a rule that we do not actively enforce?”

This question has captured the attention of some netizens, who pointed out that the same question is relevant when it comes to whether Section 377A should be repealed:

The latest social initiative against Section 377A, the Ready4Repeal campaign, gained immense traction last year and even drew support from establishment figures like former attorney-general Walter Woon and distinguished diplomat Tommy Koh, but failed to effect change.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong subsequently quashed all hope that Section 377A will be repealed in Singapore anytime soon, as he asserted that the law criminalising gay sex will be around “for some time.”

Asserting that Singapore has been open to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community, he said: “You know our rules in Singapore. Whatever your sexual orientation, you are welcome to come and work in Singapore. But this has not inhibited people from living, and has not stopped Pink Dot from having a gathering every year.

“It is the way this society is: We are not like San Francisco, neither are we like some countries in the Middle East. (We are) something in between, it is the way the society is.”

Pink Dot rebutted PM Lee’s views and asserted that “Pink Dot’s existence is not proof of Singapore’s inclusiveness to the LGBTQ community”. The group added: “Pink Dot exists precisely because members of the LGBTQ community in Singapore continue to face discrimination and inequality in a multitude of ways, on a daily basis.”

Declaring that Section 377A is a key cause of the discrimination the LGBTQ community faces in Singapore, Pink Dot said: “This discrimination that we face is borne from Section 377A, along with its trickle-down effects to other laws and policies that govern our society at large.”

Pink Dot further said that it is “more than just a convenient deflection against uncomfortable questions about the LGBTQ community in Singapore.”

Noting that PM Lee’s response shows that “he might not have a full understanding of the discrimination that takes place in Singapore,” the campaign team invited him and his colleagues to attend Pink Dot at Hong Lim Park on Saturday so that they can “truly make an effort to understand what the LGBTQ community go through on a daily basis.”

Pink Dot rebuts PM Lee’s views and invite him to attend the LGBT pride gathering

PM Lee quashes all hope that S377A will be repealed anytime soon, says the law will be around “for some time”

“It’s immoral!” – FCBC Senior Pastor Nina Khong denounces Lee Hsien Yang’s attendance at Pink Dot

SDP’s call to repeal Section 377A 12 years ago recirculates online

SPCA urges HDB to repeal cat ban once again

Peeping Tom gets 6 weeks jail for filming teenager in her HDB flat shower

SINGAPORE – A man was given a six-week jail sentence on Wednesday (October 7) after he used his smartphone to record a teenage girl while she was in the shower.

31-year old Teo Jing Zhi pleaded guilty in court to intentionally insulting the victim’s modesty on the evening of November 8, 2018.

According to a report in TODAY, the victim, who cannot be named in order to protect her identity, was 18 years old at the time the crime took place.

Mr Teo happened to be biking in the HDB estate where the teenage girl was living when he heard the sounds of her shower, which caused him to look for it, finding her in the bathroom of her ground-floor flat.

This is when the accused decided to pull out his phone to video her without her knowledge. The victim saw a hand holding up a mobile phone through her bathroom’s window louvres. She immediately screamed for help, causing Mr Teo to flee the premises.

Her brother heard her call for help and immediately went in search of the assailant, but he wasn’t able to find anyone when he got outside.

This prompted him to call the police. Initial investigations into the case led the police to CCTV footage that showed Mr Teo lurking around the back of the teenage victim’s flat, which happened to be close to the kitchen toilet window.

The CCTV footage also showed that Mr Teo had remained in that location for around three minutes before biking away. The footage also allowed the authorities to identify him, and eventually apprehend him.

According to Deputy Public Prosecutor Joseph Gwee, the accused deleted any footage he had taken of the victim from his phone.

DPP Gwee was pushing for an eight-week jail term because of a number of aggravating factors in the case.

He explained that there was a major degree of intrusion into the teenager’s privacy, citing “The victim was fully nude as she was showering and the offence had taken place in the sanctity of her own home, where she should have expected to have been safe.” / TISG

Vicky Zhao takes on more jobs to collect funds to pay off compensation arising from class action lawsuits

0

Chinese actress Vicky Zhao is going through a rough patch and she has to take on more jobs to collect funds to pay off compensation arising from law suits.

According to Chinese portal Sina.com, the 44-year-old actress and her husband Huang You Long tried to buy 50 per cent shares of a listed company Zhejiang Wanjia in 2016 via a company they controlled in Tibet Longwei. It was reported that their bid was said to have disrupted the market so in November 2018, the China Securities Regulatory Commission banned Zhao and her husband from securities market for a duration of five years.

The situation became worse for Zhao and her husband in 2019 when shareholders sued them for giving false statements. At last count, the actress had accumulated more than 500 suits that are now at the appeal stage, where she may end up paying 84 million yuan (SGD$16 million) in compensation if she loses the appeal. Insiders shared that Zhao, who shot to fame playing Huan Zhu Ge Ge in TV series My Fair Princess, had been diligently taking up jobs in the hopes of gathering more funds to pay off the compensation.

Zhao Wei is going through a difficult time now. Picture: Instagram

In the past, she would deny taking assignments that are perceived too small but it was reported that she has since changed her mind. Zhao recently joined Zhejiang Television’s variety show Everybody Standby.

Born on March 12, 1976 as Zhao Wei, Vicky Zhao or Vicki Zhao is a Chinese actress, businesswoman, film director, producer and pop singer. She is considered one of the most popular actresses in China and Chinese-speaking regions, and one of the highest paid actresses.

While studying at the Beijing Film Academy, Zhao rose to national and regional prominence overnight for her role as Xiao Yanzi (“Little Swallow”) in the hit TV series My Fair Princess (1998–1999), for which she also won Golden Eagle Award for Best Actress. My Fair Princess enjoyed unprecedented success in East and Southeast Asian countries, and Zhao is regarded by many as Mainland China’s first “national idol” since the economic reform began in 1978.

Over her 20 years acting career, Zhao has starred in many box-office hits, including Shaolin Soccer (2001), Red Cliff (2008–2009), Painted Skin (2008), Painted Skin: The Resurrection (2012), Dearest (2014) and Lost in Hong Kong (2015).

She has received numerous awards from the Shanghai International Film Festival, Huabiao Awards, Changchun Film Festival, Hundred Flowers Awards and Shanghai Film Critics Awards for films like A Time to Love (2005) and Mulan (2009). In 2014, after almost a two-year break from acting, she appeared in Peter Chan’s film Dearest, and won the Hong Kong Film Critics Society Award and Hong Kong Film Award for Best Actress.

Amrin Amin on Jamus Lim’s tax suggestions: “If a PAP MP had suggested this, many colourful adjectives will be coughed out”

0

During a parliamentary debate, Sengkang Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim suggested an environment tax be imposed on Singapore Airlines’ (SIA) proposed “flight to nowhere”.

Responding to Mr Lim’s suggestion in a Facebook post on Wednesday (Oct 7), former Sembawang GRC Member of Parliament (MP) Amrin Amin said: “If a PAP MP had suggested this, many colourful adjectives will be coughed out”.

I worry about the many cabin crew and staff of SIA who have been retrenched. Passenger volumes are critically low. For…

Posted by Amrin Amin on Tuesday, 6 October 2020

“I worry about the many cabin crew and staff of SIA who have been retrenched. Passenger volumes are critically low. For the aviation industry, it’s now about trying to stay afloat”, Mr Amrin wrote.

“There’s a serious disconnect for Workers Party Jamus Lim to suggest slapping a new environmental tax on an ailing national carrier. SIA had already dropped plans for ‘flights to nowhere’ last week. Times are bad. It’s a struggle”, he added.

“If a PAP MP had suggested this, many colourful adjectives will be coughed out. But I suppose we can be charitable and just call the less than compassionate suggestion – noise pollution?” Mr Amrin said.

Responding on social media, Mr Lim said that he is proud of SIA and wants the industry to survive, and his suggestion of an environment tax would be borne by wealthier customers who would be more willing to take a proposed “flight to nowhere.”

He added that he was hoping to “spur some creative thinking about how we can help ensure the future viability of our national airline, without compromising the need to pay attention to the environment, too”.

He said that “such creative thinking is necessary to ensure that we don’t spend our hard-earned reserves in an unwise fashion”.

Xiaxue’s complaints about the way WP runs Aljunied GRC draws mixed reactions online

Social media influencer Xiaxue’s complaints about the way the Workers’ Party (WP) runs the Aljunied GRC estate she lives in has drawn mixed reactions online, with netizens questioning her motives for publicising the issues on social media.

On Tuesday (6 Oct), Xiaxue – whose real name is Wendy Cheng – claimed that the Workers’ Party (WP) compared Aljunied GRC unfavourably to wards held by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) and claimed that her housing area is in a “destitute state”, in her Instagram stories.

The vlogger, who is a self-described People’s Action Party (PAP) supporter, has criticised the WP in the past but claimed that her complaints have nothing to do with her political views.

She added that she did not want to raise this matter online but decided to do so when her MP, WP chairman Sylvia Lim, did not respond to repeated complaints about the poor condition her Housing Development Board (HDB) block is in.

In her stories, Xiaxue shared photos of a damaged void deck ceiling after a chunk of the concrete dislodged and fell onto the ground. She also shared that exposed wires were secured with cable ties and that the concrete floor of the corridor outside her unit is also damaged.

The vlogger took issue with the cracks on certain parts of the HDB facade and the fact that these cracks are painted over in a colour that does not match the rest of the building, as well. She also complained about peeling paint and claimed that she has spotted rats in the vicinity, aside from expressing concerns about a pipe that appears to be leaking some kind of dark green substance.

On Wednesday (7 Oct), Xiaxue revealed that the issues she flagged at her block were rectified that same afternoon. Both the damage to the concrete outside the unit and the hole in the void deck ceiling were patched up. Posting photos of the repairs, the influencer wrote in her stories:

“Today workers came to fix the broke concrete outside my unit. So I guess they can be efficient if they want to…Wasn’t so hard was it? Why take so long to do zzz…Finally. Very fast suddenly after complaining it’s a miracle lol…Today the WP people must have been like “f!@#ing suay why she must stay at our estate” lol”

Netizens responding to the influencers stories were largely divided. Some understood her point of view and said that Ms Lim or a representative of the town council should have responded to her initial complaints. Others felt that the disparity in funding the WP receives to manage its town council, compared to the funding PAP wards receive is to blame, for the disrepair.

Some felt that her block could just be old and said that these issues are seen in other older estates run by the ruling party, with at least one netizen asserting that he is also a constituent of Ms Lim but has not encountered the issues Xiaxue described. Still others put little stock in Xiaxue’s claims and felt that this was just another publicity stunt:

PM Lee says suing Leong Sze Hian is not picking on him

0

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said on Tuesday (Oct 6) that suing Leong Sze Hian for defamation was not picking on him.

PM Lee’s comments came in response to accusations that he was singling out writer and financial adviser Leong Sze Hian for his role as a “staunch Government critic” by suing him for defamation.

PM Lee added that Mr Leong was not the most vocal nor most effective critic of the Singapore Government.

“I have explained to you how I have – the Government has, and so have I – dealt with repeated, multiple, prolonged onslaught of criticism from your client,” said Mr Lee to Mr Leong’s lawyer Lim Tean.

Mr Lim, who is also an opposition politician, accused Mr Lee of picking on Mr Leong among “thousands of others” who shared an allegedly defamatory article. Questioning PM Lee for over three hours, he claimed PM Lee sued Mr Leong “to frighten others”.

“I did not do that,” said Mr Lee.

“The defendant has been a thorn in our side in a small way for a very long time. He has … criticised many Government matters, Central Provident Fund matters, Government of Singapore Investment Corporation matters regularly on many forums … as he is entitled to”, said PM Lee, according to a CNA report.

“And our answer to that is – in the end, put it to the test. The test of the ballot. Persuade Singaporeans, see if they support you, or the Government. And indeed it was put to the test in the recent General Election: When the defendant and yourself contested in Jalan Besar GRC and won 35 per cent of the vote. So that’s the answer”, he added.

Mr Leong, a blogger and financial adviser, is being sued by Mr Lee for defamation over a Facebook post Mr Leong made in November 2018, sharing an article by Malaysian website The Coverage.

The article, which was originally published on the States Times Review, contained allegedly libellous material. It claimed that Mr Lee had helped former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak launder money in relation to corruption-mired Malaysian state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

Because Mr Leong has refused to take the stand, this means there will not be any more hearings for the rest of the week and all parties will file written submissions and return to court on Nov 30 for oral arguments to determine liability. /TISG

Davinder Singh says Leong Sze Hian has “turned tail and fled” by not taking the stand to be cross-examined

0

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s lawyer, Davinder Singh, in a defamation suit against writer and financial adviser Leong Sze Hian, criticised the latter for not taking to the witness stand for cross-examination.

Mr Leong’s lawyer Lim Tean stated on the second day of a four-day defamation trial that the defence was “very satisfied we have sufficient admissions to meet our case, and that Mr Leong cannot assist with the issue further.

Calling Mr Leong’s decision “deeply disappointing”, Mr Davinder Singh said: “We have a situation where the plaintiff (PM Lee) has turned up in court and gone into the stand, unafraid of any questions and ready to defend his position.”

He added that Mr Leong “has turned tail and fled” even though he had alleged that PM Lee had abused the “process of court.”

“The real reason is that he knows, that he is unable to defend what he said in his affidavits and is afraid of the truth”, said Mr Davinder.

Addressing Justice Aedit Abdullah, Mr Davinder Singh said: “From the very first, he made the most serious allegations against the plaintiff. Not just those in the offending words but of abuse of process, of having a collateral purpose, of stifling freedom of expression and speech, of wanting to send a message to the population that the Government will not tolerate criticism, on picking on him, and of running a case of malice and aggravation without basis.”

Because Mr Leong has refused to take the stand, this means there will not be any more hearings for the rest of the week and all parties will file written submissions and return to court on Nov 30 for oral arguments to determine liability.

Mr Leong, a blogger and financial adviser, is being sued by Mr Lee for defamation over a Facebook post Mr Leong made in November 2018, sharing an article by Malaysian website The Coverage.

The article, which was originally published on the States Times Review, contained allegedly libellous material. It claimed that Mr Lee had helped former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak launder money in relation to corruption-mired Malaysian state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). /TISG

Xiaxue claims municipal matters at Aljunied GRC were rectified after she raised it online

Social media influencer Xiaxue has claimed that municipal matters at Aljunied GRC were rectified only after she raised the issues on social media.

On Tuesday (6 Oct), Xiaxue – whose real name is Wendy Cheng – claimed that the Workers’ Party (WP) ran Aljunied GRC poorly and compared the estate unfavourably to wards held by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP). Xiaxue, who is an Aljunied GRC resident, claimed that her housing area is in a “destitute state”, in her Instagram stories.

The vlogger, who is a self-described People’s Action Party (PAP) supporter, has criticised the WP in the past but claimed that her complaints have nothing to do with her political views.

She added that she did not want to raise this matter online but decided to do so when her MP, WP chairman Sylvia Lim, did not respond to repeated complaints about the poor condition her Housing Development Board (HDB) block is in.

In her stories, Xiaxue shared photos of a damaged void deck ceiling after a chunk of the concrete dislodged and fell onto the ground. She also shared that exposed wires were secured with cable ties and that the concrete floor of the corridor outside her unit is also damaged.

The vlogger took issue with the cracks on certain parts of the HDB facade and the fact that these cracks are painted over in a colour that does not match the rest of the building, as well. She also complained about peeling paint and claimed that she has spotted rats in the vicinity, aside from expressing concerns about a pipe that appears to be leaking some kind of dark green substance.

On Wednesday (7 Oct), the WP re-posted another resident’s story on its Instagram page. The resident, Instagram user @lilmissnuttz, thanked the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) for responding to issues they are alerted to within a week’s time.

Appreciating AHTC for its hard work, the resident said that her block was the first to receive painting and repair works which have just resumed after being temporarily suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic for some time.

Re-posting a screenshot of the WP’s story on her own Instagram, Xiaxue wondered whether the WP’s story was a “snarky response” to her complaints. She wrote:

“Today @wpsg posted this ig story. I don’t know if it’s in snarky response to mine, but here’s what I think: 1) the hole in my ceiling has been there since 2019. Didn’t have Covid then. Notified but not fixed.

“2) Next time, dear @wpsg, if you intend to tackle the issues I brought up but simply have no time to because “not everybody can be first”, then I’ll just appreciate if you JUST TELL ME SO. Instead of just completely ignoring my requests altogether. A simple “I hear you but we are overwhelmed right now and will get to it soonest” would be much appreciated.”

Xiaxue also revealed that the issues she flagged at her block were rectified that same afternoon. Both the damage to the concrete outside the unit and the hole in the void deck ceiling were patched up. Posting photos of the repairs, the influencer wrote in her stories:

“Today workers came to fix the broke concrete outside my unit. So I guess they can be efficient if they want to…Wasn’t so hard was it? Why take so long to do zzz…

Finally. Very fast suddenly after complaining it’s a miracle lol…Today the WP people must have been like “f!@#ing suay why she must stay at our estate” lol”

Claiming that her followers told her that she is living in the “ugliest” HDB flat they had ever seen, Xiaxue added: “I spent $530,000 buying my house ok and my block’s units are all either maisonette or executive units. End up our void deck look like an abandoned building with rats, with the added excitement of possible falling concrete hitting us on the head. Tragic. Let me go weep.” 

She also lamented about how it is “unfortunate” such stories do not pop up during the election period and slammed the WP by saying,

“It’s the little things that count, and there is no point waxing lyrical in Parliament about things like asking for an “environmental tax” for SQ (when it’s on the verge of bankruptcy and just retrenched 4,300 staff) to virtue signal…when you cannot even take care of simple municipal issues.

“If you can’t handle the little things, then you most certainly cannot lead a country.”

When confronted with the possibility that the WP receives unequal funding to maintain its estate as compared with the funding PAP wards receive, Xiaxue said that while she is not the most informed “when it comes to financial stuff,” replying to emails and acknowledging problems have zero cost.

Asking how AHTC was able to rectify the issues a day after she made her complaints public if it really comes down to a disparity in funding, the influencer added that she was not asking for massive new upgrading but only for damaged cement to be patched up which would not be so costly.

Sharing screenshots of messages she was allegedly sent by residents of PAP wards praising the service their town councils provide, she said: “Call me a PAP dog if you want. Times have changed, in 2020 you rarely see anyone praising PAP anymore, online sentiment is 99% bashing them. Yet they quietly do all the sai kang for us everyday.

“But I believe just as people should call out the bad work PAP has done, good work they do should also be acknowledged. This will encourage public servants to work harder for citizens, after all nobody likes to feel invisible after working hard, right?”

The Independent has reached out to the WP for comment and will update this story with their response.

Xiaxue asks how she can be more “privileged” than Raeesah Khan