Sunday, June 22, 2025
27.8 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 1248

Singapore’s Working Hours: Longer Days, More Productivity or Just More Stress?

0
Stressed Asian woman at the office.
Photo: Freepik / tirachardz

SINGAPORE: Singapore’s working hours differ from the global 9-5 norm, extending from 9 to 6. This has sparked a discussion as Redditor Ireallylikecorn asked: “Do we really have much more to do compared to the Western workers, in the sense that they work 9-5 and we work 9-6?”

Ireallylikecorn pointed out: “There’re different views online, some would say working in Western countries are much more laidback, relax, there’re also some who said in Western countries workers have higher productivity, but I would beg to differ, longer hours can shun productivity as well. Besides, if the working hours are long, that’s where u hear ppl taking ‘2hr breaks’.”

She added, “In this video, Tharman also agreed the working hours in SG is a little long and we’ve reached the stage where the economy has became competitive already.”

@chowjiahui

Had a Q&A with Mr & Mrs Tharman. They were previously discussing about reducing stress in schools, & i couldnt help but wonder what could be done about stress in those adulting 🫠 Big ty to @Dargo for filming and editing

♬ original sound – chowjiahui – chowjiahui

In the video, the woman asked about the leading causes of Singapore’s mental health issues. She mentioned three: academic pressures, work demands, and financial stress.

President Tharman Shanmugaratnam answered about work management and culture while adding: “I’m speaking as a citizen and not as a presidential candidate…I think our work hours are a bit too long.”

Boundless pointed out Singaporean working hours: “For those covered and working five days a week, the maximum working hours are 9 hours a day (8 hours if working six days a week) or 44 hours a week, excluding lunch break.”

Working hours in different countries
Photo: Everhour

According to Everhour, “Mexico, Singapore, and Thailand among others work 6 days a week.”

Redditors gave different opinions on the matter. Some agree that Singaporean working hours are long, while some admit that even though it’s long, it doesn’t necessarily mean more work.

One Reddit user said: “Depends on what industry or work you’re in. Some industries or work require you to put in long hours others, 8 hrs is more than enough. But what I know (having worked in both Singapore and a western country) is there is more flexibility given to workers in western countries as they value work life balance.”

User kryew chimed in and added: “If you are efficient, and finish your given work earlier, you will be loaded with more work. Not all bosses, but many… Hence, employee wayang, take 2h break. Culture change will take some time, be kind to your colleagues.”

IAM_Moana shared that another reason why the work hours are longer is the work culture, saying: “We have a culture of taking long lunch breaks, going to eat lunch as a team, getting kopi and bubble tea after, etc. When I was working overseas everyone ate a packed lunch or a sandwich / salad at their desks and quickly went back to work after. Eating together was unheard of.”

Highlighting the flexible working hours outside Singapore, ArtistV-ErizaVerde added: “Mind you, it’s not just about 9-5. It’s also about 7.30am-3.30pm/7.00am‐3.00pm. Yes, flexible working hours. Friends in SG drop their jaws when I tell them I’m going home at 3pm.”

The debate on Singapore’s work hours continues.

Woman with S$11K F1 VIP access shares what she feasted @ event

0
Photo: TikTok screengrab/graceglazee

SINGAPORE: “It’s basically an all-you-can-eat buffet,” a TikTok user said of the food made available at the Paddock Club at last weekend’s F1 Singapore Grand Prix, posting a video of sushi, caviar, tuna, tempura, all-you-can-drink at a cocktail bar, as well as desserts from Cedric Grolet.

Of course, the food at the Paddock Club came at a price: a three-day pass costs S$11,000. Single-day tickets are less costly, but not by much. Still, because TikToker @graceglazee got to do something most of us can only dream of, many people wanted to see how the rich live it up, with her Sept 17 video reaching more than 257,000 views.

@graceglazee

Everything I ate at f1🏎🏁 #f1 #f1tiktok

♬ original sound – Formula 1

“Everything here is free! And it’s basically an all-you-can-eat buffet,” the TikToker wrote in the captions, adding that the day’s agenda was to eat as much as she was able before the race began.

Her first stop: the iconic Japanese restaurant Nobu. There, she enjoyed a number of seafood, both raw and cooked. “Fatty tuna was way too good,” she enthused.

From there, she headed to a cocktail buffet at Paradiso where her second drink came with cheese, then onto Dani Garcia, a restaurant with three Michelin stars, for more drinks, caviar, three servings of lobster, and some uni, which she again described as “way too delicious.”

“I can’t believe how much we’ve eaten at this point but it’s all so good,” she said.

And if you think the TikToker was too full and wanted to skip dessert, think again, because treats from famed pastry chef Cedric Golet were in the house.

“All you can eat Cedric Grolet pastries? I think I’m in heaven!” was her caption at this point, before adding that she realizes that she’s actually happiest when she’s eating.

And just before the race started, she had a cup of coffee.

The TikToker added snippets of more food she had been unable to try but vowed to be back.

Many TikTok users have commented on her post, including one who gently corrected her, writing, “Nothing is free. That’s the cost of the ticket.”

A three-day access pass costs a cool S$11,00 this year. Whew!

“Your life my dream,” wrote another.

Another asked, “Can I be your +1 hahaha?,” while one chimed in, “Next year can you bring me go?”

Someone who had the opposite experience from @Graceglazee.

wrote, “Hehe i had Mcdonalds during F1!!” /TISG

Singapore migrant workers treated to SG Grand Prix for the very first time, because “it’s only right they enjoy a little” 

Gerald Giam: Long-term passes for SG foreign spouses should be easier to process

0
Photo: Youtube screengrab / MCI Singapore

SINGAPORE: Workers’ Party MP Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) said in Parliament on Monday (Sept 18) that many of the cases presented to him during his ‘Meet the People’ Sessions (MOS) are related to immigration matters, with Singaporeans feeling disappointed when their spouses are denied an LTVP (Long Term Visit Pass) or permanent residency.

“The Government should not make it difficult for a married couple to stay together by denying an LTVP to a foreign spouse or child of a Singaporean. Family formation is one of the core social values in Singapore and our immigration policy must support it,” he said.

Mr Giam noted that his sessions are mainly attended by lower-income Singaporeans, who ask him to appeal for them when their spouses’ applications to stay in Singapore are rejected.

Some share with me their deep longing to start a family, but their hesitation due to their spouse’s uncertain immigration status. Most don’t understand why the applications were rejected because no reasons are provided by ICA (Immigration and Checkpoints Authority),” he added.

Speaking on the Immigration Amendment Bill, Mr Giam noted that around a quarter of all marriages are between Singaporeans and foreigners, but settling down in Singapore involves challenges.

The first challenge is for the spouse to stay in the country on a long-term basis, first through an LTVP and then permanent residency, a difficult process for those with low educational qualifications and incomes.

Mr Giam noted that a Pre-Marriage LTVP Assessment (PMLA) was introduced by the ICA in 2015, and it would indicate whether a foreign spouse could qualify for an LTVP.

However, the take-up rate for completing the PMLA has been poor. Many residents Mr Giam has met are unaware that the assessment exists.

“I am aware that the ROM website advises them to undergo a PMLA. However, is this highlighted to the couple in person before the marriage registration process, keeping in mind that many of these couples may not be proficient in reading English?” asked the MP.

He also noted that the ICA, in general, does not say why an application for LTVP or PR was denied.  He pointed out that in Canada and Australia, spouses and family reasons are given the reasons when such applications are rejected.

After proposing four approaches to improve the immigration process for the immediate family members of Singaporeans, he added, While I am grateful for the chance to engage with more constituents at my ‘Meet the People’ sessions, submitting appeals through one’s MP should not be the default means of communication between citizens and the government.

An accessible, self-service channel should be made available, particularly for appeals with a substantial volume. A secure online form should be made available on the ICA website for all immigration appeals, with clear instructions guiding appellants to submit new facts not provided in earlier applications. /TISG

In Parliament: Gerald Giam asks about background checks for foreign nationals who open businesses in SG, cites Chinese crypto mogul sued by US SEC

Upset customer: Samsung phone software update leaves vertical lines on her phone

0
Photo: FB screengrab/COMPLAINT SINGAPORE

SINGAPORE: A woman took to social media, frustrated with her Samsung phone and the company’s customer service.

Ms Megha Sharma Singh posted a photo of her phone on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page on Monday (Sept 18), showing vertical lines running from top to bottom of the screen.

The lines appeared after she carried out a software update, something other Samsung phone users have noticed and complained about over the past year.

“This is what happens to Samsung phones… after Software upgrade.. buy a phone 2800sgd worth and then get it repaired for 650sgd…,” Ms Singh wrote.

She also wrote that the company has the “Worst Customer Service,” explaining that she had to pay for the repair since her phone is no longer covered under a warranty.

“And the BEST part.. it (was) spoiled because of SOFTWARE UPGRADE..,” she added.

Her post has been shared more than 200 times and has received almost 300 comments.

The Independent Singapore has reached out to Ms Singh, as well as to Samsung, for further comments or updates.

However, Ms Singh is not the only one who has faced this issue.

In February, a woman wrote on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE page that  Samsung charged her almost $400 when she brought her phone for repair as a green line appeared on her screen when she updated it. Several other Samsung phone users also posted about the same problems.

The green line has appeared on phone displays not only in Singapore but in other countries across the globe.

“A bright vertical green line suddenly appeared on my Note 20 Ultra screen after installing the latest software update. The phone has never been dropped or submerged in water. The line just appeared all of a sudden. The same thing happened to my S series phone early last year.

Now I am seeing multiple posts in these forums this month reporting the very same issue. Searched the web and also found several reports from Samsung users over the world this month. What is up with these updates causing the green lines? Planned obsolescence? Force users to spend money for repair?” wrote one Samsung phone user in a community forum last June.

Many netizens across the globe appear to be waiting for the company to address the problem.

The interwebs offer helpful tips for resolving the issue, like this page does, including factory resetting your phone. However, anyone who does so should know the risks involved and may want to bring the phone to a professional. /TISG

Customer frustrated with high repair fees for the Samsung flip phone and S20 issues

Ong Beng Seng appears at SG F1 amid ongoing CPIB probe

0
Photo: Singapore Grand Prix

SINGAPORE: Many people wondered if Singapore-based Malaysian tycoon Ong Being Seng would show up at this year’s Formula One Singapore Airlines Grand Prix since he is under investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).

But the 79-year-old Mr Ong turned up for the event he is largely responsible for, and photos of him at the event have been published on several news sites.

On Saturday, The Straits Times posted a photo of a smiling Mr Ong on its Facebook page.

Photo: The Straits Times Facebook

Singapore Grand Prix also featured photos of Mr Ong beside Chrome Hearts Jewellery Designer Moko. The designer is seen in pictures with his arm around the billionaire businessman.

Photo: Singapore Grand Prix

The tycoon also mingled with guests in the paddock on Sept 16, TODAY reported.

Photo: Screengrab TODAY Online

While Mr Ong built his name and fortune as a hotelier, he is best known for bringing F1 to the country, launching the Singapore Grand Prix in 2008.

A friend of F1 boss Bernie Eccleston, Mr Ong helped seal the deal in 2007 that brought the race to Singapore.

Moreover, he is the sole shareholder of the event, the first Formula 1 street race in Asia and the first race to be held at night in F1’s history.

However, in July this year, the billionaire businessman was given a notice of arrest linked to an investigation involving Transport Minister S Iswaran.

Mr Iswaran is the subject of an investigation by the CPIB and was asked by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on Jul 12 to take a leave of absence while the probe is ongoing.

The case involving the Transport Minister had been termed by the international press as the ‘Most Serious Graft Probe’ in 34 years.

On July 14, Mr Ong was asked by the CPIB to provide information on a corruption probe involving M Iswaran.

Mr Ong’s company, Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), said in a statement that day that he was issued a notice of arrest and had posted bail of S$100,000.

HPL said Mr Ong was “cooperating fully with CPIB and has provided the information requested”.

“As this is an ongoing matter, he is unable to provide further details at this point,” added HPL.

Hotel Properties owns Four Seasons, Forum The Shopping Mall, and Concorde Shopping Mall in Singapore, among other properties globally. Mr Ong co-founded the company in 1980. /TISG

Ong Beng Seng, Iswaran and Formula One Singapore Grand Prix

USA Dethrones Spain In FIBA Ranking 2023

0
FIBA Ranking 2023

In the latest FIBA rankings released on September 15th, the USA dethroned Spain and took over their original spot with 786.6 points.

FIBA rankings 2022

Last year, when the FIBA rankings came out, it was bad news for the US – Spain had just put an end to their 12-year basketball dynasty. Spain had moved up to number one, while the US had dropped to number two with a score of 757.5. Spain’s success at the FIBA Basketball World Cup 2019 and FIBA EuroBasket 2022, as well as their quarterfinal run at the Tokyo Olympics, enabled them to overtake the United States by a margin of 1.1 points.

This year, the tables turned when the USA returned to the top of the leaderboard thanks to its consistent performance at major championships over the past three years.

FIBA World Cup 2023

The USA had an impressive run at the beginning of the World Cup. They had an impressive winning streak until they went head to head with Lithuania and lost with 104-110. Although they had already secured spots in the quarterfinals and the Paris Olympics, before the game even started, they were still affected by their first loss.

The USA went on to beat Italy, but then lost to Germany. They also lost against Canada, missing out on the chance to at least claim the bronze medal.

With the dismal fourth place finish, this put the USA in a state of disarray, consequently sending their fans into a tailspin.

Redemption at FIBA rankings 2023

Although the United States did not win a medal at the FIBA World Cup, the Americans were able to reclaim the number one ranking in FIBA. The United States had a record of 786.6 points, and Spain was in second place with 778.6 points.

In addition to this, there were other significant shifts in the rankings, beginning with Germany, who won their first World Cup title and moved up to third place from 11th last year. Germany saw a big jump in their score this year, going up from 640.8 to 759.7.

After winning the bronze medal, Canada, which had 745.5 points, moved up nine spots in the world rankings, moving from 15th to 6th. Serbia also moved up from 6th to 5th with 755.6 points. However, the biggest change this year has come from Latvia, who have risen 22 spots to 8th place thanks to their incredible underdog performance that got them 5th in FIBA World Cup.

🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 🚨

🇺🇸 USA reclaim #1 spot in FIBA Men’s World Ranking!

📊 See the full rankings here, presented by @Nike: https://t.co/GeTyrrEHDF pic.twitter.com/oDljE0NUAR

— FIBA (@FIBA) September 15, 2023

The official rankings were posted by FIBA in their X account, and this garnered the fans attention.

“The difference between best in the world and world champions.” -@IdowuJudah

The difference between best in the world and world champions.

— Judah Idowu (@IdowuJudah) September 15, 2023

“1 in the world but not world champions”- @tadashiroll

#1 in the world but not world champions

— Derek 🍣 Tadashiroll (@tadashiroll) September 15, 2023

“Congratulations USA”- @Dailytweet40461

Congratulations USA

— Dailytweets (@Dailytweet40461) September 15, 2023

One fan also commented on the post, saying that they can now call themselves “World Champions”, alluding to Noah Lyles’ post-meet trash talk that seemingly questioned the NBA’s World Championship title.

“Oh this is nice! 👌🏾
Now they can call themselves world champions 🤣.”– @engineerbae_

Oh this is nice! 👌🏾
Now they can call themselves world champions 🤣.

— Nay🌸 (@engineerbae_) September 15, 2023

Read more sports news here

Lionel Messi spends $10.8 million on a new waterfront estate in South Florida, details of the residence are revealed

Why higher fares for bus & MRT when SBS & SMRT are making profits?

0
Photo: Freepik (for illustration purposes only)

SINGAPORE: SBS and SMRT both reported higher profits this year.

So why will bus and train fares go up more than ever before? asked a commuter in the United Singaporean Facebook Group.

Bus and train fares will go up by 11 cents from Dec 23, generating more revenue for the. transport operators.

SBS Group reported a S$68 million profit attributable to shareholders in 2022, up from S$51.6 million in 2021, on S$1,515.3 million in revenue, and SMRT Trains reported a S$42.5 million profit after tax in the financial year 2023, up from S$11.2 million in 2022, on S$813.2 million in revenue.

According to their annual reports, these are big, profitable companies, but they need to charge higher fares. That’s the view of industry observers.

The Public Transport Council, which regulates fares in Singapore, sanctioned a seven per cent increase. This is the highest fare hike since 2019, when fares increased by seven per cent, and commuters had to pay up to nine more cents.

But the transport operators this year wanted even more. They applied for a 22.6 per cent hike, citing higher energy prices, a competitive labour market, and a slow and uncertain recovery in ridership.

And they were eligible for a 22.6 per cent hike under the fare adjustment formula, said the Public Transport Council (PTC) in a news release. They could have got a 12 per cent hike this year because of rising energy prices, core inflation and strong wage growth in 2022. And they could have got an additional 10.6 per cent deferred from the 2022 fare review exercise when they were allowed only a 2.9 per cent hike.

But the PTC instead sanctioned a 7 per cent increase this year to keep “public transport fares affordable”.

More hikes to come

However, fares will go up again.

The PTC didn’t dismiss the operators’ demand for a 22.6 per cent fare increase. It merely deferred the hike.

This was confirmed by PTC chair Janet Ang and chief executive Tan Kim Hong at a press conference.

“We will ensure that public transport remains affordable for commuters, but we seek commuters’ understanding that the fare increase is necessary to meet rising costs and ensure that we can continue to provide better salaries and training for about 22,000 public transport workers,” said Ms Ang.

The PTC says public transport remains affordable.

It says the average public transport user spends 1.7 per cent of their monthly household income on transport, while lower-income households spend 2.4 per cent.

“The fare hike is small compared to the increase in operating costs, analysts say,” reported Channel NewsAsia without going into figures.

Incidentally, passenger fares are not the only source of funds for the transport operators. They also receive government subsidies.

The Government subsidises them to the tune of more than S$2 billion a year. And they will get an additional S$300 million from the Government this year because they have not been granted a bigger fare hike.

Concessions for low-wage workers, seniors, national servicemen and students

The Government will also introduce a monthly hybrid – bus and train – concession travel pass for low-wage workers costing $96 from Dec 23. This is $32 less than the price of adult monthly travel passes, which will remain unchanged at $128.

Monthly hybrid travel passes for seniors, national servicemen and students will be up to 10 per cent cheaper, costing S$4.50 to $9.50 less than now.

The cost of a monthly concession pass for those with disabilities will also be reduced from $64 to $58 – the same as that for seniors.

The changes to the monthly concession passes will benefit about 60,000 existing and expected new monthly pass holders.

SBS and SMRT contributions to Public Transport Fund

SBS Transit and SMRT Trains will also have to make a bigger contribution to the Public Transport Fund.

The PTC has decided that SBS Transit should contribute 15 per cent and SMRT Trains 30 per cent of their expected increase in revenue – a total of S$15.85 million ($3.14 million and $12.71 million respectively) – to the fund.

The PTC has recommended that the Government draw on the fund to provide further assistance to lower-income resident households in the form of public transport vouchers.

The fare hike comes as the public transport network — the MRT in particular — is expanding. The Thomson-East Coast Line opened in January 2020. The North East Line, Circle Line and Downtown Line are all being expanded. New transport operators, for example, Tower Transit and Go-Ahead Singapore, have also arrived on the scene.

Previous fare hikes

Last year, the 2.9 per cent fare hike followed two years of unchanged fares. Fares did not go up in 2020, the year of the general election, and 2021. The PTC did not raise fares then because it recognised that Singaporeans had been through a difficult time during the COVID-19 pandemic and wanted to help them.

However, the seven per cent fare hike in 2019 was the biggest till then. Fares went up by up to nine cents as a result.

Fares went up in 2018, too — by six cents.

But that followed three years of fare reductions. Those were the days!

Or were they?

One may not want to go back to income levels back then.

The Singapore Department of Statistics website says the median monthly household income from work, including employer CPF contributions, was S$10,099 in 2022, up from S$9,023 in 2017 and S$8,846 in 2016.

Public Transport Council Chief Exec outrightly says more fare hikes in next few years to come, as fees for adults increase from December

NUS Asst Prof apologises for East Asia Forum article, retracts piece

0
Photo: Screengrab/ East Asia Forum

SINGAPORE: An assistant professor from the National University of Singapore has apologised for an opinion piece he wrote for the academic website East Asia Forum, for which a correction order was issued on Sept 13.

He has also retracted the piece from the site. The page where it was published now reads, “The 18 August 2023 article titled ‘A spate of scandals strikes Singapore’ has been removed from our website at the request of the author.”

The order, issued under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), was for Dr Ying-Kit Chan’s piece titled “A spate of scandals strikes Singapore.”

The piece contained false statements about the independence of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s approach to addressing marital infidelity among parliamentarians, the government said.

Responding to questions from TODAY Online on Monday night (Sept 18), Dr Chan said he “sincerely and unreservedly apologises” for the errors in the piece and thanked the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) for the correction it issued.

He added that the NUS had no knowledge of the piece and that the op-ed had been written of his own volition

“I am remorseful and deeply sorry to the prime minister, CPIB (Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau), NUS, and all the persons whom I have named for my actions and the distress my article has caused,” TODAY quotes Dr Chan as saying.

He also wrote that he had “failed to consider the fact that the Government approaches allegations of corruption and misconduct in personal lives differently, and that the PM has indeed not conflated the issues of corruption and marital infidelity”.

“My neglect and oversight of the facts have resulted in a flawed and biased article, which lacked academic rigour and conveyed false and misleading information to its readers. I will exercise greater prudence in my scholarship and hereby undertake that I will not contribute to speculations and unverified rumours,” added Dr Chan.

He then went on to thank PMO for its corrections and said: “I am truly sorry and have retracted the article from East Asia Forum.”

The NUS academic’s article had received considerable attention. However, the PMO said, “Whilst the author is free to express his views on the above matters, his article makes false and misleading statements while omitting key facts on these matters of public interest.”

On Sept 16, after East Asia Forum failed to adhere to the correction order, the government required Internet service providers (ISPs) in Singapore to block access to the site.

The geo-block disallows netizens in Singapore to access the site, especially the portions where false information was disseminated. /TISG

Govt geo-blocks East Asia Forum for not abiding by the full requirements of POFMA order

 

Making Real Friends at Work: Can It Happen?

0
Photo: freepik/katemangostar (for illustration purposes only)

SINGAPORE: There is a different notion when it comes to friendships at work. Some are comfortable with it, while some are hesitant.

One Singaporean Redditor shared, “I feel that people at my workplace only know me for my alias and job title.” He continued asking, “Do you think its possible to forge genuine friendships at work?”

Redditor One_Cup2807 shared, “I have no friends but work friends, because of my personality.”

Another user agreed, sharing, “Same here. I think its not too bad la cos like sometimes if you know them too well, you can’t be professional also. And tbh, I also dont know how long I will stay in this company. Dont want to feel sad later if I resign. Easiest way to prevent getting hurt is keeping a distance, my coping mechanism, that’s why I have no friends.”

Some shared it’s ‘possible but rare’: “Possible but rare. Why? Because you already see them for 8 to 12 hours a day (if you OT) for 5 days a week. Most people would want to spend more time with their loved ones and families in their free time instead of spending even more time with colleagues. Even if you are on good terms like friends with your colleagues.”

While some are keen on keeping boundaries: “No, and by choice. Take it from me, make sure that anything you say can and will be used against you in any form. If you MUST gossip, do it verbally. Be very careful with text messages as they can serve as evidence against you…Your colleagues are not your friends.”

Another user jokingly added, “Dangerous territory” while user Bitinggames agreed, saying, “Important to draw lines at work.”

The importance of friendship at work

Research supports the importance of friendships at work. According to My Careers Future, “a 2021 survey found that 57% of employees felt that having a best friend made their work more enjoyable, while 22% agreed that work friends made them more productive. Conversely, those with no friends or who have fewer than five friends often felt lonelier and more disengaged.”

It was also explained by Professor Teresa Amabile, a professor from Harvard Business School, that ‘one of the things that contribute to positive inner work life is a sense of camaraderie with teammates and close co-workers’, she said: “People are more creative and productive when they experience more positive inner work life, including more positive emotions, stronger motivation toward the work itself and more positive perceptions of the organization.”

Although Singaporeans’ opinions on workplace friendships may differ, with some valuing friendly connections and others preferring a more professional boundary, there are ways to foster better friendships at work.

Building Friendships at Work

  1. Find common ground: Start conversations around hobbies, passions, or life perspectives you relate to.
  2. Try small talk: Not everyone is comfortable sharing their lives, but try taking a moment to check in with your colleagues before work starts. Small gestures can make a big difference.
  3. Celebrate together: Celebrating can sometimes be difficult, as Redditor thethinkingbrain said: “if your job involves making a living and there’s promotions on the line.’ However, to form a strong bond, it’s nice to acknowledge your colleagues’ success.
  4. Plan something fun: Something fun doesn’t mean something grand. It can be as simple as sharing a meal at lunchtime or going to the gym together.

Although not everyone prefers having friends at work, ShuaigeTiger said: “Of course it’s possible. Met some of my best friends from different jobs over the years.”

 

Sylvia Lim calls for banks to reimburse scam victims

0

SINGAPORE: In Parliament on Monday (Sept 18), Workers’ Party MP Sylvia Lim (Aljunied GRC) said that in light of the increase in reported cases of scams and cybercrimes, banks should take the lead in combating scams, instead of placing the burden of responsibility on consumers.

The WP chair said that these crimes have grown by 25 per cent year on year, for a total of 3,700 cases or 92 reports per day, adding, “On the human level, the suffering caused by such crimes is devastating.”

Scams have gotten more sophisticated, and even young people who are tech-savvy have been victimized by scammers, she added.

Ms Lim said that as an MP, she has met “too many residents” who’ve lost money, some in the hundreds of thousands, which is not likely to be recovered. She added that these losses are not just financial but impact their families, especially those with serious health issues who are vulnerable or are supporting others.

She then made the case for banks to reimburse scam victims who were not fraudulent or grossly negligent. Banks are also to take the lead in combating scams as banks are better qualified and have more resources than consumers.

“Banks should take on an outsized role in preventing (scams). Banks are able to monitor transactions, block suspicious payment flows, and keep abreast of the latest technological developments. Such endeavours are beyond the remit of most bank customers,” said Ms Lim.

She added that they are more equipped to identify and detect suspicious transactions, citing the example of when a customer’s account is emptied quickly, transfer limits are quickly changed, and new payees are added.

The WP Chair also said in her speech that moves for banks to reimburse scam victims who have not been grossly negligent or have had transactions involving cryptocurrency or international payments have begun in Britain and that Australia and the European Commission are also looking into similar measures.

“I believe that this solution can and should be implemented in Singapore. It could cover all transfers between banks in Singapore via the FAST and PayNow systems. Like the UK system, it could be scoped to protect customers who are consumers, small businesses, and charities.

This would give Singaporeans the confidence to transact using these methods without fear that their savings will be unknowingly siphoned off. It would also ensure that victims of these scams would be compensated in a timely manner without having to undergo a complex adjudication process,” added Ms Lim. /TISG

Over 6,600 Singaporeans have lost almost $100 million to recruitment scams since Jan