Teen cyclist involved in fatal crash tells Judge 73-year-old victim would have survived if he was younger

5535
ST
 

19-year-old Khairul Hairuman admitted yesterday to causing the death of an elderly pedestrian after he ran a red light and crashed into 73-year-old Mr Tong Cheng Poh while riding a bicycle without working brakes. Khairul was charged with causing death by a rash act after the victim sustained serious injuries and passed away the day after the crash occurred on 13 April 2017.

 

Khairul represented himself in Community Court and told Judge Eddy Tham during mitigation that Mr Ting would have survived the crash he he been in his 40s.

The teenager added that he did not flee the scene following the crash and that he call for assistance, carried Mr Tong to the roadside and waited for the ambulance.

The court heard that Khairul’s bicycle had not been fitted with brakes during the time of the accident and that his bicycle was not designed to be used on roads such as the Lorong Ah Soon road where the accident occurred.

On the day of the crash, Khairul had been cycling between the two lanes at Lorong Ah Soo amid heavy traffic on both sides. As he approached a pedestrian crossing, Khairul mistakenly thought the light had turned green for him, despite the fact that a bus was blocking his view. Khairul sped up and crashed into Mr Tong.

A week before the accident occurred, Khairul had removed the front brakes on his bicycle which had been defective and did not replace the brakes. An inspection of his bicycle also showed the absence of rear brake levers or calipers but found a rear “coaster brake” that operates by turning the pedals backwards only at very slow speeds.

Arguing for a four month jail term, Deputy Public Prosecutor Lee Zu Zhao said: “Without either front or rear brakes, the accused would normally use his right foot to step on the rear tyre of the said bicycle to slow down, and it would take at least four to five seconds to stop completely.”

Interestingly, Khairul is described to be a delivery rider for food delivery company Deliveroo in court documents but Deliveroo has denied that he is an employee and clarified that he was not making a delivery when the accident occurred. The company added: “We will work with the authorities however we can to assist them in this matter. This is a tragic incident and our thoughts are with Mr Tong’s family at this very difficult time.”

25 COMMENTS

  1. Just so full of bull simply to get lighter sentence….. why not also say possessed by spirit at the point of impact?

    Delivery or not….. loads of moronic cyclists & PMD users are out there 24/7 terrorizing roads, crossings, walkways, Footpaths….. all cuz of the Morons at LTA that made it all possible!

    Ng Chee Meng! Still NO Corrective Actions?!?!?

    Return all Footpaths to Foot Only use unless One is certified a handicap that needs to ride in a motorized wheelchair. Nothing else other than Prams should be permitted.

  2. What? Looking at 4 months?
    “Khairul represented himself in Community Court and told Judge Eddy Tham during mitigation that Mr Ting would have survived the crash he he been in his 40s.”
    Sounds familiar right? Ownself absolve ownself by blaming the victim. Tsk tsk tsk

  3. Kind of moronic answer. Sounds like “If there isn’t so many people using the MRT at the same time, there will not be overcrowding issue. Therefore it is the commuters fault, not MRT fault” or “The MRT is more reliable now, even though it has more breakdowns” ….