Home News Featured News Why only partially nationalise public transport? Govt should go all the way

Why only partially nationalise public transport? Govt should go all the way

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

By: Chris Kuan

I am sure that Desmond Quek, SMRT CEO will get a round of condemnation from media by saying this:

“Despite the steady increase in non-fare earnings, this trend of declining profitability is expected to persist under the current financing framework as the additional capital expenditure and increased depreciation would exert additional pressure on the cash flows and profits of the SMRT train entities.”

He is talking about the $2.8b needed to upkeep the ageing rail infrastructure as too onerous for SMRT to bear and of the shortfall in profitability due to fare concessions etc.

- Advertisement -

We should refrain from shooting the messenger. If a company is unable to meet a minimum return on risk capital, that company ought not be in existence because shareholders will have better use of their funds. If the business that the company is involved in, is unable to provide the required profitability to meet that minimum return because of political and dynamics, then the company should exit the business and that business should be in state hands.

What Mr Quek said is not wrong and he is pointing straight at the conundrum of running a public good, i.e. public transportation under the demands of capital, that is to say under a privatised operating framework. That is why I wrote previously that privatised public transportation do not really work because pits an essential service to the public against the interest of shareholders. In most cases, shareholders win out at the cost of making the public pissed off.

is for the same reason the public except the rich are unhappy with involvement of insurance companies in the provision of public healthcare. These sort of services are best provided by the through its low cost of financing and tax and spend prerogatives, can shoulder these risks far better than the private sector.

So don’t kick Mr Quek even if he is well compensated for his troubles. The real problem rests with the ’s public transport policy and its ideology that even public goods ought to be privatised. I am not even sure the complete nationalisation of the rail and rolling stock assets leaving a privatised company pay for the license to operate really solve the issue.

The question that pops is if the entire infrastructure and equipment set up is nationalised, why not nationalise the operating company as well.

Please follow and like :
Tweet
Share
No tags for this post.
- Advertisement -

Jamus Lim not only praises Singapore’s hawker culture, he learns to make popiahs from scratch too

After joining volunteers from Anchorvale at a popiah-skin making workshop, Jamus Lim wrote about how crucial it is to preserve Singapore’s hawker culture. In a post on Tuesday (Dec 1), the Sengkang GRC Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) wrote...

It’s past 11 pm but elderly blind man is going door-to-door to sell biscuits

Singapore -- A Facebook user has posted about meeting an elderly blind man was  on his way to sell biscuits to a regular customer at his block even though it was past 11 at night. In the post on Tuesday (Dec...

PM’s libel suit: TOC editor explains why he did not take down article

Singapore -- On the third day (Dec 2) of the libel suit filed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, The Online Citizen (TOC) editor Terry Xu said he would have complied with a letter of demand from PM Lee’s office to...
Please follow and like us:
Tweet
Share
No tags for this post.
Follow Me
Tweet