Thursday, May 8, 2025
29.2 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 4325

Ong Ye Kung’s stance on parking in schools reflect everything wrong with 4G leadership

Defending his Ministry’s policy to impose parking charges for teachers, Minister for Education Ong Ye Kung said that the decision has to do with “self-discipline”.

Earlier, an AGO report said that free parking for teachers is akin to a hidden subsidy that contravenes the “clean wage policy” set by the public service division. The clean wage policy makes it a point to make sure that salaries are all accounted for and there are no hidden perks.

Making reference to the AGO report, the 4G Minister said that the government has to “respect our internal system of checks and balances” and “cannot pick and choose which finding to address or comply with – we take them all seriously”.

For someone who has some experience working with Government-linked companies, it is surprising that the Minister would not know how to deal with an audit report.

In the corporate world, there are numerous instances where management disagree with the findings of their auditors and would defend their decision in the audit response. The final decision would then be decided by the audit committee.

Should his ministry not have to bring this up to the President or Prime Minister for them to decide on this issue? Shouldn’t there be more comprehensive consultation on this matter, given the backlash it has produced?

A good benchmark that the government could adopt would be to look at what is fair, reasonable and in line with international standards. For example, schools the UK have the right to decide on whether they wish to charge teachers for parking or not.

Otherwise, where does one draw the line? Should teachers be expected to pay for coffee in the pantry because that similarly accounts for hidden perks that is not accounted for in their wages?

Even former NMP Calvin Cheng – who has been known to be supportive of PAP policies – seems to disagree with Minister Ong.

In a Facebook post, Cheng offered the notion that if “parking was already free and there [was] no monetary value to [it]” then this “cannot be counted as a perk and a contravention of the clean-wage policy”.

Others were less convinced and labelled this as weak leadership, with one user commenting on the Minster’s Facebook post that his defence was downright lame.

The user wrote: “AGO is not a political office. Yours is. The difference is factual vs contextual. AGO does not balance pros and cons. Political leaders must. Why take the lead from AGO instead of leading? Lame excuse for wrong decision”.

Just last week, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat did say that the 4G leaders with listen to the people “with humility and respect”. Less than a week later, the Education Minister has proven this wrong with his line of reasoning. Surely – given the sentiments from the people – the minister cannot claimed to have listened?

It is clearly disappointing that he has neither listened to the ground with humility nor acted with the slightest bit of common sense.

Pachaimuthu Ali

The views expressed in this piece do not represent the views of the editorial.

65-year-old motorcyclist suffers injuries after HDB carpark gantry barrier fell on his head

An elderly technician Tan Ying Xiong suffered injuries last Tuesday after a HDB carpark gantry barrier at Block 659B Jurong West St 64 fell on his head, around 7.30 in the morning. The shocking incident caused the 65-year-old to become pinned underneath his motorcycle, where he remained trapped for at least ten minutes.

Tan, who has lived in Jurong for the past 18 years, recounted to the Chinese daily that he rode his motorcycle towards the gantry and waited for the car in front of him to move off, before he rode forward. His motorcycle’s IU was scanned and the gantry barrier went up as per normal, and Tan moved forward to exit the open air carpark.

Suddenly, the barrier came crashing down on him. Tan shared, “I had no time to react when I felt a metal rod fall on my head.”

The impact not only threw Tan off balance, causing him to fall to the right, it also caused his motorcycle to fall on him and pin him to the ground. With no other pedestrian or commuter in sight, the trapped Tan slowly managed to get his hands on his cell phone and contacted his wife.

Fortunately, another motorcyclist and a pedestrian chanced upon Tan after he had been trapped for ten minutes and they helped to free him. The kind strangers helped Tan to the kerb and helped him to call an ambulance.

Tan, who suffered abrasions to his right shoulder and leg, was conveyed to the hospital. He was discharged that same day.

HDB hits back against taxi driver’s story that he was issued a summon while he was helping a wheelchair-bound passenger

Housing Development Board (HDB) has debunked a taxi driver’s claims that he was issued a summon for stopping his car on a service road for “less than 2 min” while he was only helping a wheelchair-bound passenger get to the elevator.

Facebook user Max Tan, the taxi driver, wrote on Facebook recently, “Alighting a old wheelchair old lady. Engine on. Helping to push her up the slope to lift lobby…time taken less than 2 min.” He continued, “Got this summon. I approached this idiot and ask why?? Can’t u see I helping this wheel chair lady??? He said Law stated No parking at all times even with engine on…..I say thank you..”

Tan ended his post by striking a sarcastic tone. He wrote, “From now on…this summon will remind me what Singapore is becoming…I eeish one day his mother is my customer with wheel chair…Do Blame me for throwing her on the road side…”

In his post, Tan included a map showing where the parking offence occurred. He also shared a shot of the summon which shows that the incident occurred on 24 May at 12.25pm, near 196a Punggol Field rOAD. Tan was fined $100 for flouting Rule 3 (a) of the Housing & Development (Common Property and Open Spaces) Rules.

Standing by the traffic summon, HDB has revealed that Tan alighted his passenger at the service road, in front of the central rubbish chute, while the two nearby loading bays were empty and available for him to have stopped his car to help a customer. The board added that these bays have ramps that could have better facilitated movement for the alleged wheelchair-bound passenger.

Besides this, HDB debunked Tan’s claims that he left his engine on and that he was gone for “less than 2 min”. The authority revealed that Tan had parked his vehicle at the service road for 10 minutes with the engine turned off and noted that the service road is meant to be kept clear at all times for the use of emergency vehicles.

Tan has since removed his post from Facebook.

69-year-old woman knocked down in collision on the same day 6-year-old lost his life in tragic accident

A 69-year-old pedestrian was conveyed to Singapore General Hospital after she was knocked down by a car at the junction of Lim Teck Kim Road and Tanjong Pagar Road, last Thursday (24 May). A six-year-old boy tragically lost his life in a collision involving a public bus at Choa Chu Kang, that same day.

An eyewitness known as Adrian recounted that the incident involving the elderly pedestrian occurred around 5pm that day and claims that a black car struck the woman after the driver made a right turn “without looking”.

A photo shared by Adrian shows the victim lying in the middle of the road as a man stands beside her and appears to be speaking on a mobile phone. The police have confirmed that investigations are ongoing.

https://theindependent.sg.sg/tragedy-involving-6-year-old-boy-draws-xenophobic-comments-online/

Aunty screams and strikes young girl maliciously on public bus for no good reason as fellow commuters remain silent

An older woman has been caught on camera lashing out at a girl on board a public bus in Singapore. It remains unclear when the incident occurred.

In the video, the older aunty – dressed in white – can be heard screaming at the girl who takes a seat beside her. The aunty can be heard shouting, “What happened to me? Just now your bag knock at me, you know? You understand a not?!” As the flabbergasted girl remains silent, the aunty violently grabs and pulls the girl’s backpack while continuing to scream, “You understand a not? Say sorry first. Don’t be so rude, okay?”

The aunty then shoves the girl – who can be seen struggling to move from the seat – against the bus window before taking her seat again. As the girl tries once more to move from the seat, the aunty refuses to give way and instead, stands up and pushes the girl so forcefully that the girl falls backwards.

The aunty finally lets the girl out of the seat after this but pushes the girl from the back as she moves out, causing the poor commuter to stumble. The harassed victim fortunately regains her footing and alights at the next bus stop.

All this while, the other commuters on the bus can be seen taking videos of the incident with their mobile phones. It does not appear as though any of the other commuters went to the girl’s aid or confronted the bully based on the clip that has been trending on social media.

The video circulating online was posted on Facebook group, Singapore Incident, but appears to have been removed or made private. The video has also been circulating widely on messaging application, WhatsApp. A copy of the video can be seen here.

Netizens have flamed the older woman for her shocking behaviour while extending their support to the girl:

The Two Faces of Meritocracy in Singapore

Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam reiterated last Sunday that anyone can succeed in Singapore regardless of background.

“Whoever your parents are, whatever your situation is, if you work hard, you can succeed, even (for children of) single parents, it depends on your determination,” he said.

To drive home his point, Shanmugam pointed out that all three front-runners to be the next Prime Minister – Heng Swee Keat, Chan Chun Sing and Ong Ye Kung – emerged from challenging backgrounds.

So it’s that whole thingy called meritocracy.

Let’s look at one face of it.

Goh Chok Tong came from a difficult background – his father died when he was very young, and his mother slogged as a teacher to support him and his sister. Goh rose to become Prime Minister of the country.

Chan Chun Sing’s parents divorced when he was young and his mother raised him. His grandparents lived with them in a three-room HDB flat. He could become the country’s next Prime Minister.

Halimah Yacob lost her father, a watchman, when she was eight. At 10, Halimah assisted her mother at a food stall, washing dishes, clearing tables and serving customers. Today, she is the country’s President.

These are exceptional cases of Singaporeans who rose to the top from humble origin. They represent one facet of meritocracy in Singapore, the one that we hear talked about by politicians like K Shanmugam.

Then there is the other facet of meritocracy.

Meritocracy is when all three children of Lee Kuan Yew become President’s Scholars, and the two sons are also SAF Scholars, one becoming Prime Minister.

Meritocracy is former President Tony Tan’s son Patrick and daughter Patricia rising to become President’s Scholars; Patrick was also granted an unheard-of 12 years’ disruption from national service to complete further studies, and eventually served in the specially created post of medical researcher.

Meritocracy dictates that Generals with zero private sector experience and zero industry experience are appointed CEOs of SMRT.

Meritocracy is such that Generals and SAF Scholars are systematically inducted into the top echelons of the government and government-linked corporations – among the current batch are PM Lee Hsien Loong, DPM Teo Chee Hean, Chan Chun Sing, Tan Chuan-Jin, Ng Chee Meng, Ng Chee Kern, Ng Chee Peng, Neo Kian Hong and Ng Yat Chung.

Meritocracy is when Singapore’s most powerful man is married to the most powerful woman – PM Lee and Ho Ching, CEO of Temasek, have both been in their respective jobs for 14 years running.

Meritocracy can even be reinterpreted – the Elected Presidency becomes Reserved for Malay candidates only; and only one candidate (based on merit) qualifies and automatically becomes President.

So there you have it, the two faces of meritocracy in Singapore.

Which is the one you see? Which is the one you are familiar with?

Augustine Low is a proud but concerned citizen. Voicing independent, unplugged opinion is his contribution to citizen engagement.

Who’s who in 1MDB scandal: The men and women who did the leg work

We know who are the main actors in the 1MDB scandal. From ex-Prime Minister Najib Razak (creator of the 1MDB) to the elusive Jho Low or the famous Malaysian playboy who tried to woo Miranda Kerr with expensive jewels.

We have heard a lot about them, including the step-son of Najib, Riza Aziz. Riza is the film producer behind the ‘Wolf of Wallstreet’, a US$100 million production that made him a lot of money.

Here are the names of the people who were doing the legwork for the central figure and one of the “key persons of interest” in the 1MDB saga, Low Taek Jho:

Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil [1], Jasmine Loo [2], Tan Vern Tact [3] were at UBG Bhd when Jho Low was there.

Faisal and Loo later joined 1MDB. Faisal was Jho Low’s point man at 1MDB. Tan was a director of Jho Low’s Wynton Group.

Singaporean Seet Li Lin [4] was Low’s main operator and was CIO of Good Star Ltd, which received US$700 million from 1MDB. He posted on his Facebook account after the money was remitted by 1MDB, “I feel the earth moved under my feet.”

Tiffany Heah [5], a lawyer who worked at UBG and before that, at Wong & Partners. She was Jho Low’s main legal counsel. She is now with a law firm in Los Angeles.

Patrick Mahony [6], PetroSaudi’s head of mergers and acquisitions. Seet, Heah and Mahony met Jho Low in New York in August 2009 where they first discussed how to bring 1MDB to JV with PetroSaudi.

But besides the three main actors, there were the people who got short-circuited in Singapore.

Tim Leissner, a former senior Goldman Sachs banker based in Singapore, has been barred from the US securities industry.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in March last year issued a 10-year Prohibition Order (PO) against Leissner.

Three other individuals who were investigated by the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) on 1MDB-related matters, and consequently convicted by the Courts in Singapore, were also served the POs.

They are Jens Fred Sturzenegger, former branch manager of Falcon Private Bank Ltd, Singapore branch (Falcon Bank), Yak Yew Chee and Ms Yvonne Seah Yew Foong, both of whom were former employees of BSI Bank Limited (BSI Bank).

A former banker at the Swiss BSI, Yeo Jiawei, 34, pleaded guilty to money laundering and cheating in 2017.

Yeo was already serving a 30-month term on charges for destroying evidence during the investigation into illicitly transferred funds linked to 1MDB.



Ministry of Transport responds to viral Facebook post, explains Bukit Timah Road bus stop

The Ministry of Transport (MOT) has responded to a viral Facebook post about the unconventional placement of a bus stop along Bukit Timah Road.

The original Facebook post by user Mei Shan was reacted to more than 500 times, with about 3000 shares.

https://theindependent.sg.sg/netizens-confused-about-barriers-in-front-of-a-bus-stop-along-bukit-timah/

In her post, Mei Shan said, “sometimes i really very confuse[d] with the construction in SG.. what is that barrier for if the bus stop is build there.. maybe someone can enlighten me..”.

She was referring to a bus stop with railings built in front of it, and was confused about its functionality.


On Saturday, the Ministry of Transport shared their own Facebook post with the following caption: “Wonder what happens when there’s insufficient space for a typical bus stop?

The answer? We innovate!

In their post, they also added, “Bus stop 40021 along Bukit Timah Road was one such challenge. Our engineers found an unconventional way to site this bus stop along the busy Bukit Timah Road, while minimising impact to vehicular and human traffic. They even factored in a shelter to ensure bus passengers will not be too affected by the rain and shine!”

Earlier today, the Ministry’s post was picked up by Facebook group ROADS.sg, who added their take:

“MOT(Ministry of Transport) makes the tall claim that the weird design of the Bukit Timah bus stop was the result of innovation.

The strange boasting aside, why didn’t they just put a sign at the bus stop informing commuters that the boarding and alighting area was further up due to space constraints?

“Sometimes, I miss the bus because it stops so far away,” Matthew Ng, 10, an Anglo-Chinese School (Primary) pupil, said he has been taking the bus home from school for the past two years.

Ms Siew Bay Choo, 48, a cashier who works at a nearby petrol station, said commuters might get wet walking to the bus if it rains. “It can be rather inconvenient, if one takes public transport to work daily.”

MOT should have made a shelter all the way to the alighting and boarding area.

MOT respond: https://bit.ly/2sbzI1U”

Netizens dismiss the statement by the Ministry of Transport, and insist that a spade should be called a spade.


[email protected]

Swiss Cottage Secondary School disciplines teacher for mocking students’ work on social media

Swiss Cottage Secondary School has reportedly disciplined the teacher who mocked his students’ work on social media. The teacher, Mr Tan, posted photos of his students’ work on Instagram stories with derogatory captions as such:

Mr Tan reportedly became employed at the Ministry of Education in 2016.

Noting that teachers should not conduct themselves in the manner that Mr Tan did, Swiss Cottage revealed that Mr Tan has been counselled and that appropriate disciplinary action has been taken against him.

Mr Tan, who had over 2000 followers – some of whom are believed to be his students – has since shut down his Instagram account.

ST correspondent says unaware 1MDB whistleblower interview scripted

In a response to The Edge, the Straits Times said today its correspondent in Bangkok was unaware of whatever deals Mr Xavier Justo, the 1MDB whistleblower made with ex-Petrosaudi men.

The response published today and seen on the Straits Times website says :

“If Mr Justo’s new claims are true, they are disappointing.

“Whatever deals Mr Justo had made, or what his deeper calculation was, I was unaware of.

“To verify the claims and as per good journalistic practice, we asked for reactions from key people he named – and we used their reactions as well.”

It is signed by ST correspondent Nirmal Ghosh.

Yesterday, The Edge Malaysia published a 24-page recap of the 1MDB saga.

On the 24th page of the online document, Justo, who is now a free man and met Malaysian PM Tun Mahathir last week, said the interview published by ST was ‘scripted’.

He also said this was part of a blackmail by the ex-PetroSaudi boys whom he named as Mahony and Finnegan.

Justo named the hidden hands as PetroSaudi director Patrick Mahony; and Paul Finnegan, a UK
private detective who disguised himself as a Scotland Yard detective.

Justo told Ho Kay Tat, The Edge publisher that a list of 50 questions was handed to him by the ex-PetroSaudi guys.

“They handed to me a list of 50 questions and answers that I was supposed to use for my interview just before I saw him (Nirmal).

“Everything I told him was prepared by them (Mahony and Finnegan) and I was also told not to bring up the name Jho Low,” Justo says.

Mahony, PetroSaudi’s head of mergers and acquisitions. Mahony met Jho Low in New York in August 2009 where they first discussed how to bring 1MDB to JV with PetroSaudi.

Why the “hidden hands” decided to use Nirmal and ST for the Justo “confession” to spin a fake narrative is open to speculation, said Ho.

The Straits Times carried the interview on July 24, 2015, splashing it on its print and online editions claiming it was a world scoop.

It said it was an interview with Swiss citizen Xavier Andre Justo inside a Bangkok jail.

It was headlined “I was offered $2.7m for stolen data: Ex-PetroSaudi employee Xavier Andre Justo on the 1MDB saga”.

But The Edge Malaysia at that time questioned how the Straits Times could have access to Justo in jail when the Malaysian police did not.

In the ST interview, Justo spoke about the group to which he handed documents related to 1MDB’s transactions with PetroSaudi.

The interview made him say the group told him they intended to “modify the documents” and use them to “bring down the Malaysian government.”

The ST story was picked up by the international media.

Newspapers and TV stations in Malaysia, where the government had just clamped down on an investigation into 1MDB, happily reproduced the ST report.

They were in support of Najib’s narrative, wrote The Edge Media.