Wednesday, April 30, 2025
25.9 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2739

Michael Tao claims Alex Man flushed tens of thousands of dollars in toilet during a raid

0

There would be a time in your life when you panic and did something silly which you regret later. Former Hong Kong actor Alex Man and fellow actor Michael Tao who saw it has lived to tell this tale. According to Michael, it sounded like a scene from an action film. This dramatic incident involved a police raid and tens of thousands of dollars being flushed down in the toilet, and it happened in 1987 when the actors were filming TVB series Genghis Khan in China.

Recalling the incident during a guest appearance on veteran Hong Kong producer Yang Shaohong and actress Elena Kong’s radio show last Saturday (September 26), Michael revealed that they were not allowed to bring big amounts of cash into the country at that time and had to exchange HK$100 for 30 yuan coupons to spend. To manage it, the actors had to pretend that they did not have cash and did not declare it at the customs.

Michael Tao saw Alex Man flush down tens of thousands of cash down the toilet. Picture: YouTube

Everyone did not declare except one very honest actor who admitted that he had brought more than HK$10,000 (SGD$1,800) with him. It was all good until the police suddenly raided their premises one day when the cast and crew were eating. Michael said that everyone was frantic and that Alex scrambled to flush his money down the toilet.

“Everyone was really afraid. [We] didn’t know if we would go to jail, so we decided to flush the money down the toilet. Little did we expect to clog the toilet, so everyone had no choice but to leave immediately.”

When asked how much money they flushed away, Michael replied: “Over tens of thousands of dollars.”

Born on August 26 1963, Michael Tao Dai Yu is a Hong Kong television actor.

Michael entered the acting industry in the 80s, affiliating with TVB. It was during this period that he earned the name “Housewife Killer” due to his overwhelming popularity amongst housewives (who arguably constitutes a majority of television viewing audiences in Hong Kong), solidifying his position as a first-tier television actor in TVB.

Michael later moved over to rival ATV in 1997 after problems over his contract with TVB. His ATV series Flaming Brothers successfully defeated the TVB rival show at the time, a landmark for ATV. Apart from filming ATV series, Tao has also filmed in China and Singapore. He returned to TVB in 2004 and has starred in several television series since. Once again, problems with his contract resulted in Tao leaving TVB in 2009. /TISG

Rare interview: Li Shengwu felt like the first grandson to Mr and Mrs Lee

Singapore — In another part of a rare interview with Yahoo News, Lee Suet Fern recalled that her eldest son’s birth in 1985 felt to her in-laws Lee Kuan Yew and Kwa Geok Choo like it was the birth of their first grandson, even though they already had a grandson, Li Yipeng, who was about three years old at the time.

She said with a laugh: “They’re very traditional. They wanted a male grandson, and this was the male grandson they were waiting for. My mother-in-law clucked with pleasure.

“Shengwu’s birth was the biggest event for them on a personal level. Mama was thrilled, Papa was thrilled. They were deliciously, deliriously happy. It meant a lot to them. It felt to them like a first, although my brother-in-law did have a son with his first wife.”

Eldest son Hsien Loong married his first wife, Wong Ming Yang, in 1978. Their daughter,  Xiuqi, was born in 1981. Three weeks after giving birth to their first son, Li Yipeng, Wong died of a heart attack at the age of 31 in October 1982.

Li Yipeng was born with albinism, a genetic condition.

In 1985, the same year Shengwu was born, Hsien Loong married Ho Ching, a fast-rising civil servant. They have two sons. Hongyi was born in 1987 and Haoyi in 1989.

Meanwhile, Hsien Yang and Suet Fern had two other sons after Shengwu: Huanwu was born in 1986 and Shaowu in 1995.

Three years younger than Li Yipeng, Shengwu was closest in age to his younger brother, Huanwu, and his cousin, Hongyi.

Shengwu and Hongyi were once described as “very close” and were both in the west coast of the United States at one point as Shengwu was pursuing his PhD at Stanford University and Hongyi was working at Google in Silicon Valley.

However, cracks in their relationship became public in 2017 — the year the Lee family feud spilled into the public domain and the year the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) initiated legal action against Shengwu over a private Facebook post during the feud.

In December 2017, Shengwu said he was no longer on speaking terms with Hongyi but that they remained Facebook friends.

Shengwu subsequently decided to remove Hongyi from his Facebook friends list. He wrote on Facebook: “I will continue to be active on Facebook, and will continue to regard my friends-only Facebook posts as private. However, I have removed my cousin Li Hongyi from my Facebook friends list.”

Hongyi responded in a Facebook post of his own and asked his cousin to leave him out of grievances with the authorities. He wrote: “I don’t know what’s going on between you and the government, but I’ve got nothing to do with it. Could you please leave me out of this?”

Hongyi, saying that he had “really tried to not be involved as far as possible”, added: “If there’s something I’ve done that’s led you to believe otherwise, I would be happy to talk with you about it. It’s a bit disconcerting to be repeatedly publicly accused of undermining democracy without understanding why.” 

He added: “I would prefer not to have done this over public Facebook posts. But I suppose that’s how we communicate nowadays.”

Although the exact origins of the rift remain unclear, there is speculation that their relationship fractured around the time the Oxley Road dispute broke out in 2017.

That year, Hsien Yang and his sister Lee Wei Ling accused their elder brother Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister, of using state organs against them and of abusing his power to preserve their family home, against their father’s willed desire to demolish the house, in order to bolster his grip on power.

The younger siblings also accused Hsien Loong of grooming Hongyi for politics. Hongyi responded that he really had no interest in politics.

Shengwu, however, said Hongyi’s comments on a potential entry into politics were “vague”: “He only said he has no interest in politics, but my uncle Lee Hsien Loong also once said he wasn’t interested in politics when he was in his 20s. These words can easily be taken back.”

Although the younger siblings offered a ceasefire, the family appears to remain estranged. In 2018, Hsien Loong said that the family feud remained unresolved and that his siblings had not communicated with him.

He added: “Perhaps one day, when emotions have subsided, some movement will be possible.”

Hsien Yang responded that Hsien Loong had not made any effort to reach out to resolve matters in private. He said: “Our brother says he is unsure that the feud is solved. Notwithstanding his public statements, Hsien Loong has made no attempt to reach out to us to resolve matters in private.

“Meanwhile, the Attorney-General is busy prosecuting Hsien Loong’s nephew for his private correspondence. The AGC’s letters make repeated reference to the family feud.” 

Shengwu was eventually fined S$15,000 after being found guilty in the contempt of court case. He paid the fine in order to “buy some peace and quiet” but insisted that this does not mean he admits guilt.

The AGC also lodged a complaint against Suet Fern to the Law Society, accusing her of being involved in the preparation of her father-in-law’s last will while her husband was one of the beneficiaries.

Suet Fern was censured by a Disciplinary Tribunal for grossly improper professional conduct in the case and appealed against the decision to the Court of Three Judges. Judgment has been reserved on the case.

Rift between Lee cousins widens: Shengwu removes Hongyi from his Facebook friends list

Singapore-Malaysian dual citizen pleads guilty to almost decade-long NS default

Singapore—On Oct 1 (Thursday) a 28-year-old man admitted that he had spent 9 years, 11 months and 16 days outside the country in default of his obligations under the Enlistment Act.

Mr Basil Lim Boon Hoh, the son of a Singaporean man and a Malaysian woman, was born in Singapore. When he was a year old, however, he left the country to live in Malaysia, where he remained until he left for his university studies in the United Kingdom.

However, as a child, he used the Singaporean passport he had been given when he was 3 weeks old to travel in and out of Malaysia on numerous occasions.

Since his mother wanted to give him a choice of where he wanted to work later on in his life, Mr Lim also obtained an identity card from Singapore when he was a teenager.

He was also granted Malaysian citizenship at the age of 10

However, Mr Lim has never studied in Singapore.

According to the prosecution, Mr Lim knew about the national service requirement from his father, who had told him about it the year he turned 10. But at the age of 16, he was told by his mother that since he was a Malaysian citizen, he could set aside the mandatory NS requirement.

At the age of 16 and a half, when he was liable for National Service, Mr Lim not obtained and Exit Permit, moreover he did not report for national service registration. Further Reporting Orders were sent in 2009 to both the address where he was born and to his places of residence in Malaysia, which went unheeded. After this, a Stop List and Police Gazette was raised against him.

Mr Lim’s lawyer corresponded with the Central Manpower Base (CMPB), asking for a list of his offenses and for permission to renounce his citizenship in Singapore. The CPMB counseled him to come back to Singapore that the issue may be resolved but rejected his request.

On March 19, 2018, he emailed CPMB to say he would return to Singapore on March 27 of that year. He began serving his National Service at the Singapore Civil Defence Force on August 14, 2018, finishing on August 13, 2018.

He has said he wants to keep his Singapore citizenship and work in the country.

Regarding his offence under the Enlistment Act, Deputy Public Prosecutor Sean Teh says the prosecution is seeking five months and 18 days’ jail. His lawyer, Lim Kia Tong, is asking for only one month in jail for Mr Lim instead.

The lawyer said Mr Lim pleaded guilty to just to end the case, but some of the responsibility lies on the shoulders of his mother. She emailed the lawyer saying Mr Lim’s father left their family in 2003 and that she did not have complete information about the national service laws.

She admitted that she did not want her son to see any letters that referred to NS.

According to Yahoo News Singapore, she wrote to the lawyer, “I never told Basil anything about this or NS because I wanted him to stay with me and not go back to Singapore.”

Nevertheless, Mr Lim himself want to come back to Singapore after he graduated from university, even having arguments with his mother over the matter.

His lawyer also said that Mr Lim has diagnosed depression and anxiety due to his NS problem, and received treatment in both Malaysia and Singapore.

Mr Lim returns to court for sentencing on 15 October.  He could be fined as much as $10,000 or receive a jail sentence of up to three years for each charge of failing to fulfil his liability under the Enlistment Act. -/TISG

Read also: Swimmer Schooling seeks national service delay after Olympics moved

Swimmer Schooling seeks national service delay after Olympics moved

 

Lim Peifen welcomes second son

0

Singaporean DJ Lim Peifen just welcomed her second son during the mid-autumn festival. The baby boy’s name is Jude. YES 93.3FM DJ Lim Peifen and her husband, computer engineer Lie Wei Xiang are parents for the second time.

Peifen shared the good news on her social media account on October 1 together with a photo of their family’s latest member, baby boy Jude. The 38-year-old DJ seems to have a lot of fun getting pun-ny with her baby boy’s name. She wrote: “Hey, Jude,” clearly referencing the famous Beatles song.

Lim Pei Fen with husband Lie Wei Xiang and son Luke. Picture: Instagram

The DJ also included in Chinese, the hashtag “zhu ni zhong qiu jie kuai le“, which means “wishing you a happy Mid-Autumn Festival”, except she replaced the word ‘zhu’ with ‘Jude’. On July 20, the DJ announced that she was expecting baby number two. She and her husband have another son, Luke, 5.

Peifen realised that she was pregnant at the end of February, she revealed in an interview. She shared that at that time, she and her family planned to visit Taiwan for a vacation but then the pandemic happened.

Peifen also said that while she was okay with having a boy or a girl, she was curious to find out how her life would turn out if her second baby happened to be a girl. “A lot of people have told me that having a girl would be ‘good’ [Ed: The Chinese characters for girl and boy make up the Chinese word for ‘good’]. But it’s okay, having a boy means I can reuse all my baby stuff!”

Peifen is a Singaporean radio personality known for her work with the Mandarin radio station Y.E.S. 93.3 FM, specifically the morning show Morning Fanatics. She has also served as the host of television shows like Let’s Talk.

Peifen won the Most Popular Radio Personality Award at the MediaCorp Radio Awards in 2013. She and Gerald Koh are both popular radio hosts in Singapore.

She attended CHIJ Our Lady Of Good Counsel and CHIJ St Nicholas Girls’ School. /TISG

Rare interview: Lee Suet Fern discloses intimate details of her relationship with in-laws

Singapore — Intimate details about Lee Suet Fern’s relationship with her in-laws, founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and his wife Kwa Geok Choo, have come to light in a rare interview with Yahoo News, where she also spoke about Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s first wife, Wong Ming Yang.

The connection went back to the time her father, Professor Lim Chong Yah, tutored Lee Hsien Loong, and later Hsien Yang, for their A-Level examinations. Romance bloomed between Hsien Yang and Suet Fern when they were both in Cambridge University. They got married in 1981, mere days after she finished her final law exams.

Suet Fern told Yahoo’s Nicholas Yong: “Before I was married, my father-in-law and mother-in-law were incredibly courteous and very gracious.” She added, after a long pause: “They were lovely.”

She did not count on how “fierce, old-fashioned and imperious” her mother-in-law would be.

Suet Fern recalled feeling frightened of her mother-in-law when she and Hsien Yang were living in Cairnhill Mansions — just above Hsien Loong and his first wife, Wong Ming Yang — after their marriage, when her husband was often away for military training.

She shared her fears with her husband, who assured her not to worry.

Suet Fern recalled: “I did feel a little isolated and unprotected. I confided that in Yang, that when I first got married, she (her mother-in-law) was quite frightening. Yang just gave me every assurance that it was him that I married and not his mother, and that he would always put me first.”

A turning point in Suet Fern’s relationship with her mother-in-law apparently came when Wong Ming Yang died after a heart attack in October 1982. She said: “Thereafter, she was much more reserved and reticent and more careful.”

Suet Fern also revealed that she was irked by some of her mother-in-law’s advice after she had children: “I was often ticked off by her (but) not in a terrible way. And when I had my first two sons, this was her typical refrain, ‘You know Fern, you must raise your children like the queen. Leave others to raise your children, and inspect them every day at tea time’.”

The young mother even hid the fact that she nursed her babies due to her mother-in-law’s disapproval of breastfeeding. Suet Fern said: “She would say, ‘Yang’s fully bottle-fed and he turned out all right, leave them to maids and a bottle’.”

As for her relationship with her famous father-in-law, Suet Fern said: “I was very scared of him. In those days, I think everyone was terrified of him, more so me.”

She recalled her father-in-law constantly enquired about her weight and even got her to weigh herself when she visited his home, when she was losing weight during a particularly stressful time when she was juggling work and family duties.

She also recounted how her conversations with her father-in-law centred on how his grandsons were doing, particularly how they were doing academically in Chinese.

But Mr Lee’s softer side was also brought out when Suet Fern began a tradition of celebrating his and his wife’s birthdays at her home. She recalled, with a laugh: “Yang would typically cook, and I used to think his father was such a so-and-so. Poor Yang is in the kitchen, and I’d bring the food out, birthday dinner, and my father-in-law would say, ‘Oh, this is not very well done, send it back to be redone’.”

Recounting how her father-in-law enjoyed his food with candles, flowers and table service, Suet Fern said that he would drop hints as to what he wanted to be served and brought along wine or a small gift to her home during the birthday dinners.

She added: “He would always grumble that the children were rather noisy. But I think he liked having them around, and I do think he often felt it was his chance to let his hair down and he loved the bustle of the family.”

When asked about the relationship between her in-laws, Suet Fern said that Mr and Mrs Lee enjoyed a happy and traditional marriage. She remembered: “For ever so long, Papa was very fierce at home. He expected everything to be perfect. And not uncommonly, he would tick off my mother-in-law, even in front of me. She never answered back to him.”

Mr Lee became softer towards his wife after she suffered the first of a series of strokes in 2008, according to Suet Fern. Sharing that her father-in-law took care of his wife, cut her food to make it easier and helped her, she said: “I love that he was good to her. I have so many good memories from that time about how good he was to her.”

She also shared a sweet anecdote with Yahoo that provided a glimpse into how devoted Mr Lee was to his wife. When Mrs Lee summoned her husband to fetch a lipstick she wanted to show Suet Fern, “I said, No, no, Mama, I can get the lipstick. And she turned around and said, ‘No, let him do it’. And she said to me, ‘Maaanja!’ (Malay for ‘I want to be spoilt’)”

When he turned up with the lipstick, she chastised him for bringing the wrong one. “And so he’d go back, and she’d shout at him, ‘Don’t mess up my lipsticks.’”

Mrs Lee passed away in 2010 and Mr Lee in 2015. /TISG

Kris Jenner sued by former bodyguard for alleged sexual harassment

0

Reality TV star Kris Jenner denied allegations after she was sued by former bodyguard for sexual harassment. The 64-year-old momager was sued for unspecified damages together with her eldest daughter Kourtney Kardashian, 41 as well as the private security firm for which the former bodyguard worked. The accuser was identified as Mr Marc McWiliams, based on court documents obtained by several United State media, and he is a black man who said he was hired to be Jenner’s security guard in May 2017. In September 2018, Mr Marc MacWilliams was terminated from the job.

The 51-year-old former bodyguard claimed that he was subjected to “sexual advances and otherwise harassing misconduct” by Jenner.

Kourtney Kardashian was also involved in the allegations. Picture: Instagram

Mr McWilliams also claimed that he was subjected to comments of “an overt sexual nature” about his physical appearance and sexual activities as well as suggestions he “engage in a romantic and sexual relationship.”

He also accused Jenner, among other things, of “non-consensual physical contact” with him, including massaging his neck, shoulders, arms and back and resting her hand on his thigh and groin.

The former guard also claimed that his subsequent complaints to the security company’s human resources department were ignored.

However, Jenner’s lawyer Marty Singer told celebrity website TMZ, which first reported the news, that “Kris categorically denies ever behaving inappropriately toward Marc McWilliams.”

Mr Singer said Jenner “had very little interaction with” Mr McWilliams, and that the former security guard “was repeatedly caught sleeping in his car while on the job”.

The lawyer added that while Kardashian is named in the suit, “she is not accused of doing anything improper with the guard, nor did she do so.”

He said Jenner and Kardashian plan to “immediately sue McWilliams and his attorneys for malicious prosecution” when they defeated the “ridiculous, frivolous lawsuit”.

Jenner rose to fame after starring in the reality television series Keeping Up With The Kardashians (2007 to present) with her children, including Kim Kardashian West and Kylie Jenner. The mega-celebrity family announced in September that the reality show will end in 2021.

Singaporeans anti-foreigner? The Singapore Business Federation cannot be so ill-informed or naive

The Singapore Business Federation is so worried about “the recent rise in anti-foreigner sentiments” that it hosted a dialogue on October 1 with Chan Chun Sing. Representatives from 16 foreign chambers, including the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore and the Singapore International Chamber of Commerce, voiced their concern to the Trade and Industry Minister. Quite a gathering of corporate lions.
This “dialogue” looked very much like a public relations event which served nicely the interests of both parties. The manner it was reported in the media showed that neither was yet ready to substantially address the real issues.
The SBF released a statement on its website which was as PR as it could get:
“Singapore’s success has been built on openness and connectivity. The presence of foreign companies and global talent in Singapore contributes to the creation of good jobs for Singaporeans and high-value activities which will have a positive spillover effect in the domestic ecosystem. Remaining open and connected is critical in ensuring Singapore remains relevant and resilient to enhance Singapore’s competitiveness and attractiveness in an increasingly competitive world.”
It then dutifully paraphrased the remarks of Chan (who in turn reiterated exactly the same thing in his Facebook account):
“Responding to the concerns, Minister Chan assured participants that Singapore remains committed to being open and connected to the world, and continues to welcome foreign investments and global talent to build the best team to play for Singapore in the global arena.”
Chan also dutifully flew a small flag for Singaporeans: “At the same time, Minister Chan stressed that the concerns of Singaporeans also deserved to be addressed…Chan welcomed the commitment from participants and their members to adhering to responsible employment practices and strengthening the Singapore core. He also encouraged participants to showcase these efforts, so that more people could better understand the role that foreign companies and global talent play in the development and growth of our economy and our workforce.”
That was it, as far as the public could tell. We understand you, you understand us – and let’s eat and drink to one another’s health and prosperity.
The SBF cannot be so out of touch with what’s happening in Singapore. It must know full well the real situation and not be drawn into or take part in a narrative which seems at odds with the genuine concerns of true-blue Singaporeans.
How can we be anti-foreigner?
Modern Singapore was founded by an English colonialist and later developed by all sorts of races from all over the world. Even if it wants to do, it can never look inward (or be nativist) – that’s just nonsense official Pofma-able disinformation.
What exactly is this anti-foreigner sentiment that is constantly being hurled at poor Singaporeans by its own government?
Is it anti-foreigner to question whether CECA or any other trade agreement has put the job security and expectations of Singaporeans at risk? Is it anti-foreigner to question whether double standards are being practised in ensuring laws are being followed? Is anti-foreigner to highlight the misbehaviour of some expatriates? Is it anti-foreigner for Singaporeans, especially non-Chinese ones, to want our bus captains to able to communicate with non-Chinese Singaporeans?
Is it anti-foreigner for NS-serving male Singaporeans (and their affected family members) to ask what exactly it is that they are serving to protect – the interests of PRs and others? Would they be wasting two years of their lives (and more, doing reservist training) so that they may end up being at a massive disadvantage in their careers and everything else in life? Is it anti-foreigner if they totally resent being told at the same time that they are too cautious and unwilling to “take risks” (such as seek careers outside Singapore), implying they are not competitive enough, compared to risk-taking and hungrier foreigners?
How has it come to past that the victims of an unfair system are being cast as the villains by an establishment – government and business elite – too used to taking its citizens for granted?
Surely, foreign investors cannot be so ill-informed and so out of sync with ground sentiment here that they actually believe Singaporeans are anti-foreigner.
I think the SBF should try and find out what the real situation is – and not rely on the skewed reporting and “opinion” pieces in the beholden and controlled mainstream media.
Unless, of course, employers and businesses are themselves also not interested in what true-blue Singaporeans are unhappy about anyway – and have their own priorities which have the interests of Singaporeans right at the bottom of the totem pole.
I hope not.
Let me recall what the late DPM S Rajaratnam once said when he delivered a speech to mark a birthday dinner for Lee Kuan Yew. He said, from his association with the latter, that he had been given the impression that the late PM would never want to be a lion leading a nation of lambs. He would rather be a lamb leading a nation of lions.
I think, judging by the results of GE2020 and the latest findings of an Institute of Policy Studies survey, true-blue Singaporeans are tired of being lambs.

Tan Bah Bah, consulting editor of TheIndependent.Sg, is a former senior leader writer with The Straits Times. He was also managing editor of a local magazine publishing company

Miley Cyrus wears bold crimson coat with funky hat while going out with her mother

0

Actress-singer Miley Cyrus wore a bold crimson coat with a funky hat while going out with her mother Tish in New York City.

Cyrus has gone viral this week since the drop of her epic cover of Blondie’s 1978s hit Heart of Glass.

The 27-year-old was seen wearing a funky outfit while spending time with her mother on Friday. The mother and daughter walked arm-in-arm together as they made their way out of a posh Manhattan hotel dressed in fashionable coats for the start of autumn.

Cyrus was barely recognisable as she stepped out wearing a bold look that covered her face. She hid her retro platinum coloured mullet with a tall black wide-brimmed hat positioned slightly askew on her head together with a large pair of modern reflective shades and a black mask. She wore a long wool statement coat in bright crimson over a basic white T-shirt and gunmetal silk trousers. She paired the look with a pair of crocodile platforms.

Miley Cyrus did a cover of Blondie’s 1978s hit Heart of Glass. Picture: Instagram

53-year-old Tish Cyrus, on the other hand, linked arms with her daughter and portrayed a country star chic look with cowboy boots, jeans, rocker tee and a leather motorcycle jacket. Tish had on a black facemask and she had a large leather Saint Laurent bowler back in the crook of her other arm. Cyrus’ nod to vintage style is reflective of her current musical vibe which has been embracing the sounds of the 1970s and 1980s in her forthcoming seventh studio album She Is Miley Cyrus.

Last month, the lead single Midnight Sky was released together with a psychedelically stylised music video. In September, Cyrus performed the song for the first time at the MTV Music Awards where she brought back a disco ball version of her iconic Wrecking Ball moment from 2013. At the end of September, in keeping with her vintage sound, the Grammy-winner performed a rock and roll cover of Blondie’s hit Heart of Glass at the iHeartRadio Music Festival.

She dropped the much-loved cover ‘by popular demand’ on music streaming services earlier this week where it has gone instantly viral. /TISG

Former Celebrity Couple Allan Wu and Wong Li Lin Celebrate Daughter’s Sweet 16

0

Singaporean former celebrity couple Allan Wu and Wong Li Lin celebrated their daughter’s 16th birthday on September 30. Both father and mother shared heartfelt messages to their daughter, Sage on Instagram. In the former’s actress post, she wrote: “At the cusp of so many discoveries!

Be gentle with yourself and the world. Happy sweet 16 beautiful S ❤️”

Lilin Wong celebrated her daughter’s 16th birthday. Picture: Instagram

As for Allan Wu, he brought Sage and her 14-year-old brother Jonas to the Grand Hyatt restaurant Mezza9. Here’s his caption:

“Sweet 16! Happy Birthday, Sage Wu! It still feels like yesterday when I beamed with love as I cradled your tiny self like a football sixteen years ago. So much has changed and time has indeed flown by faster than I could’ve imagined, but there has been nothing that has brought me as much joy and pride as watching you become a kind, generous, and hard-working young lady. I wish you nothing but the best and hope one day you can experience the same boundless happiness I’ve had in being your father. Love, Dad”

An observant follower pointed out that Sage appeared to have gotten an iPhone as a birthday gift from Wu.

Wong Li Lin and Allan Wu got married in 2003. In 2013, the couple divorced after 10 years of marriage. They still keep in contact to discuss typical parent concerns and were last seen as a family celebrating Sage’s 15th birthday last year.

Born on June 11, 1972, Allan Wu is a Singapore-based Chinese-American actor, host, VJ, and former model.

He is perhaps best known for being the host of three different editions of the popular reality game show, The Amazing Race. He was the host of 5 seasons of AXN Asia’s The Amazing Race Asia, 3 seasons of International Channel Shanghai’s The Amazing Race: China Rush, and 4 seasons of Shenzhen Media Group’s Chinese edition of The Amazing Race.

Despite struggling with limited knowledge of Cantonese, he was given a stint as a VJ by MTV Taiwan during which he co-hosted a Christmas concert. He moved to Singapore and began acting in Chinese language drama series on Channel 8.

He has been the host for all five seasons of The Amazing Race Asia. He is also the host of The Amazing Race: China Rush, the Chinese version of The Amazing Race. In Season 16 of the American version of The Amazing Race, Allan Wu made a cameo appearance in Singapore, handing out clues.

 Both Wong Li Lin and Allan Wu, despite their past marital trials, maintain a shared commitment to nurturing their children. As Sage steps into a new chapter of her life, it’s evident that she’s backed by a powerful, supportive force – her parents’ unwavering love and dedication. This story serves as a testament that family, indeed, transcends all boundaries./TISG

Read also:

Allan Wu’s son just turned 15 and he resembles his father – Singapore News 

Lim Tean: PAP gives before GE but takes back after it is over

0

Singapore — Opposition Peoples Voice leader and lawyer Lim Tean has criticised the planned increase in fees and tariffs amid the financial hardship caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

On Friday (Oct 2), Mr Lim uploaded a post with the following caption, “Giving you a chicken wing before the GE and taking back the chicken farm after”. He attached a few examples of the “chicken farm being taken away”, which was a metaphor for the coming increase in fees and tariffs.

“Even as thousands of Singaporeans lose their jobs and face financial hardship in this pandemic, the People’s Action Party (PAP) government has not forgotten to raise fees and tariffs,” said Mr Lim.

He gave the examples of three Central Expressway (CTE) gantries seeing a rise in ERP charges, the electricity tariff for households rising by 9.3 per cent and MediShield Life premiums possibly increasing by up to 35 per cent for some groups.

In response to his post, members of the online community did not appear surprised by the developments.

Photo: FB screengrab / Lim Tean
Photo: FB screengrab / Lim Tean
Photo: FB screengrab / Lim Tean
Photo: FB screengrab / Lim Tean
Photo: FB screengrab / Lim Tean

Increase in fees and tariffs

As of Aug 31 this year, new Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) charges kicked in at the Southbound CTE auxiliary lane to Pan-Island Expressway (Changi)/Serangoon Road and the two gantries at Northbound CTE after PIE. The ERP charges for these three gantries increased by S$1 “to ease congestion during peak periods”, said the Land Transport Authority (LTA). ERP charges for the gantry along a southbound CTE auxiliary lane to PIE (Changi) and Serangoon Road were also re-introduced.

On Wed (Sept 30), the Singapore Power (SP) Group announced that the electricity tariff for households would increase by about 9.3 per cent for the last quarter of 2020. The tariff will rise from 19.6 cents to 21.43 cents per kWh. Before the Goods and Services Tax (GST) computation, the rise in tariffs would equate to an approximate increase of S$7.01 on the average monthly bill of families living in four-room flats, it said.

In addition, premiums for MediShield Life are to increase by up to 35 per cent in the next few years, according to a Ministry of Health (MOH) statement on Tuesday (Sept 29). This is the first significant review of Singapore’s national health insurance scheme since its launch in 2015. The said changes are expected to be implemented in early 2021.

Giving You A Chicken Wing Before The GE And Taking Back The Chicken Farm After!

Posted by Lim Tean on Thursday, October 1, 2020

Meanwhile, also on Friday (Oct 2) but with regard to a completely different matter, the police said in a statement that Mr Lim had been arrested in his office in connection with an allegation of criminal breach of trust by one of his clients.

The police said that he had failed to turn up for an interview in connection with investigations into the allegation. /TISG