Friday, May 2, 2025
26.9 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 25

My mother-in-law nitpicks everything, while my sister-in-law gives her a ‘black face’ — Woman dreads weekly family visits

0

SINGAPORE: A woman who has been visiting her in-laws every week is now reconsidering whether she should continue doing so after realising that her efforts to build a relationship with them have been completely one-sided.

She shared her experience on the r/askSingapore forum on Sunday (April 20), explaining that every time she visits, her younger sister-in-law does not even acknowledge her and often greets her with a “black face.” Meanwhile, her mother-in-law, being “extremely controlling,” never fails to make a comment about everything the woman does, no matter how small.

The woman also revealed that she had told her husband before they got married that she did not get along with his family. As a compromise, he had promised that she would only need to attend major family gatherings such as Chinese New Year, birthdays, or Mother’s Day. However, that agreement was not kept, and the weekly visits soon became a regular routine.

She went on to say that one of the biggest challenges is that her husband refuses to speak up to his parents, even when situations become uncomfortable. Because of this, she is often left to defend herself during tense interactions.

Now feeling emotionally drained and increasingly anxious about each visit, she turned to Reddit for advice.

She asked, “Is it ok to just see them occasionally and not every week? I’m not sure if I should still visit my in-laws every week, as I’m always dreading it.”

“It’s okay to not see them all the time.”

The woman’s post sparked a wave of responses from the online community, with many agreeing that it’s perfectly valid to distance oneself from toxic in-laws, especially when the relationship becomes emotionally draining and one-sided.

One commenter said, “Yes, please, it’s okay to not see them all the time. I had the same issue, too; my parents aren’t happy with the in-laws as well.

We had a huge argument, and my husband had to step in. I really think my in-laws are expecting too much; they want to be treated like a king and queen. Like, come on, what year is it already?”

Another shared, “I’ve been in your situation before. I tried to convince myself to stay, but in the end, it was also the very reason that made me leave him, because the mental load became unbearable. I’m not encouraging you to leave, but as females, we need to protect ourselves.”

Some users also took aim at the woman’s husband for his lack of involvement in resolving the issue. One wrote, “So where is your husband in the middle of all of this? If you tried to discuss it with him, but he doesn’t acknowledge the problem and just runs away and doesn’t do anything, [there’s a] high chance that he is just another spineless mummy’s boy.

It’s his job to proactively defend and protect you from his own family, not just stand on one side meekly while he watches his own mum bully his own wife. You really want to be with such a husband, meh?”

Conflict with in-laws

Ginger Kolbaba, an award-winning author, editor, and speaker, suggests that when it comes to handling conflicts with in-laws, setting boundaries is essential. She advises that if your in-laws are behaving in ways that are uncomfortable for you, it’s best not to escalate the situation with a tantrum or by allowing emotions to take over. Instead, talk things through with your spouse, and together, figure out some healthy boundaries. Once you’ve agreed on them, communicate those boundaries clearly with your in-laws, and stick to them as a team.

Kolbaba also encourages maintaining a calm perspective when your in-laws offer their opinions. Ultimately, these are just opinions, and you are not obligated to agree with them or even follow them. Most importantly, she emphasises the value of kindness, even during tense moments. Kindness goes a long way, and it helps you maintain your own peace of mind while navigating tricky family dynamics.

Read also: Employee terminated for not agreeing to work on Saturdays, asks Singaporeans, ‘Is this wrongful termination?’

Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

‘I’m very confused’ — Man asks if he’s wrong to party with his friends while his girlfriend grieves her dog’s death

0

SINGAPORE: A man took to social media to ask netizens if he was in the wrong for partying with his friends while his girlfriend was grieving the loss of her dog.

In an anonymous post on NTU Confessions, the man explained that he had tried to support her in every way he could. He even insisted on staying with her over the weekend and suggested doing things she enjoys, like going out for sushi and playing Cyberpunk 2077, to help lift her mood. However, his girlfriend declined, explaining that she didn’t want to talk and preferred to handle her grief on her own.

Since she didn’t want him around and he would otherwise be alone at home, he decided to hang out with some friends (whom she had always said she liked) and ended up going to a Skin Night event at Ten Men’s Club. “I told her that I was going, and she said I could do whatever I wanted and that she wouldn’t really care,” he said.

However, the next day, he was shocked when his girlfriend called him, extremely upset. She told him she was “very disappointed” that he wasn’t there for her during such a difficult time. She also said she had “trouble sleeping”, wasn’t feeling well because of her loss, and didn’t feel like she “could call or text him” since he was out partying.

In response, he told her girlfriend that he understood her desire to be on her own but reminded her that she could talk to him anytime, and he would be there. He added that even though he went to the party, he would have left immediately had she told him she needed him.

He continued, “Some people said I should simply go, but she lives with her parents, and I can’t just show up there without any warning. Not gonna lie, I am very confused about this situation. Am I the jerk?”

In the comments, one netizen offered a suggestion to help the man assess whether he was in the wrong. They wrote, “It’s very easy to tell if you’re in the wrong. Just switch the dog’s death with a human’s, and imagine you were the one grieving instead of your girlfriend. Then imagine she went out to have fun. How would you feel?”

Supporting your partner through grief

When your partner is grieving, it can be really hard to know how to support them, especially if you haven’t experienced a similar loss yourself. You may feel a strong urge to understand their pain or fix the situation, but grief is a deeply personal and complex process, and everyone handles it differently.

Grief experts suggest that during times like these, the most helpful thing you can do is offer your unwavering presence and support. Sometimes, simply letting your partner know you’re there, without trying to change how they feel, can provide them with comfort. Your steady compassion can help them feel less isolated as they navigate their grief in their own way.

Read also: Singaporean confused why companies ask for so much ‘personal and confidential info’ before job interviews

Featured image by freepik (for illustration purposes only)

Internships in Singapore jumped nearly 50% in 2024, led by creative industries

0

SINGAPORE: Singapore’s internship job postings rose 47% in 2024, with the biggest increase seen in creative industries. According to new data from Indeed, this was the sharpest year-on-year (YoY) growth between March 2022 and March 2025, when the number of internship job postings in Singapore doubled.

The global hiring and matching platform reported that over the past year, marketing (22%), media (17%), and art (17%) had the highest share of internship-related postings. Meanwhile, corporate roles like human resources (9%), real estate (8%), and administration (7%) saw the lowest share.

Rohan Sylvester, Talent Strategy Advisor at Indeed, attributed the surge of interns to Singapore’s businesses’ “commitment to innovation”. “Interns bring relevant skills, creativity, and out-of-the-box thinking,” he said, noting that these are “critical ingredients to fuelling innovation”.

He added, “Interns will find opportunities in industries like marketing, media, and the arts, which offer them many avenues to push creative boundaries with content creation and digital marketing projects. For employers, internships offer a resource-efficient way to inject and test bold ideas while building a pipeline of future talent.”

Soft skills also played a major role in hiring interns. Communication stood out as the most sought-after skill, mentioned in 30% of postings last year. Other top skills include analysis (9%), writing skills (5.2%), and project management (5%).

Mr Sylvester noted that while technical and domain expertise remain essential, interns who can blend hard and soft skills will be the ones who thrive. Microsoft Office (15%), finance (6%), and Python (6%) were among the top 10 in-demand skills, while HTML (1%) and C (1%) were at the bottom of the list.

Mr Sylvester advised, “Students and fresh graduates should capitalise on the surge of internships to develop holistic T-shaped skill sets. Automating routine tasks and processes is a great opportunity for interns to focus on skills such as creativity and adaptability, which will help businesses navigate ambiguity and discover new opportunities in today’s uncertain world.”

“With content creation being accelerated by technologies such as AI, interns with strong communication, analytical skills, and project management skills will become the talent that stands out above the rest,” he added. /TISG 

Read also: SkillsFuture uptake increased in 2024, but some Singaporeans say it still doesn’t lead to jobs

Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)

GE2025: PSP to field ex-SMF sec-gen Lawrence Pek in CCK GRC, Harish Pillay to contest Bukit Gombak SMC

SINGAPORE: The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) will field newcomer Lawrence Pek alongside three veterans blooded in the 2020 general election in the battle for Chua Chu Kang GRC against the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) team led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong.

Mr Pek, 55, a former secretary-general of the Singapore Manufacturing Federation, will be joined on the five-member slate by Ms Wendy Low, 48, tech lawyer; Mr S Nallakaruppan, 60, president of The Society of Remisiers (Singapore); and Mr A’bas Kasmani, 71, training consultant, all of whom had contested in the previous general election in 2020.

This was announced by PSP’s chairman, Dr Tan Cheng Bock, on Saturday (April 19), at Teck Whye during their party’s walkabout with about 30 party volunteers.

“I met Dr Tan and (Leong) Mun Wai way back in August 2023, and I was hit by a profound sense of common purpose. I asked myself after the meeting if these two gentlemen are willing to do this, then why shouldn’t I?” said Mr Pek to the media after he was introduced by Dr Tan.

Progress Singapore Party’s candidates for Chua Chu Kang GRC: Mr S Nallakaruppan, Mr A’bas Kasmani, Ms Wendy Low, and Mr Lawrence Pek. (Photo: Facebook screengrab / lawpek69)

Mr Pek and his team have stepped up their engagement within Chua Chu Kang GRC in the last year, engaging with residents, especially the new families that have moved into the new Tengah estate.

“We have spoken to many small business owners, we understand their needs, we hear them and listen to them very carefully.

“It is clear to us there is a shifting demographics within this particular GRC, especially in the area of the first-time young voters. They demand more transparency, advocacy, and more importantly, they say that they want a better balance of discourse, of pushback in parliament,” added Mr Pek, who was the secretary-general of the Singapore Manufacturing Federation from 2020 to 2023.

The party also confirmed that veteran technologist Mr Harish Pillay, 65, will be fielded at the new Bukit Gombak SMC. He was also part of the PSP team that contested in Tanjong Pagar GRC in 2020, with Ms Low and Mr A’bas. Mr Nallakaruppan was part of the team that contested in Nee Soon GRC.

Mr Pillay highlighted that the PSP has been actively looking into several municipal issues, including ensuring that the residents won’t be affected by disruptions to the Town Council administration’s systems and services should he be elected in Bukit Gombak SMC.

“When I get into parliament, and when we get our Town Council going, one of the things I really want to achieve is to ensure that the Town Council administrative products and services are available on day one,” said Mr Pillay.

PSP’s former central executive committee member, Mr Harish Pillay, will be fielded at Bukit Gombak SMC. (Photo credit: Progress Singapore Party)

The former PSP’s central executive committee member explained, “Previous situations when there was a change in the leadership of the Town Council, the applications and administrative tools that they were using were stopped from access by the incoming group of people.”

Mr Pillay will be up against Ms Low Yen Ling, Mayor of South District, and Senior Minister of State for Culture, Community and Youth and Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry at Bukit Gombak SMC.

In the Electoral Boundary Committee Review report released in March, Chua Chu Kang GRC welcomed 11,621 and 193 residents from the new Tengah estate and a Holland-Bukit Timah polling district, respectively. It also saw the Bukit Gombak division, helmed by Minister of State Ms Low Yen Ling, carved out into an SMC.

DPM Gan, anchor minister for PAP’s team in Chua Chu Kang GRC

On April 14, the People’s Action Party announced their team for Chua Chu Kang GRC, fronted by Deputy Prime Minister Mr Gan Kim Yong. The team consists of newcomers, former senior civil servant Mr Jeffrey Siow, and Dr Choo Pei Ling.

Incumbent member of parliament Mr Don Wee will be stepping down after one term, while Mr Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahman remains in the four-member team.

Mr Siow is a former senior civil servant who served as a principal private secretary to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong from 2017 to 2021. His 24-year career in public service ended on April 2. Prior to that, he was the second permanent secretary at the Ministry of Manpower and Trade and Industry.

Meanwhile, Dr Choo is a neuroscientist and physiotherapist, as well as an assistant professor at the Singapore Institute of Technology. She was previously a party activist in the Marine Parade constituency helmed by Manpower Minister Dr Tan See Leng.

DPM Gan and his team are expected to face a strong challenge from the PSP once again. In the 2020 general election, the PAP won the constituency with 58.64% (59,554) of the vote. The PSP polled 41.36% (42,012) in their electoral debut five years ago in Chua Chu Kang GRC.

Residents who spoke to The Independent Singapore are looking forward to a contest between the PAP and PSP in Chua Chu Kang GRC. They hope that whichever political party is elected in the constituency will be able to look into their concerns and look into ways to improve the town.

“Although the construction of the new Jurong Region MRT line has caused some temporary inconvenience to the residents here, my family feels that it will be good for us in the long-term,” said Mr Chen, a resident in Choa Chu Kang Avenue 4 who does his weekly marketing at Teck Whye with his wife.

People’s Action Party candidates for Chua Chu Kang GRC.

Prior to the dissolution of parliament earlier in the week, DPM Gan unveiled a $212m rejuvenation plan for Chua Chu Kang Town Council on April 5. In the Chua Chu Kang Town Council’s five-year master plan, DPM Gan mentioned that part of the plan includes a new sheltered walkway and pavilions in the neighbourhood for the residents.

400 HDB housing blocks involving 40,000 households will also be repainted, and about 8,800 households are set to benefit from the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme.

“First, we are going to spend about $212 million on the various upgrading projects to improve the living environment. We will also be introducing six MRT stations to enhance the connectivity within Chua Chu Kang as well as beyond,” said DPM Gan to the media after the launch of the master plan for the constituency. 

“At the same time, it is not just about hardware, facilities and amenities, but it’s also about software, about social services as well as programmes.”

DPM Gan also reiterated that this is a Chua Chu Kang Town Council plan, and it will depend on who will be in charge of the town, stressing, “If there is a new team, they may have different ideas. They may have different things that they want to do.”

Singaporeans will go to the polls on Saturday, May 3, which has been designated as a Public Holiday, and there will be a cooling-off day on May 2. On cooling-off day, candidates and political parties are not allowed to conduct any campaign activity, including posting on their social media pages.

Johor turns to Singapore’s NIE to raise school standards and curb brain drain

0

MALAYSIA: Johor is making an unprecedented move to reform its education system by turning to Singapore’s National Institute of Education (NIE) to upskill local teachers — a bold step that could reshape the state’s economic future. With a strong focus on STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) and English language instruction, the initiative aims not only to raise academic standards but also to stem the tide of brain drain that has long plagued Malaysia’s southernmost state.

This pilot effort, known as the Bangsa Johor Schools programme, was spearheaded by the Regent of Johor, Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim, in 2024. Frustrated by the national system’s inertia, he declared: “If it (a review of the education system) cannot be done at the national level, let Johor be the first state to change the school syllabus,” The Straits Times (ST) reported.

First batch of teachers trained at Singapore’s NIE

In April 2025, Johor sent its first batch of 30 educators to NIE’s campus in Boon Lay for a week-long training programme, the first of its kind between Singapore and a Malaysian state. The group included primary and secondary teachers, lecturers and education officials, all commuting daily from Johor’s Iskandar Puteri.

“The goal is to facilitate the sharing of best practices and fresh perspectives that the teachers can bring back,” said Ms Lim Hwei Ming, senior assistant director of business development at NIE International, in a statement to ST. The second and third groups, focusing on English-language teaching and learning assessments, are set to undergo similar training in May and June.

Education reform with economic intent

Johor’s strategy is clear: Improve the quality of teaching, especially in STEM and English, to develop a future-ready, skilled workforce. The ultimate aim is to reduce the state’s reliance on low-wage jobs in neighbouring Singapore and instead retain talent to drive growth within Johor.

Top state education official Mr Aznan Tamin explained that students in the pilot programme’s four selected government schools will complete at least 112 hours annually in STEM subjects, almost double the national average. “English proficiency and higher standards of assessments will also be introduced, with the aim of 100% of students progressing to higher education,” he said in March, as quoted by ST.

The Johor government has earmarked RM6.22 million (S$1.85 million) in its 2025 budget to support this pilot. This budget covers 4,300 students and 212 teachers across the four schools in Johor Bahru.

Addressing brain drain at its roots

The urgency of reform stems from Johor’s ongoing brain drain. Despite producing nearly 500,000 higher education graduates in 2024, the state also sees thousands of youths abandoning formal education in favour of low-skilled, better-paying jobs across the Causeway.

More than 900 students skipped the most recent SPM (equivalent to the O-level) exams, many opting for jobs in Singapore’s F&B and hospitality industries, ST reported. “These students preferred taking up jobs in Singapore, even if they were low-skilled positions, as the pay was lucrative,” Mr Aznan noted.

The reform effort also complements the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ), which aims to promote cross-border collaboration in 11 sectors, including manufacturing, digital services, healthcare, and tourism.

“This pilot (Bangsa Johor Schools) is the first step towards a better future for education for the citizens of Johor, that is more advanced and competitive,” said Menteri Besar Onn Hafiz Ghazi in July 2024, as quoted by ST.

Hope for a future built on homegrown talent

For teachers, the experience has already been eye-opening. “I hope when (the fruit of) this project is realised, young Johoreans can grow, learn, work and contribute back in their home state,” said Madam Yogeshwari Chelliah, head of chemistry at SMK Kota Puteri 2 in Pasir Gudang.

While she acknowledged similarities in content between Malaysian and Singaporean training, she praised NIE’s approach for encouraging students to explore multiple solutions to a problem. Fellow teacher Mohd Fazly Mohd Salleh added: “Students need to look around what’s happening in Johor and realise their potential.”

Public support and pride in pioneering efforts

The Bangsa Johor Schools pilot has not only drawn the attention of policymakers and educators but has also sparked a wave of public pride and support across social media and local platforms.

Many Malaysians have expressed optimism and encouragement for the programme’s long-term goals. One comment summed up the hopes of many: “May this pioneer school project be made easy and achieve its purpose.”

Teachers participating in the NIE training have also received warm praise, with messages such as “Well done and congratulations to the teachers of Bangsa Johor,” acknowledging their role in shaping the initiative’s success.

Others remarked on the rare opportunity afforded to the selected educators: “How lucky are those who are chosen.” These sentiments reflect a growing belief that Johor’s investment in human capital may well yield lasting change, both inside and beyond the classroom.

Controversy over curriculum and language policy

Not everyone has welcomed the initiative without reservation. Some critics argue that Johor is stepping outside national policy boundaries, especially regarding the use of English. Education leaders, however, maintain that the national syllabus remains intact.

“No education system out there is perfect, but we believe the first step to improving schools is to improve ourselves,” Dr Yap Soon Li, assistant director at Johor’s education department, was quoted as saying by ST.

In February, Mr Aznan clarified that STEM subjects will continue to be taught in Malay and that enhancements are being made to learning methods and teacher training, not the curriculum itself.

From bold experiment to blueprint for change

The Bangsa Johor Schools programme may still be in its infancy, but its ambition is unmistakable. Drawing inspiration from Singapore’s globally respected education model, Johor is betting big on long-term reform as the key to economic self-sufficiency and social mobility.

Whether this will become a blueprint for other Malaysian states or remain a unique experiment in education diplomacy, one thing is clear: Johor is not waiting for change; rather, it is leading it.

Best budget-friendly destinations that won’t break the bank for Singaporeans this 2025

0

SINGAPORE: Now that travelling is becoming popular again, many Singaporeans want to explore the world without breaking the bank. New data from Skyscanner.com show that flight prices to several places have dropped significantly, making them perfect for budget travellers.

Here is our list of the 10 best cheap vacation spots for 2025. Each one offers a different experience without sacrificing value.

  1. Okinawa, Japan

Photo: Instagram/lau_dmn

In the top spot is Okinawa, which also ranked fifth among Singapore’s trending destinations, with its 41% drop in airfare. It is known for being a great place to relax because of its clear seas, beautiful beaches, and unique mix of Japanese and native cultures.

This place has the right mix of relaxation and adventure, whether you want to snorkel among the colourful coral reefs or learn about the area’s traditions.

  1. Shenzhen, China

Photo: Instagram/shenzhenville

Ticket prices have dropped 37%, making Shenzhen more appealing. It offers an interesting look into China’s fast urban growth to see how this modern metropolis with futuristic skylines and busy markets came to be. 

Shenzhen has a great mix of modern and traditional features, from high-tech shopping malls to delicious traditional food.

  1. Vienna, Austria

Photo: Facebook/The World

If you want to take a trip to Europe, Vienna is a great place to get a great cultural experience for less money. With airfares down 27%, tourists can enjoy the city’s history of classical music, its great palaces, and its cosy coffee shops. 

Vienna is a great place for culture lovers because it has a lot of history and a lively art scene.

  1. Birmingham, United Kingdom

Photo: Instagram/onlybirmingham

With ticket prices cut by 24%, Birmingham is now a secret gem in the UK. This city has a lot to see and do. 

It is known for its rich cultural history, thriving art areas, and industrial past. With its unique museums and great restaurants, it is an excellent example of a cheap city to explore.

  1. Nice, France

Photo: Instagram/Julien_delsaut

With prices down 21%, Nice is a great way to get a taste of the French Riviera at a fraction of the cost. Its Mediterranean style, bright markets, and lively street life make it a great place for sun, sea, and culture.

  1. Malé, Maldives

Photo: Instagram/shyleena_

Flights to Malé have become 20% cheaper, making it easier than ever to get to the Maldives. If you want to dive into the clear waters and enjoy the island’s natural beauty without spending a lot of money, this tropical paradise is great for you.

  1. Wellington, New Zealand

Photo: Instagram/wellingtonnz

With a 20% drop in airfare, Wellington’s mix of stylish city life and beautiful nature scenery is even more appealing. On a budget, you can check out its lively arts scene, fun things to do along the water, and welcoming local culture.

  1. Hangzhou, China

Photo: Facebook/Hangzhou, China

With an 18% price drop in ticket fare, Hangzhou now offers more cultural and natural attractions. It is known for its beautiful West Lake and unique tea farms. This place is said to offer a peaceful and pleasant break from city life.

  1. Hobart, Australia

Photo: Facebook/City of Hobart

With a 14% decrease in ticket price, Hobart’s laid-back vibe and beautiful Tasmanian scenery are now more accessible to more people. Hobart is a great place for history and nature fans alike because it is close to both exceptional wilderness and charming colonial heritage.

  1. Vancouver, Canada

Photo: Facebook/Destination British Columbia

Vancouver has both the charm of a city and the beauty of nature. With ticket prices down 12%, tourists can enjoy the city’s parks, diverse food, and lively art scene while seeing one of Canada’s most beautiful sights.

These destinations not only offer incredible value for money but also promise enriching experiences that cater to diverse interests. Singaporeans can make the most of these budget-friendly escapes by booking early and staying resourceful in 2025.

GE2025: Red Dot United unveils manifesto rethinking society with a heart

SINGAPORE: In a spirited address that called for a renewed social contract and reimagined national priorities, Red Dot United (RDU) unveiled its manifesto for GE2025 on Saturday night (April 19), rallying under the banner of a more compassionate, transparent, and people-first Singapore.

With the slogan “First Class Citizens, Fairer Singapore”, RDU is taking a bold stance against what it says is the People’s Action Party’s inertia in the face of global uncertainty. At the heart of its manifesto are five pillars of reform—collectively dubbed the new “5Cs”: Collective Prosperity, Citizen’s Dividend, Comprehensive Housing Reset, Caring Healthcare, and Civil Freedom.

A safety net, not a sound bite

RDU’s secretary-general Ravi Philemon delivered a powerful critique of Singapore’s current socio-economic safety measures. “We are facing a global trade crisis,” he said, “and Singapore cannot escape getting trampled when the giants fight.”

In response, RDU’s flagship policy proposal is the Citizen’s Dividend—an unconditional cash transfer for all Singaporeans that begins with the most vulnerable and gradually expands to all. This initiative, they argue, offers a dignified financial floor that empowers citizens to seek better opportunities, retrain, or innovate without the crushing weight of economic uncertainty.

“The trampoline has too many broken springs,” Philemon said, referencing Singapore’s current social assistance schemes. “It’s time for a real safety net.”

Homes with heart: A comprehensive housing reset

The second major thrust of RDU’s manifesto targets housing insecurity, particularly for those at risk of lease decay.

With HDB leases ticking toward expiry and little clarity on the government’s long-term plans, RDU is calling for SERS-for-All, a proposal to extend the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme to all HDB estates, thereby ensuring the value and utility of older flats.

RDU is also championing a Rent-to-Own scheme aimed at the bottom 20% of income earners and young, single Singaporeans who struggle to buy homes. “There is no price you can put on a home,” Philemon noted. “Singaporeans deserve security, not stress, when it comes to housing.”

Additionally, RDU’s housing reforms include restrictions on resale flat purchases by new citizens and PRs, which aim to ensure that locals have priority in the public housing market.

Well-being, not just GDP

RDU is proposing a shift towards a Well-being Economy, moving away from gross domestic product (GDP)-centric policies to those prioritising wage fairness and job security.

Despite Singapore’s wealth and inflow of foreign investments, Philemon highlighted the growing disconnect between economic growth and the lived realities of workers: “Wage growth has barely kept pace with inflation.”

To address this, RDU wants the government to support local SMEs through improved procurement policies, moderation of commercial rents, and easier access to grants. Recognising small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMES) as the backbone of the economy, RDU argues that a thriving small business ecosystem directly translates into stable employment for many Singaporeans.

Environmental sustainability also finds its place in this pillar, with RDU calling for prioritisation of brownfield redevelopment, which is about revitalising old, used-up plots—like former factories, warehouses, or old urban sites—instead of clearing untouched “greenfield” land (like forests or farmland) for new developments. The party is also advocating enforceable emissions limits and increased transparency in land-use decisions.

Healthcare that cares

RDU’s fourth pillar focuses on transforming the healthcare system into one that prioritises people over profit.

Reforms proposed include expanding MediShield Life, redesigning MediSave, and capping out-of-pocket expenses. The goal? To ensure that no Singaporean ever has to choose between their health and their financial survival.

“Healthcare must be a right, not a financial burden,” Philemon emphasised. RDU proposes fairer subsidies and the rebalancing of the 3M framework (MediShield, MediSave, MediFund) to reduce the individual burden and promote collective responsibility.

Civil freedom as a foundation

The final C—Civil Freedom—was presented as not just a moral obligation but a practical necessity for innovation and trust in governance.

RDU has pledged to pass a Freedom of Information Act and revise laws such as POFMA, FICA, and POHA, which they say are currently used to stifle dissent rather than ensure accountability.

“Transparency is critical for trust,” Philemon said. “We cannot build a thriving society while restricting information and silencing voices.”

Speaking to The Independent at the manifesto launch, RDU Secretary-General Ravi Philemon elaborated on the party’s pledge to pass a Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, calling it “a foundational step toward building public trust and ensuring accountability.”

He referenced a past environmental controversy involving unauthorised land clearance, which only came to light after independent observers using satellite imagery raised the alarm. “This is not about finger-pointing,” Philemon emphasised. “It’s about the lack of visibility—about how the public often only finds out about decisions after damage is already done.”

Why a Freedom of Information Act?

The FOI Act proposed by RDU would allow citizens to access a range of public documents and government-held data, especially on issues such as:

  • Land use and environmental decisions

  • Public procurement and government contracts

  • Urban redevelopment plans

  • Budget allocations and spending

  • Official correspondences on policy implementation

Philemon stressed that the intention isn’t to “open every drawer in the Cabinet” but to “make information accessible unless there’s a compelling reason to withhold it.”

“In mature democracies like the UK and New Zealand,” he added, “Freedom of Information laws come with clear safeguards for national security and sensitive diplomatic matters, but they don’t default to secrecy.”

What information would be covered?

According to RDU, their FOI framework would:

  • Establish clear classifications for what can be disclosed, what requires redaction, and what must remain confidential for national security or legal reasons.

  • Introduce declassification timelines—for example, a 10- or 20-year embargo on certain sensitive information, similar to practices in other countries.

  • Allow for independent review boards to assess rejected information requests.

  • Require government bodies to proactively publish key datasets and minutes from policy meetings, where feasible.

“This is not about political witch-hunts,” Philemon clarified. “This is about the right of Singaporeans to understand how decisions that affect their lives are made.”

A call to reimagine the nation

More than a collection of policy proposals, RDU’s manifesto is a philosophical call to reimagine Singapore as a society rooted in heart and dignity. It introduced HEART as a new guiding framework:

  • H – Housing: Secure homes for all, especially the vulnerable.
  • E – Equitable Healthcare: Access to affordable, quality care.
  • A – Assured Prosperity: A fairer economy with decent wages.
  • R – Resilient Economy: Growth aligned with sustainability.
  • T – Transparency: A government that is open and accountable.

If elected, RDU has pledged to run town councils efficiently, grounded in principles of prudence and transparency, and to be a voice in Parliament that truly represents the people.

“This is not just about policies,” Philemon concluded. “It’s about the kind of society we want to build. A Singapore where prosperity is shared, dignity is upheld, and no one is left behind.”

With a clear-eyed view of the challenges ahead and a heart-centred approach to governance, RDU’s manifesto may well be the rallying cry for a new chapter in Singapore’s political story.

Stay tuned to The Independent for more ground-up perspectives, bold questions, and stories that matter as polling day inches closer.

‘Desperately trying to shift silent majority’ — Singaporeans say IB is going overboard as GE2025 approaches

SINGAPORE: Complaints are arising online that the pro-establishment “internet brigade” (IB) is going overboard as the 2025 general election approaches.

Some Singaporeans are lamenting that the IB is in overdrive in the comments sections of Facebook posts made by mainstream news channels like The Straits Times, CNA and TODAY, in what some deem is a “desperate attempt to shift the silent majority” as the ruling party heads into its first election under the leadership of Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.

The IB is believed to be an organised, coordinated effort to promote pro-government narratives, counter criticism, and shape public opinion in comment sections, forums, and social media spaces. Accounts suspected of being part of the “internet brigade” have been accused of denigrating opposition politicians, discrediting alternative media outlets, reporting dissenting content and flooding online discussions with pro-establishment talking points.

While some ruling party supporters believe the IB is a myth cultivated by the opposition, the roots of this supposed brigade can be traced back almost 20 years. Back in 2007, The Straits Times reported that there was a “mounting a quiet counter-insurgency against its online critics. It has members going into Internet forums and blogs to rebut anti-establishment views and putting up postings anonymously”.

According to the national broadsheet, this initiative is driven by a ‘new media’ committee that was set up after the 2006 General Election and led by prominent ruling party politicians like Ng Eng Hen, Zaqy Mohamad, Baey Yam Keng and Josephine Teo.

Mr Baey, at the time, declined to comment on the group’s activities but told ST that it was important for the ruling party to have an online voice to provide balance and clarity in a space perceived to be heavily anti-establishment. While this positioning appeared innocuous enough, the fact that the New Media Committee members’ efforts were conducted under the radar—and often without disclosing party affiliation—sparked discomfort among many Singaporeans.

Back in 2007, Mr Baey said that the committee’s aim to propagate pro-establishment views and balance skewed comments can only work if activists are not “too obvious” about it — otherwise it comes across as “propaganda.” He said, ‘The identity is not important. It is the message that is important.”

One activist involved in the committee at the time told the paper that he does not identify himself as an establishment member when posting comments online. With technology having advanced rapidly in the past two decades, today some pro-establishment comments have raised suspicion because they are posted by locked or visible-to-friends-only accounts.

Some individuals even use software to hide their identity before making comments that seem like they are coming from an ordinary citizen. This practice is called astroturfing, where one person uses multiple online personas to give the impression of widespread support for the agenda of the entity they support.

It has become much easier to hide party affiliations since the New Media Committee began, five election cycles ago. Critics argue that declining to disclose one’s party affiliation and posing as regular citizens to give the illusion of widespread support deepens public distrust and blurs the line between genuine support and strategic manipulation.

Aside from the transparency issues, the aggressive tactics of IB members have also drawn widespread criticism. Critics argue that these online defenders don’t just engage in debate—they undermine and attack, sometimes resorting to character assassinations or misinformation to shut down dissent. This creates a chilling effect, especially among independent voices who fear being targeted or harassed for expressing alternative viewpoints.

Opposition parties and activists have often found themselves on the receiving end of sudden waves of online hostility, especially during election periods, leading to suspicions of coordinated campaigns. Indeed, a quick look at the comments sections of social media posts covering opposition figures in recent weeks shows that the comments are riddled with words like “loser,” “going to lose deposit,” or “don’t waste time.”

But look at the posts covering ruling party politicians and you’ll notice a deluge of comments singing the praises of these politicians, with words like “humble,” “inspiring,” or “the best MP”—sometimes repeated across posts and platforms almost word-for-word. The uniformity of this praise suggests coordination, not organic support.

Critics have called out these tactics as a strategic attempt to shape perception by flooding the online space with emotionally charged, repetitive messaging designed to influence undecided voters, also known as the “silent majority.” This group typically doesn’t comment, share, or post publicly about politics, but they are watching. And during election season, they’re paying even closer attention.

Singaporeans online have raised concerns that amplifying the ruling party’s positives while hammering the opposition with negativity can give the false illusion of consensus and sway the silent majority’s perception of electability or credibility.

If one is undecided and all they see online is one candidate getting trashed while another is being lauded across the board, it subtly shifts their internal narrative. This voter might even associate one with failure and chaos, and the other with competence and trust even if they have never seen either of them in action.

The power of this strategy is that it doesn’t rely on facts or policy arguments. It’s about repetition, tone, and emotional cues. And during elections, when undecided voters are forming quick judgments based on limited exposure, this kind of narrative manipulation can have a profound impact on voter sentiment.

Ultimately, the controversy around the PA Internet Brigade is not just about who is behind the keyboard, but what it means for online discourse in Singapore. In an era where social media plays a central role in shaping public opinion, the use of anonymous or coordinated digital actors—whether formally organised or not—raises significant concerns about transparency, fairness, and the health of civil debate.

Criticism of GRC system reignites as 3G Minister plans to lead four fresh faces through GE2025

SINGAPORE: Despite being a member of the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) third generation (3G) leadership, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam appears to still cut a hefty figure in fourth-generation Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s general election strategy. The politician who has been helming two of the most heavyweight ministries is expected to lead a team of four fresh faces into the 2025 general election (GE2025).

Mr Shanmugam entered politics close to four decades ago, in 1988. He has represented the Chong Pang division since then and has served as the incumbent in the ward for 37 long years. Chong Pang used to be in Sembawang GRC and was absorbed into Nee Soon GRC when it was established ahead of the 2011 general election.

Interestingly, Nee Soon GRC was one of a handful of wards that remained untouched in the latest electoral boundaries review exercise, which left Singapore’s electoral map heavily altered.

Since Nee Soon GRC was formed in 2011, Mr Shanmugam has led the PAP team contesting the ward as anchor minister. In the past three election cycles, he has led five PAP new faces to Parliament.

This number is set to almost double. In the coming election, Mr Shanmugam will likely be the only known face in the PAP’s Nee Soon GRC team. The veteran politician said he will likely be leading four new candidates in the contest that will take place on May 3.

The four new faces are ex-Nominated Member of Parliament Syed Harun Alhabsyi; ex-Ministry of Digital Development and Information director Goh Hanyan; Mr Shanmugam’s former branch secretary Jackson Lam; and Temasek Foundation associate director Lee Hui Ying.

Dr Syed Harun and Ms Goh had resigned from the posts days before the writ of election was issued, triggering questions over the neutrality that is expected of the NMP scheme as well as concerns over civil servants turning to partisan politics without a mandatory cooling-off period.

The notion that Mr Shanmugam could lead four fresh faces through to the polls has reignited longstanding criticisms of the GRC system itself — a system that many believe allows political rookies to “ride coattails” into Parliament by being bundled into teams led by heavyweight ministers.

Critics argue that the GRC system, which was introduced to ensure minority representation in Parliament, has evolved into a mechanism that benefits the ruling party disproportionately. By joining a GRC team anchored by a high-profile minister like Mr Shanmugam, political newcomers gain a significant electoral advantage.

This perceived structural imbalance has led to accusations that the system discourages true electoral competition and limits voter choice. Some critics argue that voters in a GRC may want to support an experienced incumbent like Mr Shanmugam but may be less confident about endorsing unknown candidates on the same slate — yet they are forced to vote for the entire team as a package.

For critics, the makeup of the team for Nee Soon GRC is a textbook example of how the GRC system can be used to usher in new faces without subjecting them to the full rigour of individual electoral contest.

NUS study invites public to weigh moral dilemmas of embryo selection in IVF

SINGAPORE: When faced with choosing an embryo for implantation during in vitro fertilisation (IVF), would you prioritise a lower risk of heart disease—or a higher chance of musical talent? That’s the provocative question at the heart of Tinker Tots, a new interactive research project co-developed by the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine at the National University of Singapore (NUS Medicine), alongside the University of Oxford and the University of Exeter.

The online platform invites the public to grapple with the complex ethical, emotional, and scientific questions surrounding preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)—a technology that can now offer potential parents probabilistic insight into their embryos’ future health conditions and even non-medical traits like intelligence or physical aptitude.

“Tinker Tots isn’t just about science—it’s a window into how we think about life, family, and the kind of world we want to build,” said Professor Julian Savulescu, one of the study’s principal investigators and Director of the Centre for Biomedical Ethics at NUS Medicine.

Participants are presented with a series of IVF scenarios, each featuring several embryos with distinct genetic profiles. The task: choose one embryo for implantation. Each option comes with predicted chances of developing certain diseases (like schizophrenia or cancer) and desirable traits (like creativity or high IQ).

The goal is to better understand how people weigh genetic possibilities—and what their choices reveal about underlying social and personal values.

The interactive nature of Tinker Tots allows users to engage directly with the ethical dilemmas doctors and prospective parents increasingly face. In each round, participants must choose between embryos based on varying predicted outcomes, all while considering trade-offs that reflect real-world reproductive decision-making.

At the end of the session, users receive a personalised summary of their decisions along with insights into how others chose in similar situations. They can replay the scenarios to explore how their preferences might shift over time or in response to new genetic information.

Every choice contributes to a growing body of research that may eventually inform not just medical practices but broader regulatory and ethical discussions around reproductive technologies.

With the growing availability of PGT, doctors and patients are already navigating these decisions in clinics worldwide. By crowdsourcing responses from diverse participants, the researchers hope to map societal attitudes toward genetic selection—particularly as technology evolves faster than legislation and ethical consensus.

Researchers hope that the project’s findings could help shape future guidelines on how genetic information is presented and interpreted in the context of IVF. “We’re asking people to really think: What do you value in a child? What kind of future are you imagining when you make these choices?” said Prof Savulescu.

Tinker Tots is freely accessible online and open to anyone curious about genetics, bioethics, or the moral questions behind family planning in the genomic era. Click THIS LINK to take part in the study.