Monday, June 16, 2025
30 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 1015

Eatery menu shows food prices up by 20%, even 25% — S’porean says it’s the “real world effect of 1% GST”

0
Photo: Reddit screengrab/u/khaizersozay

SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user posted the prices from a local eatery showing the “real world effect” of the Goods & Services Tax hike. While the GST went up by one per cent from Jan 1, 2024, on the ground, prices have increased at much higher rates.

u/khaizersozay posted the menu of Ponggol Nasi Lemak from 2022 when GST was at seven per cent, and one from 2023 when it was at eight per cent, as well as the one from this year at 9 per cent.

Reddit screengrab/u/khaizersozay

 

Reddit screengrab/u/khaizersozay

 

Reddit screengrab/u/khaizersozay

“Someone do the math,” the post author wrote.

The menus show that prices have definitely gone up, especially from last year to this. For example, French Bean, which used to be S$1.20 is now S$1.50, a 25 per cent increase. An egg, which was S$1.00 is now S$1.20, a 20 per cent markup.

u/khaizersozay’s post has gotten a lot of attention, with many commenters weighing in, as some have noticed this type of price increases in a multiple places.

“The 7-11 muffin, from $2 to $2.20. Nasi lemak near home $3.5 to 3.8. 1% vs 10% up. Zero effort 9% profit,” wrote one.

Others worried that salary increases are not coming at the same pace as price increases. “How many of us get 10% salary increase? Maybe only the ministers,” one opined.

“Is this the ripple impact of a GST increase, or is it greedflation? Cos there’s a whole lot of the latter going on in all kinds of industries,” another chimed in.

Some, however, wrote that other factors are also in play, such as higher rental, fuel, and insurance prices, as well as more expensive ingredients.

“I argue that price increase by 1-2% was an unrealistic expectation, especially for end-users,” wrote another, adding, “It’s ‘impossible’ to raise price by just 1-2%, e.g. for a bag of fishballs it’s increased in price by about 10-20c. Noodles also increase price, ketchup increase price, soy sauce increase price. So your bowl of fishball noodles is the cumulative product of every price increase further up the supply chain.”

In a Facebook post on Tuesday (Jan 9), Workers’ Party MP Jamus Lim touched on the topic as well, writing:

“Many of those we spoke to mentioned hikes that went far beyond the one percent GST increase (jumps seem to range in the tens of cents, rather than single digits, as might be implied by a 1 percent rise), as merchants took the opportunity to revise prices more generally, across the board.”

However, some of the points Assoc Prof Lim raised in his post were rebutted by Senior Minister of State for Finance Chee Hong Tat on Wednesday (Jan 10) in a Facebook post of his own.

Mr Chee wrote that the WP MP “should provide details of these merchants to the (Committee Against Profiteering) CAP, so that it can investigate and take action against any errant businesses seeking to profiteer from the GST increase.” /TISG

Read also: ‘Are You Seeing Similar Signs?’ — Lim Tean draws attention to higher prices due to GST hike

Rosamund Pike wore veil to Golden Globes after ‘smashing up’ her face in skiing accident

0
rosamund-pike-wore-veil-to-golden-globes-after-‘smashing-up’-her-face-in-skiing-accident
Rosamund Pike wore veil to Golden Globes after ‘smashing up’ her face in skiing accident

Pike

Rosamund Pike made a stunning appearance at the Golden Globes wearing a vintage Dior gown adorned with lace and embellished netting, along with an unusual lace-fascinator by Philip Treacy featuring a gauzy veil.

However, Pike disclosed that the veil wasn’t just a fashion statement; it was a necessary accessory following a skiing accident during the Christmas holidays.

In a conversation with Variety on the red carpet, Pike humorously likened her ensemble to having a “weird funeral vibe” and explained the veil as a “protective veil” due to her recent skiing mishap.

Her face had been significantly injured on December 26th, prompting her to seek a solution before attending the Golden Globes on January 7th.

Photo: Instagram/Rosamund Pike

While Pike confirmed her facial recovery, she still required the protective layer. Surprisingly, she found herself embracing the unique look, stating that she “kind of fell in love with the look.”

Pike lost Golden Globe award to Da’Vine Joy Randolph

Nominated for her role as Lady Elspeth Catton in “Saltburn,” Pike lost the award to Da’Vine Joy Randolph from “The Holdovers.” Despite this, Pike’s character in “Saltburn,” known for delivering sharp and blunt remarks, particularly resonated with viewers.

Pike shared improvised lines, cut from the show, where her character addressed sensitive topics with stark honesty, showcasing Elspeth’s tactless yet memorable dialogue.

Reflecting on her portrayal of Elspeth, Pike acknowledged her surprising ability to embody the character, stating, “I wasn’t normally a great improviser, but with Elspeth, somehow, I could just sort of hear her. I knew who she was.”

Getting entangled with Natalie Portman

In other related news, Natalie Portman and Rosamund Pike faced a wardrobe mishap at the 2024 Golden Globe Awards, as their dresses got entangled multiple times during the star-studded event.

Portman, in an embroidered Dior Haute Couture gown with a vibrant floral design, posted about the incident on her Instagram Story. She attended as a nominee for “May December,” a film inspired by Mary Kay Letourneau’s case, losing the award to Emma Stone, who dedicated it to her husband, Dave McCary. Pike, involved in the dress snag, featured in the story shared by Portman during the event.

Read More News

More on the $23,500,000 one-year contract signed by All-Star Teoscar Hernández

Cover Photo: IG

The post Rosamund Pike wore veil to Golden Globes after ‘smashing up’ her face in skiing accident appeared first on The Independent News.

“You live in Geylang; your husband will get slashed hor” — Mum warns daughter about SG’s “unsafe place”

0
Youtube Screengrab/Geylang, Singapore

SINGAPORE: A Singaporean married woman in her mid-30s took to social media to ask whether Geylang was generally safe for young families.

She heard her mom say, “wah if you live in Geylang then you cannot come home late.. so unsafe, you will get assaulted and your husband will get slashed hor. Is Geylang really still an unsafe place, in general? Has anyone had any sketchy experiences in the recent years?” she wrote.

The woman explained that she and her husband had been looking for apartments to buy, but since the home prices were “crazy,” she said it’s been rough finding something within their budget.

“We saw a few condo units in Geylang (such as Tre Residences) going for pretty good prices. My husband, being a foreigner, is completely okay with living in Geylang and can’t understand why it’s so affordable despite it being so close to town,” u/cakebitxh89 wrote on r/askSingapore on Jan 10.

However, as a local, she’s been “hardcore dissuaded” by her parents to live in Geylang, and growing up, she’s also heard people talk about how dangerous Geylang is. 

SG Redditors suggest Geylang is safe

One Redditor who lived in Lorong 14 Geylang for several years said that “it was safe to walk out alone in the brightly lighted areas when the streets are not empty. I have never been harassed or stopped, probably, because the business-men and business ladies are able to “sense” if you are a local in search of fun or food.”

Another Redditor also offered an explanation of why the condos are relatively cheaper.

“Location wise its not on the geylang lorong side so its pretty okay. Why is it so affordable is because of the size of the unit, the newer condos 3 bedrooms are 94x to 98x for non yard layout. Those with yard are typically 10xx sqft.”

Yet another SG Redditor also said that the area is not dangerous, but because people “always had the stigma,” they chose not to live there and added that “a lot of the smaller boutique condos there have a lot of sketchy people living there. No danger, but vice.”

Pros and cons of living in Geylang

Given that Geylang is Singapore’s only red-light district, many locals view it as “dangerous.”  The neighbourhood, which occupies an area of less than 10 square kilometres, is notorious for its long line of brothels and street prostitutes.

Pros

Geylang’s reputation has slowly been overturned in recent years.

Today, the area is surrounded by nine police stations and is routinely patrolled. It’s also well-known for its cleanliness and well-kept facilities, as government officials regularly inspect it.

In addition, Geylang neighbourhoods are said to rarely have conflicts, even though many Singaporeans view them as seedy. 

Cons

Even though Geylang’s image has improved, some illegal activities still remain in the area.

The Straits Times revealed in December 2023 that following many raids in Geylang, 18 males and 12 women, ages 24 to 65, were being investigated for various offences.

Police reportedly found 45g of crystal methamphetamine along with unregistered health goods like cough syrup and alleged intimate physical enhancement products.

What was it like living in Geylang

An article published by 99.co featured Malaysian Marcos Teng, who shared what it was like to live in Singapore’s sole red light district. He rented a place at Geylang Lorong 18 to 20.

According to Teng, Geylang was way friendlier than Tampines (a location he also lived in at one point). He said that during his time in Geylang, he gained 4 kilos in one year, as people always tried to sell him food. Teng also noted that food was readily available in that area “for almost around the clock.”

Teng recounted that the fights in the area often involve “drunk individuals” and not actual “gang members.” He also pointed out that the real vice in the area was not prostitution but “illegal cigarette sellers.”

Read more: Two arrested after brawl breaks out at Geylang coffeeshop

SuperAI’s global debut in Singapore: Asia’s premier Artificial Intelligence conference

0
Freepik (for illustration purposes only)

SINGAPORE: Asia’s premier artificial intelligence (AI) conference, SuperAI, is set to make its global debut in Singapore, according to a news release from PR Newswire.

The event is scheduled at the Marina Bay Sands from June 5 to June 6, 2024. SuperAI aims to bring together industry leaders, heads of state, entrepreneurs, researchers, and AI enthusiasts for an insightful exploration of the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

SuperAI’s inaugural edition is expected to draw 5,000 attendees during Singapore AI Week, which will run from June 3 to 9. The week will feature various events such as:

  • meet-ups
  • workshops
  • hackathons
  • and exclusive networking opportunities

The city-state is set to play host to diverse professionals and luminaries, establishing itself as a hub for the brightest minds in AI.

As AI continues to shape the future of society, SuperAI promises in-depth discussions on key industry topics. These include the intersection of AI in finance and healthcare, generative AI, robotics, and the ethics surrounding AI.

The event’s agenda covers a holistic perspective on the future of the AI industry, featuring keynote presentations, panel discussions, live demonstrations, and networking sessions.

Co-Founder of SuperAI, Alex Fiskum, expressed excitement about the event’s launch in Singapore, stating:

“We are incredibly excited to launch the first edition of SuperAI in Singapore, a global hub for innovation and a natural catalyst for the advancement of AI.

Going into 2024, we have seen a surge in global event interest, with internationals accounting for over 60% of our registrations to date.

SuperAI will boast a dynamic participation mix, from early-stage AI pioneers, to established business and industry leaders, all eager to explore the transformative potential of AI.”

He added, “SuperAI promises to be the most significant AI gathering in Asia this year, bridging the AI communities of both the eastern and western hemispheres. We couldn’t be more excited to bring the global AI industry to Singapore.”

As per PR Newswire, SuperAI’s first round of speakers include notable figures such as:

  • Whistleblower Edward Snowden
  • Angel investor Balaji Srinivasan
  • Analyst Benedict Evans
  • Co-founder and CEO of Real Vision Raoul Pal
  • Humanoid robot from Hanson Robotics, Sophia
  • Founder and CEO of Singularity Net, Ben Goertzel

/TISG

OCBC prices $450M perpetual capital securities; first callable set for 2029

0
Photo: FB screengrab/pages/OCBC-Singapore/157042647685515

SINGAPORE: Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation, OCBC, prices S$450 million perpetual capital securities under its global medium-term note programme, which has a total value of S$39.95 billion (US$30 billion), The Edge Singapore reports.

The notes come with a coupon rate of 4.05% per annum (p.a.) and are subject to redemption conditions. The first callable date is set for 2029, with the option for redemption on Oct 16, 2029, or any distribution payment date post the first reset date.

Conditions for redemption include a tax event or the capital securities no longer qualifying as eligible capital.

In the event the securities are not redeemed on the first reset date, the distribution rate will be reset every five years thereafter. The reset rate will be a fixed per annum, comprising the aggregate of the prevailing five-year Singapore Overnight Rate Average overnight indexed swap (SORA-OIS) and the initial spread of 1.3165%.

Distributions may be cancelled at the bank’s discretion, adhering to the provisions outlined in the securities.

The objective of these securities is to serve as additional tier 1 (AT1) capital in compliance with the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) requirements.

According to Basel III regulations, if OCBC is deemed non-viable by MAS, the securities may be wholly or partially written off.

Proceeds from this issuance, totalling S$450 million, are for general corporate purposes.

OCBC is acting as the sole lead manager and bookrunner for this offering. The notes are to be issued on Jan 16, 2024.

The Edge Singapore states, “The notes are expected to be rated Baa1 by Moody’s Investors Service, BBB- by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services and BBB+ by Fitch Ratings.”

OCBC shares are at S$12.83 as of 5:04 p.m. SGT./TISG

X platform suspends progressive influencers Klippenstein and Monacelli

0
x-platform-suspends-progressive-influencers-klippenstein-and-monacelli
X platform suspends progressive influencers Klippenstein and Monacelli

X platform

Well-known journalists and progressive influencers were suspended from Elon Musk’s X platform, raising eyebrows and questions about the boundaries of free speech and moderation policies. Among those affected were Ken Klippenstein, an investigative journalist associated with The Intercept, and Steven Monacelli, a reporter for the Texas Observer.

While the accounts were seemingly reinstated a few hours later, the lack of clear explanations left the impacted users perplexed.

X platform suspended accounts

Monacelli, speaking to The Messenger, expressed his bewilderment, saying, “I woke up and had missed a call from a journalist who wanted to talk to me about my suspension. So, I was informed via other journalists who had called and emailed me this morning about it.”

Podcast host Rob Rousseau’s account and the TrueAnon podcast account were also temporarily suspended, adding to the growing list of affected users.

In addition to journalists, some influencers reported similar suspensions. @Zei_squirrel, an X user, took to Instagram to express confusion about the ban, speculating that posts critical of Israel and hedge fund manager Bill Ackman might be the cause.

No explanations whatsoever?

The specific rules violated by the suspended accounts remain unclear, and the X platform has yet to respond to inquiries seeking clarification.

Interestingly, Monacelli highlighted a Texas law prohibiting social media companies from banning users based on their political viewpoints, raising questions about the potential legal implications of the suspensions.

“I would certainly be interested in hearing from people who are First Amendment lawyers about how that might apply if they don’t provide some legitimate and well-documented reason for my suspension.”

As debates around free speech, moderation policies, and corporate influence on online discourse intensify, the X platform’s recent actions have thrust these issues back into the spotlight.

Users, influencers, and journalists are left grappling with uncertainty in the evolving landscape of digital expression.

Read More News

Conservatives calling Nikki Haley “too woke” to be Republican politician 

Cover Photo: YouTube

 

The post X platform suspends progressive influencers Klippenstein and Monacelli appeared first on The Independent News.

Designer bags named after famous people

0
designer-bags-named-after-famous-people
Designer bags named after famous people

Designer bags

Here we give a short list of designer bags named after famous people. Celebrities are usually known for their looks or talent. This becomes an inspiration for brands to design fashion after them. Here are some designer handbags named after celebrities.

Photo: Wikipedia/Jane Birkin
Photo: Wikipedia/Hermes Birkin

Hermes Birkin

Arguably one of the most coveted handbags in the history of fashion, how the handbag came about was during a flight from Paris to London in 1981. Jean-Louis Dumas, the then CEO of Hermes was seated next to Jane Birkin on the plane.

Birkin is a popular British singer and actress. She was putting her wicker basket in the overhead compartment when everything fell down as well as her Hermes diary. The CEO of Hermes then joked that Birkin needed a handbag with pockets, not a basket.

The star then complained that there were no beautiful, practical weekend handbags which had enough space for her needs.

Dumas then sketched a design inspired by Birkin. The design was based on an earlier Hermes handbag from the 1900s. Birkin added the large interior pockets and detachable shoulder strap.

Photo:Wikipedia/Grace Kelly
Photo: Wikipedia/Hermes Kelly

Hermes Kelly

Hot on the heels of the Birkin is the Hermes Kelly. The story about this classic beauty is of equestrian heritage, Hollywood glamour and accidental reinvention. Back in 1892, Hermes created “Haut à courroies” bag. It was designed for horse riders, has a trapezoid shape, a single rolled handle, leather sangles, a metal plaque, and a touret closure.

This was the prototype for both Kelly and Birkin handbags. Named Sac à dépêches, in 1950s the handbag found its way to the hands of Hollywood actress Grace Kelly. The bag was selected for Kelly’s role in Hitchcock’s film To Catch A Thief by costume designer Edith Head.

The actress loved the handbag and continued to use it after filming. She had it to cover her early pregnancy from paparazzi. Over time, photos of the actress and the handbag became viral and in 1977 it was officially named as the Kelly bag.

Photo: Wikipedia/Princess Diana
Photo: Instagram/Albert Dior

Lady Dior

The tale of the Lady Dior is about royal encounters, cultural exchange as well as the iconic influence of Princess Diana. During a visit to Paris, French First Lady Bernadette Chirac fave the then-unnamed Dior handbag to Princess Diana in 1995. Gianfranco Ferré designed the bag and it was nicknamed Chouchou ‘favourite in French’ at that time.

Princess Diana loved the quilted pattern, rounded handles and D-I-O-R charms that signified good luck. Photographed carrying the bag frequently, the public became enraptured by the handbag. Dior then named the handbag “Princesse” and then later “Lady Dior” as a tribute to the princess.

Photo: Instagram/Jessica Stam
Photo: Instagram/sheisdede

Marc Jacobs Stam Bag

Debuting in the early 2000s fashion scene, the Stam bag by Marc Jacobs was a trend-setter when it was introduced. It appeared in Marc Jacobs’ Fall/Winter 2005 collection on the runway. The handbag was named after Canadian supermodel Jessica Stam who is known for her edgy, cool-girl vibes.

Featuring a vintage-inspired quilting, kiss-lock closure and chunky chain it was a glamorous item to have at the time. Celebrities like Rihanna, Beyonce and Lindsay Lohan were spotted carrying the Stam bag. In 2023, the Stam bag was reborn as part of Marc Jacobs’ re-edition project.

Photo: Instagram/Alexa Chung
Photo: Instagram/Mulberry England

Mulberry Alexa

The Mulberry Alexa is a timeless classic that boasts British fashion heritage and celebrity influence. Emma Hill, the brand’s creative designer saw Alexa Chung carrying a vintage Mulberry briefcase in 2009. Chung is a fashionista and British TV presenter.

The handbag had a casual slouch and practical functionality which led Hill to design a modern adaptation for the contemporary woman. In 2010 the Alexa handbag was introduced and it was inspired by Chung. It features vintage briefcase elements like the postman lock and satchel silhouette. It also had softer leathers, wider straps and playful detailing.

Read More News

Conservatives giving props to court system enhancing safety by literally chaining man who attacked judge 

Cover Photo: IG

The post Designer bags named after famous people appeared first on The Independent News.

In Parliament: New bill introduced to allow police conduct warrantless search on suspects

0
Photo: FB screengrab/Singapore Police Force

SINGAPORE: The Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill was introduced by the Ministries of Law and Home Affairs in Parliament on Wednesday (Jan 10).

“The Bill advances our criminal justice system and contains significant proposals aimed at (A) protecting the public by strengthening our levers to tackle crime, including serious s*xual crime, and (B) enhancing transparency, fairness and coherence in our criminal court processes,” the Ministries said.

Under it, police officers would be permitted to conduct warrantless searches on suspects in more situations and during arrests to take dangerous items away from them.

Updating and enhancing the powers of law enforcement officers—including powers of arrest, search and investigation— would serve to “better equip the law enforcement agencies (LEAs) to combat crime and result in greater operational efficiency,” the bill states.

Police would be allowed to conduct a search without a warrant in situations “when they have reason to believe that the relevant evidence is in the possession or power of a suspect of an arrestable offence.”

For the moment, if an officer has reason to believe that a person would not, or is unlikely to, produce relevant evidence when presented with a production order, the officer may search without a warrant.

But whether a person would comply with a production order can’t always be accurately determined at the outset, which could cause delays in searches and the opportunity to tamper with evidence.

With the proposed bill, police can search suspects at the point of arrest so they can remove dangerous items in the possession of suspects, including razor blades and needles.

The new bill may be read in full here.

If passed, it empowers police to compel suspects to undergo a forensic medical examination, including taking DNA swabs or blood samples, if deemed relevant. Accused persons who refuse to comply will be charged with an offence, with penalties laid out in the bill.

A harsher sentencing option has also been put forth in the bill for dangerous offenders who commit violent or s*x crimes. These include new minimum jail terms and detention beyond jail for life.

“There is no downside to this amendment because if they search and they find the evidence, or if they do not find the evidence, no one is worse off.

And, if challenged, the police will show you why they reasonably suspected the person to have the evidence. This would make things easier for the police and law enforcement agencies on a day-to-day basis,” CNA quotes Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam. /TISG

Read also: Chan Chun Sing: Ministerial pay review postponed due to “other pressing issues”

In Parliament: Sylvia Lim urges more protection against scams for Singaporeans

0
Photo: Facebook screengrab/ The Workers Party (Mediacorp)

SINGAPORE: Workers’ Party MP Sylvia Lim (Aljunied GRC) spoke of the crisis of confidence in digital banking because so many people have been scammed recently. The WP chair herself was almost a victim, but she managed to avoid losing money.

In Parliament on Wednesday (Jan 10), Ms Lim spoke on the importance of restoring trust in virtual communications due to scams and the risks of artificial intelligence.

She underlined that more should be done to protect people from getting victimized by scammers and that the government and businesses should lead the way in these efforts.

Ms Lim noted that the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) has said that out of 1.6 billion international calls made to Singapore yearly, around one-fourth, or 300 million calls, were believed to be scam calls and were blocked by telcos from January to September last year.

“To block 300 million calls is a staggering statistic, but I would surmise that many other scam calls would have gotten through. Our parents, residents and we ourselves are all in the pool of potential victims,” said Ms Lim.

And while she acknowledged that banks “appear to be taking more steps to prevent scams and stop scams in progress,” she added that banks, quite naturally, need to do this since they make “healthy profits” and also have the resources and expertise to do more to detect and prevent scams.

But scams continue to evolve, and scammers now even impersonate officers from the Monetary Authority (MAS). Phishing scams involving PayLah have effectively spoofed SMS messages sent by DBS, one of which she herself received.

“On New Year’s Day this year, I too received the SMS about a withdrawal of $289 from my PayLah account, and a link to stop the transaction if it was unauthorised.

As I was in the midst of some work then, I did not scrutinise the message carefully and clicked on the link to stop the transaction. The link then brought me to a page to enter banking credentials, whereupon I had my Eureka moment and stopped in my tracks.”

However, some residents who received the same SMS had gone on to get scammed and came to her Meet People Session “in desperation.”

She said she has concluded that scammers “must have very good consultants” as even modes of savings believed to be very safe turn out not to be so.

“I would not like to exaggerate the situation, but I would say that we are moving towards a crisis of confidence in digital banking without stronger intervention by government regulators.”

She added that MAS should ensure that banks behave responsibly and ethically, having heard from the public that they believe banks’ interests will always be protected at the expense of the consumer.

“I hope that the MAS will demonstrate that this is not true,” added Ms Lim. /TISG

Read also: Sylvia Lim calls for banks to reimburse scam victims

Ong Ye Kung: Healthcare workers not given COVID-19 resilience medals can appeal to MOH

0
Photo: PMO screengrab

SINGAPORE: While Health Minister Ong Ye Kung said in Parliament on Tuesday (Jan 9) that nine out of 10 healthcare workers have received the COVID-19 Resilience Medal, those who haven’t may write an appeal to the Ministry of Health.

Mr Ong said this in a written reply to a number of MPs who had posed questions on the matter. Last month, an anonymous group of healthcare workers who had served on the frontlines during the pandemic said they had been left out of the awardees honoured with the COVID-19 Resilience Medals.

The minister told Parliament that 91 per cent of the 68,600 workers in the country’s public healthcare institutions had received the medal, adding that about 2,000 outsourced workers, such as cleaners and porters, had been nominated for and had also received the medal.

However, a “very small number” of healthcare workers were disqualified because of their disciplinary records. As the medal is “a national-level award, individuals with criminal records and public service officers with disciplinary records and within the debarment periods are also disqualified,” noted the Health Minister.

Mr Ong also said, however, that those who did not get the award had not contributed “substantially or on a sustained basis” to address the pandemic within the specified period of contribution.

As for those who feel that they deserve the medal, they can “write to MOH, and we will review their appeals with their employers accordingly.”

Workers’ Party MP Jamus Lim (Sengkang GRC) had asked whether MOH would consider a channel for appeal by individuals who missed out on receiving the medal.

Other MPs, including Mr Yip Hon Weng (PAP-Yio Chu Kang) and Dr Tan Wu Meng (PAP-Jurong), as well as Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Leong Mun Wai, also asked questions related to the issue.

Two days after the letter from the healthcare group was published over social media, a statement from MOH in response to it was published in TODAY.

The ministry said its approach to awarding the medals had been as inclusive as possible, acknowledging that not everyone who had been part of the effort had received the medal.

Mr Ong also invited the group members to come forward so that their cases could be looked into. /TISG

Read also:  ‘How did you forget Sanjeev?’ — Healthcare workers ask why MOH ‘poster boy’ doctor wasn’t given COVID-19 Resilience Medal