Singaporean shares his opinion on how PAP has changed: “It’s not the same party that led us through the early years and stood by us when times were hard”

SINGAPORE: A Singaporean recently shared a brief commentary online on how he thinks the PAP has changed over the years. The netizen’s post also touched on how he feels the change has affected how Singaporeans see the ruling party.

Sharing a screengrab of a news headline about Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin’s apology for using “unparliamentary” language in Parliament, an online user had quite a few things to say about the matter.

“This is why Singaporeans are getting pissed with the ruling party,” he wrote. “It is not because we are ungrateful for what the PAP has done for us but because it is not the same party that led us through the early years and stood by us when times were hard. Our first and perhaps second-generation leaders were not all likeable leaders but they were a respected lot.”

The netizen also shared his personal experiences in the past as a Singaporean. “I lived through those days when life was all but easy. Not all of their decisions were good ones but when they made sound decisions, it really made a positive difference for Singapore. They were men with high moral standards and integrity—leaders who never took advantage of their rank or position.”

He also shared an incident where he allegedly spoke with the niece of Mr Lim Kim San. “I remember the niece of Mr Lim Kim San telling me when her uncle assumed the chairmanship of SPH, his new secretary gave him a cycle & carriage automobile brochure to choose a brand new merc as his new position entitled him to one,” he shared.

The comments section served as an online space where several spoke about the importance of the Speaker of the House having a strong sense of fairness and impartiality.

See also  "Maybe Sun Xueling could coach Tan Chuan-Jin on appropriate language use" — Netizens draw parallel between vulgar email from resident and F-word in parliament

“An opinion that I share as well…” one responded. “I am merely a humble citizen, but it is my belief that the Speaker Of The House, like the office of the President, must have a rock solid foundation on fairness and impartiality. So what does this all say then when it seems abundantly apparent that individuals with a history working among the members of the current government, find it so easy to reveal their level of ‘quality’ when situations present themselves? As you said at the start, this isn’t quite the same party. Not by a long stretch in my humble opinion.”