Saturday, May 3, 2025
26.8 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2745

Trump and Biden outline competing visions for US economy

0

by Julie CHABANAS / Chris STEIN

One US presidential candidate wants to raise taxes, the other lower them. One will pursue an ongoing trade war, the other may throttle back tensions. And neither will get much done without Congress’s approval.

The proposed economic policies of President Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Joe Biden offer starkly different views of the world’s largest economy and its global role, ahead of the tense November 3 election.

Biden’s agenda is aimed at poorer Americans and includes a number of policies that would mark a sharp departure from Trump’s time in office, while building on the policies of Barack Obama, whom he served as vice president.

Trump, by comparison, has offered what analysts complain are few details on his plan, other than a vow to bring back the comparatively good economy and the record low employment Americans experienced until March, when the coronavirus pandemic ended that.

“I would categorize the Biden plan as really being about an expansion of existing social programs,” said John Ricco, a senior analyst at the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Wharton Budget Model.

“In contrast, the Trump plan, to the extent that such a plan exists, is… sort of taking the same themes that the administration pursued in the last four years.”

The extent to which either candidate can get what they want will depend on which party controls Congress, which is currently split between the Republican-controlled Senate and the Democrat-controlled House.

With polls showing the former vice president ahead and many key Senate races leaning toward the Democrats, analysts are cautiously warming to the possibilities offered by a Biden victory — assuming Democrats win the Senate.

“Democratic control of the House, Senate and White House would produce the largest changes in policy, but if Republicans retain the Senate or White House, we expect limited new federal policies, fiscal or otherwise,” JP Morgan said in a note.

– The race upended –
Biden’s economic platform has centered on the slogan of “build back better,” with promises of creating jobs via infrastructure and clean-energy improvements funded by $4.1 trillion in taxes over the next decade, most of it levied on big business and the rich.

Trump has vowed to restore what he calls “the greatest economy in history,” the period from his 2017 inauguration up until March; after a decade of economic expansion, unemployment was at a 50-year low.

Polls have shown voters thus far siding with Biden as the United States grapples with the world’s worst coronavirus outbreak. Then on Friday the race was upended when Trump reported he had contracted the virus.

The two men’s platforms appear aimed at benefiting different sectors of the economy, said Mark Zandi and Bernard Yaros, economists at Moody’s Analytics.

Biden’s platform is targeted at the poor and middle class, whose “tax bill will remain roughly the same as it is today, but they are significant beneficiaries of increased government spending on education, healthcare, housing, a plethora of other social programs and a larger economy,” Zandi and Yaros wrote.

A Trump presidency would likely see the extension of tax cuts passed by Congress in 2017, and “the benefits largely go to higher-income households and businesses, while government spending is scaled back on healthcare and a range of social programs,” they wrote.

– Control of Congress is key –
If the Democrats manage to take Congress and the White House, Moody’s predicts that full employment, as seen before the pandemic, could return as soon as the second quarter of 2022. If Republicans get the same control, full employment would be restored only in early 2024.

However, Moody’s most likely scenario is that neither Trump nor Biden wins the White House and Congress, and employment isn’t restored until sometime in 2023.

While much of their economic policies are aimed at winning individual Americans, businesses are eyeing the two candidates’ differing approaches to trade and in particular to China, with which Trump has pursued a trade war.

More than 3,400 businesses from all sectors, including heavyweights like Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, Home Depot and Ralph Lauren, have sued the Trump administration over customs duties on Chinese exports to the United States.

A President Biden could reverse those policies, but Ricco points out that he may only go so far.

“Both candidates are envisioning a platform in which there’s a lot more skepticism towards free trade,” he said. “The tools to get there are different.”

cs-jul/bbk

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Trump ‘much better’ but WH doctor says ‘not yet out of the woods’

0

by Daniel WOOLLS

US President Donald Trump posted a video Saturday from the hospital where he is battling Covid-19, saying he was improving and would be “back soon” — but acknowledged that the crucial coming days would be “the real test.”

“I came here, wasn’t feeling so well. I feel much better now,” Trump, 74, said from his business suite at the Walter Reed military medical center near Washington.

“We’re working hard to get me all the way back… I think I’ll be back soon and I look forward to finishing up the campaign the way it was started.”

Appearing relaxed in an open-collar shirt and blue suit jacket, Trump acknowledged there was uncertainty about the course of the disease, which can hit recovering patients hard with no warning.

“I’m starting to feel good. You don’t know over the next period of a few days, I guess that’s the real test, so we’ll be seeing what happens over those next couple of days.”

Trump’s wife also tested positive but he said her symptoms were not as bad as his own.

“Melania is really handling it very nicely. As you’ve probably read, she’s slightly younger than me, just a little tiny bit,” he joked about the 50-year-old first lady.

Late Saturday, White House doctor Sean Conley said Trump was “not yet out of the woods,” but that the medical team is “cautiously optimistic.”

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said Trump’s condition had them worried on Friday, but that he had since improved.

“Yesterday morning, we were real concerned… he had a fever and his blood oxygen level had dropped rapidly,” Meadows told Fox News late Saturday.

Meadows said there was never a risk Trump would have to hand over power to Vice President Mike Pence, after a day of conflicting reports and confusion over the leader’s actual fitness.

“He’s made unbelievable improvements from yesterday morning, when I know a number of us, the doctor and I, were very concerned,” Meadows said.

His comments echoed remarks by Conley, who said Trump had “made substantial progress since diagnosis, and remained “fever-free and off supplemental oxygen.”

Trump had completed a second dose of therapeutic drug remdesivir and had spent “most of the afternoon conducting business,” Conley added.

Conley was evasive when asked earlier whether the president had received supplementary oxygen at any point since falling ill, only confirming that he hadn’t received any at the hospital or on Thursday — the day of his positive test.

Several US media outlets said Trump was on oxygen at the White House on Friday before being admitted to Walter Reed.

– ‘White House cluster –
Conley added to the confusion by suggesting that Trump had been diagnosed on Wednesday — not on Thursday, per the official account — but he later said he had misspoken.

Soon after Trump arrived at the hospital, Conley said in a memo the president was starting a course of remdesivir and had received an eight-gram dose of an experimental antibody cocktail.

Neither Trump’s doctors nor the White House explained why the president was taking unproven drugs if his progress was satisfactory.

Trump’s optimism over his recovery prospects has been tempered by news that more people close to the president have tested positive for the coronavirus.

They included campaign advisor Chris Christie, who was among several aides that helped Trump prepare for the first presidential debate who have since announced positive tests.

Christie and a number of senators and Trump aides are also among a growing list from the president’s orbit to have tested positive after attending an event in the White House Rose Garden last weekend.

The so-called “White House cluster” includes the president’s wife Melania, close confidante Hope Hicks, former White House top aide Kellyanne Conway, campaign manager Bill Stepien and Republican senators Thom Tillis and Mike Lee.

Another close aide, Nicholas Luna, one of the “body men” who accompanies the president round the clock, had also tested positive, CNN reported.

Heightening the sense of crisis at the heart of power in America, a third Republican senator, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, announced on Saturday that he had tested positive.

– ‘False sense of comfort’ –
Public health experts have expressed alarm at the outbreak linked to the September 26 celebration of conservative judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

“They relied too much on diagnostic testing. We know that these tests have a very high false negative rate,” said Ali Nouri, president of the Federation of American Scientists.

“By simply relying on these diagnostics to determine who gets to come in and out of the White House, and by not requiring other protections, like social distancing and masks, they created a false sense of comfort for the White House.”

Democrats have called for Barrett’s Senate confirmation hearings to be postponed after several Republican senators tested positive, but judiciary committee chair Senator Lindsey Graham said they would go ahead.

Trump — who is well behind his 77-year-old Democratic election rival Joe Biden in the polls — has been forced to freeze or rework much of his campaign ahead of a potentially messy vote on November 3.

Biden has made Trump’s frequent downplaying of the Covid-19 crisis and mixed messaging on mask-wearing a central campaign theme.

The former vice president, who stood on a stage with Trump for 90 minutes during their ill-tempered first debate Tuesday, announced that he and his wife Jill tested negative Friday.

Biden reminded voters during the debate that he has pushed consistently for a serious approach to the coronavirus, which has killed more than 208,000 Americans, unlike his opponent who has mocked the Democrat for his rigorous use of masks.

bur-acb/bfm/mtp/tom

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

WP clarifies that Sylvia Lim has not abandoned her “Justice for All” parliamentary motion

Singapore — The Workers’ Party (WP) has clarified that Chairman Sylvia Lim has not abandoned an adjournment motion she had planned to raise pertaining to the Parti Liyani court case.

On Sept 14, Ms Lim had filed an adjournment motion in Parliament to examine the issues that had arisen after former domestic helper Parti was acquitted on appeal of theft in a case brought by the family of her former employer, Mr Liew Mun Leong.

Through the motion, entitled “Justice For All: Enhancing Equity In The Criminal Justice System”, Ms Lim, a lawyer, intended to “discuss aspects of the criminal justice system and the challenges faced by persons of less means in navigating it”. She also planned to propose specific suggestions to improve the system.

On Tuesday evening (Sept 29), however, Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin announced that Ms Lim had lost the ballot on the motions raised in the House. A motion filed by People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Louis Ng, calling for protection against secondhand smoke in homes, won the ballot.

The result of the ballot sparked criticism of the way the motions are selected. Mr Tan responded with multiple rebuttals of the criticism. Mr Ng, when urged by the critics to withdraw his motion and give way to Ms Lim, said he would also speak on the Parti Liyani case in Parliament.

On Thursday (Oct 1), Law Minister K Shanmugam announced that a Ministerial Statement he was planning to deliver next week on the court case would be postponed to November since the internal reviews by the police and the Attorney-General’s Chambers would take a few more weeks to conclude.

On Friday (Oct 2), the WP said Ms Lim would not seek any further ballot of the adjournment motion since Mr Shanmugam had announced that his Ministerial Statement on the case had been postponed to November.

The party said: “Appreciating the premium on Parliament’s time, WP will coincide its contribution to the debate with the Ministerial Statement as far as practicable. WP Chair MP Sylvia Lim will therefore not seek any further ballot in October of the adjournment motion filed by her.”

Asserting that its aim was “to seek enhancements to a justice system that should work for all”, the party added that the strong public interest in the case bode well for a critical public discussion on how disadvantaged individuals could adequately navigate the criminal justice system.

While the party said that Ms Lim would not apply for further ballot in the month of October — since the Ministerial Statement would only be delivered in November — some took the statement to mean that the WP Chairman had abandoned her motion totally.

Clarifying that this was inaccurate, the opposition party said in a statement on Saturday (Oct 3): “The Workers’ Party notes that some media reports in the last 24 hours may have given the misimpression that WP Chair Sylvia Lim has abandoned re-filing of her Adjournment Motion entitled ‘Justice For All: Enhancing Equity In The Criminal Justice System’. This is not accurate.”

Hinting that Ms Lim may re-file her motion next month, the WP said: “Our earlier statement stated that Ms Lim would not seek to have her adjournment motion re-balloted for October, since the Minister for Law has confirmed that he would make a Ministerial Statement on the Parti Liyani case and answer questions raised by MPs in November.

“The WP stated that it would coincide its contribution to the debate with the Ministerial Statement on the matter, as far as practicable i.e. in November.”

It added: “We are closely monitoring developments and will consider all procedural options for participating in the Parliamentary debate in November.”

????????? ???? ??? ???????' ?????????????????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ????…

Posted by The Workers' Party on Saturday, October 3, 2020

No motion on Parti Liyani in the next Parliament sitting

Tan Chuan-Jin gets defensive in response to backlash for not picking Sylvia Lim’s adjournment motion

Louis Ng says he will also touch on Parti Liyani case in the face of calls for him to give way to Sylvia Lim

Rare interview: Lee Suet Fern “incredibly proud” of her husband Hsien Yang and sons

Singapore — In a rare interview with Yahoo News, Lee Suet Fern says the family feud  between her husband Hsien Yang and his elder brother Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister, has brought her immediate family closer.

In the interview, which was conducted over three meetings, Suet Fern recalled how she fell in love with Hsien Yang and how he put her first throughout their relationship.

Suet Fern’s connection to the Lees goes back decades, from the time her father, Professor Lim Chong Yah, tutored Hsien Loong, and later Hsien Yang, for their A-Level examinations. Although Suet Fern and Hsien Yang were contemporaries in National Junior College, they drew closer while they were studying at Cambridge University.

Recalling how Hsien Yang would take long cycle rides between their respective colleges to see her, sometimes multiple times in one day, she told Yahoo’s Nicholas Yong with a laugh:

“Yang was one of many young men who turned up at my door. I joke that he didn’t have much choice, there were so few girls in Cambridge in the 70s. He jokes that I fell for him, largely because he cooked so well for me. He also claims that he was persistent enough that, over time, the others just gradually fell away.”

The romance bloomed and led to marriage in July 1981, when she was 23 and he 24. Sharing that their marriage took place quickly, mere days after she took her final law exams and returned to Singapore, Suet Fern said: “I think that we married young, perhaps as a result of some amount of parental pressure.”

She also recalled how their wedding, which involved a small ceremony at the Barker Road Methodist Church and a large reception at the Istana, was an “impersonal” one where she “shook hands with hundreds of people I did not know”.

She shared that the bridal car was her husband’s first car, a Honda Civic, and that she wore lipstick that she had purchased at a Boots store in England as there was no one to do her make-up or hair. After the ceremony, Hsien Yang cooked his bride a steak for dinner.

Yahoo reports that Suet Fern’s tone was “playful, almost girlish” when she spoke about her romance with Hsien Yang. Referring to her husband’s time as a brigadier-general in the Singapore Armed Forces, she giggled and told the publication: “I loved him in uniform. I thought he was so handsome. I used to think, oh my goodness, what a heartthrob.”

On whether she had second thoughts about marrying into the famous Lee family, Suet Fern said: “I was young, I was in love, and I thought, then as I think now, that Yang’s a really special individual. I never married the family, I married him.”

Likewise, Hsien Yang remained devoted to his wife and put her first. When the couple were living in Cairnhill Mansions after their marriage, Suet Fern confided in her husband about how lonely she felt when he was away for military training and how frightened she was of her mother-in-law, Kwa Geok Choo.

Instead of dismissing her feelings, Suet Fern said her husband “just gave me every assurance that it was him that I married and not his mother, and that he would always put me first”.

Suet Fern said that she also had “huge support” from her husband in her career and said: “It takes a special man to allow his wife to work all night in the office. And he often put up with a house not being perfect, and he never complained.”

Aside from not complaining, Hsien Yang also pitched in to share the load of caring for their sons while his wife struggled with the demands at work and parenting. She said with a laugh that Hsien Yang initially did not know how to change a diaper: “He did an awful job and he kept saying, ‘Be patient with me. I’m a Lee. I need to learn this’. And he got better and better.”

Suet Fern revealed that the bonds within her immediate family have been strengthened in the past few years, amid the Lee family feud that erupted after patriarch Lee Kuan Yew passed away in 2015.

In June 2017, a dispute among his three children over his last will spilled into the public domain. Hsien Yang and his sister Wei Ling accused their elder brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, of abusing state organs for his benefit.

Hsien Loong denied the accusations. His siblings subsequently offered a ceasefire.

Hsien Yang’s eldest son, Shengwu, was later accused of contempt of court by the Attorney-General’s Chambers over a private Facebook post. Shengwu, a Harvard academic, was eventually fined S$15,000, which he paid in order to “buy some peace and quiet” while maintaining that he did not admit guilt.

The AGC also lodged a complaint against Suet Fern for her involvement in Lee Kuan Yew’s will. She was censured by a Disciplinary Tribunal for grossly improper professional conduct in the case and appealed against the decision to the Court of Three Judges. Judgment has been reserved on the case.

Referring to the initial accusations her husband and sister-in-law had levelled against their brother in 2017, Suet Fern told Yahoo: “I didn’t wake up like everybody else and was absolutely surprised.” 

When asked how she feels about her family being in the spotlight, the lawyer said: “What has happened in terms of publicity is something we don’t welcome at all. We clearly don’t like (the attention) but this is what has happened.”

While she indicated that she “hopes that there will be fairness and justice” with regard to her appeal, Suet Fern revealed that her immediate family has emerged “better and stronger” from the saga.

Expressing pride over the way her sons responded to the saga with maturity and thoughtfulness, she said: “We’re closer than we’ve ever been before. And I’m incredibly proud of my husband and my sons, in different ways. I love that our sons have stood by their father and me throughout.

“I’ve learned that they are strong, very wise, mature and thoughtful, have better insights on Singapore and the world than I would have ever imagined. We have come to deeply value their perspectives.” /TISG

Michael Tao claims Alex Man flushed tens of thousands of dollars in toilet during a raid

0

There would be a time in your life when you panic and did something silly which you regret later. Former Hong Kong actor Alex Man and fellow actor Michael Tao who saw it has lived to tell this tale. According to Michael, it sounded like a scene from an action film. This dramatic incident involved a police raid and tens of thousands of dollars being flushed down in the toilet, and it happened in 1987 when the actors were filming TVB series Genghis Khan in China.

Recalling the incident during a guest appearance on veteran Hong Kong producer Yang Shaohong and actress Elena Kong’s radio show last Saturday (September 26), Michael revealed that they were not allowed to bring big amounts of cash into the country at that time and had to exchange HK$100 for 30 yuan coupons to spend. To manage it, the actors had to pretend that they did not have cash and did not declare it at the customs.

Michael Tao saw Alex Man flush down tens of thousands of cash down the toilet. Picture: YouTube

Everyone did not declare except one very honest actor who admitted that he had brought more than HK$10,000 (SGD$1,800) with him. It was all good until the police suddenly raided their premises one day when the cast and crew were eating. Michael said that everyone was frantic and that Alex scrambled to flush his money down the toilet.

“Everyone was really afraid. [We] didn’t know if we would go to jail, so we decided to flush the money down the toilet. Little did we expect to clog the toilet, so everyone had no choice but to leave immediately.”

When asked how much money they flushed away, Michael replied: “Over tens of thousands of dollars.”

Born on August 26 1963, Michael Tao Dai Yu is a Hong Kong television actor.

Michael entered the acting industry in the 80s, affiliating with TVB. It was during this period that he earned the name “Housewife Killer” due to his overwhelming popularity amongst housewives (who arguably constitutes a majority of television viewing audiences in Hong Kong), solidifying his position as a first-tier television actor in TVB.

Michael later moved over to rival ATV in 1997 after problems over his contract with TVB. His ATV series Flaming Brothers successfully defeated the TVB rival show at the time, a landmark for ATV. Apart from filming ATV series, Tao has also filmed in China and Singapore. He returned to TVB in 2004 and has starred in several television series since. Once again, problems with his contract resulted in Tao leaving TVB in 2009. /TISG

Rare interview: Li Shengwu felt like the first grandson to Mr and Mrs Lee

Singapore — In another part of a rare interview with Yahoo News, Lee Suet Fern recalled that her eldest son’s birth in 1985 felt to her in-laws Lee Kuan Yew and Kwa Geok Choo like it was the birth of their first grandson, even though they already had a grandson, Li Yipeng, who was about three years old at the time.

She said with a laugh: “They’re very traditional. They wanted a male grandson, and this was the male grandson they were waiting for. My mother-in-law clucked with pleasure.

“Shengwu’s birth was the biggest event for them on a personal level. Mama was thrilled, Papa was thrilled. They were deliciously, deliriously happy. It meant a lot to them. It felt to them like a first, although my brother-in-law did have a son with his first wife.”

Eldest son Hsien Loong married his first wife, Wong Ming Yang, in 1978. Their daughter,  Xiuqi, was born in 1981. Three weeks after giving birth to their first son, Li Yipeng, Wong died of a heart attack at the age of 31 in October 1982.

Li Yipeng was born with albinism, a genetic condition.

In 1985, the same year Shengwu was born, Hsien Loong married Ho Ching, a fast-rising civil servant. They have two sons. Hongyi was born in 1987 and Haoyi in 1989.

Meanwhile, Hsien Yang and Suet Fern had two other sons after Shengwu: Huanwu was born in 1986 and Shaowu in 1995.

Three years younger than Li Yipeng, Shengwu was closest in age to his younger brother, Huanwu, and his cousin, Hongyi.

Shengwu and Hongyi were once described as “very close” and were both in the west coast of the United States at one point as Shengwu was pursuing his PhD at Stanford University and Hongyi was working at Google in Silicon Valley.

However, cracks in their relationship became public in 2017 — the year the Lee family feud spilled into the public domain and the year the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) initiated legal action against Shengwu over a private Facebook post during the feud.

In December 2017, Shengwu said he was no longer on speaking terms with Hongyi but that they remained Facebook friends.

Shengwu subsequently decided to remove Hongyi from his Facebook friends list. He wrote on Facebook: “I will continue to be active on Facebook, and will continue to regard my friends-only Facebook posts as private. However, I have removed my cousin Li Hongyi from my Facebook friends list.”

Hongyi responded in a Facebook post of his own and asked his cousin to leave him out of grievances with the authorities. He wrote: “I don’t know what’s going on between you and the government, but I’ve got nothing to do with it. Could you please leave me out of this?”

Hongyi, saying that he had “really tried to not be involved as far as possible”, added: “If there’s something I’ve done that’s led you to believe otherwise, I would be happy to talk with you about it. It’s a bit disconcerting to be repeatedly publicly accused of undermining democracy without understanding why.” 

He added: “I would prefer not to have done this over public Facebook posts. But I suppose that’s how we communicate nowadays.”

Although the exact origins of the rift remain unclear, there is speculation that their relationship fractured around the time the Oxley Road dispute broke out in 2017.

That year, Hsien Yang and his sister Lee Wei Ling accused their elder brother Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister, of using state organs against them and of abusing his power to preserve their family home, against their father’s willed desire to demolish the house, in order to bolster his grip on power.

The younger siblings also accused Hsien Loong of grooming Hongyi for politics. Hongyi responded that he really had no interest in politics.

Shengwu, however, said Hongyi’s comments on a potential entry into politics were “vague”: “He only said he has no interest in politics, but my uncle Lee Hsien Loong also once said he wasn’t interested in politics when he was in his 20s. These words can easily be taken back.”

Although the younger siblings offered a ceasefire, the family appears to remain estranged. In 2018, Hsien Loong said that the family feud remained unresolved and that his siblings had not communicated with him.

He added: “Perhaps one day, when emotions have subsided, some movement will be possible.”

Hsien Yang responded that Hsien Loong had not made any effort to reach out to resolve matters in private. He said: “Our brother says he is unsure that the feud is solved. Notwithstanding his public statements, Hsien Loong has made no attempt to reach out to us to resolve matters in private.

“Meanwhile, the Attorney-General is busy prosecuting Hsien Loong’s nephew for his private correspondence. The AGC’s letters make repeated reference to the family feud.” 

Shengwu was eventually fined S$15,000 after being found guilty in the contempt of court case. He paid the fine in order to “buy some peace and quiet” but insisted that this does not mean he admits guilt.

The AGC also lodged a complaint against Suet Fern to the Law Society, accusing her of being involved in the preparation of her father-in-law’s last will while her husband was one of the beneficiaries.

Suet Fern was censured by a Disciplinary Tribunal for grossly improper professional conduct in the case and appealed against the decision to the Court of Three Judges. Judgment has been reserved on the case.

Rift between Lee cousins widens: Shengwu removes Hongyi from his Facebook friends list

Singapore-Malaysian dual citizen pleads guilty to almost decade-long NS default

Singapore—On Oct 1 (Thursday) a 28-year-old man admitted that he had spent 9 years, 11 months and 16 days outside the country in default of his obligations under the Enlistment Act.

Mr Basil Lim Boon Hoh, the son of a Singaporean man and a Malaysian woman, was born in Singapore. When he was a year old, however, he left the country to live in Malaysia, where he remained until he left for his university studies in the United Kingdom.

However, as a child, he used the Singaporean passport he had been given when he was 3 weeks old to travel in and out of Malaysia on numerous occasions.

Since his mother wanted to give him a choice of where he wanted to work later on in his life, Mr Lim also obtained an identity card from Singapore when he was a teenager.

He was also granted Malaysian citizenship at the age of 10

However, Mr Lim has never studied in Singapore.

According to the prosecution, Mr Lim knew about the national service requirement from his father, who had told him about it the year he turned 10. But at the age of 16, he was told by his mother that since he was a Malaysian citizen, he could set aside the mandatory NS requirement.

At the age of 16 and a half, when he was liable for National Service, Mr Lim not obtained and Exit Permit, moreover he did not report for national service registration. Further Reporting Orders were sent in 2009 to both the address where he was born and to his places of residence in Malaysia, which went unheeded. After this, a Stop List and Police Gazette was raised against him.

Mr Lim’s lawyer corresponded with the Central Manpower Base (CMPB), asking for a list of his offenses and for permission to renounce his citizenship in Singapore. The CPMB counseled him to come back to Singapore that the issue may be resolved but rejected his request.

On March 19, 2018, he emailed CPMB to say he would return to Singapore on March 27 of that year. He began serving his National Service at the Singapore Civil Defence Force on August 14, 2018, finishing on August 13, 2018.

He has said he wants to keep his Singapore citizenship and work in the country.

Regarding his offence under the Enlistment Act, Deputy Public Prosecutor Sean Teh says the prosecution is seeking five months and 18 days’ jail. His lawyer, Lim Kia Tong, is asking for only one month in jail for Mr Lim instead.

The lawyer said Mr Lim pleaded guilty to just to end the case, but some of the responsibility lies on the shoulders of his mother. She emailed the lawyer saying Mr Lim’s father left their family in 2003 and that she did not have complete information about the national service laws.

She admitted that she did not want her son to see any letters that referred to NS.

According to Yahoo News Singapore, she wrote to the lawyer, “I never told Basil anything about this or NS because I wanted him to stay with me and not go back to Singapore.”

Nevertheless, Mr Lim himself want to come back to Singapore after he graduated from university, even having arguments with his mother over the matter.

His lawyer also said that Mr Lim has diagnosed depression and anxiety due to his NS problem, and received treatment in both Malaysia and Singapore.

Mr Lim returns to court for sentencing on 15 October.  He could be fined as much as $10,000 or receive a jail sentence of up to three years for each charge of failing to fulfil his liability under the Enlistment Act. -/TISG

Read also: Swimmer Schooling seeks national service delay after Olympics moved

Swimmer Schooling seeks national service delay after Olympics moved

 

Lim Peifen welcomes second son

0

Singaporean DJ Lim Peifen just welcomed her second son during the mid-autumn festival. The baby boy’s name is Jude. YES 93.3FM DJ Lim Peifen and her husband, computer engineer Lie Wei Xiang are parents for the second time.

Peifen shared the good news on her social media account on October 1 together with a photo of their family’s latest member, baby boy Jude. The 38-year-old DJ seems to have a lot of fun getting pun-ny with her baby boy’s name. She wrote: “Hey, Jude,” clearly referencing the famous Beatles song.

Lim Pei Fen with husband Lie Wei Xiang and son Luke. Picture: Instagram

The DJ also included in Chinese, the hashtag “zhu ni zhong qiu jie kuai le“, which means “wishing you a happy Mid-Autumn Festival”, except she replaced the word ‘zhu’ with ‘Jude’. On July 20, the DJ announced that she was expecting baby number two. She and her husband have another son, Luke, 5.

Peifen realised that she was pregnant at the end of February, she revealed in an interview. She shared that at that time, she and her family planned to visit Taiwan for a vacation but then the pandemic happened.

Peifen also said that while she was okay with having a boy or a girl, she was curious to find out how her life would turn out if her second baby happened to be a girl. “A lot of people have told me that having a girl would be ‘good’ [Ed: The Chinese characters for girl and boy make up the Chinese word for ‘good’]. But it’s okay, having a boy means I can reuse all my baby stuff!”

Peifen is a Singaporean radio personality known for her work with the Mandarin radio station Y.E.S. 93.3 FM, specifically the morning show Morning Fanatics. She has also served as the host of television shows like Let’s Talk.

Peifen won the Most Popular Radio Personality Award at the MediaCorp Radio Awards in 2013. She and Gerald Koh are both popular radio hosts in Singapore.

She attended CHIJ Our Lady Of Good Counsel and CHIJ St Nicholas Girls’ School. /TISG

Rare interview: Lee Suet Fern discloses intimate details of her relationship with in-laws

Singapore — Intimate details about Lee Suet Fern’s relationship with her in-laws, founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and his wife Kwa Geok Choo, have come to light in a rare interview with Yahoo News, where she also spoke about Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s first wife, Wong Ming Yang.

The connection went back to the time her father, Professor Lim Chong Yah, tutored Lee Hsien Loong, and later Hsien Yang, for their A-Level examinations. Romance bloomed between Hsien Yang and Suet Fern when they were both in Cambridge University. They got married in 1981, mere days after she finished her final law exams.

Suet Fern told Yahoo’s Nicholas Yong: “Before I was married, my father-in-law and mother-in-law were incredibly courteous and very gracious.” She added, after a long pause: “They were lovely.”

She did not count on how “fierce, old-fashioned and imperious” her mother-in-law would be.

Suet Fern recalled feeling frightened of her mother-in-law when she and Hsien Yang were living in Cairnhill Mansions — just above Hsien Loong and his first wife, Wong Ming Yang — after their marriage, when her husband was often away for military training.

She shared her fears with her husband, who assured her not to worry.

Suet Fern recalled: “I did feel a little isolated and unprotected. I confided that in Yang, that when I first got married, she (her mother-in-law) was quite frightening. Yang just gave me every assurance that it was him that I married and not his mother, and that he would always put me first.”

A turning point in Suet Fern’s relationship with her mother-in-law apparently came when Wong Ming Yang died after a heart attack in October 1982. She said: “Thereafter, she was much more reserved and reticent and more careful.”

Suet Fern also revealed that she was irked by some of her mother-in-law’s advice after she had children: “I was often ticked off by her (but) not in a terrible way. And when I had my first two sons, this was her typical refrain, ‘You know Fern, you must raise your children like the queen. Leave others to raise your children, and inspect them every day at tea time’.”

The young mother even hid the fact that she nursed her babies due to her mother-in-law’s disapproval of breastfeeding. Suet Fern said: “She would say, ‘Yang’s fully bottle-fed and he turned out all right, leave them to maids and a bottle’.”

As for her relationship with her famous father-in-law, Suet Fern said: “I was very scared of him. In those days, I think everyone was terrified of him, more so me.”

She recalled her father-in-law constantly enquired about her weight and even got her to weigh herself when she visited his home, when she was losing weight during a particularly stressful time when she was juggling work and family duties.

She also recounted how her conversations with her father-in-law centred on how his grandsons were doing, particularly how they were doing academically in Chinese.

But Mr Lee’s softer side was also brought out when Suet Fern began a tradition of celebrating his and his wife’s birthdays at her home. She recalled, with a laugh: “Yang would typically cook, and I used to think his father was such a so-and-so. Poor Yang is in the kitchen, and I’d bring the food out, birthday dinner, and my father-in-law would say, ‘Oh, this is not very well done, send it back to be redone’.”

Recounting how her father-in-law enjoyed his food with candles, flowers and table service, Suet Fern said that he would drop hints as to what he wanted to be served and brought along wine or a small gift to her home during the birthday dinners.

She added: “He would always grumble that the children were rather noisy. But I think he liked having them around, and I do think he often felt it was his chance to let his hair down and he loved the bustle of the family.”

When asked about the relationship between her in-laws, Suet Fern said that Mr and Mrs Lee enjoyed a happy and traditional marriage. She remembered: “For ever so long, Papa was very fierce at home. He expected everything to be perfect. And not uncommonly, he would tick off my mother-in-law, even in front of me. She never answered back to him.”

Mr Lee became softer towards his wife after she suffered the first of a series of strokes in 2008, according to Suet Fern. Sharing that her father-in-law took care of his wife, cut her food to make it easier and helped her, she said: “I love that he was good to her. I have so many good memories from that time about how good he was to her.”

She also shared a sweet anecdote with Yahoo that provided a glimpse into how devoted Mr Lee was to his wife. When Mrs Lee summoned her husband to fetch a lipstick she wanted to show Suet Fern, “I said, No, no, Mama, I can get the lipstick. And she turned around and said, ‘No, let him do it’. And she said to me, ‘Maaanja!’ (Malay for ‘I want to be spoilt’)”

When he turned up with the lipstick, she chastised him for bringing the wrong one. “And so he’d go back, and she’d shout at him, ‘Don’t mess up my lipsticks.’”

Mrs Lee passed away in 2010 and Mr Lee in 2015. /TISG

Kris Jenner sued by former bodyguard for alleged sexual harassment

0

Reality TV star Kris Jenner denied allegations after she was sued by former bodyguard for sexual harassment. The 64-year-old momager was sued for unspecified damages together with her eldest daughter Kourtney Kardashian, 41 as well as the private security firm for which the former bodyguard worked. The accuser was identified as Mr Marc McWiliams, based on court documents obtained by several United State media, and he is a black man who said he was hired to be Jenner’s security guard in May 2017. In September 2018, Mr Marc MacWilliams was terminated from the job.

The 51-year-old former bodyguard claimed that he was subjected to “sexual advances and otherwise harassing misconduct” by Jenner.

Kourtney Kardashian was also involved in the allegations. Picture: Instagram

Mr McWilliams also claimed that he was subjected to comments of “an overt sexual nature” about his physical appearance and sexual activities as well as suggestions he “engage in a romantic and sexual relationship.”

He also accused Jenner, among other things, of “non-consensual physical contact” with him, including massaging his neck, shoulders, arms and back and resting her hand on his thigh and groin.

The former guard also claimed that his subsequent complaints to the security company’s human resources department were ignored.

However, Jenner’s lawyer Marty Singer told celebrity website TMZ, which first reported the news, that “Kris categorically denies ever behaving inappropriately toward Marc McWilliams.”

Mr Singer said Jenner “had very little interaction with” Mr McWilliams, and that the former security guard “was repeatedly caught sleeping in his car while on the job”.

The lawyer added that while Kardashian is named in the suit, “she is not accused of doing anything improper with the guard, nor did she do so.”

He said Jenner and Kardashian plan to “immediately sue McWilliams and his attorneys for malicious prosecution” when they defeated the “ridiculous, frivolous lawsuit”.

Jenner rose to fame after starring in the reality television series Keeping Up With The Kardashians (2007 to present) with her children, including Kim Kardashian West and Kylie Jenner. The mega-celebrity family announced in September that the reality show will end in 2021.