Thursday, May 1, 2025
31.8 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 2586

Calvin Cheng attacks former WP polls candidate but the latter says he has left politics

Singapore — There has been much negative reaction to a question posed on Monday (Jan 4) by former Workers’ Party (WP) election candidate Bernard Chen Jiaxi on the treatment of parliamentary questions, after Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin took to Facebook to explain the process and to remark that Mr Chen was trying to make an insinuation about it.

One of the harshest critics of Mr Chen has been former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Calvin Cheng.

Mr Chen was the WP candidate in MacPherson Single-Member Constituency in the 2015 General Election. He lost to the People’s Action Party’s Tin Pei Ling in a three-cornered fight in that GE. He has since thanked the Speaker for the clarification and apologised to the MPs concerned. He has also said that he is no longer in politics.

Mr Chen had taken issue with the handling of a parliamentary question by WP MP Leon Perera (Aljunied GRC). The question was similar to a question submitted by Ms Tin. He had asked why her “question (deserved) the right of answer by the Minister and the accompanying media coverage, while Mr Perera’s question is relegated to that of a written question”.

Both Ms Tin and Mr Perera had asked questions about the Government’s plans for the live-streaming of Parliament proceedings.

The Speaker pointed out that Mr Perera had filed his Parliamentary Question as a written question and that if he had filed it as a question for oral answer, Mr Tan would have grouped it with Ms Tin’s question.

Mr Tan also linked a glossary to Parliamentary proceedings with his post which clarified that Members of Parliament can file questions for oral or written answers by the Government.

Mr Tan added: “Given his role as a politician, I thought that the person who posted this would understand this or to have checked how it works before posting. It seems clear what he is trying to insinuate.”

Mr Chen replied that he stood to be corrected and that he did not know that Mr Perera had filed the question as a written question. He thanked Mr Tan for the clarification as well as apologised to both Mr Perera and Ms Tin.

Mr Chen added: “I like to clarify that I am no longer a “politician” involved in politics, elections, or have any ambitions to run in a future election. I am just a citizen, and have no specific political affiliations. I don’t think I have any inklings as to the present workings of PAP, WP or Parliament.”

source: Facebook
Many people online, who also appeared not to know that Mr Chen had left politics,  criticised Mr Chen in the comments section of Mr Tan’s post.

One of the most liked comments was by Mr Cheng, who remarked: “Bernard Chen is one of the lowest ability members of the Workers’ Party.”

Mr Cheng also made another scathing personal comment about Mr Chen in a Facebook post of his own. He wrote: “Bernard Chen has always struck me as a low-intellect, low-quality opposition politician.” His post has since been taken down. /TISG

TraceTogether app data: Vivian Balakrishnan admits he had not thought of CPC

Singapore — Speaking in Parliament on Tuesday (Jan 5), Dr Vivian Balakrishnan issued a clarification on the collection and use of TraceTogether app data after it became public knowledge from the previous day’s sitting that the data could be used for police investigations.

The Foreign Minister and Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation Initiative said: “Frankly, and I think members know me well, and I am always very frank. Frankly, I had not thought of the CPC (Criminal Procedure Code) when I spoke earlier.”

His comments were in reference to why he had in the past said that TraceTogether app data would only be used for Covid-19 contact tracing.

Dr Balakrishnan noted that under Section 20 of the CPC, the police have the power to order anyone to produce data for the purposes of a criminal investigation. He emphasised that TraceTogether data will be protected for all “normal use cases”, but that it is not exempt from the CPC.

He added that the police can only ask for access by requiring a person involved in or assisting in criminal investigations to produce his mobile phone or his TraceTogether token.

The clarification by Dr Balakrishnan came following a backlash from Singaporeans after it was announced on Monday (Jan 4) that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) can obtain TraceTogether data for criminal investigations.

There was controversy on social media right after that announcement, with people calling out the Government and others posting that they had deleted the app. Some others came up with solutions to circumvent the issue by having two mobile phones — one for daily use and another, a cheaper version, to be used for TraceTogether purposes.

On Monday, Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan had responded to a question from Mr Christopher de Souza (PAP, Holland-Bt Timah GRC), who had asked if TraceTogether data will be used for criminal investigations and what the legal provisions and safeguards are for using such data.

A privacy statement on the TraceTogether website had earlier said the data would only be used “for contact tracing purposes”.

The site was updated on Monday, which “clarified how the Criminal Procedure Code applies to all data under Singapore’s jurisdiction”.

Under the Public Sector (Governance) Act, public officers who recklessly or knowingly disclose the data without authorisation, or misuse the data, may be fined up to S$5,000 or jailed up to two years, or both. /TISG

Jay Chou may have edited wife’s photo to hide pregnancy

Taipei – Taiwanese pop star Jay Chou and his model wife Hannah Quinlivan are happily married with two children — Romeo, 3, and Hathaway, 5.

Fans are speculating that another child is on the way based on a recent New Year’s Eve celebration photo. Eagle-eyed fans scrutinised the recent photo and have concluded that the photo has been edited. They suspected it was edited to hide Hannah’s baby bump.

Hannah’s waist seemed to have been manipulated to be slimmer, by comparing the photo to a similar one posted by a friend. The giveaway was that the table leg behind Hannah was distorted. Previously, Hannah expressed her desire to have another child.

The possibility of a third child is likely with the observation of a visible bump during the New Year’s Eve celebration. However, to the disappointment of many, the pop star’s agent has squashed all baby rumours; “It’s just that the clothes are too big.”

Jay Chou and his wife Hannah Quinlivan. Picture: Instagram

Born on January 18, 1979, Jay Chou is a Taiwanese singer, songwriter, rapper, record producer, actor, film director, businessman and magician. Dubbed the “King of Mandopop”, and having sold more than 30 million albums, Jay is one of the best-selling artists in Mainland China and is known for his work with lyricist Vincent Fang, who he has frequently collaborated with on his music.

In 2000, Jay released his debut studio album, Jay (2000), under the record company Alfa Music to moderate success. He rose to fame with the release of his second studio album, Fantasy (2001), which combined Western and Eastern music styles.

The album won five Golden Melody Awards, including Album of the Year. He has since further released 12 more studio albums, spawning a string of hit singles and gaining significant prominence in Asian communities around the world. Jay has embarked on six world tours, performing in cities around the world to more than 10 million spectators as of 2019. /TISG

 

British teen found guilty of hate crime against S’porean student in London

Singapore — A 15-year-old teen who had been part of a group that assaulted a Singaporean student has been found guilty of committing an “unprovoked and racially-motivated” act by a court in London.

The attack on Mr Jonathan Mok, 23, occurred in Oxford Street on Feb 24, 2020. It left him bruised and bloodied. He later required facial surgery.

Magistrates at the Highbury Corner Youth Court on Monday (Jan 4) found the teen guilty of racially-aggravated grievous bodily harm. He has not been named due to his young age.

The police in London had investigated the attack as a racially- motivated assault.

The teen had admitted that he had wounded Mr Mok but denied at his trial last month that the attack had been motivated by race. He said that he was not a racist and that he did not mention the word “coronavirus”.

Mr Mok had claimed that the boy and his friends had said “I don’t want your coronavirus in my country” and had commented on the Singaporean student’s ethnicity. The teen denied this.

However, witnesses some metres away from where the assault occurred heard the words “disease” or “coronavirus”, the court heard.

In August last year, the teen had pleaded guilty to wounding or causing grievous bodily harm without intent.

Chairman of the Bench Lesley Ward told the teen: “Given the number of witnesses and your proximity to the incident, we feel it’s not plausible that you missed the racist term being used and it’s therefore difficult to believe your version of events.”

This now means that the assault on Mr Mok is considered a hate crime, which will have bearing on the teen’s sentencing later this month.

The law student wrote about the assault in a Facebook post

That night, Mr Mok passed by some male teenagers in a group. One of them addressed him but all he could understand was the word “coronavirus”. He turned to look that the person who spoke, which provoked him to shout: “Don’t you dare look at me.”

Within seconds, he and others from his group, including a young female, confronted Mr Mok.

He said: “I was shocked and angry because he directed a racist remark at me and had the audacity to shout at me like I had wronged him. All of a sudden, the first punch was swung at my face and took me by surprise. When I was still shocked by the first hit, the guy delivered the second sucker punch.”

Passers-by tried to step in. And while Mr Mok attempted to explain he had done nothing, another person from the group tried to kick him.

Mr Mok tried to defend himself but was limited from doing so as he had a broken finger.

Then the person who tried to kick him punched him in the face, bloodying his nose.

The group left before the police came.

In the hospital, Mr Mok was told that he “had suffered a few fractures in my face and might need to undergo reconstructive surgery to fix some of the bones”.

In his Facebook post, which went on to be shared more than 38,000 times, he said: “Racism is not stupidity — racism is hate. Racists constantly find excuses to expound their hatred — and in this current backdrop of the coronavirus, they’ve found yet another excuse. From refusing service to a Chinese-looking person to racially-motivated hate crimes, every single one of these acts are based on racism.

“People dismiss racism with statements such as ‘it’s not all of us — only a minority are racists and this does not reflect on a city/country’. While factually true, not only it does not change the fact that this is an ugly problem that has plagued humanity for a very long time, but also it belittles this problem we have. Racism has changed its form and shape through the years and it is once again rearing its ugly head in light of the Covid-19 crisis.” /TISG

Read also: S’porean student victimised in racist attack in London tells assailants to ‘grow a pair’

S’porean student victimised in racist attack in London tells assailants to ‘grow a pair’

WP’s Gerald Giam says “ill-advised” to use TraceTogether data for criminal investigations

Singapore — Workers’ Party Member of Parliament Gerald Giam (Aljunied GRC) questioned Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Tan in Parliament on Monday (Jan 4) regarding the use of TraceTogether data for criminal investigations.

Mr Tan had said that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) is empowered under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) to obtain data for criminal investigations, including data from TraceTogether.

Mr Tan said: ”The Government is the custodian of the TT (TraceTogether) data submitted by the individuals and stringent measures are put in place to safeguard this personal data.

“Examples of these measures include only allowing authorised officers to access the data, using such data only for authorised purposes and storing the data on a secured data platform.”

In a Facebook post the same night, Mr Giam said: “I think it is ill-advised that the Government has not specifically ruled out the use of TraceTogether data for criminal investigations, as other countries like Australia have done. I hope they change their position, for sake of our national battle against Covid-19.”

Mr Christopher de Souza (PAP-Holland-Bukit Timah GRC) had asked in Parliament whether or not the data collected from the contact tracing platforms would be used in criminal investigations as this was a concern of some people.

Mr Tan had replied that data from TraceTogether would be treated in the same way as any other data under the jurisdiction of Singapore.

Mr Giam had then asked Mr Tan: “Now that the government has said that they might actually use TraceTogether data for police investigations, does this not violate the TraceTogether privacy statement, which says that any data shared with the (Ministry of Health) will only be used solely for contact tracing of persons, possibly exposed to Covid-19?”

Mr Tan had said that this does not “preclude the use of TraceTogether data in circumstances where citizens safety and security is or has been affected”.

He had added: “Authorised police officers may invoke then the Criminal Procedure Code … to obtain this data for the purpose of criminal investigation, and for the purpose of the safety and security of our citizens. But otherwise, TraceTogether data is to be used only for contact tracing and for the purpose of fighting the Covid situation.”

In his Facebook post, Mr Giam said barriers preventing people from adapting contact tracing methods should be done away with, given that this is vital to curbing the spread of Covid-19 infections.

He said that he had expressed concern that “if people suspect that their TraceTogether data is being used for anything other than contact tracing, this will surely lead to lower adoption and usage.

“I cautioned that there are ways users can prevent the app or token from exchanging proximity information, even if they have it installed or are carrying it around.” /TISG

Read also: Calvin Cheng praises WP’s Gerald Giam’s piece on how to solve “the $100 million TraceTogether dilemma”

Calvin Cheng praises WP’s Gerald Giam’s piece on how to solve “the $100 million TraceTogether dilemma”

IN FULL: Health Minister sheds light on COVID-19 vaccine supply, efficacy and side effects in ministerial statement

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong shed more light on Singapore’s COVID-19 vaccination strategy in a ministerial statement on Monday (4 Jan), as Parliament sat for the first time in the new year.

Aside from answering questions on the supply and operation of the vaccines, Mr Gan also provided a closer look at the safety, efficacy and side effects of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which is the only COVID-19 vaccine that has been approved for use in the immediate term. Read Mr Gan’s speech in full here:

Mr Speaker, Sir, thank you for allowing me to give an update to members on the COVID-19 situation, and specifically on our plan to vaccinate our population. Minister Lawrence Wong and I will address Oral Questions 2 to 14 and Written Questions 15 to 18 from today’s Order Paper, as well as questions filed by MPs for future sittings.

Sir, it has been almost a year since we had our first case. We have come a long way. We strengthened our healthcare system, enhanced our contact tracing capability, expanded our testing capacity, and introduced safe distancing measures. All these efforts work together as a multi-layered defence system to keep us safe from COVID-19.

With the continued support and sacrifices of everyone in Singapore, we have brought the situation under control and kept community transmissions low. We have now moved into Phase Three and are making steady progress towards a new normal.

Global Situation

However, this is not the moment to be complacent. Globally, daily infection numbers and deaths continue to rise in many countries, constantly setting new records, including countries that had been successful in containing their outbreaks previously.

We have also seen the emergence of new variants that appear to be more transmissible, and have had to tighten some of our border restrictions as a precaution.

We must therefore be prepared that despite best efforts, new infections will still occur here from time to time. We face the continuing risk of new clusters and outbreaks, and the danger of a new wave of infections getting out of control.

This will be the new normal for a long time to come. That is why we still need to keep up our multi-layered defence. In fact, we must further strengthen it as we continue our journey through Phase Three, and vaccination is a new line of defence we must put in place.

Vaccination Plans

Vaccination is a critical shield to protect us and our loved ones against COVID-19, even as the global situation remains volatile. It will also be a key enabler allowing us to return to normalcy.

The Expert Committee on COVID-19 Vaccination, comprising professionals in infectious diseases, immunology and other relevant fields, has studied the available data on the vaccine, reviewed the reports from the Health Sciences Authority (HSA), deliberated at length and considered carefully safety and efficacy aspects of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

The Committee has concluded that the vaccine meets the safety and efficacy requirements of the World Health Organization and other international regulatory authorities, as well as that of our own HSA.

It recommended that everyone who is medically eligible should be vaccinated so that Singapore can achieve as high a level of vaccination coverage as possible. Vaccinations should however be voluntary. The Government has accepted these recommendations in full.

A high level of vaccination coverage will maximise protection for the population, and minimise the proportion of persons still susceptible to COVID-19. This will in turn reduce the risk of large outbreaks, and continue to keep community cases low, and allow us to further re-open the economy and resume more normal social activities.

Vaccine Supply

We received our first shipments of vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech at the end of last year. Our first vaccinations were conducted at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases last week. This is an important milestone and we are beginning to see the light at the end of this very long tunnel.

Dr Lim Wee Kiak and Mr Louis Chua asked about the number of vaccines that we have secured. I am not at liberty to disclose the specific quantity ordered, due to commercial sensitivities and confidentiality undertakings in our advance purchase agreements with the vaccine manufacturers.

However, I can assure members that we have secured enough vaccines for all Singaporeans and long-term residents in Singapore. A team headed by the Head of Civil Service led the efforts and undertook this very urgent, complex and difficult task.

The vaccines will arrive in Singapore in batches, given high global demand especially from countries with high rates of infection. Pharmaceutical companies will also need time to scale up vaccine production and distribution.

Following the first shipment of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at the end of last year, we are expecting more deliveries in the next few months, including from Moderna and Sinovac. If all goes according to schedule, we will have enough vaccines for everyone by the third quarter of this year.

Prioritisation of Population Subgroups

As recommended by the Expert Committee, we will prioritise vaccinations of groups that are most at-risk. This is also consistent with the World Health Organization’s guidance, and similar to what other countries are doing.

We will therefore begin with the healthcare workers and staff working in the healthcare sector as they work in direct care of patients or in supporting roles.

We will also prioritise COVID-19 frontline and other essential personnel, including swabbers hired by Health Promotion Board, staff working at the Government Quarantine Facilities, Community Care Facilities, and dedicated Stay-Home Notice facilities.

We plan to start vaccinating our elderly and those at greater risk of severe disease from COVID-19 infection starting from February 2021, beginning with seniors aged 70 and above.

We will also prioritise others who are in jobs or settings where risk of a super-spreading event is high, such as the construction, marine and process (CMP) sector, including migrant workers. Thereafter we will progressively broaden our vaccinations to include other Singaporeans and long-term residents who are medically eligible.

As more vaccines are approved for use, we will adjust our vaccination programme, depending on the vaccine supply as well as the disease epidemiology at that point in time.

Vaccination Operation

The national effort to vaccinate the population will require considerable resources to implement. This is one of our key focus areas this year.

The last time we did a vaccination of this scale was in 1959, in response to an outbreak of smallpox, where slightly over 1 million people were vaccinated. The scale of the current effort is larger, but we are also much better prepared.

We started planning for this very early on. We have put in place end-to-end processes to meet the cold-chain logistics requirements – from delivery and receipt at the airport, through to storage and then transport to vaccination sites – so that the quality and efficacy of the vaccines are not compromised.

While our healthcare workers are receiving their vaccinations within their healthcare institutions, we are concurrently readying clinics and vaccination centres for others to be vaccinated when it is their turn.

Prior bookings will be necessary given the cold-chain requirements at the vaccination sites and multi-dose vials of the vaccines. It will also ensure operational efficiency and minimise individual wait times. More information on how to make the booking will be provided later.

We encourage everyone to come forward for your vaccination when your turn comes so that we can increase our coverage as soon as possible.

We should also bear in mind that some vaccines, such as Pfizer-BioNTech, will require two doses, 21 days apart, and it will take up to another 14 days after the second dose to achieve maximum protection against the virus.

At the same time, we will test our systems thoroughly before ramping up to ensure that vaccination operations proceed smoothly and patient safety is not compromised.

Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines

There were several questions from members, including Foo Mee Har and Sylvia Lim, on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. These concerns are understandable, given the extraordinary speed at which the COVID-19 vaccines have been developed and brought to the market. The speed achieved is the result of a strong and concerted global response to a major pandemic, rather than a compromise of safety standards.

Let me assure you that the safety and well-being of Singaporeans is top priority in our vaccination efforts.

First of all, the vaccine must be approved by HSA. Under HSA’s Pandemic Special Access Route (PSAR), HSA’s scientific and clinical experts apply strict international standards to assess COVID-19 vaccines to ensure that they meet the stipulated high standards of quality, safety and efficacy.

These standards are the same as those used for full vaccine evaluations, except that long-term data from clinical trials will only be evaluated later, as the data becomes available.

The data that has been reviewed includes those from pre-clinical studies done in laboratories, clinical trials on human volunteers, manufacturing and quality controls, as well as the ongoing experience with the actual use of the vaccine.

The assessment and recommendations for the vaccines are also reviewed by HSA’s Medicines Advisory Committee and Panel of Infectious Diseases Experts.

HSA will only allow a COVID-19 vaccine to be used if it is assessed to be sufficiently efficacious and safe for use, and only if the benefits of the vaccine are assessed to outweigh the risks of any potential adverse effects from the vaccination.

HSA has put the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine through this rigorous review process and has authorised its use. The Moderna and Sinovac vaccines are also currently undergoing the review process.

Following HSA’s approval, the independent Expert Committee appointed by MOH has also reviewed the clinical data on safety and efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and has been briefed by HSA on the full range of considerations in granting interim authorisation. The Expert Committee concurs with HSA – that the vaccine is suitable for use in Singapore, for persons aged 16 years and above, for the prevention of COVID-19.

In assessing the suitability of vaccine candidates for specific population groups, the Expert Committee took into consideration four key criteria – vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy, vaccine tolerability, and data adequacy of clinical trials.

The Expert Committee has assessed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine demonstrated a high vaccine efficacy of 95% in reducing symptomatic COVID-19 disease among persons aged 16 and older, and its safety profile is consistent with that of other established and registered vaccines used in immunisation against other diseases.

Mr Melvin Yong asked whether there is any data to show that the current COVID-19 vaccines are effective against the new strains seen in the UK and Europe. Mutations occur in viruses naturally and different strains can emerge from time to time, especially in a long-drawn pandemic.

While this B.1.1.7 strain from UK, does appear to be more transmissible, there is currently no evidence that current COVID-19 vaccines are less effective against this strain. Experts have said that it is unlikely that these mutations would impact effectiveness of current vaccines.

Vaccine producers such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have also come forward to reassure that their vaccines should protect against the B.1.1.7 variant, and are undertaking studies to formally confirm this. MOH will evaluate the data as it emerges and review our vaccine strategy and border measures accordingly.

Side Effects

Miss Cheng Li Hui, Mr Lim Biow Chuan and others have asked about potential side effects. Both HSA and the Expert Committee have studied the data, from clinical trials as well as actual experience from vaccinations carried out in other countries. They have factored this into their evaluation before granting authorisation or making a recommendation on the use of COVID-19 vaccines.

Based on data available today, people who receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may experience side effects such as pain in the injection site, fatigue, fever, muscle aches, or headaches. These are similar to the side effects for other established vaccines and they usually resolve on their own in a few days.

As with all medications and established vaccines, there is a small risk of very rare but serious adverse events that may occur post-vaccination, including allergic reactions.

HSA and the Expert Committee have therefore recommended that those with known severe allergies should not be vaccinated. All vaccine recipients should also be observed on-site for 30 minutes post-vaccination, so that any severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis can be detected and treated promptly.

MOH will also introduce a vaccine injury financial assistance programme to provide support for persons who suffer a serious adverse event that is assessed to be related to COVID-19 vaccines administered in Singapore. While we expect few to need this, the programme will give peace of mind to those taking the vaccination. Further details on the programme will be provided in due course.

In addition, HSA requires vaccine manufacturers to submit new information continually for active review. HSA and the Expert Committee will continue to monitor and review the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in the local population and internationally. This includes data on specific population subgroups such as those below age of 16, persons with immunosuppression, or pregnant women who were excluded from initial clinical trials.

HSA and the Expert Committee will also look at long-term safety data to detect rare and severe adverse events, and study the durability of protection provided by the vaccines. This on-going monitoring is the norm expected for any vaccines that first come into use.

Mr Dennis Tan asked whether there will be a need to separate blood collected from donors who have and have not received COVID-19 vaccinations. There is no need to do so. The COVID-19 vaccine does not cause infection.

Encouraging Uptake

While the COVID-19 vaccination will be voluntary, we strongly encourage everyone who is medically eligible to get vaccinated when the vaccine is offered to you. This will not only protect yourself, but also indirectly protect others who cannot be vaccinated due to medical reasons.

This collective protection will be more effective the more people are vaccinated. In case of a fresh outbreak, with more people vaccinated we can keep the number of cases low, minimise the stress on the healthcare system, ensure that those who are ill get the treatment they need, and allow us to return to normalcy sooner.

Some may feel that there is no urgency to get vaccinated given the current low number of community cases and the local situation is well under control. We must not be complacent or wait till an outbreak and then rush to be vaccinated.

We have seen a few community cases in the last few days, which shows clearly that there are hidden cases among us. We are also seeing new variants that are more contagious. Any of these cases has a risk of sparking a major outbreak as we have seen in other countries.

The best time to vaccinate is now. If people wait until an outbreak has happened to get themselves vaccinated, it will be too late, both to protect themselves and to prevent the outbreak in the first place.

As PM has said, we have every confidence in our experts and the process that has been put in place. PM and our Cabinet colleagues, including myself, will lead on this. We will be getting ourselves vaccinated as early as possible when our turn comes.

To ensure access to the vaccine, COVID-19 vaccination will be free for all Singaporeans, Permanent Residents and long-term residents in Singapore, which will include Employment Pass, S-Pass, Work Permit holders, Foreign Domestic Workers, and Dependant’s Pass, Long-Term Visit Pass and Student Pass holders, totalling about 5.7m people. This excludes Short-Term Visit Pass holders, such as tourists.

I understand Mr Yip Hon Weng would like to know whether those who are not vaccinated will have their job scopes reviewed, in order to reduce exposure to the virus. In most instances, redeployment of non-vaccinated employees will not be necessary, unless there is a resurgence of local cases.

But all workers will continue to take the necessary precautions such as mask-wearing, and where required, donning of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and undergoing Rostered Routine Testing (RRT).

That said, there may be specific cases such as researchers or laboratory staff working directly on the COVID virus or those who face very high risk of exposure to infected individuals. MOH and MOM are reviewing the issue of vaccination of workers in such workplace settings and will provide advice later.

Ms Foo Mee Har asked if individuals will be issued vaccination cards after receiving the COVID-19 vaccination. Every person who is vaccinated will receive a physical vaccination card, and this will remind them of their appointment to return for their second dose, indicate clearly which vaccine was administered, and provide brief post-vaccination advice.

In addition, any person who is vaccinated will have their record updated in the National Immunisation Registry, and individuals will be able to check their vaccination status digitally.

Choice of Vaccines

Mr Louis Chua asked if individuals will be given a choice of vaccines when more than one has been approved for use. The allocation of vaccines will largely be based on medical indications of the different vaccines and the suitability of the vaccine for the different population groups, as well as availability of the vaccines.

Any COVID-19 vaccine that is approved for use will have to meet the stringent safety and efficacy requirements. Allowing individuals to have choice of vaccines will unnecessarily complicate this already complex vaccination programme. Anyway, in the immediate term, only the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been approved for use. So there is no choice.

Public Education and Outreach

Mr Alex Yam and Ms He Ting Ru asked about our public communications strategy. Government agencies have been using various channels to understand public sentiments on the COVID-19 vaccines, including ground outreach and surveys.

Our findings showed that more than half (close to 60%) say they would get vaccinated if a vaccine becomes available in Singapore. About a third were more cautious, saying they would prefer to wait for more data before deciding.

We will continue our efforts to reach out to our population to explain the importance of vaccination and to assure them of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines we are using. I hope parliamentary colleagues will help to share this information with your constituents.

I would also urge everyone to refer to official or credible sources of information, and not to forward unconfirmed or false information.

For example, there were claims that six people had died due to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine during clinical trials. However, the facts are that only two of the six individuals were given the vaccine and the other four were given the placebo. Investigations revealed that there was no causal relationship between the vaccine and the two individuals’ deaths.

Spreading such misinformation undermines our efforts to protect Singapore and Singaporeans against COVID-19.

Conclusion

Sir, let me conclude. We have come a long way in the past year. We have been through the Circuit Breaker. Many have missed their vacations for the whole year. We have had to learn to manage with safe distancing measures when we are out and about. It is only through everyone’s concerted efforts that local transmission is now low in Singapore. However, the global situation is still far from under control.

Vaccinations will be a key enabler for us to return to normalcy. We have secured enough vaccines for the whole population. Every vaccine approved for use will meet all our safety and efficacy requirements. I strongly encourage all Singaporeans and long-term residents to get vaccinated when the vaccine is offered to you, to protect yourselves and your loved ones.

This will be the key focus of the Multi-Ministry Taskforce over the next few months. Let’s all do our part, so that we can overcome and emerge stronger.

“Too slow,” says former NMP about Singapore’s Covid-19 vaccination programme

Singapore — For someone well-known to be a strong supporter of the Government, former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng has been vocal in his criticism of late. This time it is about the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccination programme.

Mr Cheng, in a series of Facebook posts beginning on Saturday (Jan 2), compared Singapore’s vaccine rollout to that of Israel, which he said was “leading the race in vaccinations”.

He added that while the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Dubai, China and India have already started with vaccines for the general population, Singapore will begin to do so only next month.

“Too slow,” he wrote.

A post the following day was even more strongly-worded, calling the Government’s choice not to spend more in securing early vaccines a “mistake”.

“We need our population to be vaccinated so we can return to normal, open our borders. Lift domestic restrictions.

“Instead of spending money on vaccinations, we built a huge ‘prison’ near airport so people can fly in to meet Singaporean residents behind plastic screens. Only idiots will come.”

In the same post, he added: “Too much dithering. We are not the gold standard. Silver at most.”

Later that day, he put up another post, calling on “scientists and the Government” to “stop dithering”.

On Monday (Jan 4), Mr Cheng commented in several posts on the updates in Parliament concerning the Covid-19 situation given by Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, pointing out that only 40 individuals in Singapore had received the vaccine.

“Our months of preparation only allowed us to vaccinate 40 persons by the end of last year?

“That’s comedy,” he said.

Mr Cheng even suggested: “I hope opposition MPs and backbencher PAP MPs will ask these questions.

“Because from my vantage point, 40 persons vaccinated by Dec 31 2020, compared to what Israel has achieved (and even UK and US), is a complete joke.”

In his final post about the vaccine rollout on Monday evening, Mr Cheng called on readers not to be blind supporters of the Government.

If Singapore were leading the vaccination race, the PAP ultras would be shouting this from the mountain top, about how amazing we are.

“Now that we have been proven to be slow, and VERY SLOW, they turn up in droves and give stupid excuses that even the Government isn’t giving.”

While the Health Minister has said that the high demand for vaccines around the world has meant that Singapore has only been able to obtain a limited supply, the former NMP asked how is it that other countries have been able to both obtain more supplies and quickly vaccinate many people.

These are FAIR questions,” he said.

“Don’t be a blind supporter. Our Government has done well in some things and not so well in others.

“When they have seemingly underperformed — like only vaccinating 40 persons when others have done a million — it is our responsibility to ASK QUESTIONS.

“Not make stupid excuses.” /TISG

Read also: Calvin Cheng bans Critical Spectator from his page due to “white supremacist” ideas

Calvin Cheng bans Critical Spectator from his page due to “white supremacist” ideas

Health Minister quells concerns over efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines against B.1.1.7 strain

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong responded to concerns over the B.1.1.7 variant of the COVID-19 virus, that emerged in the UK last month.

While there is insufficient evidence as to whether the new strain is more virulent, severe and caused higher mortality, the B.1.1.7 variant has raised alarm bells worldwide since it is believed to be substantially more transmissible than other COVID-19 variants.

As Singapore barred travellers from the UK over the B.1.1.7 variant, Singaporeans grew concerned over the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines that are being deployed to the nation against the new strain.

Experts have said that the novel coronavirus does not mutate as quickly as, for example, influenza viruses, and the new vaccines that had proved effective by the end of 2020 are types that can be adjusted if necessary.

As of the end of 2020, German, British, and American health authorities and experts believe that existing vaccines will be as effective against the new variant as against previous variants and Public Health England specifically confirmed there is “no evidence” to suggest that the new variant would be resistant to the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine.

The Singapore Government made a similar statement in Parliament on Monday (4 Jan).

In response to Radin Mas SMC MP Melvin Yong’s question on whether there is any data to show that the current COVID-19 vaccines are effective against the new strains seen in the UK and Europe, Health Minister Gan Kim Ying said that there is currently no evidence that current COVID-19 vaccines are less effective against this strain.

He said, in a ministerial statement: “Mutations occur in viruses naturally and different strains can emerge from time to time, especially in a long-drawn pandemic.

“While this B.1.1.7 strain from UK, does appear to be more transmissible, there is currently no evidence that current COVID-19 vaccines are less effective against this strain. Experts have said that it is unlikely that these mutations would impact effectiveness of current vaccines.”

Adding that vaccine manufacturers are working to formally confirm the efficacy of their products against the new strain, Mr Gan added:

“Vaccine producers such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have also come forward to reassure that their vaccines should protect against the B.1.1.7 variant, and are undertaking studies to formally confirm this. MOH will evaluate the data as it emerges and review our vaccine strategy and border measures accordingly.”

Singapore is rolling out a large-scale COVID-19 immunisation operation this year. 5.7 million people, including citizens, permanent residents and long-term residents, can sign up to get immunised for free when the vaccine becomes available sometime this year.

Worker who saved child from ledge at Hougang HDB posts photos of dramatic rescue

Singapore—On Monday (Jan 4), TISG reported that a video of a worker rescuing a child standing precariously at the window of a ledge of what seemed to be a HDB block had been making the rounds on WhatsApp.

The young boy in a red-and-white striped shirt on the ledge had been holding on to a laundry pole as a worker on a boom lift approached him.

People who had gathered round the Hougang HDB erupted in cheers when the boy was safely rescued.

The worker, who goes by Kûâšhâ Ďâš on Facebook, took to his social media account late on Monday night to post photos of the dramatic rescue.

“At a work time I saving one children life (sic) in Singapore..at last my life is a good job..(sic) l pray for the God i doing the work (sic) properly,” he wrote. 

His post has since been widely shared and commented on, with grateful Singaporeans expressing their thanks for saving the boy and calling the worker a “hero.”

FB screengrab: Kûâšhâ Ďâš
FB screengrab: Kûâšhâ Ďâš

According to a story in thestraitstimes.com, the rescue occurred before 8 o’clock Sunday morning (Jan 3) at Block 243 Hougang Street 22.

The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said that a call for assistance had come in at about 7.50am, but that the child had already been rescued by the time the officers arrived.

The 6-year-old boy’s condition was evaluated by a paramedic from the SCDF, who determined that he needed no further medical treatment.

Chinese daily Lianhe Wanbao reported on Jan 4 that the boy had awakened and discovered that he was by himself, and then climbed out of the kitchen window.

Neighbours saw the distraught child crying for his mother, but when they knocked on the door of the flat, which is on the third floor, no one answered.

Luckily, two workers were in the vicinity of the prune trees, and heard the boy crying. They came quickly to his rescue.

The New Paper (TNP) reported that the boy’s rescuer is known as Mr Dipto. He works for Yong Aik Construction and is a Bangladeshi national.

The boy’s father spoke to TNP on the phone on Monday, asking to remain anonymous, but tried to express his thanks to the two workers for his son’s rescue.

He explained that the boy’s mother is currently caring for him on her own, since he is serving a Stay Home Notice (SHN) in another location. His wife had gone out briefly to buy food.

“My wife was the only one looking after him and had to go out for a short while to get groceries. We’re very traumatised by this incident, but we’re very thankful to the workers and we’ll be trying to find them to thank them,” he told TNP.

A representative of Yong Aik Construction told TNP that the firm is talking about what kind of reward can be given to Mr Dipto for rescuing the child.

“It was raining and so the tree-pruning team we had there were on standby with the spider lift when they heard the commotion. Mr Dipto did not hesitate to save the boy, and the company will be commending him for his good job. The management is discussing how we can reward him.” —/TISG

Read also: Caught on cam: Child waits to be rescued from window ledge

Caught on cam: Child waits to be rescued from window ledge

Singaporeans will not be allowed to choose which COVID-19 vaccine to take

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong revealed on Monday (4 Jan) that Singapore residents will not be allowed to choose which COVID-19 vaccine to take, since allowing them to do so would “unnecessarily complicate the already complex vaccination programme.”

The Government announced late last year that it will be bringing COVID-19 vaccines to Singapore sometime this year. Revealing that vaccination will be free for all citizens, permanent residents and long-term residents, the Government encouraged all to take part in the non-mandatory immunisation scheme when vaccines become available.

Although the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the only vaccine that has been approved for use in the immediate term, Workers’ Party MP Louis Chua asked whether individuals will be given a choice of vaccines when more than one has been approved for use.

Mr Gan replied in Parliament: “The allocation of vaccines will largely be based on medical indications of the different vaccines and the suitability of the vaccine for the different population groups, as well as availability of the vaccines.”

Asserting that any approved vaccines will have to meet stringent safety and efficacy requirements, he added: “Allowing individuals to have choice of vaccines will unnecessarily complicate this already complex vaccination programme. Anyway, in the immediate term, only the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been approved for use. So there is no choice.”

In his ministerial statement, Mr Gan also confirmed that individuals will be issued vaccination cards after receiving the COVID-19 vaccination. He said:

“Every person who is vaccinated will receive a physical vaccination card, and this will remind them of their appointment to return for their second dose, indicate clearly which vaccine was administered, and provide brief post-vaccination advice.

“In addition, any person who is vaccinated will have their record updated in the National Immunisation Registry, and individuals will be able to check their vaccination status digitally.”

Calling on Singaporeans to get immunised when the COVID-19 vaccine becomes available, Mr Gan also said: “While the COVID-19 vaccination will be voluntary, we strongly encourage everyone who is medically eligible to get vaccinated when the vaccine is offered to you. This will not only protect yourself, but also indirectly protect others who cannot be vaccinated due to medical reasons.

“This collective protection will be more effective the more people are vaccinated. In case of a fresh outbreak, with more people vaccinated we can keep the number of cases low, minimise the stress on the healthcare system, ensure that those who are ill get the treatment they need, and allow us to return to normalcy sooner.”

He added: “Some may feel that there is no urgency to get vaccinated given the current low number of community cases and the local situation is well under control. We must not be complacent or wait till an outbreak and then rush to be vaccinated.

“We have seen a few community cases in the last few days, which shows clearly that there are hidden cases among us. We are also seeing new variants that are more contagious. Any of these cases has a risk of sparking a major outbreak as we have seen in other countries.

“The best time to vaccinate is now. If people wait until an outbreak has happened to get themselves vaccinated, it will be too late, both to protect themselves and to prevent the outbreak in the first place.”