The big news this week was the fact that Samuel Seow, a prominent lawyer in the entertainment scene, was struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors for verbally and physically abusing three women who worked for him.
This incident is horrifying and while it is good that Seow has been struck off the rolls, the punishment does not seem significant in a nation that makes a song and dance about having harsh penalties to deter crimes. What Seow did was not just abuse, but criminal intimidation (What else can you call holding a knife at someone and threatening to kill them?). If we really are a nation that believes in justice and equality, Seow must face our famously harsh penalties so that future abusers are “deterred” from doing such things.
What makes these crimes particularly awful is the setting of the crime. This did not happen in a seedy bar in the red-light district or in a dark alley in the migrant worker area. This happened in a lawyer’s office located in Singapore’s main shopping district. The three young ladies that he assaulted were not “looking for trouble” by going to “dodgy” areas and behaving inappropriately at a time when they should have been at home. They merely went to work like normal and get got assaulted.
Then, there is the issue of who the assailant is. He is not a migrant worker who lost his money in a scam and decided to rob someone out of desperation. He is not someone with a low IQ nor is he some kid who ended up in “Bad Company” and spent his days committing armed robbery instead of going to school.
If anything, Seow is the picture-perfect Singaporean. He is a lawyer (which means he’s not only been through school but also had to go on a number of professional courses) and he’s a lawyer with over 20 years of experience – hence you can’t say he’s an immature kid acting on impulse. Furthermore, he’s not just any lawyer. He is known as the “Entertainment” lawyer, or the man that people in the publicity industry turn to.
It’s one of those cases where the more you look at Seow’s status and all the good things he’s achieved, the more inexcusable his crimes become. There’s no way Seow could not have known what he was doing was a crime, and there is no evidence to suggest that Seow was suffering from mental incapacity. Yet, despite this, he chose to engage in criminal activity.
So, what makes a man in Seow’s position behave like this? This question needs to be asked because, while Seow is a very visible example of a boss behaving badly, he is very likely not the only one to be behaving in this manner. As I’ve argued in previous postings, Singapore has a peculiarity from the rest of the world.
In other places, crimes like taking upskirt videos, mistreatment of workers and so on, are usually crimes associated with the lower strata – the poor, unwashed and uneducated. However, in Singapore, these are crimes that are committed by the educated and well-to-do (University students and working professionals).
I think of the first time I ever had to hand my identity card over to the police. It was an exquisite spa when the woman I was hanging out with at the time decided to throw a tantrum because the spa wouldn’t let me sit in on her massage.
So, why is it such that Singapore’s “Educated” class is behaving in a way that you only associate with the rubbish in other parts of the world?
A part of me suspects that while things may look good on the surface, we are in fact a very repressed society and this situation are in part due to one of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s biggest failures – an obsession with using fear. He himself said that if given a choice between being “feared” and “loved” he would prefer to be feared.
I don’t doubt that fear can be a useful tool for people with power. I don’t doubt that fear if used correctly can have a positive effect. Sad to say, there is an element of society that needs to fear something (jail time etc) in order for the rest of society to be able to function. However, this can be taken to an extreme, where fear is used to the extent that the people creating the fear have no fear of the consequences of their actions.
Mr Lee Kuan Yew got away with it because he was a man of strong character, and although he did get used to enjoying power, he was also wise enough to know that there has to be a limit. He knew that trade-offs had to be made. People would fear the government, but the government need to use it to get things done and ensure a better way of life. Like him or loath him, Mr Lee saw to it that the government performed at a certain standard.
Unfortunately, not everyone who comes into power has Mr Lee’s character. As Seow has shown, weaklings do come into positions of power and after a while, they develop what can only be politely described as a “God-Complex,” believing that they can do anything to the people beneath them because nothing will happen to them. You will notice that weaklings in power enjoy reminding the people beneath them that they are somehow dependent on them, so it’s best not to change things.
This is not healthy because it effectively corrupts things and corrupt systems do not produce anything of value. The rot starts at the top because the top does not believe it will be held to account. Then the rot moves down. Most people from the African continent, for example, will be able to testify to the fact that corruption at the top creates systems where you cannot survive by being honest.
If you want to see the ill effects of our overreliance on fear, one only needs to take a trip to the Malaysian state of Johor. You will find litter bugs are inevitably Singaporeans. If you were to ask them why they litter in Johor but not in Singapore, the answer is simple – because they can.
The thing keeping Singapore clean is not the fact that the people are clean but the fact that they fear the fine imposed on them if they get caught and once you remove that fear, the people behave in a way that suggests they are not as clean as the city they come from.
Ironically, Mike Tyson said it best when he said, “Greatness is not guarding yourself from the people, greatness is being accepted by the people,” when he was rebuking Floyd Mayweather for claiming to be the greatest boxer ever.
When you use fear as a tool of power, you become fearful too, and then you set yourself apart from the people. Think of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, where people lived in constant fear of Saddam. Funnily enough, Saddam was also living in constant fear.
Fear can be used initially to get things done. However, you need to produce results that make life better for everyone. Tech legends Steve Jobs and Bill Gates were known to terrify employees. However, they created revolutionary products (hence the feeling of being part of something) and they also made ordinary people very rich.
Seattle is filled with “Microsoft Millionaires,” who may have disliked Bill Gates for terrifying them at work, but in the end, he saw to it that they got a better life by merely working hard. Fear turned to respect. The same is true for Lee Kuan Yew.
This is something many of the world’s strutting peacocks forget. People will only put up with being afraid of you if it’s going to lead to something for them. If they have to feel frightened on a daily basis because you are uncertain if certain parts of your anatomy exist, they will either leave or do whatever it takes to ensure you will never have the ability to terrify.
In order to ensure that Singapore does not suffer from the corrupting influence of fear-based leadership, the justice system needs to see to it that Seow pays for his crimes so as to set a message that people in power are accountable.
Making Seow pay would remind Singaporeans that Singapore is the “Lion City” and not the “Ameba City” and we should expect people in leadership positions to be lions and not ameba.
A version of this article first appeared at beautifullyincoherent.blogspot.com