Monday, April 28, 2025
30.8 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 5227

Where is the love, Singapore?

By Herbert Teo

whereistheloveHaving left Singapore almost 30 years ago, technology has allowed me to follow my country of birth’s birthday on August 9 as though I was there sitting in the stands in front of Marina Bay’s Floating Platform.
This year’s Singapore celebrated its 48th year of independence. The NDP has transformed itself from just pure military and marching to multimedia, colours, lights, fireworks and everything else. I follow the parade almost every year when I can because I almost became a life member of NDPs, having religiously being part of eight NDPs when I worked for the Port of Singapore Authority. I was also in the army cadets in school and the marching and uniforms and precision reaction to drill commands were close to my heart.
2013 was all of that and more. As usual, the Oos and the Aahs were very much more for all the men in their wonderful flying machines as the jetfighters and helicopters roared overhead. The might of the military was shown in its powerful killing machines, weaponry and naval prowess. Singapore was a safe place to be.
But it was not all hardness in the NDP. Over the years, as Singapore matures, the softer edges are appearing. The children on stage were just beautiful. Not only beautiful in their colorful costumes highlighted by good lighting and multimedia. I could sense it in their voices as they sung, their pride in their dancing, and mostly in the smiles on their faces. They were happy, and proud, to be Singaporean.
However, all the glitter and gold, and pomp and ceremony, could not detract me from one figure as he sat in the terraces amongst his fellow junior cabinet members. He looked frail because of his years. His hair was white and wispy. His face has aged considerably. I could not but feel the pain of a father. This man is none other than the founding father of modern Singapore, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew.
I asked myself, with all the grandeur, all the skyscrapers, all the wonderful airports, seaports and mass transit systems, WHERE IS THE LOVE? Do Singaporeans really know how to show love, and I don’t mean in a sexual way? Do Singaporeans know how to give, and receive, compliments?
I said to my wife, who was watching with me, wouldn’t it have been so nice if Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had walked up to his father, hugged him, shook his hand and maybe invited him to sit next to the Prime Minister of Singapore? Don’t talk to me about protocol? Mr. Lee Kuan Yew is the founder of modern Singapore! Can we not be flexible and give some respect, and compliment to where it is due, by letting him sit next to his son?
I sent a message on PM Lee Hsien Loong’s Facebook on how a fantastic public relations opportunity had gone a begging. I said, if he had done what I thought he should have done, it would have left a lasting legacy amongst all Singaporeans young and old of the love that he has for his father and the love that he has for the founder of modern Singapore. In addition, it would have endeared younger Singaporeans to the concept of filial piety, something so good that is being eroded with modernization and technology.
I did get a reply from his Page Administrator saying:

“Dear Herbert,
Thank you for taking time to share your thoughts with PM.
Best wishes Page Administrator

Deep in my heart I wish the Prime Minister could publicly love his father on National Day on national – and global – television. It would have been one fantastic show of love and filial piety for all Singaporeans to follow.
This single public gesture of love by a leader could have been like Roberta Flack’s & Donna Hathaway’s 1972 hit song WHERE IS THE LOVE that made it to number five on the Billboard Hot 100 list!

Can we expect a cracker of a speech?

The Prime Minister will be addressing the nation this Sunday at the National Day Rally. Will he be able to move the nation, address long standing issues and unify us? Tan Bah Bah puts the PM on the spot. 
national-day-rally
Sunday’s National Day Rally speech will be Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s great opportunity to move a nation that appears like a listless boat in an ocean of uncertainty.
Two rally speeches and a milestone by-election have gone by but the citizens’ angst is still palpable.
The 2011 rally was just three months after General Elections 2011. PM Lee was a contrite leader ready to listen to the people, to find out what they were unhappy about.
The issues were not yet all that properly collated. But a slew of promises were made and action pledged.
Even before that speech, the PM was in action mode announcing the reduction of ministerial pay.
The 2012 event continued to address some of the issues brought up in GE 2011 and it also covered the traditional ones – including education, shortage of babies, work-life balance.
Five months later came the loss of Punggol East to the Workers Party. PE was by no means a WP stronghold and neither was the young Lee Li Lian a heavyweight politician.
The People’s Action Party lost by a significant swing of 13.49 per cent, a harbinger of what might well be the national scenario as many of the Piunggol East residents were young and middle-class.
The ruling party has been in a serious self-assessment and listening mode since then because next came Our Singapore Conversation. About 47,000 people came forward (or were roped in) to talk about the issues egging them. This was a government setting its own pace and agenda.
Now we are at the 2013 Rally. There is suddenly a sense of urgency. It is only three years before the next general elections, expected by many to be a momentous moment.
We are now told the PM will address what emerged from the Conversation as among the most pressing issues troubling the electorate. They are those affecting jobs, housing and healthcare.
“I will also speak about how we can together make Singapore a better home for us all,” said Mr Lee in a Facebook post.
The foreigner issue is still raw despite the government rolling back many perks for PRs and putting the squeeze on the numbers.
Sunday’s speech offers the PM a great opportunity to try and put the matter to rest.
Tell foreigners that they are welcome here, but tell them they have to decide after, say five years, that they have to make up their minds about this country. Apply for citizenship or plan to leave.
As for this country called Singapore, it is at an inflexion point, as Goh Chok Tong said the other day.
And the PM, as captain of the boat, has to move all of us in a way that he has never had to do.
Words can stir, lift hearts, live on in history and collective memory, become immortal. The greatest speeches are passed down the generations because they touch a chord and resonate.
Think of Martin Luther King, Jr’s speech, I Have A Dream, proclaiming his vision of racial equality. That vision has been translated into reality, his soul-stirring words mobilizing powerful forces that helped realise his dream. There is no denying the power of words.
We look forward to a cracker of a speech from our PM.
 

The property reality

Property curbs increase prices of HDB flats. This the new property reality. 
By Leong Sze Hian
The way we see it, The Independent Singapore.Forget those who have the bucks to continue to buy private proverties, curb or no curb.
The latest statistics which show that new private property purchases plunged 73 per cent last month, a 43-month low, are likely to mean something to the ordinary Singaporean.
One possibility is that the demand for HDB flats will go up, which can only mean an increase in the price of such homes.
It is no comfort that the BTO and resale prices are still at record highs.
When people can’t buy private property because of the new loan curbs, they may have no choice but to turn to HDB flats. Also, the new loan curbs do not apply to new Build-to-order (BTO) flats which are governed by HDB concessionary loans.
This is the new reality in Singapore: Put the squeeze on one side, the other side is going to be affected.

Trickle-down effect – Really?

The way we see it, The Independent Singapore.Throwing money at the problem is not the solution. But somehow, when members of our venture capital community, academics and government officials got together earlier this week to discuss the problems faced by local start-ups organised by the Entrepreneurship Review Committee (ERC), they figured getting some money from the government was a great idea.
However, the problems faced by our start-ups are not limited to funding.
The Independent has spoken to several start-up founders and their major concerns are:
1. A crowded market in Singapore for their products/services;
2. Lack of knowledge/know-how on expanding to overseas markets;
3. Inability to monetise their products or execute their business plans effectively;
4. Lack of access to talent who are willing to take risk with start-ups businesses; and lastly;
5. Inability to raise money from local financial institutions
Our take: learn to walk before you start to run. Provide adequate training and support for the start-ups, take them on overseas missions (don’t just limit these to the usual suspects) and start by awarding some contracts to home-grown companies first.
Give them a chance to succeed in Singapore, the money will follow.

What singaporeans, foreigners need to do

Singapore is not perfect, but it is still a good place to call home. Augustine Low writes about the need to instil love and loyalty for our country like how the Americans love their own. And he does not condone bashing in our backyard.  
By Augustine Low
IMG_2173 (300x200)On Singapore’s 48th birthday month, let’s take stock and count the ways we can stand up for Singapore.
I can start with three.
Don’t condone bashing in our backyard: I have many foreign friends. I have no problems with them competing for jobs, jostling for MRT seats and clamouring for homes. But for them to rant and rave in our own backyard is plain rude and disgusting. A few months back, I was at a gathering where this foreigner who has been working here for several years kept going on and on about how sick he was about things here, from NEWater and taxis to public hygiene and public libraries. I could not stomach it. I told him to go back to his country if he felt that way . . . just don’t make a mockery of everything while making a living here. He looked surprised and walked off sheepishly. Chances are he would think twice about doing the same thing again. But we need to speak out.
Speak out for a better Singapore: Singaporeans making their voices heard in good faith is another matter altogether. We should not bash for no reason. And we certainly must banish the notion that when we are critical of leaders and institutions, we are anti-Singapore. We may not speak with one voice because views differ, but we speak with one heart – the yearning for a better Singapore.  And let’s give credit where credit is due. Singapore is not perfect, but it is a good place to call home. We only wish for it to get better.
Instil love of country: I envy the earnest love that ordinary Americans show for their country. American patriotism is sharp and sure, anchored on the promise of individual freedom. Nearer home, I like the spirit of the Filipinos and Vietnamese in their love of country. We have some way to go. For a start, let’s instil that love in our children. Get them to respect the flag, the pledge and the anthem. And if we keep at the back of our minds the idea that we could always migrate for greener pastures and cooler climates and a less stressful education system, then our affinity to home is not sharp and sure. Let’s also not condone our sons shirking National Service responsibilities. It is a good rite of passage. Defence is integral to love of country.
 Augustine Low is a former journalist with The New Paper and now owns a business in the PR industry.

Lee Lilian: I have only half a term to prove myself

In an exclusive interview with The Independent, MP Lee Lilian speaks about local issues and why she had to quit her job as a financial trainer to focus on her constituency. 

By Kumaran Pillai
Managing Editor

Lilian_profileShe made a big splash when she was elected to Parliament in January when even international media like the Wall Street Journal and The Economist sat up and took notice. “Singapore’s voters show an increased appetite for change,” proclaimed the Journal.

The opposition Workers’ Party’s Lee Lilian’s victory in the Punggol East by-election was significant not only as a vote against the ruling party but for another reason, too. It marked the triumph of the grassroots worker over the para-dropped highflyer. The voters preferred a familiar face, someone they could relate to, to a successful outsider. Koh Poh Koon, the colorectal surgeon fielded by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP), had the potential to become a minister, according to the PM, but that did not impress the voters – they preferred someone they knew.

Lee Lilian is determined to live up to her trust. She quit her job as a financial trainer to serve the people, she told The Independent. The international attention she received on her election victory has not distracted her from keeping her eye firmly on local issues. She spoke to The Independent about what she has been doing to reduce noise from the nearby temples and the need for more childcare centres, eateries and bus services in Punggol East. Mundane matters, everyday issues that directly affect the lives of local residents.

Lee, 35, may be a new face in Parliament, but she is already canny enough to know elections are won and lost on local issues, that you have to keep your customers – sorry, constituents – satisfied.

And her work is cut out, she says, because she has only half a term to prove herself.

It has been about six months since the Punggol by-elections. How has life been since you have been elected as a Member of Parliament?

I quit my job on the 30th of April 2013 so that I can focus on serving the people because I have only half a term to prove myself. My priority was to focus on the residents and their issues, the problems that they were facing and if I could resolve them quickly. I mean, there are new issues and problems that I need to tackle every day.

Besides looking at the municipality issues, I also need to fulfil my duties as a parliamentarian. I have to look into national issues, get myself ready for Budget debate, the White paper on population as well as table Parliamentary questions. My philosophy is simple, I entered politics to serve the people and I want to keep it that way.

The Independent understands that there have been complaints about the excessive noise levels from the temples nearby. How did you go about handing this very delicate long standing issue?

As a nation, we need to live together harmoniously. So, I lost no time when this issue was  first raised after the BE.

I picked on a block that is most affected to conduct my weekly house visits. I wanted to experience firsthand the kind of noise levels that they were experiencing.

At the same time, I met up with the temple management committee to discuss about the issues and I must say that I am convinced that they are already doing their best. Till today, I have yet to receive any feedback on this.  And if I do, I am ready to explain to the residents what the temple have done to minimize noise pollution.

I am also aware that this is a very sensitive issue and residents understand that this is a religious organisation and they are free to practise their faith.

Are there any new amenities or improvements that are coming up in Punggol East? What are your plans?

We need to do more for the young working parents, especially if both of them are working.  We need more child care centres, not just in Punggol East, but in other estates as well. The key is to keep the costs affordable for the average Singaporean who is starting a family.

I have spoken to ECDA (Early Childhood Development Agency) on this and I look forward to more centres in the short to medium term. This is one of the things that I have planned for.  Other pertinent issues are the lack of eating establishments and lack of bus services along Rivervale Crescent.  I have brought both issues up in Parliament.

What is you key message to your constituents?

I am here to serve and I want to thank them for putting their trust in me. My task is  to look after the welfare of the residents and create the necessary conditions for them to raise their families in Punggol East. Everybody, including those who didn’t vote for me is under my care and I will do my very best to ensure that their needs are taken care of.

Iskandar hit or hype?

New projects are springing up in Iskandar, Johor but where are the tenants? Buyers are concerned about high crime rates in JB.

By Mathew Yap

DangaBayCountryGardenWhat do you think of Johor-Iskandar as an investment?” I casually asked Delvin, a director of a well-known Singapore-based property consultancy firm. He paused momentarily, then retorted: “Where are the tenants? I have yet to see tenants flocking in and meanwhile the projects are springing up very quickly.”
Excitement on Iskandar seemed to hit fever pitch six months ago after the prime ministers of Malaysia and Singapore officiated at the signing ceremony for Danga Bay Marina on Feb 19, 2013.
According to press reports, the two giants, Khazanah Nasional Bhd and Temasek Holdings, will develop a $3.2 billion township with another private Malaysian firm, Iskandar Waterfront Holdings, in the once swampy Danga Bay. The 71.4- acre site will be turned into a waterfront marina city by 2018  overlooking Sinagpore’s  Sungei Buloh shore .
But just as new marketing brochures for Iskandar rolled out, a word of caution flew out of the pages of  Lee Kuan Yew’s book,  One Man’s View Of The World. “Let’s wait and see how Iskandar develops. This is an economic field of cooperation in which, you must remember, we are putting investments on Malaysian soil… And at the stroke of a pen, they can take it over. They are not likely to because they want more investments… When we go there, we must understand that any real estate or building that you plant on the ground belongs to the owner of the ground.” Mr Lee said in his book.
In response, Malaysia’s Johor’s former chief minister Abdul Ghani said Iskandar had been rapidly progressing in the past five years and therefore negative views were unwarranted.
And, as if to help prove Ghani’s point, one of China’s top developers, Country Garden, on August 11, chartered several buses to bring in hundreds of  Singapore residents and Chinese nationals to  the carnival-like sale launch ceremony for its $300 -400 per sq foot Danga Bay Country Garden condominium . The event was even graced by the Johor Sultan. Half the buyers were from China, 30 per cent Malaysians, and the remaining 20 per cent Singapore-based residents.
The Iskandar fervor is understandable having seemingly reached a tipping point last year – with the apparent successful completion of LEGOLAND, Puteri Harbour Family Theme Park and several education institutions, coupled with the announcement of the High-Speed Rail Singapore-KL line.
This led one major Malaysian bank to proclaim: “We remain bullish on this growth corridor and advise investors to position for the longer term.”
The main lure of Iskandar for property buyers, especially those from Singapore, is the price and, by implication, more space. Singapore property prices are now at new peak levels – 45-50% up from 2008 – which has prompted the government to introduce stringent measures to curtail investment demand. While average prices at Johor-Iskandar have also more than doubled since 2008, current house prices remain 5-10 times lower than  in Singapore.  As one Singaporean, Jonathan, in his 40s, puts it : “Sadly prices of HDB may be even higher than that of some properties in Iskandar, JB. But, rather than gripe about the situation, it might be better to take advantage of it and invest.”
Many analysts have given the thumbs up for Iskandar, often citing the buy-in of top political leaders and direct investment from the GLCs like Khazanah Nasional and Temasek Holdings as the key reason for optimism.
But not all is rosy for Iskandar. Crime remains a serious concern for many residents and investors – only 10 per cent of the 112,000-strong police force is actually “field-deployed” in fighting crime, according to one UMNO Vice-President source, and with the recent spate of high-profile killings in Malaysia, though not in Johor itself, many Singaporeans are understandably spooked.
Another potential source of discomfort is the regulatory and governance framework on contracts and investment issues which may be subject to changes depending on the Johor state and federal capital policy directions. For example, there is talk that the foreign ownership consent levy will be raised from the current RM10,500 RM (including RM500 administrative fee) to RM30,000.
In June, Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Mohamed Khaled Nordin said the state government would impose higher taxes on properties owned by foreigners by year’s end.
Currently, Malaysia allows foreigners to buy residential and commercial properties above RM500,000  in value. Industrial properties, agriculture and development land have other requirements to comply with. But recent press reports suggest that the Government may increase the threshold figure to RM1 million to curb rising prices and keep them affordable for the average Malaysian households.
Such changing political winds dictated by local needs may be the single greatest worry for new investors getting into new ventures in Iskandar.
 
 

Medisave, Adrian Tan and luck

3

Ordinary Singaporean Adrian Tan, 52, has questions for Leong Sze Hian on the proposed changes to health-care financing:
piggymediWhat are the proposed changes in Medisave?
Allow Medisave money to be used for more treatments, especially for the elderly, such as for health screening.
What do these mean for me and my family? I have a wife and two children, 24 and 26.
Just in case you can’t afford to pay for the Medishield premiums, your coverage may not lapse as future Medisave top-ups from the government may go directly into paying your premiums.
I read in the papers about restrictions on people using their Medisave money for their families. This worries me. Doesn’t government want to encourage filial piety?
This is to restrict the unlimited use of your Medisave to pay for family members. If not, one day you may find your Medisave has very little money and you might not have enough when you are much older.
In the Medishield segment, there is a mention of getting people to pay more in premiums when they are young? Will these have an affect on a person like me?
You may pay less and your children will have to pay higher premiums.
There is a proposal that tells the government to guarantee Medishield coverage for those who cannot afford premiums. Is this for real?
Yes, the government may pay the premiums for those who cannot afford it.
I have stopped paying premiums. Anything for me here?
You can try to re-apply for Medishield, but acceptance may be subject to your health condition and history.
You told me earlier about the element of luck? What is that all about?
The recommendation on higher Medishield coverage and coverage of more non-standard drugs will mean that Singaporeans may have fewer concerns about very high medical costs.
But that is all a matter of luck because it may still cost you a bomb if you or your family members are affected by an uncommon ailment.
If the government accepts these changes, what does it tell?
That we are paying more attention to addressing the concerns on the affordability of healthcare, particularly for the lower-income.

Serious, this gap

The way we see it, The Independent Singapore.The government has admitted a new divide in Singapore: the knowledge divide.
It is the gap between what the government is doing and what the public thinks it is doing.
The candid admission came from the point man for the Our Singapore Conversation, Heng Swee Keat.
 
Two examples:
1. In education, it is the 40-year gap where parents who left school many years ago are out of touch with what happens there now.
“Unless we bridge that gap we will always have a problem in terms of how parents perceive education,” he said.
2. In health-care, the public just don’t know there are schemes to help them reduce their cost burden.
“The one take-away I have is that the same things have to be repeated over and over again and we really need to do a better job of reaching out to fellow Singaporeans whenever we have important policy changes,” he said.
What happened to all your spin doctors, Mr Heng?

I have a bone to pick with LKY

By Augustine Low
source: EDMWAs a child of the Sixties, I grew up in an era when Mr Lee Kuan Yew was larger than life. He was revered, he was feared.
Today’s generation knows of Mr Lee as a paternal figure, venerated for his wisdom and remarkable contributions to Singapore. His latest book, One Man’s View Of The World, once again assures us of his undoubted and undiminished intellect.
Reading the book, however, gives me great discomfort.  I have long craved for some inkling of his sentiments and frailties because he is, after all, just a man.
But the book, like the others preceding it in recent years, shows Mr Lee to be pragmatic to the core. His pragmatism is so unbending it is chilling. For example, espousing his belief that there is no afterlife, he says:
“I wish I can meet my wife in the hereafter, but I don’t think I will.  I just cease to exist just as she has ceased to exist – otherwise the other world would be overpopulated. Is heaven such a large and limitless space that you can keep all the people of the world over the thousands of years past? I have a question mark on that . . . it goes against logic. Supposing we all have life after death, where is that place?”
Yes, logic is all or nothing to Mr Lee, even in the twilight of his years.
Here is a quote which could well serve as a summary of his entire perspective and philosophy:
“Between being loved and being feared, I have always believed Machiavelli was right. If nobody is afraid of me, I’m meaningless.” – Mr Lee Kuan Yew, 1997, South China Morning Post
I think of Nelson Mandela who is universally beloved, never feared. His life is well documented, so his triumphs and his faults are there for all to see. He has become an everyday hero, a beacon of hope, forgiveness and conciliation.
Mandela is reassuringly human. We cherish and love him – even from afar – because he represents the notion of a greater good.
As a proud Singaporean, I would  dearly love to love Mr Lee.
After all that he has done, why is it so difficult – almost impossible even – to connect “beloved” with Mr Lee?
My thoughts turn to a novel which I first read 15 years ago, The Remains Of The Day by the Japanese-born British writer Kazuo Ishiguro. The novel’s narrator, Stevens, is the perfect English butler. Snobbish and humourless, Stevens has devoted his life to the concept of duty and responsibility, hoping to reach the pinnacle of his profession through totally selfless dedication and ruthless suppression of sentiment.
Having made a virtue of stoic dignity, he is proud of his impassive response to his father’s death and his unflinching attention to detail in the face of adversity. There is irony towards the end as the butler unwittingly reveals his pathetic self-deception. Stevens poignantly and belatedly realizes that he has wasted his life in blind service to a man discredited for seeking peace with the Nazis  and that he has never discovered the “key to human warmth.”
Logic says that it is just a novel and Stevens is just a fictional character.
Whilst Mr Lee carved his own path and can equally be said to have devoted his life to the concept of duty and responsibility, and certainly reached the pinnacle of leadership,  sentiment tells me that fiction mirrors truth and knowing the key to human warmth can mean absolutely everything.