Tuesday, April 29, 2025
25 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 5223

Redefining meritocracy

By Augustine Low

meritocracy cartoonElitism and meritocracy have suddenly become buzzwords.

Public Service Commission Chairman Eddie Teo said on Tuesday in an open letter on the PSC website that the PSC will continue to guard against elitism by having scholars from different socio-economic backgrounds as “a public service comprising only the privileged and upper classes will add to the impression that meritocracy leads to a lack of social mobility in Singapore”.

In July, Mr Goh Chok Tong had warned in a speech at Raffles Institution that “when economic inequality gives rise to social immobility and a growing social distance between the winners of meritocracy and the masses; and when the winners seek to cement their membership of a social class that is distinct from, exclusive, and not representative of Singapore society — that is elitism.”

Both warnings are strikingly similar.

In his recent National Day Rally, PM Lee Hsien Loong spoke about compassionate meritocracy, and he choked back tears in recalling the story of Dr Yeo Sze Ling who was blind since the age of four but went on to win the Singapore Youth Award and contribute to society.  His point: That people can rise above circumstances and the system has to be kept fair for all.

The question is, could the relentless pursuit of meritocracy itself be the cause of elitism creeping into Singapore society?

In fact, the word “meritocracy” was coined by a man who used it to conjure the image of a society obsessed with talent, to its detriment. In 1958, British sociologist and Labour Party activist Michael Young wrote the book “The Rise of the Meritocracy.” Meant as a satire, events in the book took place in 2034, when psychologists had perfected the art of IQ testing. But far from promoting social harmony, the preoccupation with talent had produced social breakdown. The losers in the talent wars were branded as failures deserving of their fate. Eventually they revolted against their masters.

Some 43 years after his book came out, Michael Young wrote an article in the British newspaper The Guardian, affirming that much of what he predicted had come true. On British society, he said those left behind “can easily become demoralised by being looked down on so woundingly by people who have done well for themselves . . . It is hard indeed in a society that makes so much of merit to be judged as having none. No underclass has ever been left as morally naked as that.”

PSC Chairman Eddie Teo has asserted that “we continue to subscribe to meritocracy”. The focus is on refining the concept of merit and the PSC now uses psychological interviews and psychometric tests to determine traits such as leadership, character, interpersonal skills and stress tolerance.

Michael Young (who coined “meritocracy”) takes a more humanist approach, eschewing more and better testing for a “tolerant society, in which individual differences are actively encouraged as well as passively tolerated . . . Every human being would then have equal opportunity, not to rise up in the world in the light of any mathematical measure, but to develop his own special capacities for leading a rich life.”

Often cited by observers as possibly the best way to head off a meritocratic backlash is to give everybody equal opportunity, by intervening much earlier in life to boost the chances of those from poor and disadvantaged backgrounds. This starts with setting them on the right path through good, accessible early childhood education.

This is something the government is taking to in a big way. The Singapore Budget 2013 includes more than $3 billion extra funding for expanding the number of pre-schools and improving the quality of pre-school education. For parents, this will mean having more pre-school centres closer to their homes and workplaces and better quality teachers in these schools.

The recent warnings about elitism show that the government has perceived a fault line in Singapore society. There are signs that it doing its part to level the playing field across the board, to ward off any backlash from decades of meritocracy.

The bigger challenge is to effectively address the sense of entitlement that will drive a wedge between the haves and have not. The idea that “I made it because I’m smart, driven, and hardworking and you messed up because you lack intelligence and work ethic and therefore you deserve your fate.”

Augustine Low is a communications strategist. He is a former journalist with The Straits Times and The New Paper, and also managed public sector corporate communications.

Bali hi! 'Zoo Man' Bernard Harrison in paradise

0

By PN Balji
Editor, The Independent Singapore
Bernard Harrison, who helped create the Night Safari and make the Singapore Zoo a prime tourist attraction, continues to do what he loves. Bernard Harrison and Friends, his company, builds zoos around the world.
But why did he leave the Singapore Zoo in 2002? What is lacking in Singapore? Singaporeans are good at innovation, but creativity is stifled by the education system and social structure, he says. What’s the difference? Harrison, the “Zoo Man”, as he calls himself, answers the questions in this two-part email interview.
In the first part, he explains why he now spends much of his time in Bali.

Bernard Harrison and his wife, Tina
Bernard Harrison and his wife, Tina

Q. You have set up home in Bali. Tell us about that. Why Bali? When did you go there?
A. Tina and I decided to rent a house long term in Bali about 5 years ago. We have not really set up home in Bali per se. We have a home in Singapore and also in Penang, but choose to spend much of our time in Bali. We have been spending more time here for the last year and enjoy an evergrowing circle of friends – locals and expats.  My daughter Sharda coined the term lowpats: localized expats.
Why Bali? It’s known as the Island of the Gods. You live in the constant presence of Agung, the 3,000m high active volcano that dominates my morning walk to the beach. You sit down for a coffee and there is Agung, poking his head through a mantle of clouds – dominating everything. The Hindu Balinese spend much time on the gods with offerings every morning. Best to appease this mighty volcano!
I love the pace of life here. As soon as you get off the plane from Singapore, you go into overdrive. Our home is in Sanur, which was a small fishing village and one of the first tourist areas to be developed. It’s managed to retain some sanity. It’s unlike the constant traffic jams, crowds, noise and partying of tourist urban sprawl of Greater Kuta which includes Legian, Semynak and Krobukaran.
Australian tourists – who use Bali as a their Asian playground — are prevalent in Greater Kuta although Chinese tourists are arriving in hordes now.
It’s substantially cheaper to live in Bali (house, car, domestic help, food) though alcohol is expensive. However, we have a few good wine labels made from Margaret River grapes but fermented and bottled in Bali that are reasonably priced (one has to get around the high tax on imported alcohol). There are also locally grown producers of reasonable wine on the island. Beer is, of course, fairly cheap….the ubiquitous Bintang.
Bernard Harrison and his daughter, Sharda
Bernard Harrison and his daughter, Sharda

Q. How does Bali compare to Singapore as a home?
A. Bali is a paradise. It’s got a great culture, the population is Hindu and there are many very interesting rituals and ceremonies. As it’s a tourist resort, you get the sophistication and range of restaurants if you want them and good supermarkets for imported goods.
Tourists stay in Bali for a week and hang out at resort hotels, along the beaches. That’s what you do. And surf. Singapore is also a tourist hub, hardly a beach resort, no matter what Sentosa tells you! I think 50 per cent of tourists to Singapore are coming for the casinos.
Q. Do you miss Singapore?
A. Yes, I do miss Singapore. It’s been home for 50 years of my life and where Sharda, my son Sean and stepson Christian live. However, I’m in and out often enough because my work involves a lot of travel and I choose to hub out of Singapore as opposed to Jakarta or Kuala Lumpur.
I also miss my constitutional bowl of fish ball noodle soup for breakfast and I miss my Rhodesian ridgeback Shumba. For a ruling understood only by Bali, dogs and cats are not allowed into Bali until they eradicate the current rabies epidemic on the island, which has been under eradication for the past five years.
Q If you were put into a time tunnel and pushed into the past, what would you do differently?
A. I don’t think I would do anything differently.
I totally enjoyed growing up in Malaysia, Australia and Singapore. I had lovely parents, had a ball at boarding school and university in the UK and landed the best job in the world which I kept for 29 years. I used to wake up every day and say, it’s great to be alive and going to work.
And ironically I left the Zoo and now have the very best job in the world, consulting on what I love…..zoos.
I have a fantastic wife, four superb children (two I helped make and two I inherited).
I can’t think of what else I would want to be different.
Read tomorrow:  

  • Why Bernard Harrison left the Singapore Zoo in 2002
  • What he is doing now
  • Why he says Singaporeans are good at innovation but the country is lacking in creativity

Amobee Adds New Dimension to Mobile Ads With PULSE 3D

0

Industry’s Only Real-time, High Fidelity 3D Mobile Ads Bring Products Out of the Showcase and Into Users’ Hands

 

Demo of 3D rendering
Demo of 3D rendering

REDWOOD CITY, CA and SINGAPORE, September 18, 2013 – Amobee, the company defining digital advertising, today announced the next generation of its ground breaking 3D mobile advertising platform, PULSE 3D. The new platform empowers advertisers to create realistic 3D ads that allow mobile users to engage with products in ways never possible before.

PULSE 3D ads are based on a new hybrid architecture of HTML5 and native device technology to achieve maximum reach, engagement, and performance. As a result, PULSE 3D ads are not only three-dimensional, but incorporate app-like features, location-based customization, as well as other forms of rich media, including video, expandable image galleries, interactivity and gamification. With PULSE 3D smart adaptation, advertisers can develop a single creative, which then gracefully scales across iOS and now Android mobile devices. Additionally, PULSE 3D ads can scale across 3D- and 2D-capable publisher inventory.

“Our mission is to create the world’s most beautiful, engaging ads to build lasting brand relationships,” said Trevor Healy, CEO of Amobee. “PULSE 3D gives advertisers the ability to put their products in people’s hands and explore them in ways otherwise only possible in a store. With mobile commerce on a fast trajectory, creating visceral experiences on mobile devices will become a ‘must’ for advertisers.”

Uniquely, the PULSE 3D platform delivers real-time 3D rendering in a mobile ad. Users can personally select which components of the ad they want to explore, making it a truly customizable brand experience. For example, within a PULSE 3D car advertisement, the mobile user can spin the 3D car model in all directions, open the car doors, change the exterior color, explore the details of the interior design, thus creating an unprecedented personalized experience. Every action of engagement in PULSE 3D ads can be measured and analyzed, allowing CMOs to effectively re-engage customers in a more meaningful way.

PULSE 3D has already been used to deliver immersive mobile ad campaigns for brands such as BMW, Expedia, Nokia, DISH Network, and The Weather Channel.

“We’re always looking to test new cutting edge, mobile ad formats, and it was crucial to work with a mobile advertising partner who understood our need to drive consumer engagement and downloads of the Expedia app among potential travelers,” said Elizabeth Dorrance, Media Director, Expedia. “The PULSE 3D ad created a unique experience that, combined with Amobee’s targeting capabilities, delivered strong consumer engagement.”

PULSE 3D is available now from Amobee. For more information on creating high-impact PULSE 3D ads, or to obtain the PULSE 3D SDK to deliver PULSE 3D ads with your content, go to amobee.com/3d.

ABBOTT'S WIN NOT A GOOD NEWS FOR THE “BOAT PEOPLE”

0

By Gaurav Sharma

tony_abbottAustralia’s opposition leader Tony Abbott is the country’s 28th prime minister after his Liberal-National coalition defeated the governing Labour Party by winning 88 seats in the 150-seat parliament. While the two parties differed on issues such as measures for tackling an expected economic slowdown and reducing the controversial carbon emissions tax, both displayed politically expedient bi-partisan urgency on supposedly “vote-winning” issue of reducing the number of asylum seekers arriving by boat, or “boat people” as they are called.

As recently as July, the then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd had announced all asylum-seekers, even women and children, arriving by boat with no Australian visa will be sent to the impoverished Papua New Guinea or Nauru for further processing or resettlement. “The asylum-seekers will not enjoy any right ever of being processed to go to Australia. There will be no cap on the number of people who can be transferred or resettled in Papua New Guinea or Nauru,” his  government said.

While Rudd claimed “this policy is designed to stop people smugglers and stop further loss of life at sea”, critics have dubbed it as Rudd’s “Final Solution”.

 

WHO ARE THESE “BOAT PEOPLE”?

These asylum-seekers are mainly people fleeing from war-infested zones such as Middle-East, Iraq and Afghanistan, and from countries like Indonesia and Sri Lanka, who bribe “people smugglers” in hope of a better life in Australia. As the boats used in smuggling people are not well-equipped, many drown en-route.  Those who survive, are sent to the detention centres[or “concentration camps” as critics call them] in isolated islands of the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
Even when Australia detains the “boat people” on its own territory, the conditions are bad. There were 7,632 incident reports between October 2009 and May 2011 across the country’s operational immigration detention facilities including self-harm, assaults, hunger strikes, riots and disturbances.
For Australia, a land of immigrants, nothing can be more farcical.
As noted by award-winning investigative journalist John Pilger, in The Guardian recently, “For Aborigines and refugees, the irony is self-evident. Only Aboriginal people are true Australians. The rest of us – beginning with Captain Cook – are boat people.”
A new film on Australia by John Pilger, Utopia, commissioned by ITV and produced by Dartmouth Films will premier on October 3, which explores the country’s suppressed colonial past and its treatment of the Aboriginal population, against the backdrop of a huge mineral boom. 

HISTORY OF THE “BOAT PEOPLE”

1992: Mandatory detention for refugees arriving in boats was put in place.
1998: A report by Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) stated that such detentions violated international as well as Australia's own human rights obligations.
2001: As known colloquially, “Pacific Solution” is implemented by the John Howard Government. This entailed detaining asylum-seekers in the Pacific islands, Nauru and Manus (in Papua New Guinea), while their asylum claims were processed. Such claims were not processed under Australian law and claimants had no access to legal assistance or judicial review.
2004: HREOC publishes a report criticising Australian immigration laws and stated that the “Pacific Solution” is fundamentally inconsistent with the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
2008: “Pacific Solution” ends. Now, Asylum-seekers were sent to the Christmas Island, a territory of Australia in the Indian Ocean, instead of Manus and Nauru.
2012: The Julia Gilliard Government ties-up with the governments of Nauru and Papua New Guinea again and restarts offshore processing of asylum-seekers. By year-end, 414 people were transferred to Nauru and 155 to the Manus Island.
July, 2013: The Kevin Rudd Government implements “Final Solution”, as known colloquially, which means all asylum-seekers will be held indefinitely on Papua New Guinea, with no chance of ever going to Australia.
August, 2013: A UN human rights committee calls Australia’s indefinite detention of 46 recognized refugees on security grounds amounting to “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, inflicting serious psychological harm on them”. The refugees - 42 Tamils from Sri Lanka, three Rohingya from Myanmar and a Kuwaiti, are in detention for the last two and a half years.
September, 2013: Tony Abbott storms to power. Earlier, during his election campaign, Abbott had stated that if his party wins, he will deport refugees already in Australian detention centres and will not hesitate to use the Navy to stop asylum boats. He also plans to create a new “tent city” on Nauru to house the “boat people”.

A kinder, gentler South China Morning Post

0

www.scmpchinese.com
www.scmpchinese.com

William Zheng Wei, a former Singapore Press Holdings business editor, has been named the chief editor of the South China Morning Post’s new Chinese-language Web site. His mandate? Don’t carry anything controversial.
Zheng’s appointment was announced on Monday in an internal company release by Robin Hu, the 55-year-old chief executive officer of the SCMP Group, himself a former Singapore Press Holdings executive. Hu replaced Kuok Hui Kwong last July after serving for six years as regional director in China for the Singapore Economic Development Board, a government agency, and as a senior vice-president for an Internet startup.
The softly-softly approach to the territory’s news may not go far in a city whose 7.5 million residents are growing increasingly impatient with a government that is regarded as being too willing to align itself with official Beijing to the detriment of Hong Kong itself.
The determination to remain rosy — apparently because the Web site is in Chinese – seems ill advised given the 13 Chinese-language newspapers of different political hues and stripes in Hong Kong. There are five pro-Beijing leftist papers; one semi-neutral one, Ming Pao; and three basically pro-democracy ones including Apple Daily, whose owner, Jimmy Lai, uses a successful formula of lurid crime stories and political coverage that savages the government at any opportunity.
In a company town hall meeting with employees earlier this year, Hu said the revamped Chinese language website would avoid coverage of Hong Kong’s increasingly rancorous political scene and instead play the role of booster for the city’s attractions as a travel and business centre.
‘Singaporization’
If anything, Hu’s remarks resemble the Singaporean approach to news, where media outlets are de facto cheerleaders for government policies. Indeed, concerns have been growing inside the paper for more than a year and a half over what might be termed its “Singaporization,” a reference to the Straits Times of Singapore and its family of other newspapers, which are notorious for rarely criticizing the Singapore government.
The 110-year-old South China Morning Post was bought by Malaysian sugar and hotel tycoon Robert Kuok Hock Nien from Rupert Murdoch in 1993, reportedly as a favour to the Chinese government to keep it in safe hands as the 1997 handover of Hong Kong to the mainland was approaching. It has been through a revolving door of editors in recent years apparently in search of a formula that checks declining print circulation and finds a safe way to cover the mainland. Independent-minded foreign and local editors have lost out in a variety of struggles inside the paper.
The mild-mannered Chinese language Web site coincides with the reign of Wang Xiang Wei, the paper’s first mainland-born chief editor and a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Congress. He was appointed to the top job in 2012 and immediately began weeding out Western editors and reporters.
Although it has been considered one of the most influential English-language broadsheets in Asia, critics say the paper has been steadily losing its independent voice, a growing concern for the international business and diplomatic communities in Hong Kong, who have previously regarded the SCMP as an important window into China..
“There has been a sustained and creeping clean-out of western reporters and editors for a couple of years,” said a former SCMP executive who asked not to be named. “‘Gweilos’ (a derogatory term for Caucasians) are seen as a problem for a Chinese-owned and managed newspaper… They ask awkward questions at meetings which embarrass the puppets put in to manage them. They also, more importantly, have networks to international media which cause no end of unwelcome exposure to the men behind the screen who work best in the shadows.”
Overseas Chinese from Canada, the United States and the UK are ostracized as well, a source said. And, while Western reporters and editors have steadily lost influence except for their work polishing stories from reporters for whom English is a second language, local Chinese reporters are beginning to despair as well, a source told Asia Sentinel.
“It hasn’t seemed to have got any better from my point of view,” the reporter said. “China reporters complain of their stories being axed on a near-weekly basis. A dozen or so Hong Kong and China reporters have left the paper recently because they were unhappy with getting stories censored and other restrictions.”
The new Web site, www.scmpchinese.com, was launched earlier this year. Despite his remarks about the Web site, Hu reportedly the told employees that English-language coverage in the South China Morning Post will continue to “pull no punches” to inform the world about what’s going on in China.
In the meeting, Hu reportedly dismissed accusations of self-censorship. “The job of any editor is to censor. Every editor has to decide what to put in the paper and try to provide balance.”
In the same internal Sept. 2 company release announcing Zheng Wei’s appointment, Hu also announced the appointment of Anne Wong, who is to assume the role of Consultant to the Celebrating Hong Kong Project, which has been described as a celebration of the city’s culture and history along with the unsung deeds of ordinary people; it bears an uncanny resemblance to similar campaigns launched by the Straits Times of Singapore on a regular basis.
The paper launched the campaign on May 30. Reportedly the brainchild of Robin Hu, the launch drew Hong Kong’s embattled chief executive, Leung Chun-ying, along with former British civil servant David Akers-Jones as the city’s top tycoons looked on approvingly.
The event was featured on the front page of the South China Morning Post the next day accompanied by a large photograph of Leung. Following the campaign launch, several senior staff members approached Hu with complaints, according to a source.
(From Asia Sentinel)

New SISTIC Website incorporates a new look, more information and social media

0

sistic

Singapore — SISTIC, Singapore’s leading ticketing services provider has launched a completely new and improved website, one of its most significant customer initiatives in recent years. The new website delivers a more informative, customer-focused experience for anyone looking for concerts, theatre, attractions, seminars, and more. Enhancements include a new look, better search and navigation and new content formats including reviews and videos. Fans will also be able to interact and engage through improved social media integration.

“The SISTIC website has long been one of the most popular sources of entertainment information in Singapore, with about four million page views a month. We have made the new site more exciting for fans, for show organisers and for artists. It is now easier, faster and simply much more fun checking out what’s happening in Singapore”, explained Marie Liow, Marketing Communication & Channel Development Manager, SISTIC.

SISTIC’s homepage is completely revamped. Searching for shows, with auto-complete and advanced search functionsby category, venue, event, genre, or date – in any combination – is easier than ever. The new design brings a more ‘magazine look’, and there are short synopses linked to show pictures. Besides show synopses, the search result can now also provide artist biographies and concert publicity videos, when available.

Other improvements include a showcase of top-viewed events, helping to quickly identify the most popular shows, implementation of 3-D seat plan views for all venues, as well as a countdown timer that indicates the time remaining until the end of contests and promotions.

The integration of social media creates a great opportunity for fans to say and share what they want. Every page on the site includes Facebook, Twitter and email icons to share at the click of a button. And event detail pages will now be integrated with live feeds from promoters’ Facebook pages, providing more information, sharing and engagement.

The website relaunch continues recent investments into improving the customer experience. The website booking flow, upgraded in late 2012, received 90% positive feedback from users. The SISTIC mobile app, launched in June 2012, has since clocked up over 180K downloads.

A unique partnership with Asiatravel has also been established, combining travel and entertainment, and offered on the SISTIC website. Anyone planning a visit to Singapore can buy event tickets, flights and accommodation at the same time and through the same site. The collaboration was formed with the objective of making SISTIC a one-stop-shop for all entertainment, including travel, and will offer more choices, packages and deals as it evolves over time.

SISTIC will continue to upgrade the site to enhance user experience, evolving organically, with continuous improvements based on customer behaviour analysis, input and feedback. The next upgrade will include online sales of event-related merchandise.

The SISTIC website carries the most comprehensive information on what to do in Singapore, including concerts and theatre productions, family attractions (Singapore Zoo, Resorts World), cultural centres (Art Science Museum, Asian Civilisation Museum), conferences and events, and of course the F1, SingTel Singapore Grand Prix. More recently, several overseas activities and attractions have been added, including LegoLand Malaysia and Indonesia’s famous Borobudur.

Suicides up in Singapore

0

The number of attempted suicides increased from 1,009 in 2011 to 1,090 in 2012.
This is an increase from 19.5 to 20.5 per 100,000 people.
The number of deaths from suicide rose from 8.1 per 100,000 people in 2011 to 10.3 in 2012.
Health Minister Gan Kim Yong revealed these figures in a written answer to Nominated MPs Laurence Lien and Faizah Jamal.
Relationship problems were associated with one-third of all suicides.
Employment issues accounted for another one-third.
This was found in a study based on Singapore’s suicide statistics from 2000-2004, said the minister.
He stressed that the government had suicide prevention measures in place.
The Health Promotion Board has a programme which trains selected tertiary students on mental health issues, including suicide prevention, to help fellow students in need.
To help prevent suicides by the elderly, there are community services such as active ageing programmes and wellness centres managed by the People’s Association that encourage socialisation and promote an active lifestyle.
Family Service Centres help people overcome their social and emotional problems and to regain stability and independence.

What concerns the Indian community in Singapore

0

By Gaurav Sharma
The minister for environment and water resources Vivian Balakrishnan and People’s Action Party (PAP) MPs Hri Kumar Nair, Vikram Nair and Janil Puthucheary, recently attended a dialogue with about 300 grass-root leaders and residents organised by Narpani Pearavai, or “Good  Activity Council”, which is an umbrella organisation of People’s Association 94 Indian Activity Executive Committees spread all over Singapore.
Vikram Nair, who represents Sembawang group representation constituency in Parliament, explained the issues concerning the Indian community in Singapore.

Little India
Little India

“The Indian community like any other race in Singapore is also concerned about high immigration which may lead to job losses for Singaporeans, affordability of healthcare, and increasing competition in the primary education. The government has already acknowledged these concerns, which is why the PM in his National Day Rally speech proposed various strategic shifts in policies,” Nair said.
“For housing, I can say only about my constituency, where because of the ethnic quota, it has become harder for the Indian community to buy an HDB flat. We have few  such appeal cases as well. Educational under- performance has always been a issue for the community but I am heartened to note that self- help groups like SINDA are doing a wonderful job on this front.”
Though repeated attempts to contact the minister Vivian Balakrishnan were unsuccessful, earlier media reports noted his comments that “employment discrimination is a key concern raised by Indian community leaders” during the dialogue.
Even the recent survey findings by Institute of Policy  Studies and OnePeople.sg have highlighted such concerns.
Narpani Pearavai, when contacted declined to comment on the matter as “the information requested do not come under their purview”, it said. Hri Kumar Nair and Janil Puthucheary were also not available for comments. On the concerns expressed relating to employment discrimination, the MOM was approached, which declined to comment.

What UN expert said on Singapore race relations

The UN Special Rapporteur on racism, Githu Muigai, visited Singapore on Government ‘s invitation between April 21-28, 2010, to gather “first-hand information on the main issues facing people living in Singapore in relation to racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.”
After eight days, and a series of meetings and discussions with Singaporeans from all walks of life, Muigai said, “The authorities have continuously and actively promoted social cohesion, religious tolerance and what they refer to as racial harmony, through a number of commendable policies and measures emphasizing tolerance, understanding and respect among the diverse ethnic and religious groups living in Singapore.”
“While there may be no institutionalised racial discrimination in Singapore, several policies have further marginalized certain ethnic groups,” he added, “this is a situation that must be acknowledged and acted upon in order to safeguard the stability, sustainability and prosperity of Singapore.”
Acknowledging the peaceful coexistence of diverse communities in Singapore as a remarkable achievement, Muigai raised various concerns relating to some “blind spots” in the policies and measures pursued by the Government in its quest for racial harmony.
These include “restrictions on public debate and discourse on the issue of ethnicity, and the importance of ethnic identity in daily life, housing, education and employment ”.
The ministry of foreign affairs (MFA), on its part, issued a press statement and clarified some issues raised by the UN expert.
Regarding restrictions on discussion of sensitive issues, the MFA said, “Here, we must emphatically disagree with Mr Muigai. Race, language and religion will always be sensitive issues in Singapore. This does not mean that they cannot be discussed, but a balance must always be struck between free expression and preservation of racial and religious harmony. This balance is only for the Singapore government to determine because only the Singapore government bears the responsibility should things go wrong.
The UN bears no such responsibility and we see no reason to take risks for the sake of an abstract principle. We believe most Singaporeans agree with the government ‘s approach.”

Confessions of a PR

0

By Abhijit Nag
Some time ago I met a Sri Lankan graduate of a Singapore university on the day he became a PR. He looked so happy.  I could understand the feeling, being a PR myself.
Foreigners are believed to come to Singapore for the money. But then they fall in love with the place. I missed Singapore when I was in India last year.  I missed the greenery, the public libraries, the temples and churches – and the food.

Singapore Flyer
Singapore Flyer

I was so happy I could watch the National Day Parade again after missing it last year.  One of my favourite moments was a glimpse of Mr Lee Kuan Yew.  Frail, rheumy-eyed, wispy-haired, but recognizably, reassuringly present.
It’s not as if I have no idea of his strict regime or his mixed views on India. I remember reading in The Straits Times that he was more keen on getting Indians from the West than Indians from India. “Contentious”, was one of the words he used for Indians from the subcontinent. But when you see Singapore, you have to admire the people who created it; and when you read Mr Lee — his books, his statements — you are impressed by the authority with which he speaks, his knowledge of the world.
In the run-up to the 2011 elections, it was said the government was freely creating new citizens who were more likely to support the PAP.
Well, if you come from India, you are likely to appreciate peaceful, prosperous Singapore and its freedom from corruption.
Singaporeans, young ones especially who have enjoyed prosperity all their lives, take this Singapore for granted and criticize any shortcomings they see.
But Singapore still allures others. Last month I went to the ICA Building – and saw so many people applying for permanent residency (PR) or to have their PR extended. Yes, foreigners still want to settle in Singapore despite growing restrictions.
The government announced last month that the PRs would have to wait for three years before they could buy a resale HDB flat. “Gap between citizen and PR widens,” said The Sunday Times in a headline.  It noted the growing gap in housing, health care and education between citizens and PRs.
Maybe the government was too generous to PRs, said a friend. Maybe.
But there might have been economic factors too. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said at the National Day Rally in 2010: “You want higher growth which will benefit our workers, that also means accepting more foreign workers to come and work in Singapore. You choke off the foreign workers, the economy is stifled, growth is not there, our workers will suffer.”
You don’t hear that any more after the government won the 2011 election with the lowest share of votes since independence. “Sustainable growth” is the new mantra, higher productivity – requiring less manpower, fewer foreign workers – the holy grail.
There will be a price to pay. About the new HDB rule for PRs, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said: “There will be some impact on the market, but eventually things will catch up again after three years.”
Singaporeans have been signalling their desire for a better work-life balance, more affordable housing and fewer foreigners for some time.
There had to be a backlash against “foreign talent”. I found the phrase embarrassing, working with far more talented Singaporeans.  The reason I was hired 25 years ago to work as a journalist was, my employer could not find enough workers in Singapore. Now every fourth Singaporean of a certain age is a university graduate.
Abhijit Nag came to Singapore to work for The New Paper when it was launched in 1988.

Government Statement on Dinesh Raman Reprehensible : Civil Society

0

The following is a media statement from the civil society members

SINGAPORE – We deplore the statement issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs in respect of the late Mr Dinesh Raman s/o Chinniah, entitled Statement regarding the case of Dinesh Raman s/o Chinniah, published on the ministry’s website on 13 September 2013.

There is a claim before the courts. The family desires to learn the facts of their son and brother’s death while in the custody of the Singapore Prison Service.  The details of the MHA press release pertaining to Mr Dinesh’s past, ostensibly in order to determine the quantum of compensation, have instead rehearsed  his past misdeeds in order to conduct a character assassination ahead of the court hearing. It is designed to swing public opinion from sympathy for the family. Moreover, these matters are irrelevant to the case before the court.

They were then repeated in the mainstream media without regard for the sensibilities of the family or basic norms of courtesy. We urge the media to show more sensitivity to the family’s situation.

The action of the ministry in publishing its press release is deeply wrong. It has done so in a way that is clearly intended to destroy Mr Dinesh’s posthumous reputation. We have no doubt that by doing so it has added to the deep grief of the family, already suffering the profound pain of their only son’s loss. It is entirely unseemly for the Ministry of Home Affairs to have done so.

As fellow citizens, we demand that the Minister for Home Affairs apologise to the family.

Leslie Chew
Priscilla Chia
Joshua Chiang
Stephanie Chok
Damien Chng
Jean Chong
Chong Kaixiong
Neth Chong
Choo Zhengxi
Fadli Bin Fawzi
Han Huihui
Gilbert Goh
Ho Choon Hiong
Kirsten Han
Russell Heng
Adrian Heok
Vanessa Ho
Dan Koh
Dana Lam
Vincent Law
Basil Lee
Lynn Lee
Corinna Lim
Lim Jialiang
Andrew Loh
Braema Mathi
Ng Yi-Sheng
Roy Ngerng
Ong Yanchun
Pak Geok Choo
Vivian Pan
Alfian Sa’at
Martyn See
Siew Kum Hong
Miak Siew
Isrizal Mohamed Isa
Shafiie Syhami
Constance Singam
Kenneth Tan
Roy Tan
Shawn Tan
Shelley Thio
Melissa Tsang
Vidula Verma
Jolovan Wham
Vincent Wijeysingha
Wong U-Wen
Terry Xu
Yap Ching Wi
Rachel Zeng