Thursday, May 8, 2025
29.2 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 5197

Cold facts of spending money on schools

0

Those parents who are moaning about today’s headlines that the Ministry of Education will cut funding to our top schools should be pinched a little harder: “Our children need air-conditioning,” said one parent. Another rich parent who sits on an independent school board and is an alumni member added:”I hope MOE isn’t bringing everyone down so that all schools are more or less equal, instead of levelling everyone up.”

Levelling up were the operative words of Education Minister Heng Swee Kiat’s Budget speech last March, when he pointed out that the government had almost doubled the investment in education – from $6.5 billion in 2003, to $11.6 billion in 2013.

From now on, the top schools, which also run the gifted education programme (where class sizes are smaller), will have government funding reduced per student. Although the top independent Singapore schools charge $200–$300 a month in school fees, any student unable to pay those fees gets help from MOE. Ordinary schools charge only $22 a month in fees.

Meanwhile, the independent and mission schools like Anglo-Chinese School Independent and International, St Andrews, Methodist Girls’ School and St Joseph’s Institution and International, have also been instructed to moderate their fund-raising activities to focus on facilities that the school really needs.

The funding saved from going to top schools is clearly needed to fulfill the Minister’s goal “to embark on a comprehensive programme to level-up our students… which is… especially important for students from disadvantaged backgrounds or who need more dedicated support”.

Spectra Secondary School is one such school, catering to the hard-to-teach students who achieved the lowest scores in the Primary School Leaving Examinations last year. These students, who are unteachable in ordinary classrooms because they are hyperactive or have attention deficit disorder (as in the case of student Justin who demanded that his teacher apologise to him for yelling at him to sit down (TISG, Jan 23rd), need specially trained teachers (of which there will be more, according to Heng).

Previously, children like Justin would have fallen by the wayside of education. Today, they will finish 10 years of school with basic literacy and numeracy skills that will make them able to function as normal young adults without being damaged by years of intolerance — and labeling as “failures — in school.

It is students like Justin – bright and lively teenagers – who need more help than the so-called “gifted” students who, being what they are, will do well in a competitive learning environment anyway.

Said Heng last year: “Students who need additional help in specific areas will be given more attention and resources… For children who lack confidence and need more structure, schools may provide small group teaching, and break the learning task into smaller parts.”

If parents of erstwhile privileged students threaten to emigrate, the ruling party should have the courage to shrug and turn their attention back to children who really need help — and funding. It will breathe life into what Heng now calls an “open and compassionate meritocracy”.

 

Why I came back to Singapore, Wong Souk Yee

0

Wong Souk Yee knows the old Singapore and the new Singapore. In 1986, wide-eyed and excited about life, she presented a play, Esperanza, at the local Art Festival Fringe.

More than a year after the staging of this play about the tyranny of an employer over her domestic worker, Wong was detained for allegedly being part of a Marxist conspiracy. The now 56-year-old was released four months later and was detained again in 1988 for 11 months.

Looking back, she laughs and says: “I didn’t even know what Marxism was at the point I was arrested.”

She never dwells on the 15 months she was detained but it opened her eyes to see the sort of society Singapore was two decades ago. And she decided to pack her bags and leave Singapore.

I could not stand this place not just because of the bad experience. I mean I was not traumatised. I just could not stand Singapore, everything was so constrained,” she says.

Wong travelled to Hong Kong and worked for several publishing houses before she left again for Australia to complete her post graduate studies in creative writing. She later lectured in Hong Kong for another three years.

More than two decades down the road, Wong finds herself back in her own country.

She talks about the new Singapore and why she decided to stay. “Singapore has changed. I came back here and I saw these young people. They are speaking up and they are not afraid. I see these protests in Hong Lim Park. We have some kind of civil society now.

Many of them [younger generation] are still spending a lot of their time on their careers and studies but there is a small section of the young people who are curious about our society and they will come forward to do voluntary work and take part in human rights activities.”

She speaks with a smile when she talks about the protest in Hong Lim Park. The most recent one involved protesters spitting on their ez-link cards.

Singapore, I think it is not the boring old place where people are afraid to speak up anymore. [In the past] when people were angry, they were only restricted to griping in the coffee shop.”

She adds that the vibrant local theatre scene also allows Singapore to be less restrictive as she remembered 20 years ago.

We like to think that plays will have some impact on people who come and watch. If it can stay in their mind and mull over these issues, then it is a small step,” Wong notes of her latest play, Square Moon.

Local playwrights like Alfian Sa’at (Kakak kau punya laki, 2013) and Platform 65 (Rites and Regulations, 2012) also depict social realities in Singapore through their plays and have resonated well with the locals.

When asked if plays can be an avenue for the freedom to express social realities that may be difficult to express in straight-laced news media, she says:

We are portraying very close to reality. I think you can go as far as you like and you see whether MDA approves it or not. I think if we are portraying what actually is happening I don’t think there is any ground for banning it. Because it happened. Mas Selamat did run away [referring to Square Moon].”

Square Moon is Wong’s re-imagination of the infamous escape of Mas Selamat from prison. Theatre, unlike news media, has the privilege of mixing reality and fiction.

Maybe we cannot say things that are untrue but because it is fictional, you may still get away with it. We are not a news report, this is a creative piece. We can still get away with a fictional piece. I don’t know, I haven’t tested the water yet. How far can we go?”

So far, Wong is happy with the changing social landscape.

Singapore-registered firm in India scandal; CEO in hospital with cancer

0

By Zafar Anjum

ComputerWorld Singapore

A Singapore-registered e-commerce company is in the eye of a storm with the Indian police accusing it of forgery, criminal conspiracy, cheating and money-circulation schemes which resulted in the loss of about $400 million . It is the business model of the company, SpeakAsia, that is at the centre of the controversy. Indian police say the company has violated the law of the land by indulging in money circulation schemes. But SpeakAsia countered by saying  its business is about “creating a panel community of empowered consumers, which earns reward points by participating in many of the company’s activities'”

To add to the drama, the company’s CEO, Manoj Kumar Sharma, 53, is being treated for cancer at the John Hopkins Singapore International Medical Centre.

Sharma’s troubles started on July 28, 2001 when the Mumbai Police’s special branch, the Economic Offences Wing (EOW),  registered a case after a client alleged that some investors had cheated him by acting in a criminal conspiracy with SpeakAsia Online Pte. Ltd., Singapore, and its CEO Haren Kaur and others “by inducing him to invest about $11,000 in a money-rolling scheme knowing that the company is a fraud and has no product”.

Mumbai  police said that those accused also cheated many other Indian investors.

The investigation revolves round the company’s e-zine sales, survey fillings, product referrals and sales, advertising-based surveys and training programmes. These activities are carried on (or they used to be) partly on SpeakAsia’s website, and partly through affiliates and authorised agents in the real world. As a result of these activities, consumers earn reward points that they can use to buy products (mobile phones, TV sets, etc) and services from the company.

Most precisely, it is the company’s business model that is at the centre of the controversy. SpeakAsia claims its business includes e-zine sales, survey fillings, product referrals and sales, advertising-based surveys, and training programmes. These activities are carried on (or they used to be) partly on SpeakAsia’s website, and partly through affiliates and authorised agents in the real world.  However, according to Indian police, this foreign-registered company has violated the law of the land by indulging in money circulation schemes.

MEETING WITH CEO SHARMA

I met Sharma at a café in Orchard Road a year ago. He said that his was not a Ponzi scheme. His wife was in Mumbai and police had impounded her passport. He could not travel to India for fear of getting arrested. All his companies’ bank accounts in India have been frozen. And he did not have much longer to live. He was in a limbo, a man on the run, living on borrowed time..

After the police filed provisional charges against SpeakAsia on Dec 19 last year, I met Sharma again — this time in the  hospital.

“We are glad that the police have filed a charge sheet,” he says. “Now we have the opportunity to explain our case before the judges.”

Why did it take Mumbai Police more than two years to file a 5,000-plus page charge sheet against the 13 office-bearers and franchisees of SpeakAsia and eight other companies?

“The charge sheet contains all the evidence that we have collected during the investigation. It was a lengthy probe. The money was collected in India, laundered in Dubai and other countries, and hence, it took time to file the charge sheet. We will be filing supplementary charge sheets too,” Rajvardhan Sinha, city EOW chief told the Times of India.   E-commerce or Ponzi scheme?

The police have said in their charge sheet that SpeakAsia is a Ponzi scheme.  It involves each investor (panellist) being given two surveys a week to complete for an annual fee of about $200. If the investor successfully completes all the surveys, he or she can get about $10,000 a year.

Sharma denies this characterisation. According to Sharma, the business of SpeakAsia is not an “investment scheme”. “There is not even an iota of evidence to suggest that SpeakAsia had asked any person to invest any money with a promise of any return. It is completely misleading and incorrect,” says Sharma.

Sharma claims that the Company’s business model is valid and legal. “Since there is no element of investment and there being various external sources of income, there is no question of this business model being considered a Ponzi or money-circulation scheme which is banned under Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1979,” he says.

India’s direct selling industry, however, welcomed the SpeakAsia probe by the police. ”The SpeakAsia controversy had raised doubts over the modus operandi of other direct and multi-level marketing companies that have been flourishing in India for 15-20 years,” reported the Business Standard. India Direct Selling Association (IDSA) secretary general Chavi Hemanth told the newspaper: “We have long been requesting the Ministry of Commerce to frame a clear definition of a direct selling company to bring out clarity in the industry. The way the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) had formulated a detailed wholesale policy in 2010 and set FDI limits for retail in 2005, why can’t we have a similar policy for the direct selling industry as well? We need the government to come out with a policy to regulate the industry.”

3 Common Motivational Sayings (That Keep You Poor)

0
Meditation

In any self-help book, you tend to find the same suggestion: that optimism and motivational sayings are more important than actual talent (though admittedly, that does explain some managers I’ve met). For the most part, motivational cliches are just harmless, feel-good gibberish. But watch for these three, which have a tendency to keep you poor:

 

Positive thought can help with financial problems. For example, it helps you starve to death less painfully.

1.Working Outside the System Will Make You Rich

This is usually accompanied by terms like “originality” and “out of the box thinking”.

Now I won’t deny that sometimes, this kind of thinking results in getting rich. Hey, someone had to start the tablet craze, and the first auction site. But I’ll let you in on a little secret:

If an idea is so ‘outside the system’ that no one’s done it, chances are high that no one needs it.

I’m not saying you’re 100% wrong about it being a good idea, but you probably are. There’s also a kind of fallacious romance behind this: some Steve Jobs-wannabe defies convention, and manages to beat the odds. But consider the financial reality of “working outside the system”:

Apple is a multi-million dollar company that wouldn’t have collapsed, even if the iPad had failed. Remember Apple Maps?They also have a huge customer base, who would buy a hobo’s armpit drippings if Apple stamped a logo on it. Likewise, if Google or Virgin chooses to “work outside the system”, their top managers can fail at a dozen edgy projects without needing a second mortgage.

“Outside the box”…yeah it kind of loses meaning after the house is repossessed.

I doubt the same applies to you.

If you work outside the system, you will fail more often than you succeed. There is no “super genius” that emerges just because you’re being a rebel. The universe, contrary to self-help gurus, does not give a monkey’s ass about how individual you’re being.

Working outside the system can make you poor and keep you there, if you repeatedly throw time and money behind improbable ventures. If you want to do things outside the system, do so at reasonable cost to yourself. Don’t empty your life savings on a start-up just because an idea seems innovative. It has to relate to an actual need.

2. Your Job Should Be Your Passion

If you follow your passion, the money will follow”.

That’s true, but notice the saying doesn’t mention how much money. If your passion is writing Twilight fan fiction, I’m sure someone out there will chuck a few dollars (or a brick in my case) your way; but don’t count on it covering the down payment for your flat.

As our sometime HR consultant Angeline Seah says: “Some passions are more lucrative than others.”

Almost every hobby can earn you some amount of money. But unless you’re lucky enough to have a hobby in demand (e.g. you like developing apps, or get a nerdgasm when discussing the Capital Asset Pricing Model), don’t assume your passion will send money running after you like an attention starved puppy.

Tons of paperworkWell I have to admit, working here has ignited my passion…for assisted suicide.

Some of the biggest money-making things you do in life will involve no passion. This is true for most people. I’ve written corporate journals about ball bearings and gotten paid tons for it, but I don’t exactly talk about it in excited squeals.

If you want to make money through passion, re-frame this saying: Your passion gives you the stamina to endure the dullest, most excruciating job. You may hate compiling reports or making Power Points. But if the income fuels a cause you love, you can probably bear it.

Never assume that directly indulging in your passion will bring you money. Sometimes, feeding your passion means doing a whole bunch of things that aren’t relevant to it. Don’t hesitate just because you want to be picky.

3. If You Just Visualize Having Money, You’ll Attract It

I’m not going to mention the bestseller that’s currently associated with this one. Suffice it to say this isn’t an original idea, and it’s been mentioned (in various forms) in a dozen NLP books.

The general idea is that, by visualizing yourself being rich, you will attract money. Never mind that studies show the opposite is more probable. Since no one reads the academic references I link to, here’s a few choice lines:

Positive fantasies that idealize the future are found to be inversely related to achievement over time: the more positively the fantasies are experienced, the less effort do people invest in realizing these fantasies, and the lower is their success in achieving them.”

pay checkWell, maybe you could just “visualize” getting the money instead of banking it in?

The fantasizing (visualization) makes you complacent. Because you already spent all that energy imagining, you’re less likely to go and enroll in a financial awareness course. Or to start mapping prospects for your side-business, or take up certification courses to advance your career.

You feel good when you’re visualizing, but it all falls to nothing after a few months.

Now there may be some upside to positive thinking, but apply a bit of common sense here: if you could attain things by just visualizing them, you should be able to hammer out a Clapton solo on a guitar without any lessons. So instead of visualizing money, just actually go out and start getting some.

If you have no idea where to start, try asking us on Facebook. Our methods are more…drivel free.

Image Credits:
crdotx, Felixe, Alan Cleaver, liewcf

Source: http://www.moneysmart.sg/money-talks/3-common-motivational-sayings-that-keep-you-poor/

It’s time Bumiputeras learn something from Lee’s One Singapore

Photo by Hussein Shaharuddin/The Mole - Source
Photo by Hussein Shaharuddin/The Mole – Source

In May this year, the incumbent Prime Minister Najib Razak led Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, which has governed Malaysia since 1957, was re-elected for the thirteenth time in a row. The record 85 percent voter turnout gave BN 133 out of 222 parliamentary seats, with the remaining going to Anwar Ibrahim led Pakatan Rakyat (PR), a three-party opposition coalition. But more importantly, BN secured only 47 percent of the popular vote, which is its worst-ever electoral performance. Analysts have thus argued that if another election victory is an endorsement of government’s strong performance under the Economic Transformation Programme, BN’s shrinking voter base is a timely reminder for PM Najib to pay heed to PR’s election rallying-cry of “ubah” or “change” in BN’s policies of Malay racism.

After Singapore separated from Malaysia, the then Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew made Singapore a multiracial meritocracy where “everybody will have his place: equal; language, culture, religion”, as noted by him during the pledge he took on August 9, 1965. Contrary, Malaysia embarked on affirmative-action policies favouring the ethnic-Malay majority [Bumiputeras as coined by Tunku Abdul Rahman meaning “sons of the soil”] over a quarter population of Chinese Malaysians and about 8 percent Indian Malaysians.

These policies, while generating a strong rural support base for The United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) that dominates BN, alienated the Chinese and other voters. These are also deemed to be the root cause of corruption and cronyism plaguing the Malaysian society right now. Even though in his year-long election campaign, Najib tried to woo the younger and liberal urban voters by beginning to dismantle some of the Bumiputeras policies, UMNO, led by former PM Mahathir Mohamad, was still as racially divisive as ever in the Malay rural heartlands. Najib too spoke of a “Chinese tsunami” that had hit BN after the elections, and stressed on the need for a period of “national reconciliation” in Malaysia.

Though not entirely true, Najib assertions are not without substance. The Chinese-based parties in the BN, namely Malaysian Chinese Association, Gerakan and Sarawak United People’s Party won only nine seats while the opposition ethnic-Chinese Democratic Action Party swept 38 of the 51 seats it contested. Also, the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) – a component of the ruling BN, won just four out of the nine seats it contested. Twice as much Indian candidates won from the opposition PR.

What is noteworthy is that BN lost seats in predominantly Malay seats even in the urban areas, indicating an urban-rural divide to go along with the predominant racial element in the elections. So much so that Mahathir who expressed shocked at BN’s performance in the elections blamed it on “greedy” Malays and “ungrateful” Chinese. The local media has not helped either. The UMNO-aligned newspaper, Utusan Malaysia, published an article posing the question Apa lagi Cina mahu [“What else do the Chinese want”] just after the elections.

Contrast this to Singapore, where Malays enjoy constitutional protection as a minority and authorities have time and again expressed commitment to treat them with “extra care”.

Article 152 of Singapore’s constitution states,“ Minorities and Special Position of Malays: It shall be the responsibility of the government constantly to care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities in Singapore. The government shall exercise its functions in such manner as to recognise the special position of the Malays who are the indigenous people of Singapore and, accordingly, it should be the responsibility of the government to protect, safeguard, support, foster, promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests and the Malay language.”

The constitutional guarantee and Singapore’s ingrained multiracial approach is good, “but there is clearly much that can be improved”, as noted by The Strait Times Managing Editor Han Fook Kwang in his commentary, Race politics all over again, published after the Malaysian elections in his newspaper. Few measures that Han proposes include proper representation of Malays in key institutions in Singapore, and strict action against those who discriminate against minorities in jobs and homes to rent.

Lee Kuan Yew too while speaking in parliament in 2009 said,” Our constitution spells out the duty of the government to treat Malays and other minorities with extra care.” While referring to the pledge he took in 1965, Lee added that it’s an aspiration which Singapore must keep trying to achieve. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also alluded to the issue last year in his address at the  Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP) third convention. “The Malay-Muslim community (MMC) has done well in Singapore’s merit-based system and without affirmative action.”

The MMC itself has identified various areas where it needs improvement.

The AMP, in its convention journal, The Next Decade: Strengthening Our Community’s Architecture, highlighted some worrying trends in the community. These include demographic challenges [decrease in percentage of population], competition with other communities and immigrants for scholarships and jobs, cheaper foreign labour presenting competition to the Malay lower-waged worker, widening income gap between the MMC and other communities, Malay students’ performance in the key examinations being below the national benchmarks, increasing number of divorce cases among both youth and middle-aged couples, increase in actual number of drug abusers, crime and delinquency among Malay youths, and community’s disproportionate representation in major chronic diseases.

http://newzzit.com/stories/its-time-bumiputeras-learn-something-from-lees-one-singapore

Citizenship and Other Unbelievable Things You Can Buy For The Price of a Car in Singapore

0
3522282831_6ce46891e6_o

You read that right. Buying citizenship in a certain Caribbean nation costs about as much as a new car in Singapore. Hell, you might even have $20,000-$180,000+ left over, depending on whether you buy a practical Mazda 6, or a fancy BMW 5-Series. But citizenship isn’t the only thing you can “drive off” with for the price of a car in Singapore.

I can think of a couple other choices that’ll have you questioning why the hell you’re paying up to $300,000 for something that decreases 10% in value every year and costs several thousand dollars to operate annually (fuel, insurance, parking, taxes, etc.).

Here a few purchasing alternatives you that’ll have you laughing, crying, or both:

1. A New Passport: The Commonwealth of Dominica

Cost: $130,000+

You can buy “economic citizenship” in The Commonwealth of Dominica with a one-time “donation” of $130,000. I know, some of you are thinking “we can’t have dual citizenship!” Relax! I’m not proposing that you jump off Sampan 2.0 to move to a Caribbean island that’s about the same size as Singapore, but with 98.5% less people (pop. 71.6K) and numerous economic benefits.

I’m just trying to point out that buying Dominica citizenship is an outrageous purchase, especially when you consider that citizens get these benefits:

  • Tax Haven Status: You don’t need to wealth taxes (capital gains, inheritance tax, etc.) or taxes on foreign income.
  • Complete Discretion: Your banking and financial asset details won’t be reported to your home country. In fact, Dominica won’t even inform your home country that you’re a citizen!
  • No National Service: You’re not required to serve in the military… unless you really want to sign up.
  • Very Business Friendly: Your international business ventures, especially with the U.S., won’t be hindered by restrictive economic policies.
  • Visa Free Travel: You can travel to more than 90 nations around the world including the U.K., Hong Kong, South Korea, and Turkey.
  • You Can Reside In Your Home Country: You remain a citizen even if you’re not living in Dominica.
  • English is the National Language: You won’t have to worry about learning Spanish or French (thankfully).

If you’re curious about the application process, you can check out Dominica’s citizenship application page here.

*Bonus: Can I have a house with that? – Did I mention that property in Dominica is ridiculously cheap too? You can buy a decent 3-Room home by the ocean for about $120,000 SGD+ plus taxes, duties, and fees. As a citizen, you’ll also be exempt from paying the 10% Alien Landholding License on property.

2. A Golf Trip: 44-day golfing tour across 15 destinations with the chance to WIN a car

 

Cost: $220,000+

Ah, golfing! The sport of kings… or is that horse racing? Anyway, I bet the cost of this little “trip” is already sending you into cardiac arrest if you’ve got a weak heart. But before you shuffle off this mortal coil, stay with me for a minute – because this isn’t just any golfing trip.

It’s a once in a lifetime experience that’s part luxurious round the world (RTW) holiday, and part PGA tour-style competition against other golfers to win guess what? A BMW Z4!

Here’s what the $220,000+ “dream” golf trip gets you:

    • First-Class Travel & Accomodation: You’ll be travelling, lodging, and dining in “First Class” throughout the entirety of your golf trip. Not only that, you’ll be taken on excursions at each destination to see the sights such at each location (ex. Taj Mahal in India) or participate in activities such as wine tasting or humanitarian work.
    • Golfing Round the World: You’ll be golfing in 15 exotic destinations across the globe including Las Vegas, Peru, Easter Island, Tahiti, Samoa, Fiji, New Zealand, Australia, Angkor Wat, India, Dubai, Zambia, South Africa, Buenos Aires, and St Maarten.
    • The PGA Experience: If you spend more time on the “green” than you do in the office, this holiday is perfect for you. You’ll feel like you’re a PGA pro going up against 59 other participants from around the world. Not only that, the tournament will be hosted by PGA champion Keith Clearwater, who’ll be there to give golfing tips to everyone.
    • You Can Win a Car: If you’re a golfer with a handicap that’s good enough to win the car, you’ll basically get the holiday “free of charge” since the BMW Z4 costs about $220,000 anyway.

Of course, if you can’t distinguish a golf club from a back scratcher, it’s probably wiser to just buy the car if that’s what you really want. But if your golfing skills are, to quote my colleagues, “power,” it might be worth joining.

If you’re interested in going on the “ultimate” golf trip, you can sign up here.

3. A New Oceanfront Condo: 3-Room/3.5-Bathrooms Penthouse in Ecuador

4539337826_fd5073b2d7_o

Cost: $280,000+

Every property investor in the world knows that the housing market in Singapore is as good as gold, especially if you’re buying a condo or landed property. But after prices grew as monstrously as kaiju from Pacific Rim, the government brought prices down with a series of cooling measures.

But lower property prices are good right?

For sellers and developers… no. But for people looking to buy a home, it’s definitely a buyer’s market. In fact, you can even buy a new 3-Room condo for around $1,200 per square foot (psf)!

A couple of years ago, such as price would’ve been unheard of – but as good as this is, the cost of a car might barely be able to cover the down payment.

But for the price of a new BMW 5-Series, you can buy a new 3-Room oceanfront condo in Ecuador. To put this ridiculously cheap purchase in perspective, let’s compare this oceanfront condo in Ecuador against an oceanfront condo in Changi Village:

Plaza Del Sol– Manta, Ecuador Ocean Front Suites– Changi Village
Rooms/Bathrooms 3-Rooms/3.5 Bathrooms 3-Rooms/2 Bathrooms
Living Space 807 sqft 1,099 sqft
Features
  • Air Conditioning
  • Gym
  • Spa/Hot Tub(s)
  • Personal Jacuzzi (with penthouse)
  • Beach Access
  • Swimming Pool(s)
  • 24/7 Guard
  • Clubhouse w/bar
  • Tennis/Basketball Courts
  • Fully Furnished
  • Air Conditioning
  • 999-year Leasehold
  • Close to Changi Airport, Pasir Ris Park, and shops (Giant/IKEA)
  • Swimming Pool
  • Bomb Shelter
View View of the ocean with beach access (minus cargo ships ruining the view) View of the ocean but with the added bonus of seeing cargo ships on the horizon
Price PSF $346.96 psf $1,510.38 psf
Total Price $280,000+ $1,659,910

I don’t know about you, but if I had a choice between buying a car and a condo by the ocean… well, the answer’s simple for three reasons: 1) its an oceanfront property 2) you can make rental income from it and 3) unlike cars, a property investment won’t drop 10% in value every year!

Final Note: You still want to buy a car? Well, I certainly won’t stop you. But I can definitely offer you some advice on how to save money on buying a car, car insurance, and petrol costs. Speaking of car insurance, make sure to check out Smartinsurance.sg to find the right policy for your budget.

Shocked? Tell us what you really think on Facebook! And to find even more useful information on everything personal finance, visit MoneySmart today!

Image Credits:
palestrina55, shoebappa,

Hota, presumed consent scheme for organ transplant in Singapore

0

HOTA is a presumed consent scheme. It allows for the corneas, heart, kidney, and liver of all Singapore citizens and Permanent Residents (PRs), 21 years and above, who have not opted out of HOTA and are not mentally disordered, to be removed for donation upon death.

HOTA opt-out form
HOTA opt-out form

The Act was first enacted in 1987, before which the deceased donor kidney transplantation in Singapore was only about five per year. Initially, it allowed only for the kidneys of all non-Muslim citizens and PRs between the ages of 21 to 60, to be donated in the event of accidental death for transplantation.

This was amended in 2004 when the regulation of all living-donor transplantations in Singapore was also included under the purview of HOTA. The Act’s reach was extended to include liver, heart and corneas, and all other causes of death along with accidents. It was amended again in August, 2008, to include all Muslim Singapore citizens and PRs who were earlier excluded from the Act.

Most recently, on November 1, 2009, the upper age limit of 60 years was also removed to give HOTA its present shape.

According to Live On – a social awareness and education programme by the Ministry of Health (MOH), “The period, from the enactment of HOTA in 1987 to its amendment in 2004, witnessed 222 patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation. Subsequently, from 2004 until 2012, another 359 kidney patients benefited from such a transplant.”

Apart from efforts through Live On, which MOH hopes “will go beyond educating the public about HOTA as it aims to build up societal consciousness and acceptance of organ donation as an acceptable, generous act of goodness after one’s death”, the ministry also “informs the general public of HOTA twice a year through the main local newspapers in the four official languages”.

History of transplants in Singapore
The history of organ transplantation in Singapore dates back to 1970 when the first cadaveric kidney transplant was performed. Later, on July 6, 1990, a team of doctors from Singapore General Hospital successfully carried out the first heart transplant here. The donor was a fatal industrial accident victim, while the recipient was a 59-years-old suffering from terminal heart disease. Soon after that, on September 29, doctors from the National University Hospital performed Singapore’s first liver transplant on a female production worker. Now, the National Heart Centre performs all deceased donor heart transplants in Singapore and provides post-transplant care for recipients. Also, while Singapore started lung transplant programme in 2000, only 9 lung transplants have been performed till 2009 due to the strict medical criteria and suitability of lung donors.

The MOH sends letters to all citizens and PRs when they turn 21 to indicate their inclusion in HOTA. Such letters are send to all new citizens and PRs as well. They are also informed about their option of opting out and its implications through these communications.

Regarding implications on opting out of HOTA, MOH informs that “anyone who opts out of HOTA receives lower priority on the organ transplant waiting list should he require an organ transplant in the future. This will be specific to the organs which he opted out of”.

The MOH has established a National Organ Transplant Unit, which oversees organ donation and transplantation activities on a national level and maintains the organ donor registry.

The MOH also mandates that every organ transplant must satisfy two major criteria. Firstly, there must not be any financial inducement or emotional coercion involved while donating an organ. And secondly, the donor must be thoroughly briefed on the nature and consequences of the medical procedures involved in the transplantation.

Besides HOTA, which is a “presumed consent” scheme, Singapore also has an “opt-in scheme”, the Medical Therapy, Education and Research Act (MTERA). Under this, people who are 18 years old and above can pledge to donate their organs and tissues (for example kidney, liver, heart, cornea, lung, bone, skin, heart valves, etc.) for transplantation, education or research upon death. This Act also gives family members of the deceased the right to donate his or her organs under MTERA upon death if they wish to do so.

While HOTA covers only the corneas, heart, kidney, and liver, for the purpose of transplantation, MTERA’ scope is extended to all the body parts. MTERA also includes other purposes such as education and research along with transplantation under its ambit.

But despite all the above efforts, about 516 patients [457 for kidneys alone] are currently on the wait list for organ transplants in Singapore. The median waiting time for a kidney transplant was 9 years in 2009. In 2012, 22 patients died as they didn’t get a suitable organ match, and 57 were taken off the list as their condition worsened and they became unsuitable for a transplant.

Year 2012

Deceased donor organ transplants

Living donor organ transplants

Waiting list for organ transplants

Kidney

23

28

457

Liver

11

10

23

Heart

2

13

Cornea

365

23

Courtesy: Live On

Note: All information in this story is courtesy MOH and its awareness portal on HOTA, Live On.

http://newzzit.com/stories/hota-presumed-consent-scheme-for-organ-transplant-in-singapore

The routes to good food

0

From the very minute you board the bus to when you alight at your desired destination, you would have zipped by and counted at least 10 hawker centres, cafes, restaurants and kooky diners.

The search for mouth-watering food that gratifies the stomach and soul does not necessarily have to be by foot or by memory. Try these bus services.

SBS Bus #16

Uncover a dizzying array of food places ranging from traditional hawker centres to boutique cafes and restaurants with bus service 16. Bus service 16 plys two of Singapore’s most famous food streets, East Coast Road and Joo Chiat Road. Oh, not forgetting to mention the Vietnamese and Filipino restaurants along Joo Chiat Road that serve homemade food like the crispy spring rolls, Vietnamese-style fish soup and crispy pata.

Starting Point: Bedok Bus Interchgange End: Bukit Merah Central

Famous eating places: C. Nai Hong Kong Cafe, Killiney Kopitiam, Mellvin Restaurant, Ting Yeang Restaurant, Dunman Food Centre, Kway Guan Huat Joo Chiat Popia, Immigrants Cafe, Thunder Tea Rice, Tong Seng Coffee Shop, Tian Tian Hainanese Chicken Rice, Sin Heng Claypot Bak Koot Teh, The Beef House, Fei Fei Wanton Noodles, Lau Hock Guan Kee, Da Dong Prawn Noodle, Phong Viet and Casa Bom Veto.

SBS Bus #33

Chinatown is the only place in Singapore where you will get to see traditional medical halls, grab cultural antiques, ethnic costumes and gewgaws. It is also the place to savour authentic Chinese cuisine along with a refreshing cup of pu er tea. Bus service 33 brings you to this ethnic Chinese enclave that is forever bustling with people from morning to night.

This bus service also takes you to Tembeling Lane in the heritage district of Joo Chiat, where you will uncover the city-state’s most talked about wanton noodle stall, seafood restaurant and porridge stall: 128 Hong Mao Wanton Noodles, Kim’s Seafood restaurant and Teck Teochew Porridge.

Starting Point: Bedok Bus Interchange End: Kent Ridge Terminal

Famous eating places: Song Fa Bak Kut Teh, Teck Teochew Porridge, 128 Eating Corner – Hong Mao Wanton Noodles, Kim’s Noodle and Seafood restaurant, Old Airport Road Food Centre, Da Dong Restaurant, Fatty Weng restaurant, Moi Lum restaurant, Zam Zam, Mosi Cafe and Annalakshimi.

SMRT Bus #190

Long, snaking queues at bus interchanges often make the headlines, thanks to citizen journalism website STOMP, but there could be a possible answer as to why bus 190 is deserving of media attention: tasty food. Plying one of the city-state’s oldest and longest bus routes, bus service 190 takes you to a couple of great food places along Hill Street, Eu Tong Sen Street in the heritage district of Chinatown and New Bridge Road that has been extensively covered by international travel and lifestyle magazines.

Starting Point: Tampines Bus Interchange End: Choa Chu Kang

Famous eating places: Song Fa Bak Kut Teh, Le Chasseur Zi Char restaurant, Funan Centre Food Court, Ssikkek Korean BBQ Buffet, The Gourmet Pie Company and Tiong Shan Porridge Centre.

SMRT Bus #67   

Hopping on board this bus service in search for good food island-wide is akin to journeying from the East to West and vice-versa, West to East. Bus service 67 takes you from Choa Chu Kang to Tampines. You will definitely discover countless eating places during your three-hour bus ride.

If you are craving beef hor fun and frogs leg porridge, hop on bus service 67 to get to Geylang. This bus service plies the Little Red Dot’s notorious red light district where a bevy of tantalising “wok-fried” or zi char food places are located. En route to Tampines Bus Interchange, this bus service also passes by Bedok North Avenue 3 where popular eastern Thai restaurant Nakhon Kitchen is.

Starting Point: Choa Chu Kang Bus Interchange End: Tampines Bus Interchange

Famous eating places: Heng Kee House of Steamed Fish, Eminent Frog Porridge, Lion City Frog Porridge, Tiong Shan Frog Porridge, G7 Sin Ma Live Seafood restaurant, Tian Tian Porridge and Nakhon Kitchen.

SBS Bus #10

Soccer fans and punters will definitely know this bus service like the back of their palm – Bus Service 10 stops at the foothill of Bedok Simpang.

But that’s not all this bus service has to offer: bus 10 also takes the ravenous to Upper East Coast Road, Parkway Parade and, of course, and the popular hawker centre, Lau Pa Sat.

Starting Point: Tampines Bus Interchange End: Kent Ridge Terminal

Famous eating places: Bedok Simpang and Lau Pa Sat

 

Private vs. Public Housing in Singapore: What are the Main Differences?

0
Flats

Welcome to the world’s most expensive housing market. If you want your own house in Singapore, then you are one bank loan away from rationing individual bee hoon strands. On the upside, expensive housing can also mean big pay offs. Check out MoneySmart’s primer on private vs. public housing, before making your purchase:

 

Housing is very affordable in our country. Those trees provide great shelter.

Defining Private Property

In Singapore, residential properties fall into two broad categories: public housing (HDB flats), and private housing. In the context of this article, private housing refers to:

  • Condominiums
  • Landed Property, and
  • Executive Condominiums

Executive Condominiums (ECs) are only treated as “fully” private properties from the 11th year onward. Before that, ECs are subject to some of the rules of public housing.

The most notable differences between private and public housing are:

  • Home Loan Restrictions
  • Resale Restrictions
  • Possibility of Freehold
  • Eligibility of Grants

1. Home Loan Restrictions

No, sign the other copy. This is to wrap up your redundant organs for the down payment.

All forms of private housing, including ECs (even before their 11th year) can only be financed by bank loans (or financial institutions like Hong Leong Finance). There is no HDB concessionary loan. (We discussed bank loans vs. HDB loans in another article). To recap, the differences to expect are:

Down Payment And Cash Requirements:

For private housing, you can only borrow up to a maximum of 80% (of the purchase price). For that, you need to be prepared to pay an absolute minimum of 5% in cash. Minimum cash requirements can be substantially higher (up to 25%), after considering factors like your CPF balance, Debt Servicing Ratio (DSR), etc.

For public housing, you can borrow up to 90% (from HDB) and get away with $0 cash down payment (by paying everything via CPF). HDB BTOs are a good example. Option fees for HDB BTOs are also a flat amount of $2,000 regardless of the unit you are purchasing. This is different from private properties where you pay 1% for the option fee. Best of all, the money will be refunded once you exercise your option.

Home Loan Interest Rate Structures:

Banks don’t provide perpetual fixed rates, because of complex financial reasons like “So…What are you going to do about it?”

Home loan packages from banks always revert to floating (fluctuating) interest rates after three to five years. If you buy private housing, you must know the basics of home loan interest rates, and how to refinance regularly to keep them low.

If you’re still confused, the mortgage specialists at SmartLoans.sg can advise you for free.

While public housing can give you a perpetual fixed rate (through HDB loans), do note that the HDB loan has been more expensive than bank loans over the last 5 years. HDB’s current rate is 2.6%, compared to an average of around 1.7% among banks.

2. Resale Restrictions

HDB FlatsDid you know? Resale restrictions are the leading cause of savage attacks on noisy neighbours!

Public housing comes with a Minimum Occupancy Period (MOP). You have to live in the property for five years before you can rent out the whole flat, or sell it. If you think you can leave it empty for 5 years while you are working overseas, the fine print also states you need to be based in Singapore. There is also a resale levy. This reduces the amount of your housing grants (subsidies) when you buy another public housing unit.

For private housing, the is no MOP, but your main worry is the Seller Stamp Duty (SSD). You have to pay this if you sell your private housing within the first four years:

  • Sold within the 1st Year – 16% stamp duty
  • Between 1st and 2nd Year – 12% stamp duty
  • Between 2nd and 3rd Year – 8% stamp duty
  • Between 3rd Year and 4th Year – 4% stamp duty
  • More Than 4 Years – No SSD

There’s no restriction on when you can sell private property; it’s just a question of whether you can handle the SSD.

3. Freehold versus Leasehold

21st birthday cakeWe’re passing everything down to you. That’s why your present is this month’s mortgage bill.

HDB flats are on a 99 year leasehold. For private property, you might find freehold land. It’s also possible for some properties, dating back to the Colonial Administration, to have a 999 year lease.

So far, few properties have come close to the 99 year lease expiry. But if your definition of home includes words like “ancestral”, then private is what you want. Some people also believe in land-scarce Singapore, freehold properties will continually rise in value over their leasehold counterparts. For details on how freehold affects property values, follow us on Facebook.

4. Eligibility of Grants

Obviously, private housing doesn’t come with government grants. Right?

Eh, kind of. This gets a bit sticky with regard to ECs.

Although ECs are financed by bank loans, and become private on the 11th year, you can still get grants for buying them. Grants from ECs range from $5,000 to $30,000, based on your income level. That’s one of the main reasons for their popularity; it’s the only form of private housing that’s subsidised by the government.

Final Two Key Points to Note

BungalowDon’t worry. If some locals are unhappy, it’ll be big enough for them to fight a civil war in.

Landed Property and Foreigners

Foreigners need the government’s permission to buy landed property. This comes from the Land Dealings (Approval) Unit (LDAU). Foreigners also cannot purchase HDB flats unless they are marrying a Singaporean.

There is no restrictions on foreigners purchasing condos. They just need to pay a hefty 15% ABSD (Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty).

Upgrading to Private Housing Under Construction (Excluding ECs)

Let’s say you’re upgrading from a HDB flat to a private condo. And you have one massive problem: the condo is still under-construction and will only be ready for move-in 3 years later.

In order to get 80% financing for your condo, you cannot have an existing home loan so you will need to sell off your flat (bank loans are capped at 50% if you have an outstanding home loan). That’s a problem, because now you’ll have no flat, and your new condo will only be ready 3 years down the road.

This is why most people avoid upgrading to private properties that are still being developed, no matter how much the developer discounts are. Prepare to rent or move in with your folks until the condo is finished.

Note: As the header of this section states, this problem does not apply when upgrading to Executive Condominiums as banks can grant buyers a “conditional 80%” loan. This means you can be granted the full 80% today for your new EC so long as you sell of your current property within 6 months of the ECs TOP.

So whether you are upgrading to a private or executive condominium, you can speak to the friendly mortgage specialists at SmartLoans.sg who can ensure that you secure the best home loan that’s right for you.

Image Credits:
hazylium, nerdcoregirl, Phillipe Put, theambitiousdiaries, soham_pablo,

Source: http://www.moneysmart.sg/housing-property/private-vs-public-housing-in-singapore-what-are-the-main-differences/

Why You Can Never Get a Cab When You Need One

0
Taxi driver

One of the great mysteries of the Universe is Singapore’s taxis. Why are there loads of them when you don’t need them, but virtually nonexistent when you do? How do they warp time so they’re changing shift exactly when you start looking for them? What mysterious allergy to water makes them burrow underground and vanish when it rains? I blew $45 on cab rides to ask five taxi drivers:

 

“I’m not choosy, but blue and red is a terrible wardrobe combination. Get out.”

The Main Issues of Taxi Availability

Before we get into this, I need to explain the relationship between taxi drivers and taxi companies. I’ve covered it in earlier articles, but here’s a quick rehash:

A taxi company does not make its revenue directly from passengers. When you pay the fare in a Comfort cab, the money doesn’t go to Comfort. It goes to the taxi driver. How much the taxi driver earns is his own business – the more people he wants to pick up, the more he’ll earn.

The taxi companies – Comfort, SMRT, CitiCab and so on – make their money by charging the taxi drivers, not the passengers.

This is done through a daily rental fee, which is paid by the drivers. Depending on the car model, the price will vary. So the old beat up Toyota Crowns can be as cheap as $80 a day, whereas the more luxurious models can reach around $130 a day.

In theory, this should motivate taxi drivers to pick up as many passengers as they can. Based on conversations with five taxi drivers though, there are some flaws in the system:

  • Accident Risks in Rain
  • Picking Up the Sloshed
  • Choosing to Earn Less
  • Problems with Heavy Baggage

1. Accident Risks in Rain

Drive taxis in the rain? Too dangerous. Fly a huge ass airplane in the rain? Go right ahead.

I spoke to a driver named Cheok, who agreed it was harder to get taxis in the rain.

A lot of drivers don’t like to drive during heavy rain,” he says, “because it’s very dangerous. When you drive a taxi, you may not know the place the passenger is going, so the road is not familiar. If you already don’t know the way very well, you still want to drive in the heavy rain some more?”

Cheok added that risks outweighed the income:

I get into an accident two times, I can lose my job. Also I will bear the cost of the damages, liable up to $2,000. If you were me, will you risk losing your job or $2,000 to earn the taxi fare? It’s not worth it.”

Cheok added that, when there are heavy rains, taxi drivers want to avoid flood prone areas:

Farrer Park, Alexandra Road, Nee Soon…all these places a lot of us don’t like to go during heavy rain. If there is a flood, and you drive your taxi into it, you are responsible. Any maintenance issues, you are the one who has to pay.”

2. Picking Up the Sloshed

Drunk guy on the grass“Drive him home, take him up to the 22nd floor, put him in bed, and clean the puke off the seats. Here’s $12″.

Say you’re utterly smashed, and can’t stand without two of your buddies propping you up. You need a taxi to get home, more than ever. But the next cab you flag down just zooms past. Why?

“It’s the same with a drunk friend and your own car,” says long time taxi driver George (not his real name), “You know he is going to vomit, or be rowdy, and you also will not want to take him.

I have plastic bags, but you think that helps? When they are drunk they will just vomit without warning. And after that I spend more than one hour cleaning. For the sake of one passenger, I give up two or three more.”

3. Choosing to Earn Less

Ever get the sense that half or just two-thirds of all the taxis are on the road? You may be right. George explains that some taxi drivers aren’t as driven (see what I did there?) for the money:

You have some taxi drivers who really need the money, and you have some who are retirees who are just doing it to stay active. The retirees don’t need to push themselves too hard. Once they hit a certain quota for the day, they go home and sleep. Even if they can earn more, they are not so eager.

Wait, just retirees?

No, some young ones are also like that. They are more interested in their family time, or they want to go out and KTV or whatever. Some of them are not willing to give up an hour just to earn another $50.”

4. Problems with Heavy Baggage

Giant rock in a boxOn the upside, Uncle, it’s not fragile.

Lugging heavy bags? Look like a pack mule going over the high Sierras? Don’t expect all taxi drivers to slow down and help. According to taxi Pang, who’s been driving for two years:

As part of our service, we need to get out and help to load the things in the car. If the passenger helps a bit it’s okay. But some of them will just stand there and watch you. For people like me, I am already almost 60. I have ever gotten back injuries before.

At least they should help a bit. But most of them will not; when I see someone with so many bags, I also hesitate to pick them up.”

What Can We Do?

The issue is with the nature of taxi companies’ business models. We can’t expect taxi drivers to take certain risks – e.g. road accidents in the rain – for the fares they’re getting. There’s also no way to force taxi drivers to pick up more passengers; it’s about their own motivation. We will explore more regarding COE allocation for taxis and how this impacts drivers and taxi companies so stay tuned with us on Facebook!

Image Credits:
tallkev, Simon_sees, Oneras, cobalt123,

Source: http://www.moneysmart.sg/money-talks/why-you-can-never-get-a-cab-when-you-need-one/