Sunday, June 22, 2025
30.7 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 1293

ELD has new oath of secrecy form for presidential elections — no longer need to read out section to oath-taker

0
ELD has new oath of secrecy form for presidential elections — no longer need to read out section to oath-taker
Photo: Google Maps / Elections Department at Prinsep Link

by Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss

Back in March 2023, I wrote about my beef with the way the oath of secrecy for Singaporean elections was required to be taken. 

The oath of secrecy for presidential elections (Form P13) was as follows: “I, the abovenamed person, swear that I will not at this election do anything forbidden by section 36 of the Presidential Elections Act which has been read to me.”

Form P13 had a footnote as follows:

“Section 36 of the Presidential Elections Act (printed overleaf) must be read to the person taking the Oath. No stamp fee is required.”

The form of the oath of secrecy for parliamentary elections (Form 18) is similar.

My complaint was with the outdated requirement to read out an entire section comprising 500 words of legalese to the person taking the oath of secrecy. 

Umpteen amendments and tweaks have been made to how parliamentary and presidential elections are conducted. Yet, the form of the oath of secrecy had remained essentially unchanged from its original form enacted in colonial legislation. 

On 21 February 2023, I raised the anachronism to the Elections Department (ELD) in a long explanatory note. I proposed three changes to be made to the form of the oath of secrecy for both parliamentary and presidential elections:

1. the words “which has been read to me” in the oath statement be changed to “which I have read and understood”; 

2. the footnote be removed; and

3. to expand “swear” to “swear/affirm”. 

With lightning speed, ELD replied to me that very day: 

“Dear Mrs Chong-Aruldoss 

Thank you for your feedback submitted on 21 Feb 2023. We will take your suggestion into consideration when we next review the forms. Regards”

On 12 June 2023, ELD published a new Form P13 for presidential elections effective 13 June 2023.  

To my delight, the new Form P13 incorporated the changes I had proposed to ELD.  

The new oath of secrecy statement for presidential elections now reads as follows: 

“I, the abovenamed person, am aware of and understand section 36 of the Presidential Elections Act 1991 (printed overleaf) and swear/affirm that I will not at this election do anything forbidden by that section.”

The quirky requirement to read out an entire section of law to the person taking the oath has been abolished for presidential elections. 

I expect Form 18 for parliamentary elections will be likewise updated in due course. 

Singapore has had five presidential elections, of which only two were contested. Until recently, I harboured the thought that if the upcoming presidential election were (again) uncontested, then Form P13 would (once again) not be deployed. The joy of using an updated Form P13 would have to be deferred to another day.  

On 22 August 2023, ELD announced the nomination of three individuals, Mr Ng Kok Song, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam and Mr Tan Kin Lian, as candidates for Presidential Election 2023. We have a 3-corner fight for our votes. Polling is set for 1 September 2023.  

The new updated Form P13 will be intensively used for sure. 


Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss is a Singaporean lawyer and politician

(Footnote: “THE OATH OF SECRECY IN SINGAPOREAN ELECTIONS — GOING BEHIND A QUIRKY MUST-DO BEFORE MAKING IT” at In My Own Words and Medium)

Going behind the quirky must-do of the oath of secrecy in Singaporean elections

“Can you feel the PASSION?” — Die-hard fan screaming ‘MR THARMAAAN’ over and over grabs netizens’ attention

0
Photo: FB screengrab/AsiaOne

SINGAPORE: With the Nomination Day behind us and the campaign for the Presidential Elections in full swing, it seems that some people are feeling more than a touch of election fever.

That certainly seems to be the case for one fan of former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who is running for the presidency against former GIC chief investment officer Ng Kok Song and former chief executive of NTUC Income Tan Kin Lian.

The fan loudly calling out Mr Tharman’s name repeatedly was caught on a video posted on the Facebook page of AsiaOne and then shared on TikTok on the @kayatoast.withegg account on Tuesday (Aug 22).

@kayatoast.withegg

Can you feel the PASSION 🤣🤣🤣 #fypsg🇸🇬 #tiktoksg #politicians #sgpolitics #tharmanshanmugaratnam #sgpresidentialelection2023

♬ original sound – kaya toast with egg

A bespectacled, middle-aged man can be heard shouting at the top of his voice: “MR THARMAAAN… MR THARMAAAN… THARMAAAN… THARMAAAAAAANNN…” before fading out and apparently getting overwhelmed has now been viewed on TikTok over 66,000 times.

And while not everyone’s been a fan of the enthusiastic fan, many commenters on TikTok called him a die-hard, true-blue supporter of the candidate.

A few wondered, however, if the man was shouting “Mrs Tharman,” in reference to the ex-Senior Minister’s wife. Ms Jane Yumiko Ittogi is a lawyer by profession and in the last decade, has led initiatives to help uplift the less fortunate and possibly has a following of her own.

/TISG

Tharman draws attention to climate change, calls it Singapore’s biggest challenge

 

Grace Fu: Environment Building on lockdown due to security situation

0
Photo: Wikipedia/National Environment Agency

SINGAPORE: The Environment Building at 40 Scotts Road housing the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) and its statutory boards — the National Environment Agency (NEA) and water agency PUB — was placed on lockdown on Wednesday (Aug 23) due to a “security situation”.

The Minister for Sustainability and the Environment, Ms Grace Fu, wrote on Facebook that she received the news while overseas about a “security situation” at the building. She wrote:

“While attending ASEAN meetings in Vientiane, Laos, I received news from back home that a security situation is ongoing at the Environment Building. Police had worked with security officers on premises for preliminary checks and no threat items were found. I’m monitoring the developments closely from here and am in constant contact with my colleagues. I would like to assure all staff and stakeholders at the Environment Building that their safety is our priority.”

 

An email sent to employees at about 10 am said there was an “emergency situation” and the building was “under lockdown” but that people could leave if they wanted, reported Channel NewsAsia.

It added that an email sent to employees at about 12.20 pm said the building would be closed for the rest of the week.

 

What the President can and cannot do: Elections Department explains

0

SINGAPORE: The Elections Department had set out the powers of the President in an explanatory note, which the three presidential candidates, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Mr Ng Kok Song and Mr Tan Kin Lian, had to read before they submitted their nomination papers.

The powers of the President are also set out on the Elections Department website and the President’s website, istana.gov.sg

The President is the Head of State and holds office for a term of six years. The President stands above party politics and, therefore, cannot be a member of a political party.

The President has two important roles — first, as a symbol and unifier of a diverse and multi-racial Singapore, and second, as a custodian of the nation’s past reserves and the integrity of the public service.

As the Head of State, the President is the symbol of national unity and presides over important national events, such as the National Day Parade and the Opening of Parliament.

The Constitution requires the President to act on the Cabinet’s advice in exercising his functions, except in specific areas where the Constitution empowers the President to act in his discretion.

The President’s custodial powers

The Constitution confers on the President a number of custodial powers. These powers enable the President to veto certain proposed measures, notwithstanding the advice tendered by the Cabinet. These custodial powers fall into three broad categories.

The first category concerns Singapore’s past reserves (that is, the reserves which were not accumulated during the present term of the Government). The President is empowered to veto and, if he so decides to veto, measures taken by Parliament or the Government that he considers would draw on past reserves. For example, the President can refuse to assent to a Supply Bill passed by Parliament if, in his opinion, the Bill would draw on the Government’s past reserves. This also extends to key statutory boards (CPF Board, HDB, MAS and JTC) and key Government companies (Temasek and GIC). The President can disapprove the budgets and transactions of these entities if he considers that they draw on the entities’ past reserves.

The second category concerns the Public Service. The President can veto appointments to key public offices, including the Chief Justice and the Judges of the Supreme Court; the Chief of Defence Force and the Service Chiefs of the Singapore Armed Forces; the Commissioner of Police; the Attorney-General; the Director of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau, and the Chairman and members of the Public, Judicial and Legal Service Commissions. The President can also veto the removal of individuals from these appointments.

The third category serves a protective function. The President can authorise an investigation by the Director of the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau if the Prime Minister refuses to give such authorisation. The President’s concurrence is required for a person to be detained under the Internal Security Act if the ISA advisory board recommends against the detention. The President can also cancel or vary a restraining order made under the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act if the Cabinet’s advice is contrary to the recommendation of the Presidential Council for Religious Harmony.

The Council of Presidential Advisers

The President must consult the Council of Presidential Advisers while exercising his (or her) powers on matters related to Singapore’s past reserves and the public service. If the President exercises a veto contrary to the recommendation of the Council, Parliament can vote to overrule the President. A motion to overrule the President must be supported by not less than two-thirds of the total number of MPs (excluding nominated MPs).

The President must be politically neutral

As the symbol of national unity, the President must be and be seen to be, politically neutral. The President has no independent political role and must not get involved in political or controversial issues. This way, the President stays above the political fray.

Publicly, the President must speak and act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet, especially when expressing views on legislation or Government policy. The exception is matters related to the President’s custodial powers, where the President acts at his discretion and is naturally entitled to explain to the public how he has exercised or intends to exercise these powers.

In private discussions with the Prime Minister, the President can share his advice freely, but these discussions must remain confidential.

What the President can also do

Veto appointments to key statutory boards (CPF Board, HDB, MAS and JTC) and key Government companies (Temasek and GIC).

Veto the Expected Long-Term Real Rate of Return (ELTRROR) proposed annually by the key statutory boards and Government companies.

Veto Supply Bills that draw on the Government’s past reserves.

Deliver the Address at the Opening of Parliament, drafted by the Government and sets out the Government’s agenda.

Represent Singapore internationally in accordance with the foreign policy and advice of the Government.

What the President cannot do

Appoint his (or her) own preferred candidates for these key appointments.

Decide on the investment policies of these investment entities.

Veto Bills that increase tax rates.

Express public views on legislation or Government policy without being advised by the Government.

Pursue a different foreign policy from the Government.

 

Singapore core inflation dropped to 3.8% in July, lowest in more than a year

0
Photo: Reddit screengrab/r/singapore

SINGAPORE: Consumer prices in Singapore rose more slowly for the third consecutive month in July. Core inflation, which excludes private transport and housing costs, dropped to 3.8 per cent year-on-year last month, the lowest level in more than a year.

In June, core inflation fell from 4.2 per cent to July’s 3.8 per cent because of a smaller increase in food prices and a fall in electricity and gas costs, said the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

The last time core inflation had been lower than this was in May 2022, when it was 3.6 per cent.

Headline inflation, or the overall consumer price index, eased to 4.1 per cent in July from 4.5 per cent in June.

“This reflected lower private transport inflation, in addition to the decline in core inflation,” said MTI and MAS.

Both core and headline inflation figures matched analysts’ forecasts in a Reuters poll.

Food inflation dropped to 5.3 per cent in July as cooked and non-cooked food price rises moderated.

Electricity and gas costs fell 1.6 per cent due to lower tariffs compared to a year ago.

Retail and other goods inflation eased to 2.6 per cent owing to a smaller increase in clothing and footwear prices.

 

Ng Kok Song: Former GIC ‘Striker’ Explains How His Expertise Translates to Being a ‘Goalkeeper’ as President

0
Nomination Day: Ng Kok Song Aims to Be "Independent President" with Symbol of Unity
Photo: YouTube screengrab / Ng Kok Song

SINGAPORE: Presidential candidate Ng Kok Song says he has the experience to protect Singapore’s reserves, one of the key responsibilities of the president. “I can protect the reserves,” said the 75-year-old former GIC chief investment officer who had served as a Monetary Authority of Singapore director. “I spent my entire career at GIC and MAS helping to build up our reserves.”

However, he conceded his role as President would be different from his former job at the Sovereign Wealth Fund, GIC. “The GIC CIO role is more of a center-forward, the attacker, taking the offensive, while the President is like a goalkeeper,” he said in an exclusive interview with Dollars and Sense.

But with his experience, he could be a goalkeeper, too.

“In order to be a good goalkeeper, you must have played as a center-forward as well,” he claimed. “You know, to see how people can score against you.”

“I was the Group CIO for GIC for six years before my retirement in 2013,” said Mr Ng Kok Song. As the Group CIO, he had to set the investment strategy.

“I have to help formulate the investment policy decisions for them to be approved by the Board of Directors, which was chaired by the Prime Minister,” he recalled. Then he had to execute the strategy.

The job required “a very clear mind”, extensive reading, and networking.

Mr Ng Kok Song recalled, “I have to read very extensively and I need to have discussions with my peers and experts in order to cross-check my own thinking. It calls for a lot of study, and a lot of intelligence gathering for me to make those decisions. As a result of that, I built up many friendships around the world among leading investors, among policymakers.”

Mr Ng Kok Song elaborated on how as a former GIC CIO, he was well equipped to carry out the President’s responsibility of managing the reserves.

“The former GIC role which I held was also to safeguard the reserves. How does the GIC safeguard the reserves? By investing them properly so that we can generate better rates of return on the reserves,” he said.

If GIC earns more, there is more money for the Singapore Budget and the people benefit, he added.

“If we are able to generate better rates of return, then we can allocate more for the benefit of the people because the government can take up to half the investment returns for the Singapore Budget and through that allocate money for healthcare for the elderly, and for education and housing. If the GIC can generate better returns, we have more to benefit the people and we have more to save for the future,” said Mr Ng Kok Song.

He pointed out, “The GIC does not decide how much to spend. It is the government’s decision, but they must get the approval of the President.

“The similarity is that both the President and the GIC want to be able to build up our savings for the future. In GIC’s case, through generating better investment returns, in the President’s case, to try to save as much as possible so that we have a better and a more secure future.”

Read also:

2023 Singapore Presidential Election: Will Khaw Boon Wan Be The Establishment’s Choice? 

PE2023: Lee Hsien Yang’s Potential Run Shakes Up Singapore’s Presidential Race 

SM Tharman to run for president, DPM Lawrence Wong to be appointed chairman of MAS and committee in GIC  

Tharman Shanmugaratnam handed over EDB’s IAC Baton to DPM Lawrence Wong 

 

“Tan Kin Lian is a Singapore hero” — People’s Voice chief decries smear campaign against the “true independent”

0
Tan Kin Lian says he will be "a president who is truly independent of the ruling government"
Photo: Mr Tan Kin Lian greets supporters and well-wishers on Nomination Day (Aug 22) 2023.

SINGAPORE: The People’s Voice Party (PV) chief, Lim Tean, has come out strongly against what he claims is a smear campaign targeting presidential election candidate Tan Kin Lian, calling Mr Tan Singapore’s best hope for a truly independent President.

In a Facebook post yesterday evening (21 Aug), Mr Lim accused the mainstream media and pro-People’s Action Party (PAP) social media of launching a smear campaign against Mr Tan Kin Lian, suggesting that this indicates worry within the establishment about Mr Tan’s candidacy.

Mr Lim added that MrTan Kin Lian‘s campaign is gaining momentum, evident by the enthusiastic support he received during recent walkabouts in Kampong Admiralty and Chong Pang. He said that the ex-NTUC Income chief had been embraced as the “People’s President” by diverse sections of society.

He said, “Over the weekend, I accompanied him on his walkabouts in Kampong Admiralty and Chong Pang. He was swarmed by Singaporeans from all walks of life who have taken to him as the People’s President. Rarely have I seen such enthusiastic crowds greeting a candidate for National Office.

So, what do MSM and the PAP-friendly Alternative Media do when they realize that the supposedly impossible might happen and that the PAP-linked Tharman might lose? They go on a smearing campaign to bring down Tan Kin Lian.”

Calling Mr Tan Kin Lian a Singaporean hero who overcame challenges, Mr Lim pointed out that Mr Tan left school at the age of 14 due to financial constraints, but through hard work and determination, he became a prominent actuary.

As the CEO of NTUC Income, Mr Tan reportedly managed to exponentially grow the organization’s assets from $28 million to $17 billion over a span of three decades. Mr Lim contrasted this with ex-Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s regulatory background, claiming that Mr Tharman lacks the experience of running and growing a business.

He said, “Has Tharman started a business? No. Throughout his working life,Tharman has been a regulator.Tharman has no experience or idea of how to run a business,let alone grow one.”

Mr Lim also praised Mr Tan’s family, describing them as a quintessential Singaporean family that all citizens can be proud of. He portrayed Tan Kin Lian’s wife as a potential “fantastic First Lady” and celebrated his three children and five grandchildren.

To counter the smear campaign, Mr Lim directed attention to the letter issued by the Presidential Election Committee to Mr Lim on August 14, 2023. The letter stated: “Based on the information available to the Committee, it is satisfied that you are a man of integrity, good character and reputation.”

Mr Lim said, “Now let us get on with the task of electing Tan Kin Lian as the People’s President because only he can Bring back TRUST, Give us HOPE!”

Although Mr Tan Kin Lian is not a member of any political party, having given up his 30-year-long PAP membership in 2008 due to disagreement with the governing party’s value system, a number of opposition parties have endorsed Mr Tan as the only “true independent” in the three-horse 2023 presidential race.

Former Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and SingFirst politician Tan Jee Say is Mr Tan Kin Lian’s proposer, while Mr Lim is Mr Tan’s seconder. Another SDP member, Prabu Ramachandran, is another assentor on Mr Tan’s team.

 

 

Read also:

The “true independent” Tan Kin Lian grew NTUC Income’s assets from millions to billions 

Singapore Presidential Election 2023: Tharman, Ng Kok Song, Tan Kin Lian qualify as presidential candidates 

Calvin Cheng predicts a two-horse Presidential race — Tharman and Tan Kin Lian 

Presidential hopeful Tan Kin Lian raises concern over tight timeline 

Tan Kin Lian launches second bid for presidency, aims to restore trust and hope 

 

Is Ho Ching’s Vote for Ng Kok Song in the Presidential Race?

0
Is Ho Ching's Vote for Ng Kok Song in the Presidential Race?
Temasek FB, YT screencapture

SINGAPORE: A series of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s wife’s Facebook posts covering aspects of presidential candidate Ng Kok Song’s life and campaign has sparked questions about whether she is backing the ex-GIC chief investment officer instead of the clear establishment pick, former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam.

Aside from sharing photos and videos of Mr Ng Kok Song, Mdm Ho — who appears to be chronically on Facebook — has made it clear that she has a good impression of Mr Ng. When he first threw his hat into the race, she praised him for doing so despite facing the popularity of Mr. Tharman.

In the weeks that followed, Mdm Ho shared her views about the good work Mr Ng Kok Song has done at GIC and Wealth Management Institute. She has also shared some of the more personal posts Mr Ng’s team has made, covering his childhood, upbringing, and relationship with his fiancée Sybil Lau.

Her complimentary views on Mr Ng Kok Song have prompted some Singaporeans to ask whether the PM’s wife is endorsing Mr Ng. Some have even asked her outright in the comments section of some of her posts whether they should vote for the 75-year-old.

Mr Tharman announced his mid-term retirement from politics in June as he revealed his plans to contest the presidential election. Accepting his resignation, PM Lee said that if Mr Tharman is elected as President, he is “confident” that he will carry out the head of state duties “scrupulously and with the independence of mind you have always displayed.”

To some voters, PM Lee’s ringing endorsement of Mr Tharman’s abilities clarifies that the popular politician is the establishment pick for President.

George Yeo confirms PM Lee saw Tan Cheng Bock as a threat

Read also:

2023 Singapore Presidential Election: Will Khaw Boon Wan Be The Establishment’s Choice? 

PE2023: Lee Hsien Yang’s Potential Run Shakes Up Singapore’s Presidential Race 

SM Tharman to run for president, DPM Lawrence Wong to be appointed chairman of MAS and committee in GIC  

Tharman Shanmugaratnam handed over EDB’s IAC Baton to DPM Lawrence Wong 

 

Former World Champion Loh Kean Yew Advances to Round of 16 in BWF World Championships After Dominating Wins

0
Loh Kean Yew playing Tommy Sugiarto in Round of 16. Photo: Wikipedia screengrab/TanDavidPhotography (CC BY-SA 4.0)

SINGAPORE: Former badminton world champion Loh Kean Yew got past the second round of this year’s BWF World Championships in Copenhagen, Denmark, besting Indonesia-born Azerbaijan player Ade Resky Dwicahyo, 21-4, 21-11 on Tuesday evening (Aug 22), in just 24 minutes.

Netizens praised Loh for a match well-played.

In the first round on Monday (Aug 21), the 26-year-old athlete defeated Spain’s Pablo Abian 21-12, 21-9 in 28 minutes. After which Loh Kean Yew told Olympics.com, “I just focus on each point and each match, and hopefully, I can just keep going like this.”

Loh Kean Yew is currently ranked 7th in the world, Abian is 85th, and Dwicahyo is 75th.

Olympics.com reported that Loh Kean Yew is likely to play against India’s H S Prannoy, currently ranked 9th in the world, for the round of 16, assuming that Prannoy defeats Indonesia’s Chico Aura Dwi Wardoyo, ranked 20th in the world, later on Tuesday (Aug 22).

Several matches have already been announced for the men’s singles round of 16 games on Wednesday (Aug 23), including Denmark’s Anders Antonsen, Japan’s Kodai Naraoka, Malaysia’s Lee Zii Jia, and China’s Lee Cheuk Yiu.

Born on 26 June 1997 in Penang, Malaysia, Loh started young, playing for the Penang state team and winning the 2009 National Junior Grand Prix Finals in the under-12 category.

After early success in Malaysia, Loh moved to Singapore at the age of 13 to attend Singapore Sports School’s four-year program from 2010 to 2013 on a scholarship offered by the school.

He followed in the footsteps of his older brother Kean Hean who arrived in Singapore in 2009 and joined Montfort Secondary School. Kean Hean also represents Singapore in badminton and is a doubles specialist.

After graduating from Singapore Sports School, Loh Kean Yew studied Sports and Leisure Management at Republic Polytechnic before dropping out to become a professional player.

Loh Kean Yew became a Singaporean citizen in 2015. /TISG

Asian Games 2023 complete team list: Shanti, Kean Yew + 429 other athletes represent Singapore

Presidential Election 2023: Red Dot United proposes abolishing Elected Presidency and exploring various mechanisms to protect the reserves

0
Presidential Election 2023: Red Dot United proposes abolishing Elected Presidency and exploring various mechanisms to protect the reserves
Photo: Facebook screengrab: Tan Kin Lian, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Ng Kok Song

SINGAPORE —  While Singaporeans prepare to head to the polls to elect their ninth president on Sept 1, opposition party Red Dot United has taken a bold stance by advocating for the abolition of the Elected Presidency and the restoration of its ceremonial role.

With the proposal to abolish the elected presidency, Red Dot United is calling for the establishment of a constitutional commission. This commission would conduct a comprehensive study on creating an independent mechanism to effectively protect the nation’s reserves.

President Wee Kim Wee served as the final president appointed by parliament from 1985 to 1993. However, following a constitutional amendment in 1991, Singapore held its first presidential election two years later. Former Deputy Prime Minister Ong Teng Cheong emerged as the winner with 58.69% of the popular vote against Chua Kim Yeow to become Singapore’s first elected president.

“Recognising the evolving dynamics surrounding the Elected Presidency, Red Dot United acknowledges the importance of preserving the President’s historical role as the chief diplomat of the Republic and as a unifying figure for all Singaporeans while also addressing the custodial responsibility of protecting Singapore’s reserves,” shared Red Dot United.

To achieve this, the party is suggesting a two-pronged approach.

  1. RDU advocates for returning to the original vision of the Presidency as a symbolic and unifying figurehead. By refraining from political involvement and policy initiation, the President can focus on representing the nation domestically and internationally, fostering national unity, and promoting Singapore’s interests on the global stage.
  2. Studying a separate, independent mechanism: RDU proposes the establishment of a dedicated mechanism to safeguard the reserves, which are currently entrusted to the Office of the Elected President. This mechanism should operate independently, ensuring transparency, accountability, and prudent decision-making. RDU emphasises the need for a comprehensive study by a Constitutional Commission, mandated by appropriate Terms of Reference, to explore various proposals and learn from best practices in other jurisdictions.

The Presidential Election differs from a General Election in that candidates must not be affiliated with or be supported by any political parties. Furthermore, the president should remain above politics, and it is not within their capacity to support or oppose the government or promote their own agenda or policies.

The Elections Department, in a media release that sets out the guiding principle for the presidential election campaign, said, “Under the Constitution, the President has important ceremonial and representational roles as Head of State. He represents and promotes Singapore’s interests abroad.”

“The President’s key role is to be the custodian of Singapore’s reserves and to ensure that only people of integrity are appointed to key public sector jobs. The President should have the direct mandate of the people to perform these important national functions on their behalf,” added the Elections Department.

As the position of the President is non-partisan, the Elections Department added that political parties should not be involved in campaigning by using their party names and symbols in support of any candidates.

There are three candidates for the 2023 Presidential Election. They are former Senior Minister Tharman Shamugaratman, ex-GIC chief investment officer Ng Kok Song, and former NTUC Income CEO Tan Kin Lian.

Tharman’s campaign slogan is ‘Respect For All’, and have picked the Pineapple symbol for his campaign logo. Ng is rallying behind a ‘United For Our Future’ slogan, while his symbol is an open hand with a heart on its palm. For Tan, his campaign message is “Bring Back Trust, Give Us Hope,’ and his campaign symbol is illustrated by four figures that represent Singapore’s major ethnic group reaching out to a flower which symbolizes hope for a better future.

 

Read also:

2023 Singapore Presidential Election: Will Khaw Boon Wan Be The Establishment’s Choice? 

PE2023: Lee Hsien Yang’s Potential Run Shakes Up Singapore’s Presidential Race 

SM Tharman to run for president, DPM Lawrence Wong to be appointed chairman of MAS and committee in GIC  

Tharman Shanmugaratnam handed over EDB’s IAC Baton to DPM Lawrence Wong