Wednesday, April 30, 2025
27.1 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 3899

Trump’s inaugural committee receives subpoena

0

Federal prosecutors from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office have issued a subpoena on Donald Trump’s inaugural committee, which requests documents regarding its expenditures and donors during the President’s inauguration last January 2017.

“We have just received a subpoena for documents. While we are still reviewing the subpoena, it is our intention to cooperate with the inquiry,” said the committee’s spokesperson in a statement.

Prosecutors showed interest into the possibility that the $107 million dollars raised by the inaugural committee were misspent, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal last December as cited by Reuters.

Aside from that, investigations were geared toward whether the donors have donated for the sake of political power and influence in administration positions, or if there have been foreign donors in the mix. Foreign donations to inaugural funds are illegal, according to the law.

The subpoena document, as reviewed by CNN, said that investigators are looking into a myriad of potential crimes, such as “conspiracy against the US, false statements, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, inaugural committee disclosure violations, and violations of laws prohibiting contributions by foreign nations and contributions in the name of another person.”

It also requires the committee to show documents relating to the benefits received by the donors, including but not limited to “tickets, photo opportunities, and/or small group receptions.”

The prosecutors of the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office have declined to comment.

The subpoena does not mention the name Tom Barrack Jr., the head of the inaugural committee. Barrack is a real estate developer and one of Trump’s longtime friends. He declined to comment.

On the other hand, the only name mentioned in the subpoena is Imaad Zuberi and his firm Avenue Ventures LLC. The reasons why the subpoena seeks documents related to Zuberi are unclear. According to records, it has been shown the Avenue Ventures had donated $900,000 to the inaugural committee.

“Imaadd knows nothing about a subpoena, other than what is being written. It is well known that after supporting President Obama and later Hillary Clinton that Imaad gave generously and directly to the Trump inaugural committee, but many others gave substantially more. If, in fact, he is named in this subpoena, never mind somehow named alone, he is bewildered why,” Steve Rabinowitz, spokesperson for Zubari, said in an interview with ABC News.

Meanwhile, the White House has not yet issued a statement about the matter as of writing.

Auntie’s CNY biryani lunch paid by kind stranger

A video of a kind man paying the lunch of a woman on a mobility scooter at Clementi Hawker Center went viral, winning the hearts of many netizens.

The kindness happened on the second day of CNY when most of the stalls at the hawker centre were closed.

Photo: Screengrab from Facebook/Ry Manz

One Facebook user Ry Manz was able to capture the heartwarming gesture.

At 3 pm, at a table nearby was an auntie on a mobility scooter, deciding what to eat for lunch. She appeared to have difficulty in walking as well as she seemed not familiar with the stall’s food.

Photo: Screengrab from Facebook/Ry Manz

She asked the man what would be good food to order in that stall.

The man, who appeared to be a regular customer of the food stall, recommended biryani rice with chicken to her. But to auntie’s surprise, he paid the set for her.

Photo: Screengrab from Facebook/Ry Manz

The man’s kindness extended when the food came and he urged her to eat ahead.

Auntie could not contain her gratitude as she took her first dig in of the biryani.

Photo: Screengrab from Facebook/Ry Manz

Truly indeed, one touching act of kindness especially coming from strangers can truly move spectators.

The video made quite the impact on many netizens. A lot of people have truly appreciated the kindness the man showered upon the woman.

 

 

 

Should You Share Your Credit Card Account with Your Partner?

Should You Share Your Credit Card Account with Your Partner?

For both long-term couples and newlyweds, there has been an unending debate around whether consolidating their finances is ultimately a good move or not. Certainly, this is a very complex issue involving various factors and preferences that are emotional and practical, neither of which can be disregarded as “unimportant.” While sharing a credit card could be seen both as a nice gesture, it could also be regarded as the first step onto a slippery slope. In terms of emotional aspects of combining two people’s finances, we have nothing to add to the discourse; each couple must decide what works for them. However, we have found some practical arguments both for and against sharing a credit card account with your partner.

Benefits of Sharing a Credit Card

Overall, there are 3 clear reasons why sharing a credit card could be a good economic move for couples. First and foremost, most supplementary cards charge a much lower annual fee than principal cards. In many cases, many supplementary cards are actually completely free, as we show below. Given this, a couple could save about S$100 to S$200 each year by sharing an existing credit card account via getting a supplementary card. This could be an especially wise move if one of the couples don’t work, since most credit cards require an annual income of at least S$30,000 for the principal cardholder.

Examples of Credit Cards with Free Supplementary Cards

Many credit cards in Singapore provide supplementary cards for free

Secondly, most rewards credit cards in Singapore provide the same rewards to supplementary card user as the principal cardholder. Since credit cards in Singapore provide a pretty high level of cashback and miles, couples in Singapore can easily rack up a lot of savings by using the same credit card account.

Lastly, couples can more easily meet minimum spending levels that are often required for annual fee waivers or welcome bonus awards. For example, Citi PMV Card requires cardholders to spend S$7,500 within 3 months to qualify for its 21,000 bonus miles, while many other cards like OCBC 365 Card require S$10,000 of annual spend to qualify for its annual fee waiver. Most credit cards combine both principal card & supplementary card’s spending for these requirements, making it very easy for couples win these bonuses.

Examples of Credit Cards with Spending Dependent Bonus

It'll be easier for couples to meet spending requirements needed to earn welcome bonuses and annual fee waivers on credit cards

Downsides of Sharing a Credit Card

However, there are definitely some economic downsides to sharing a credit card account with your partner. The biggest of these is cap on benefits. Most cashback credit cards limit the amount of rebate a cardmember can earn in a given month, usually at around S$100 or below. Since most cards are designed with 1 person’s spending amount in mind, it could be possible for couples to leave money on the table by continuing to spend on a credit card account that already maxed out on its rewards for the month. The same principle applies for other ancillary benefits like complimentary lounge access, which is usually capped at a certain number of passes per year.

Secondly, a credit card account has one credit limit, no matter how many supplementary cards there are. Therefore, sharing an account would mean that each person’s spending power ultimately quite limited, especially for the supplementary cardholder whose own limit is often fixed at S$1,000.

Last but not least, all liabilities ultimately fall under the principal member, which could be a big problem for the principal cardholder in case of unfortunate development in the relationship.

3 Pro Tips for Those Who Decide to Share an Account

Whatever your personal decisions are as a couple, if you do decide to share a credit card account, there are few tips you should follow so that you can maximise the benefits and minimise the downsides we mentioned above.

1. Focus on Miles Credit Cards

First and foremost, it’s almost always better to share a miles credit card than a cash rebate card due to the simple reason that miles credit cards generally don’t cap rewards while cashback cards do.

2. Cards with High Fees & Spending Requirements Are Generally Better

Secondly, you want to try and get cards that require relatively high spending amount to qualify for certain benefits that are extremely valuable. A very classic example of this is UOB PRVI Miles Credit Card. This card charges an annual fee of S$256.8 and provides the highest mile rewards available in the market at 1.4 miles per every S$1 spent locally. Not only that, for those who are able to spend S$50,000 on the card annually, UOB waives this annual fee while also providing a 20,000 bonus miles every year, which combine for about S$460 of value annually. Given that the average household spending is about S$4,700 per person, it will be much easier for couples than an individual to satisfy the S$50,000 requirement and reap this huge reward.

3. Don’t share if your spending patterns are vastly different

Lastly, couples with vastly different spending pattern should generally not share a credit card account. If one person tends to be a big shopper while the other only spends on dining, this couple can earn more rewards collectively earn more rewards by finding different cards that are specially catered for shopping and dining separately. For example, some of the best shopping credit cards provide 4 miles per S$1 spent on shopping, but only 0.4 miles per S$1 spent on everything else. On the other hand, some of the best dining credit cards provide 4-8% rewards on dining while providing almost nothing on shopping. If such a couple were to share a card, they would be losing out on a lot of potential rewards that they could’ve easily earned.

The article Should You Share Your Credit Card Account with Your Partner? originally appeared on ValueChampion.

ValueChampion helps you find the most relevant information to optimise your personal finances. Like us on our Facebook page to keep up to date with our latest news and articles.

More From ValueChampion:

Source: VP

Viswa Sadasivan warns: Every Singaporean will be loser if trust in government goes down the drain

HE has a fiery reputation of firing from the hips, without fear or favour, especially on matters of public interest.

Former Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NMP) Viswa Sadasivan fired a timely red-hot Lunar New Year fire-cracker as he reminded that if public confidence and trust in the Government does down the drain, every Singaporean will be the loser.

In a no-punches-pulled letter, published in The Forum Page of The Straits Times, he wrote: “Just too many things have been going wrong lately – the Singapore Armed Forces, Health Ministry and Singapore Post incidents.

“We appear to be in denial that the problem – across the board – is systemic. Individual Committees of Inquiry (COIs) can only go so far. There’s an urgent need for a whole-of-government response.”

A few days earlier, Lianhe Zaobao voiced out a similar editorial calling on the authorities to correct flaws and “restore public confidence”. The leading Chinese daily asserted that a series of lapses by “public service companies recent years have swayed some people’s confidence in the institutions and efficiencies we have always been proud of.”

The Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) publication boldly listed recent incidents involving the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), SMRT, Singapore Post (SingPost) and Singapore Power as it asserted that the authorities “can’t be arrogant” and must “deeply reflect on this series of faults and not let them cause systemic failure”.

‘PROVIDE EXPLANATION, PLEASE’

Mr Sadasivan, 60, who was a NMP in the Parliament of Singapore from 2009 to 2011, says that the “first step to solving a problem is to acknowledge it”. He explains: “It is not unreasonable for public servants – including political leaders – to provide an explanation when things go wrong. The aim, however, should not be to protect the organisation or its leaders even when there has been wrongdoing.

“It’s disingenuous for public servants to see defending the Government when things go wrong as their primary duty. Their accountability is to the people, who expect them to do the right thing.”

Stand up please and be counted, he urges. He says: “This often translates to not fudging or sweetening the issues, defining the problem as it really is, and solving it decisively. By acting with integrity in such situations, public servants can help boost public trust in government.

“Second, we need to identify common threads running through the various critical incidents. One that stands out pertains to systems and processes. These can’t be designed on the assumption that they will be used correctly all the time.”

MAIDEN SPEECH IN 2009

For the record, Mr Sadasivan in August 2009, used his maiden speech in Parliament to table an extraordinary motion calling for the House to reaffirm its commitment to the principles enshrined in the Singapore National Pledge (which refers to Singaporeans as “one united people, regardless of race, language or religion”), and questioned whether the government was sending out mixed signals by emphasising racial categorisations, for example by promoting ethnic-based self-help groups.

Inevitably, his contentious speech attracted considerable media attention and drew responses from a number of Parliamentarians from the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP), including the-then Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew. Mr Lee, the iconic founding ‘Father of Singapore’ stated that he wanted to “bring the House back to earth” on the issue of racial equality in Singapore, and sternly rebutted Mr Sadasivan’s arguments.

Mr Sadasivan, who confesses he’s not a PAP cadre, has a fantabulous reputation as an public-spirited academic. He studied at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, where he completed a Master of Public Administration degree. He has been extensively involved in public service for more than two decades.

Among other distinguished appointments, he has served as the Chairman of the Political Development Feedback Group of Singapore’s Feedback Unit, and as Vice-President and Secretary of the Singapore Indian Development Association (SINDA) Executive Committee. He has also served on the Media Development Authority’s Board, the Singapore 21 Committee, Economic Review Committee, Remaking Singapore Committee, and the National Youth Achievement Award Council.

Calling a spade a spade has always been his powerful trademark and in his latest message to Singaporeans, Mr Sadasivan appeals passionately that a “good system must assume human error and frailties, and compensate for them”.

He notes that there appears to be an over-reliance on systems. He explains: “Basic human instincts to observe, spot, think, respond and react are not exercised enough. Over time, these cease to be instincts. The problems arising from this are evident in all the recent incidents.”

RISK AND REWARD CONDITIONS

He urged the Lee Hsien Loong government to “address the critical role of human behaviour and attitude in these incidents”.

Significantly, he says: “We all respond to risk and reward conditions. When there appears to be a routinised response when things go wrong – media conference, COI, apology – there’s the risk of us getting used to things going wrong and accepting it. There’s an urgent need for us to get out of this vicious circle.”

Hitting the nail on the head, he reiterates that the onus of responsibility in good governance starts from the top.

He adds: “This will only happen if the leadership at the highest level sends an unequivocal signal that those in charge will be held accountable. It cannot continue to be business as usual.”

And he sums up his Forum letter with a shivery Lunar New Year admonition for Singaporeans: “If nothing concrete is done to revive public confidence and trust in the Government, we all lose.”

 

Five killed in Lunar New Year fireworks explosion in Guanxi, China

In the early hours into the Lunar New Year celebration, five people were killed due to an explosion of fireworks in Rongan county in China’s southern region of Guangxi. The blast happened at 2 am on Tuesday, February 5, outside a store reportedly selling and storing the fireworks illegally.

China’s Xinhua News Agency reported that the blast ignited a fire that spread to four other houses. As a result of the blast and fire, five were killed and fourteen others forced to vacate their homes. Fortunately, the fire was extinguished a few hours later.

Authorities have arrested a Mr. Zhang, the owner of the store. Police believe that Zhang started the fire.

An urgent meeting was called later that morning, with police and firemen present, for the purpose of tracking down illegal firecrackers. These explosives are traditionally set off on the eve of the Lunar New Year, at midnight, when families are done with dinner. The firecrackers have fuses wrapped in red paper in celebration of the festival.

However, 499 cities across China have banned setting off firecrackers due to the injuries and fatalities that have resulted every year.

In February 2018, five people got hurt and four were killed due to a fireworks blast. One person in Yuxi in Yunnan province endeavored to set off some firecrackers, which caused the blast to occur. A few days later three more people died in Zaozhuang in Shandong province when fireworks caused the appliances in an illegal firework shop to be catch fire.

Just recently, Chongqing, a large city in the southwestern part of China, implemented a total ban on fireworks, which have been the cause of 410 injuries and 36 fires in the past few years.

Fireworks also contribute to China’s air pollution issues. In 2018, air pollution records were heightened within the first four days after Chinese New Year was celebrated.

What is it like setting up co-working hub in touristy city of Siem Reap: AngkorHub story

0

From the scarcity of furnitures, to the limited government’s support, Jeff Laflamme has seen it all and still run AngkorHub for almost six years now

Back when it was cool to be a digital nomad, Jeff Laflamme, like the rest of us, sure had been intrigued by the lifestyle that it offers. Ditching his-9 to-5 job at that time, he landed in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, when he bumped into a friend who told him about Siem Reap, south of Cambodia.
This friend introduced him to the idea of co-working space, at that time was one of the firsts in Vietnam, and Laflamme stumbled upon an AHA moment that became the preconception of AngkorHub, the first tech hub in the heart of the touristy city of Cambodia, Siem Reap.

Selling romanticised lifestyle

“It was really like the classic story of a digital nomad. I just got tired of the 9-to-5 routine,” said Laflamme.

Even so, Laflamme admitted that he realised how romanticised the nomadic lifestyle really was. “It sells the idea of working on your laptop with the beach view, remotely in an island with espresso on your table, but it was really interesting and people bought into the idea,” said Laflamme.

The reality, he added, was really trying to find a stable internet connection to be able to work for only a few hours at once. However, this seemed ideal.

Also Read: E-commerce Trends in Singapore to look forward to in the Year of the Pig

So Laflamme thought to himself, why not setting up one in Siem Reap, where tourists are flocking for the beach. “At that time I was really intrigued with co-working space industry and I fell in love with Siem Reap,” he explained.

Quickly he got to work. “I start comparing the situation, numbers, and average wages in Cambodia, especially in IT sector compared to other countries,” said Laflamme.

Challenging feat

He decided that the co-working space he was going to build should be approached with social enterprise concept. “I told myself that we can reuse the same space for training businesses that come to the place. So immediately I worked on a business plan and joined force with someone,” Laflamme added.

Laflamme proceeded to meet with a local who showed him buildings, something that he recalled was like a countryside project.

“There was no stable internet connection at that time, so that was my first challenge in setting up a tech hub, aside from how limited the buildings that are decent enough and being leased to be a place for a co-working space,” said Laflamme.

In addition to that, Laflamme remembered that it was exactly on August 2013 and Siem Reap was still the second poorest province in Cambodia at that time.

He mentioned other challenges like sourcing materials like furnitures to really create a comfortable and inviting co-working space. “You can’t find anything that fits. Sourcing it from Thailand was the closest you could get to a nice interior at that time,” he added.

“I remembered visiting the capital just recently and I was shocked seeing all the infrastructure and materials like furnitures to fill up co-working space that to me doesn’t look like it is in Cambodia,” he recalled.

Next comes the administration.

“Registering business, going to Ministry of Commerce, only to find that they didn’t speak English and they don’t have forms. I remember the guy that was there brought me to another city just to do the paperwork. It was all complicated and there was zero information online,” Laflamme told e27.

After what seemed like endless hurdles, Laflamme settled in the ex-building of a bank.

The socialisation part

Laflamme might have finished all the administration and the location necessity to build the co-working space in Siem Reap, but he wasn’t really prepared for what came next.

“I thought It will be obvious that it’s a co-working place with all the tables and facilities like a power generator. I just assumed people will jump over the idea. I was wrong,” said Laflamme.

AngkorHub was set in a tourist city, with the main attraction of the place being the leisure experience it offers. So it made sense when the firsts of their customers, the people who would need the place to work are expats, more so than the locals.

“The small network that we did have and would be a customers wouldn’t be our customers within a few months because they came during their vacation,” said Laflamme.

People around Laflamme was telling him that he needed to build a community first before starting the coworking space. “I get that, but that couldn’t be the case for every co-working space, especially not in a touristy area,” he said.

Laflamme added that AngkorHub is still struggling to date to make people understand the concept, even people that are well-traveled and professionals.

Pioneering the tech industry

“We used to be the only one, and in our first months we tried to connect with similar initiatives. It took me several months to get people’s awareness, and soon enough, like two months after opening, there were some expats starting another co-working space,” he recalled.

“Now there are around six co-working spaces, and this year local group will open one that’s going to be a big one,” he added.

Laflamme mentioned that when AngkorHub was first launched, the first idea was to be a social innovation center and become an incubation hub for young talents. It was in 2013 to 2014.

“The challenge with making it an incubation center was that people barely understood what co-working was. It was simply not ready for it. We could only plant seeds and shift focus until it’s ready. That’s what we worked on,” said Laflamme.

There’s a limited startups and investors in Siem Reap for AngkorHub to become an incubation center. “To do that, we’d definitely need the guidance. I myself have been playing an advisor role for some time, providing consult for people about their startup business,” said Laflamme.

However, Laflamme prided the fact that AngkorHub is well-positioned in Google search and reviews. “But even that’s still not enough for people to com. Startups are really limited here,” said Laflamme.

As the longest running co-working hub in the city, startup events that looked for spaces in the area would reach out to them. “Mostly are event organizers from outside of the country. The local ecosystem itself didn’t really connect and reach out to organize event with us,” said Laflamme.

Co-living in Siem Reap

Now that it’s been almost 6 years into operation, the hub has been operating from its second building, abandoning the ex-bank building. It also provides a co-living option now.

“Our business model is really working based on the co-living space. It’s creating community through renting the room, aiming at digital nomad who work online and need a good connection,” explained Laflamme.

Right now, the place is divided into two big areas: one is the common area downstairs, and the other is the upstair for co-living space.

“Now we have 20 spots, all in open space with no private offices. But we’re actually working on it because there are demands for it,” said Laflamme.

Right now, the hub provides one meeting room, a small one where people get their calls done there.

The hub offers monthly membership and options of Day pass and Weekly pass for the co-working space.

Also Read: Microinsurance is key to Southeast Asian financial inclusion

“20 per cent of our visitors are expats who will come living for a month or so. They are either a travelling professionals or digital nomads, who also stay in our co-living facility. We have more co-living members than the co-working members, actually,” said Laflamme.

“The plan for 2019 is to work on having a private office, and we will change the existing concept now, although I can’t get into details with the public yet,” said Laflamme.

What’s next

For AngkorHub, which Laflamme said has received an investment from an Angel VC based in Singapore, it’s still hard to keep the business afloat.

However, with the undisclosed number of investment they have received, the hub has begun their search for new location.

“This person helped us by investing in the project, enabling us to look for other locations with adjustment in concept,” said Laflamme.

For this year, since Laflamme has found that coworking space in the area is not valued properly if it’s not paired with incubation, AngkorHub will need to adjust business model.

“After all, the hub itself exists also to support the locals. The goal is to make people see Siem Reap and Cambodia past the temples, because it’s about the people,” said Laflamme.

Towards the end of the conversation, Laflamme shared his opinion on how Siem Reap has been overlooked by the government, especially in the tech sector.

“I would say Siem Reap is nowhere near ready to be the tech hub of the country. The government pays more attention to the capital, and the only time they were involved was a few years back, doing a business incubation 101 here. The government doesn’t connect with the existing players in both Phnom Penh and other provinces, and instead, they went out of their ways and created other programs and chose the same winners over and over again,” said Laflamme.

Laflamme believed that the only way Cambodia, and eventually Siem Reap, will be at par with other countries in terms of tech innovation and facility is for government and community to take it one step at a time. “Walk before we can run. The government should work their way from grassroots and collaborate with local universities. I believe doing it this way would create more lasting impact,” closed Laflamme.

The post What is it like setting up co-working hub in touristy city of Siem Reap: AngkorHub story appeared first on e27.

Source: E27

Singapore strengthens cybersecurity initiatives as a smart nation

Singapore is serious in its goal to become a smart nation. This makes all the government’s efforts to ensure the strict implementation of cybersecurity measures. This was according to Dr Janil Puthucheary, senior minister of state, Ministry of Communications and Information.

The agency is currently taking a fresh look at the significance of adopting cybersecurity in the country’s activities. In his previous speech held at the Infocomm Media Cybersecurity Conference, Puthucheary stressed the need for Singapore to have a secure, trusted and resilient cybersecurity to protect the country from potential terroristic attacks and anomalous transactions.

He noted through connectivity, that digital technology is an enabler for different technological breakthroughs, including 5G, narrowband internet-of-things sensor networks, and other relevant electronic innovations.

But Puthucheary reiterated the success of all of these technologies needs cybersecurity in place. The government official said securing a single, isolated computer is easy to handle. But once you get connected to a network, you become vulnerable to increased threats that may potentially jeopardise business opportunities and impact operational activities.

In a sense, cybersecurity is the driving force that combats negative consequences of connectivity and achieves the desired transformation in the digital arena. The telecommunications industry plays a vital role, which is essential in safeguarding our telco infrastructure, its services, and the business that the operators provide their clients.

The minister cited teamwork and collaboration are the best approaches to secure connectivity infrastructure. Both the government and the telecommunications industry have a major role to play.

Currently, Puthucheary cited the future needs should be prioritised. There are risks involved in these new technologies, products, and platforms. As the advancements in innovative technologies evolve, the cyber threats are always present. These include the Ransomware-as-a-service and the inappropriate employment of AI and machine learning to the advantage of cyber attackers.

There is a growing concern about the proliferation of cybersecurity threats worldwide. Disruption of opportunities and inability to transform businesses can be the results of the cyber attacks. This is where everything evolves at a particular pace where technology requires deeper, richer connectivity networks, and improved technologies.

Puthucheary noted much should be accomplished. One of these is drafting an IoT cybersecurity guide that provides recommendations for safeguarding IoT systems to combat threats and conducting a public consultation on the guidelines.

He added as more devices are on the rise, the possibility of cybersecurity penetration increases. What we need to consider is the country’s regulatory process and how the customers and users can be assured of the security of our various IoT systems.

At present, the Info-communications Media Development Authority actively works on creating the Telecom Cybersecurity Strategic Committee, which will establish the Singaporean telcos’ cybersecurity capacities.

Advancement of China’s technology enhances traditional CNY festivities

The traditional cooking of Chinese cuisine has always been part of the celebration of the Chinese New Year. Times have changed ever since. These days, meal preparations for the family reunions do not need to be exhaustive and time-consuming.

At a simple tap on your mobile app, China’s technology makes things instantly ready for you, from venue setting to food selections for the whole clan.

Some critics claimed technology has certainly changed the true meaning of celebrating the Chinese New Year. Some even commented this has brought people to be lazy and introspective in welcoming the Lunar New year.

A quick and easy order food system is simply of one the ways how technology has made the Chinese celebration of the Lunar New Year very handy. This change has been an acceptable practice for this generation. Also, with the proliferation of different apps, this method has become inevitable and easy to do.

For dining-out fanatics, the Eleme app is widely used in China when looking for restaurants that provide different meals such as Peking roast duck to hotpot to common stir fry for Spring Festival celebrations.

Ordering in a swipe of the finger on your smartphone has become a popular Chinese trend. It is an option instead of the usual home-cooked meals prepared in some households.

Many food retailers are joining the bandwagon of online marketing as the demand keeps on increasing. Most food advertisements are posted on different social media sites several days prior to the holiday.

In one WeChat ad, it reads, “Do not want your parents to be tired of cooking at home? Cannot get a restaurant reservation and do not want to clean up afterwards? How about getting your Lunar New Year’s meal delivered? None of these problems will matter.”

Today’s technology is a big leap that has brought innovations how people interact with each other. For the New Year celebrations, everything can be done at your fingertips. You can plan, make some bookings, and pay products and services using your smartphone.

Transformation continues amid erratic global economic environment : PM Lee

0

The year 2019 may not be as vigorous as the previous years since the ongoing US-China trade conflict will definitely have an impact on Singapore. However, despite the challenges ahead, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is imploring everyone to “keep on upgrading ourselves and improving lives for our workers.”

“Last year was good growth, the year before was also good growth. This year I think we will continue to grow. It may be not as vibrant as before but we work hard; even if this year is slower, the year after that we can make it better,” PM Lee said.

PM Lee met reporters after visiting workers at ground-handling and catering firm Sats at Changi Airport, on the morning of the first day of the Chinese New Year, where he was briefed on the company’s efforts to innovate and stay ahead of the competition.

Mr. Lee added that the global and regional developments will also have an influence on Singapore’s position as an air hub. “The air hub is a very important part of our economy… In the long term, I expect that business will still grow because the region in the long term will continue to be picking up and people are travelling,” further saying “We make sure that we are competitive, (and) they will fly through Singapore.”

On the same note, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat emphasized that the 2019 Budget will focus on keeping Singapore safe and secure and make sure that its industries continue to transform and create good jobs for workers, which means “enabling our workers to learn new skills to upgrade, in particular enabling our companies to build deep capabilities so that they can stand to be more competitive in the coming years,” the Finance Minister said.

Talking to the media on the first day of the Chinese New Year at PSA’s Pasir Panjang Terminal, where he joined workers on duty for celebrations, Mr. Heng informed media men that he will be providing details of the Merdeka Generation package and how Singapore is working to keep the elderly active and healthy, during his Budget Speech on Feb 18.

Aligned with PM Lee’s call for continued growth and positive change, Mr. Heng stressed “The global economic environment is more uncertain and we can expect some slowdown, but we must continue our transformation and remain optimistic that we will continue to make good progress.”

Highlighting the importance of being growth-conscious, the Finance Minister called for all Singaporeans and the national government to “look not just over one or two quarters, but over how we can make an effort in transforming our economy.”

Malaysia to lose S$ 1.6 million after IPC removed hosting rights for Para-Swimming Championships

The International Paralympic Committee (IPC) stripped Malaysia’s hosting rights for the World Para-Swimming Championships late last month. The IPC came to this decision after the country banned athletes from Israel.

As a result, Malaysia will lose S$ 1.6 million (US $1.2 million), largely in the hotel sector, as approximately 600 competitors were expected to be billeted in these accommodations outside Sarawak. The swimming championship was supposed to have been held in Kuching from July 29 to August 4 of this year.

Other sectors that will bear losses are the country’s airlines, restaurants, travel agencies, shopping areas, and transportation industries.

The Algemeiner, a Jewish publication based in the United States, reports John Teo, the honorary secretary-general of the Malaysian Association of Hotels Sarawak Chapter, as saying, “The swimmers and coaches stay up to two weeks, although the championships last for one week. The hotel would not be able to fill up the occupancy within [this] short span of time after the cancellation of the championships.”

IPC President Andrew Parsons made a statement explaining the decision. “Politics and sport are never a good mix. We are disappointed that Israeli athletes would not have been allowed to compete in Malaysia. The Paralympic Movement has, and always will be, motivated by a desire to drive inclusion, not exclusion. Regardless of the countries involved in this matter, the IPC would take the same decision again if it was to face a similar situation involving different countries.”

The committee’s decision was praised by Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesperson Emmanuel Nahshon, who tweeted “this is a victory of values over hatred and bigotry, a strong statement in favor of freedom and equality. Thank you @Paralympics for your brave decision!!!”

In early January, Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Tun Mahathir Mohamad said that athletes from Israel would not be welcome into the country. Saifuddin Abdullah, Malaysia’s Foreign Minister, said that the country would “not host any more events involving Israel or its representatives.”

This is not the first time that Malaysia has banned Israeli competitors from athletic events. In 2015, the country did not issue visas to two windsurfers who were supposed to compete in Langkawi, forcing them to withdraw from the competition. And in 2017, Malaysia declined to host a FIFA world soccer conference when a delegation from Israel was going to attend.

Read related: Malaysia stripped of hosting World Para Swimming Championships after banning Israeli athletes

https://theindependent.sg.sg/malaysia-stripped-of-hosting-world-para-swimming-championships-after-banning-israeli-athletes/