Wednesday, June 18, 2025
29 C
Singapore
Home Blog Page 3316

WP politician challenges Chan Chun Sing’s claim that the EBRC is independent

0
Photos: YT screencapture, AFP

Workers’ Party (WP) politician Yee Jenn Jong has challenged Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing’s recent remarks that the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) is independent.

The EBRC is responsible for recommending amendments to the number and boundaries of electoral wards prior to each election. The Government announced that the EBRC was convened in August last year, signalling that the next election is imminent.

Mr Chan was asked whether the EBRC can be completely independent of the Prime Minister’s Office, at the Singapore Perspectives conference organised by the Institute of Policy Studies on Monday (20 Jan).

The Minister, who serves as the ruling party’s second assistant secretary-general, replied that the committee comprises of public servants with knowledge on matters like population and demographic changes and that he feels that the committee is independent and professional.

He said: “I have never doubted their independence. They do their job professionally. No matter who does the work, how it is done, you have to report to somebody and present it to be approved and issued.”

The independence of the EBRC has remained a hot button topic in Singapore. The committee is chaired by the secretary to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Tan Kee Yong – a senior civil servant who has publicly defended PM Lee in the past, most notably in 2017 when he rebutted accusations PM Lee’s siblings Lee Wei Ling and Lee Hsien Yang made during the explosive 38 Oxley Road dispute.

Mr Tan also chaired the EBRC in 2015, prior to that year’s general election. Certain recommendations the committee were made, such as the recommendation to have Joo Chiat SMC absorbed into Marine Parade GRC, drew backlash and sparked questions over the neutrality of the EBRC.

Joo Chiat SMC, which had been a single member ward from 1997 to 2015, was absorbed into a group ward ahead of the 2015 election after it was hotly contested in the 2011 election. WP candidate Yee Jenn Jong had lost the ward by just a hair of votes, earning a vote-share of 48.99 per cent, in 2011.

Asserting that the proof for whether the EBRC is truly independent lies in what the Government does, Mr Yee Jenn Jong challenged the Government to make certain changes to the committee to make it independent.

In a Facebook post published on Tuesday (21 Jan), Mr Yee suggested that the Government could appoint other independent members to the committee, make the committee’s minutes of discussions open to the public, and provide better justification of changes instead of publishing “skimpy reports”.

He also called on the Government to set a reasonable time gap from the publication of the EBRC’s report to polling day. There is presently no set time between the release of the EBRC report to the calling of the election.

The time between the release of the EBRC’s report and polling day has ranged from as little as 17 days to as long as six months, in Singapore history. Opposition parties will need to wait for the EBRC to release its report to find out how the boundaries have been dissected.

Recommending that the Government set a fixed time frame of 6-12 months between the release of the EBRC report and polling day, Mr Yee asked:What is the urgency of having polls just immediately after changing boundaries?”

Finally, the WP member said that the EBRC should not report to the PM and pointed out that many countries practice having such committees report to an independent entity outside of the political parties.

While the EBRC has taken between two to four months to complete the review in the past three elections, it has been taking longer than usual to make its recommendations this time around. The EBRC was convened in August last year but the Government revealed earlier this month that the committee has yet to complete its deliberations.

There is strong speculation that the EBRC report will only be released after Budget 2020, which has been scheduled for 18 Feb, and that an election will be called shortly after the Budget.

Electoral boundaries committee chaired by secretary to PM Lee and cabinet

MP Tin Pei Ling urges public not to share photoshopped CNY banner of her

0
Facebook screengrab: Tin Pei Ling

Singapore—On Tuesday (Jan 21) MacPherson Member of Parliament Tin Pei Ling took to social media to decry the doctored banner of her Chinese New Year greeting that has been making the rounds.

It carried a photoshopped image of her that she characterized as “so crass” that she did not even want to put it up on her page.

Ms Tin told Channel NewsAsia (CNA) in a phone interview that she will be filing a police report over the incident.

The MP put up a photo on her Facebook page of the “ORIGINAL and actual banner” that was hanging in her ward, showing her in a modest red dress and with a greeting that read, “Tin Pei Ling, Member of Parliament for MacPherson SMC wishes all residents A Happy and Prosperous Lunar New Year.”

This is the ORIGINAL and actual banner put up in my ward. A similar photo containing a doctored version of the banner…

Posted by Tin Pei Ling 陈佩玲 on Tuesday, January 21, 2020

The photoshopped version shows Ms Tin in a much more revealing cheongsam, and the message on the banner say, “ENJOY HAPPY SAVINGS with Government U-SAVE Rebates!” and “Vote PAP for Prosperity and Power!”.

Ms Tin wrote on her Facebook page,  “I do not know who committed such mischief. But it is clear that the person or party behind this has no respect for women.”

She also asked the public not to share the doctored image, a blurred-out version of which can be seen here.

The MacPherson MP was apparently alerted to the falsified image by friends and other people who reached out to her.

CNA reports Ms Tin as saying that she will leave it up to the police whether or not to take action regarding the doctored banner.

She is quoted as saying, ”It’s unpleasant, it’s offensive – I still find that it’s clearly a lack of respect for women.”

She admitted to feeling puzzled over the matter. “The content  of the banner also has nothing to do with my Chinese New Year banner as well, so it’s very puzzling as to why whoever did this, did this.”

Here is the full text of Ms Tin’s Facebook post:

“This is the ORIGINAL and actual banner put up in my ward. A similar photo containing a doctored version of the banner has been circulating and I have received enquiries from friends and members of the public. The doctored version contained a photoshopped image of me. It is so crass that I would not even put it up here. I do not know who committed such mischief. But it is clear that the person or party behind this has no respect for women.
I sincerely urge everyone not to circulate the doctored image to discourage such behaviour.”
Thank you.

Netizens sympathized with Ms Tin, with some females commenting that the MacPherson MP should bring up in Parliament the disrespect women encounter due to pervasive voyeurism.

Tan Yee Jia Rebecca wrote, “Talking about no respect for women, perhaps you can speak up in Parliament about making the laws harsher for voyeurs who have been filming women showering or taking upskirt shots of women. As can be seen in the recent spate of crimes involving voyeurs, the punishment is barely a tap on the wrist. Women can never feel safe in Singapore if there isn’t harsher punishment for these people.”

Other netizens seemed to agree. Goh Shufeng Danielle wrote, “Yes, Ms Tin Pei Ling 陈佩玲, especially when you have mentioned that it is disrespectful to women. Setting an example for not tolerating this is also putting forward a strong message against online bully (sic) including for women.” -/TISG

Read related: Tin Pei Ling takes over from another PAP MP to become CEO of Business China

Tin Pei Ling takes over from another PAP MP to become CEO of Business China

 

 

 

Workers’ Party allegedly woos ex-presidential aspirant’s daughter as election looms

0
Photos: FB screencaptures

The Workers’ Party is allegedly wooing ex-presidential aspirant Farid Khan’s daughter Raeesah Khan to join it ahead of the impending General election, according to an unnamed insider who spoke to the Redwire Times.

26-year-old Raeesah is a social activist and freelance digital marketing consultant. She is perhaps most well known for her work with the Reyna Movement – a non-profit organisation she founded to empower women through community engagement and upskilling programmes as well as to support refugees.

The Singaporean, who has been involved in social activism since she was 17, was featured as one of Cleo magazine’s 2019 “Changemakers” last year.

Raeesah was spotted with WP members handing out party leaflets at a recent walkabout in the Punggol region. Although she was not wearing the party uniform, she donned the party’s blue colour during the outreach activity.

According to the Redwire Times, Raeesah “has been earmarked by the WP as a potential candidate.”

On Sunday (19 Jan), WP secretary-general Pritam Singh promised to field quality candidates during the impending general election. Speaking at the WP’s Members’ Forum 2020, he said:

“For the upcoming general elections, we will field candidates that the public can envision to become competent MPs and Parliamentary backbenchers and who will manage their Town Councils well. The focus will be on quality candidates from a range of backgrounds and life experiences. It is my firm belief that they will do Singapore and our people proud, in Parliament and as elected Town Councillors.”

The Independent has reached out to the WP and Raeesah for comment.

Raeesah’s father, Farid Khan, announced his intention to contest the 2017 Presidential Election which was reserved for Malay candidates.

The applications of both Mr Khan and fellow presidential aspirant Salleh Marican to run for president were rejected by the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC), on the basis that both men did not meet the updated eligibility criteria to contest the election.

The eligibility criteria to contest the election was amended in 2016 – the year before the election was called. In the past, individuals who had served as the chairman or CEO of a company with at least S$100 million in paid-up capital could contest the election but the criteria was tightened significantly ahead of the 2017 Presidential Election.

In the 2017 election, aspirants from the private sector had to lead a company which had S$500 million in shareholders’ equity for the individual’s most recent 3-year period of service.

Mr Khan, who qualified to run for President under the criteria prior to 2016, was disqualified under the stricter eligibility criteria that was imposed prior to the 2017 election. Mr Khan lost about S$200,000 in campaign marketing expenses after his failed bid to run.

Speaker of Parliament and ruling party MP for Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC Halimah Yacob eventually became President by walkover after Mr Khan and Mr Salleh were disqualified from the race. Her parliamentary seat remains vacant after the Government declined to call a by-election in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC after Mdm Halimah resigned to run for President.

Ex-NCMP criticises controversial 2017 reserved Presidential Election once again

“Are we ready for a non-Chinese PM then?” – WP politician asks as PM Lee defends reserved presidential election

Bertha Henson bans “arrogant” pro-PAP Polish blogger from her Facebook page

0
Photos: FB, YT screencapture

Veteran journalist Bertha Henson has decided to ban Polish blogger Michael Petraeus from her Facebook page.

Mr Petraeus, the man behind the blog Critical Spectator, is a marketing and design consultant who has been based in Singapore since 2016. He is known for publishing blog posts that are overwhelmingly supportive of the Singapore Government — so much so that he has been accused of being a part of the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) Internet Brigade.

The blogger’s posts are frequently shared by pro-PAP pages like the “Fabrications about PAP” Facebook page as well as by certain well-known figures, like Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s wife and Temasek CEO Ho Ching.

Last year, Ms Henson shared one of Mr Petraeus’ blog posts on her personal Facebook page and quipped that he should be given a Singapore passport. He had written about how the mosque attacks in Christchurch, New Zealand, could have been avoided if the world had studied and followed the Singapore model.

On Thursday (Jan 16), however, Ms Henson announced that she would be banning him  from her Facebook page if she received 100 “likes” on her post.

Ms Henson said: “According to the rules of engagement on this wall, I am asking to ban Michael Petraeus. I find him loutish, abhorrent and totally devoid of civility. He claims to be a great intellect but look deeper at what he says and it’s really just personal attacks with big words used.

“He has been doing this constantly on my wall and I have tolerated it. But I have to conclude he’s a horrible person and extremely toxic. I also think he’s just invading my wall to get some profile. I hope at least 100 of you agree with me. Please like this post if you agree.”

Ms Henson ended up receiving more than 1,000 “likes” on her Facebook post:

This is not the first time Mr Petraeus has clashed with a prominent Singaporean. In October last year, Singaporean academic Cherian George called him a “troll” after he published their private email exchanges online.

The disagreement between them arose after Dr George criticised The Straits Times on Twitter for “supporting the Singapore Government’s attack on independent journalists, not for lack of professional ability but for want of ethical application”.

Mr Petraeus disagreed with Dr George on Twitter and went on to email the academic when he did not receive a reply on Twitter. In his email to Dr George, Mr Petraeus called his views a “swipe” against the Singapore Government and accused the academic of “fighting for freedom as long as it is freedom on your terms only”.

In response to Mr Petraeus’ complaint that he “failed” to engage in discussion online, Dr George sharply responded that he engages in discussion with those he feels can contribute meaningfully to an exchange.

Mr Petraeus took offence and accused Dr George of “intellectual dishonesty” before accusing him of being a “self-righteous academic with no meaningful contribution — and zero responsibility — for any society…” He then made their email exchange public.

Asserting that people like Mr Petraeus hurt the ruling party, Dr George subsequently tweeted: “Couldn’t resist feeding this troll. He’s made our emails public. Wonder if PAP knows how trolls like him and Calvin Cheng hurt it. The populist demons PAP’s using to suffocate critics will poison the culture sustaining its antipopulist technocratic model.”

War of words: Professor Cherian George calls Critical Spectator a troll whom he ‘couldn’t resist feeding’

Kim Kardashian proves critics wrong, finishes first year of law school

0
Kim Kardashian believes in justice. Picture: Instagram

Reality TV star Kim Kardashian West said on Saturday that she had finished the first year of law school and that she was working on a documentary on advocacy work for criminal justice reform.

The documentary, titled Kim Kardashian West: The Justice Project, will premiere on the Oxygen cable network on April 5.

The two-hour film will show West paying prison visits, while working with legal experts on four cases.

The 39-year-old reality star is famous for beauty and fashion, while documenting her life with her siblings on the Kardashian series.

In the past two years, West helped to win the release two women from prison, which led to her interest in criminal justice reform.

West was asked recently about how she responded to people who think she was interested in it to make her brand popular. During a meeting organised by the Television Critics Association, West replied that she was used to criticism so it did not faze her. She added that she was genuinely caring about the cases and the people and that she was not doing it to be famous.

West, who spent 20 hours a week on her law programme in the first year, will be taking the bar exam in 2022.

Her late father, Robert Kardashian, was a prominent Los Angeles lawyer. He represented O.J. Simpson in the 1995 case.

The executive producer of The Justice Project, Vince DiPersio, said West was taking a fair amount of risk for advocating the release of prisoners.

He hoped, however, that no one came out and did something bad, but added that West was willing to take that risk.

Kim Kardashian West is continuing law studies. Picture: Instagram

Two years ago, West convinced President Donald Trump to commute the life sentence of a 63-year-old Tennessee woman convicted of a first drug offence. A year later, she helped win clemency for another Tennessee woman who had been convicted as a teenager of murdering a man who paid to have sex with her.

The people in The Justice Project were found through letters sent to West. She works on some cases and sends some to other lawyers who can help.

West hopes that the TV show can convince viewers that there is hope for everyone and that people can show more empathy for those who run afoul of the law.

Grab to scrap some vouchers and increase cost of rewards

0
Photo: AFP

Grab has announced major revisions to its GrabRewards programme from March 2.

The cost of rewards will go up while certain coveted rewards like S$15, S$20 and S$25 vouchers will disappear under the updated programme.

From March, Grab users will earn fewer GrabRewards points with each transaction. While users currently earn between 2 and 10 points per dollar depending on the Grab service and the rewards tier they belong to, users will only be able to earn 2 to 4 points per dollar across all types of Grab transactions with the rewards update.

Additionally, members who belong to the higher tiers — like the Gold or Platinum tiers — will no longer be able to use fewer points to unlock bigger discounts. From March, Grab ride and food delivery vouchers will cost a standard 550 points for S$1 off, 2,500 points for S$5 off, and 5,000 points for S$10 off no matter which tier members belong to.

For comparison, a S$10 Grab ride or food delivery voucher presently costs 4,200 points for regular members, 4,000 points for Silver members, 3,800 points for Gold members, and just 3,600 points for Platinum members.

The S$15, S$20 and S$25 ride and food delivery vouchers that are available now will no longer be offered when the update goes into effect.

Users who are part of the Platinum tier — the highest rewards tier — now earn 10 points per dollar spent on GrabPay transaction but will only earn a maximum of four points per dollar spent after the update. This means that Platinum members will need to spend about S$1,250 to accumulate enough points to be eligible for the S$10 discount after the update.

Users will also have to spend more to unlock and maintain each membership tier from March.

Users who now need to spend S$60 to unlock the Silver tier will soon need to spend S$150 to achieve that tier, those who need to spend S$240 now to move on to the Gold tier must soon spend S$600 to do so and those who want to move to the Platinum tier must soon spend a hefty S$1,500 to do so, compared to just S$600 now.

Meanwhile, some netizens have pointed out that it is no longer possible to make payments via GrabPay at transaction portals like YouTrip, Revolut and AXS.

Grab said in a press statement that the revisions to its GrabRewards programme will be made to adapt better to “shifts in customer expectations”:

“Our customers today interact with the Grab app more frequently for their transport, food, payments and other needs, and are demanding for better engagement on the platform. With shifts in customer expectations, coupled with the overall growth of our ecosystem, the way we reward and create value for our customers must change too.”

Grab is expected to run more promotional campaigns this year like flash sales and the ongoing “Zodiac Coin Hunt” campaign that was launched to coincide with Chinese New Year.

Assuring users that they will soon have “more places to earn and spend their reward points at millions of merchants” despite the plunge in points per dollar, Grab said: “In addition, customers can also look forward to more ways of earning points and rewards, such as through Challenges, flash sales and moment-based campaigns.”

Commuters have expressed their unhappiness with Grab’s announcement.

Facebook user Allen Eleaneur Chong, writing on The Straits Times FB page, said: “That’s the impact of not restricting the M&A between Grab and Uber last time. Now consumers will feel the pain without a competent competitor.”

Some others commenting on the same platform suggested that the travel app company will lose more business to its competitors because of this unpopular move. Others encouraged commuters to quickly use their rewards before the start of the revised programme.

Facebook user Rishi Katreddi, commenting on Today’s report on the issue, said: “This is what happens when one brand monopolises the market.” Another user, Joice Toh, said: “We need some worthy competitors.”

Facebook user Ng Swee Shoon said: “As with Lazada’s LiveUp membership, once the threshold of perceived rewards fall below an acceptable level, pioneer members will look for alternatives. A great opportunity for Gojek, Comfortdelgro, Deliveroo and Food Panda.”

Another Facebook user, Singh Prem, said: “Does not surprise me one bit! The richer it gets, it loses integrity, and starts to show its true colours — real ugly, from my perspective. I find this to be in bad taste. It is very much like biting the hand that feeds it.”

Mr Paul Ho, chief mortgage officer at iCompareLoan, said: “This is not the first time Grab has massively devalued its rewards programme.”

He added: “Commuters should quickly redeem their Grab points before the revised rewards programme kicks in. It remains to be seen if commuters will migrate to other competitor apps like Gojek and Tada to protest Grab’s devaluation of its rewards programme.”

In July 2018, Grab gutted the earning rates for rides and hiked the cost of vouchers for its customers. In March 2018, when Uber sold out to Grab, many people feared that Grab’s newly-gained monopoly power would lead to higher prices for rides. New entrants to the market have helped to better mitigate the price hikes, but not before critics took the transport travel app company to task.

Aaron Wong, writing in The Milelion, said at that time: “This is not how you run a loyalty program. Unannounced devaluations and sticking it to your most loyal customers? Who’d want to use your service then?”

ESM Goh goes full swing with CNY visits at Marine Parade

0
FB/Mparader

With Chinese New Year just around the corner, Emeritus Senior Minister (ESM) Goh Chok Tong has been going round Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency (GRC) to offer greetings and spend time with his constituents.

On Sunday (Jan 19), Mr Goh visited Marine Parade Central Market and had breakfast with residents and stallholders there.

In a Facebook post that day, he wrote that he extended Chinese New Year greetings to stall operators and customers there before heading to the community club to give out Edusave awards.

Along with sharing photos of moments with residents, Mr Goh wrote: “Good food and good vibes. People are happy with the clean, newly-renovated market.”

In another Facebook post on Tuesday (Jan 21), Mr Goh mentioned that the seniors enjoyed a bingo session and a lo hei lunch at St Luke’s ElderCare in Marine Parade.

He wrote: “We thank the cheerful and dedicated staff of St Luke’s for looking after our elderly. St Luke’s will be part of our Caregivers Support Network. They will provide respite service and transportation to hospitals for caregivers and their wards.” /TISG

Opposition party leader once again vehemently defends belief in UFOs

0
Photos: YT screencapture, Goh Meng Seng FB

Singapore — People’s Power Party (PPP) Secretary-General Goh Meng Seng has once again vehemently defended his belief in unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

The opposition leader was most recently in the news for his involvement in a proposed opposition coalition between his party, the Reform Party, the Democratic Progressive Party and the Singaporeans First party.

In 2011, Mr Goh claimed that he saw a UFO in the year 2000 and said that this experience led him to develop a belief that “there exists a more advanced civilization somewhere which is alien to Earth”. He repeated his claims in 2018.

When there was a backlash against his views, he hit out at the detractors and labelled them “myopic and ignorant”. He added that his belief in UFOs was more credible than the religious beliefs of those who had never seen their gods.

In a Facebook post last Thursday (Jan 16), Mr Goh reiterated his belief in UFOs and vehemently defended his belief in the face of fresh criticism. He wrote on social media: “It is confirmed that I am NOT the First nor the Last politicians to believe in UFOs.

“In the lesser known history of UN, UN has discussed about forming committee to look into UFOs before. Their attempts might have not succeeded yet but there are several interesting testimonies from astronauts and such which indicated sightings of UFOs.

“Some politicians even regard UFO as the most important issue that we were facing during their time. When will a formal UFO disclosure comes? Maybe in my lifetime, maybe not. A 80,90 years lifespan is really peanuts in the timeline of the universe.”

When netizens criticised his views and asked him whether such beliefs would help him get elected, Mr Goh retorted: “I am not like somebody who will plot whole day whole night just to dream about getting elected … I have a life you know!

“The worse kind of people I know are those who will go crazy in doing all sorts of treacherous things just to fulfill their political ambition.”

In 2011, Mr Goh explained why he was a “UFO/alien believer”. Describing the UFO he claimed to have witnessed, the opposition politician added that he believed there were two types of UFOs — one type operated by real aliens, while the other was “human made, by some countries like America or Russia”:

“Ok, I shall tell you why I am UFO/alien believer. I have witnessed what I believe to be an UFO, an alien object back in 1999 because no human technology can explain or did what that object did. I have written about it back then on soc.culture.sg.
“At a glance, it looks like a glowing white cloud floating in the air. It was oval in shape. It was floating just outside my windows. I was watching TV at that time.
“It caught my eyes because of its “glowing” nature and the way it moved, in a slow and steady movement which somehow looked “unnatural” to me. I tried to take a closer by moving to the window. Just a minute later, it just zipped and zoomed out of my sight within a blink of my eyes… I believe no human technology could make any object to move at such a great speed.
“Such image is still imprinted in my mind deeply. Just too bad I didn’t have any video camera back then to record the whole process. From then on, I always keep an open mind about UFO sightings. Some UFO sighting reports around the world coincide with my own witnessing experience … such objects just zip and zoom out of sight within seconds.
“Whether or not this news about the three gigantic spaceship is real, I really don’t know. Top travel from Earth to Pluto or Jupiter by a normal human space exploration crafts will take years… tens of years. If it takes only 2 years to reach Earth, it is already traveling at 20 times or more than human technology could do.
“Keep an open mind. In my opinion, there are two types of UFOs on Earth. Some are human made, by some countries like America or Russia. But these are the ones which could just fly at “normal” speed due to technological limitations. They may be in saucer shape, have the ability to hover around etc but do not have the technology of traveling at the speed of light. Those which could do that, most probably are alien types.”

He repeated his claims in November 2018 and said: “Back in 2000, I have seen an object masquerading as a cloud which was glowing and floating at a very slow speed. Before I could take out my camera to take a picture of it, it just zoomed away in extreme speed … astronomical speed, zipping through the evening sky.

“Such technology of speed is unknown to human civilization and that is why I believe there exists a more advanced civilization somewhere which is alien to Earth.”

When there was a backlash, Mr Goh compared his belief in UFOs to belief in religion and said his belief was “more credible” than religion. Lashing out that his detractors were myopic and ignorant, Mr Goh said:

“In this world, there are billions of people believing in religions without seeing their God, Goddess, Buddha, Angels or whatever supernatural beings but we hardly say anything silly about it. And yes, I am also one of the billions who believe in my religion with a leap of faith.
“But when I say I also believe aliens or UFOs exist because I have seen one with my own eyes before, camouflaging itself as a cloud but zipping off with a ultra supersonic speed, people start to say GMS has discredited himself blah blah!
“Well as far as I am concern, seeing is believing and my belief in the existence of alien UFO is much more credible than any religion which was believed by others who didn’t even see their God, Goddess, Buddha, Angels etc before!
“In all logical sense, how could a person who believe in exactly what he has seen be less credible than someone who believe in something that he didn’t even see before? Common sense and logic are really not common at all.
“Besides, the truth is, I repeated my consistent claim of my sighting when there is a recent report of a couple of pilots in Ireland who also witnessed UFOs which also flew in unbelievable speed!
“I am definitely not the only one who had seen such things zipping through our sky on Earth. It shows how myopic and ignorant people could be.”

“My belief in alien UFO is more credible than any religion which was believed by others who didn’t even see their God”: Opposition politician hits out at UFO sighting detractors

Facebook to boost site safety with 1,000 more UK staff

0
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg - Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images/AFP

Facebook on Tuesday said it plans to create 1,000 more London-based jobs this year to improve safety on the social network with the aid of artificial intelligence.

The new roles will increase the number of staff at the company’s largest engineering hub outside the United States to more than 4,000.

“The UK is a world leader in both innovation and creativity. That’s why I’m excited that we plan to hire an additional 1,000 people in London this year alone,” said Facebook’s chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg.

She said that many of the new roles would help Facebook to “address the challenges of an open internet and develop artificial intelligence to find and remove harmful content more quickly.

“They will also help us build the tools that help small businesses grow, compete with larger companies and create new jobs.”

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson welcomed the move, saying that “the UK is successfully creating both homegrown firms at the forefront of cutting-age technologies, such as artificial intelligence, whilst attracting established global tech giants like Facebook”.

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP

Thunberg condemns climate inaction as Trump joins Davos

0
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg attends a session at the Congres center during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, on January 21, 2020. (Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP)

by Alex PIGMAN and Sebastian SMITH

Swedish teen activist Greta Thunberg on Tuesday slammed the business elite for doing “basically nothing” on climate change, as the Davos forum braced for an address from US President Donald Trump hours before his impeachment trial begins.

The 50th meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in the Swiss Alps resort got under way seeking to thrash out dangers to both the environment and economy from the heating of the planet.

Trump, who has repeatedly expressed scepticism about climate change, is set to give the first keynote address of Davos 2020, on the same day as his impeachment trial opens at the Senate in Washington.

Before his appearance, Thunberg underlined the message that has inspired millions around the world, saying “basically nothing has been done” to fight climate change.

“It will require much more than this. This is just the very beginning,” the 17-year-old said.

Speaking calmly and with a wry smile, Thunberg acknowledged that her campaign which began with school strikes had attracted huge attention without yet achieving concrete change.

“There is a difference between being heard to actually leading to something,” she said.

“I am not the person who should complain about not being heard,” she said to appreciative laughter.

“I am being heard all the time. But the science and the voice of the young people are not at the centre of the conversation.”

While the WEF and individual business leaders have been detailing their own concerns about climate change, Greenpeace complained in a new report that some of the world’s biggest banks, insurers and pension funds have collectively invested $1.4 trillion in fossil fuel companies since the Paris climate deal in 2016.

“Pretty much nothing has been done as global Co2 emissions have not been reduced. And that is of course what we are trying to achieve,” said Thunberg.

– Davos showdown? –
There are no expectations that Trump and Thunberg, who have exchanged barbs through Twitter, will actually meet, but the crowded venue and intense schedule mean a chance encounter cannot be ruled out.

When Trump and his entourage walked through UN headquarters last year at the annual General Assembly, a photo of the teenager staring in apparent fury at the president from the sidelines went viral.

Tweeting before arriving in Davos aboard his Marine One helicopter, Trump appeared in bullish mood, writing he would “bring Good Policy and additional Hundreds of Billions of Dollars back to the United States of America!”

Although Trump’s Republican party holds a majority in the Senate and is almost sure to acquit him on charges of abusing his power and obstructing Congress, the impeachment adds volatility to an already tense 2020 presidential election.

– ‘Governments continue to fail’ –
Sustainability is the buzzword at the Davos forum, which began in 1971, with heel crampons handed out to participants to encourage them to walk on the icy streets rather than use cars, and the signage paint made out of seaweed.

Trump’s opposition to renewable energy, his withdrawal from the Paris accord negotiated under his predecessor Barack Obama, and the free hand extended to the fossil fuel industry puts him at odds with this year’s thrust of the event.

“People are playing a lot more attention to” climate, Eurasia Group president Ian Bremner told AFP at Davos, adding there was “genuine action by some big players”, after investment titan BlackRock said it was partially divesting out of coal.

“But let’s be clear — a big part of this is because we failed for a very long time and governments continue to fail,” he added.

Business leaders are likely also to be concerned by the state of the global economy whose prospects, according to the International Monetary Fund, have improved but remain brittle.

The IMF cut its global growth estimate for 2020 to 3.3 percent, saying that a recent truce in the trade war between China and the US had brought some stability but that risks remained.

“We are already seeing some tentative signs of stabilisation but we have not reached a turning point yet,” said IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva.

Activists meanwhile will be pressing for much more concrete action to fight inequality, after Oxfam issued a report outlining how the number of billionaires has doubled in the past decade and the world’s 22 richest men now have more wealth than all the women in Africa.

© Agence France-Presse

/AFP