International COVID 19 Netizens agree with Pritam Singh’s call for full report on Covid-19 to...

Netizens agree with Pritam Singh’s call for full report on Covid-19 to be made public

Follow us on Instagram and Telegram

“Can that report be made available to Parliament, so that MPs and Singaporeans can better understand the breadth of perspectives gathered, the known data and facts, and draw their own conclusions?" Mr Singh asked.

SINGAPORE: In Parliament on Monday (Mar 20), Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh (Aljunied GRC) called for the full report to be made public during the debate on the Covid-19 White Paper, even as he assured the House that the WP had come not to criticize the government’s handling of the pandemic, but to support the national effort during an unprecedented time.

See also  Pritam Singh, Sylvia Lim & He Ting Ru pay courtesy call at New Zealand High Commission

However, the Leader of the Opposition asked why the government has chosen not to publish the original report from Mr Peter Ho, the former head of civil service who headed the COVID-19 After Action Review (AAR), adding that this report should be published in full for the public to come to its conclusions.

“During my Fortitude Budget speech in June 2020, I reminded the Government that Singaporeans had a right to expect a thorough review and accounting of the Government response to the crisis. Our position as a constructive opposition required us to communicate the feelings of Singaporeans in Parliament which necessarily includes a public expectation of government accountability.”

See also  Online Safety (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill: Gerald Giam seeks a broad content filtering system for children’s mobile phone

He noted that while the White Paper admits some of the Government’s shortcomings, “Singaporeans do not know what has been excluded from the original reports and reviews.”

He then asked if the White Paper contained the entirety of the report from the AAR, which presumably presented more comprehensive findings.

Can that report be made available to Parliament, so that MPs and Singaporeans can better understand the breadth of perspectives gathered, the known data and facts, and draw their own conclusions? If there is confidential information within the AAR report that could harm national security if revealed, that could be redacted from the report,” he added.

Why did the Government decide against publishing the original review report presented by Mr Peter Ho in full?

To publish the original AAR report would be consistent with the spirit of the motion, which seeks to affirm the Government’s effort to learn from the experiences of the last three years.

See also  Leon Perera: Singapore must not allow only 1 dominant narrative, and marginalization of those with differing views should be prevented

Not doing so will leave open questions as to the motive behind the Government’s presentation of a synthesised report authored by the Prime Minister’s Office,” he asked.

See also  WP MP's statements on detention law "pure theatrics with no substance": Shanmugam

Several netizens on Reddit commenting on Mr Singh’s speech tended to agree with him.

/TISG

1 month after being under direct management, Sengkang Town Council opens branch office at Anchorvale

- Advertisement -
Follow us on Instagram and Telegram

Follow us on Instagram and Telegram