;

Transforming Thailand into an innovation economy and startup hub is certainly a monumental task, and it would be a gross oversimplification to break down all of its challenges to a single factor

A few weeks ago, I posted a comparative analysis of startup ecosystems around the world as part of a trip debrief following a 5-company delegation that Digital Ventures/Siam Commercial Bank PLC led to Israel. The analysis centered around Israel’s status as the “Startup Nation”, and looked at its startup ecosystem side-by-side with leading ecosystems in the United States and Singapore. For good measure, I threw in Thailand so that our bank’s management could see where our country stood relative to these world-class ecosystems.

With regard to Israel, the numbers came out pretty much as expected, cementing its status as one of the leading hubs of entrepreneurship in the world. With regard to Thailand, the numbers likewise revealed what many already know: Our ecosystem is quite nascent, and it has a long road ahead in its transformation into a regional startup hub.

But while the conclusions were in line with expectations, what was truly surprising were the magnitude of the numbers and metrics I had presented, and the yawning chasm between the world’s top startup ecosystems and our own. The analysis was quick-and-dirty, cobbled together rather hastily from third party sources from all over the internet, but the reactions and responses were overwhelmingly positive, with some great feedback & follow-up questions.

It was this feedback that inspired me to flesh out the analysis a bit more, adding a few new metrics, and including China in the comparison. So here is my revised five-country tech ecosystem comparison.

The key takeaways:

1. Startup density: Israel, the United States, and Singapore have incredible startup densities, boasting one startup for every 1,900 to 2,800 people, cementing their statuses as global hubs of entrepreneurial activity. China’s startup density is significantly lower at 1 startup for every 9,500 people, but its super-sized population definitely skews the ratio.

See also  Uber for Myanmar, Hello Cabs, raises funding and will compete with Grab and Go-Jek

However, if we assume the that the bulk of startup activity occurs in China’s coastal metropolises and top tier cities where half the population is concentrated, that ratio approaches one per 4,750 people, indicating a strong ecosystem on the rise. Meanwhile, Thailand’s approximately 600 startups equates to one per 113,000 people, a 12x differential to China and 60x differential to Israel.

2. Venture capital: The strongest startup ecosystems benefit from a number of key inputs, chief among them the number of venture capital funds active in the country and amount of venture capital financing those countries’ startups. Singapore and Israel are among the world’s fastest growing venture capital scenes, seeing US$625 and US$550 in inbound VC investment per capita, respectively.

The United States, a stable and mature startup ecosystem, saw a very respectable US$212 in VC investment per capita. China’s US$23 per capita in inbound venture capital looks paltry in comparison, but is still a whopping 18x larger than Thailand’s US$1.30 of inbound venture capital per capita. Neighboring Singapore sees 480x more funding per capita over Thailand, a stunning gap for an economy that aspires to be ASEAN’s next startup hub.

3. Accelerators: The disparities are just as remarkable looking at another startup input/resource: the number of startup accelerators operating in the country. Here, Israel is the runaway leader, with one accelerator for every 17 startups, more than twice the support available to startups in Singapore, at one accelerator per 38 startups. China and Thailand have similar levels of support at approximately one accelerator per 86 to 90 startups, while America only has one accelerator for every 700 startups.

See also  Singapore defense firm ST Engineering launches US$150M venture arm

Also read: Curating 150 plus startup and investor matches at Echelon Thailand, AsiaStartups.com helps improve fundraising success and impact

4. Exit opportunities: VC funding and accelerators are all well and good, but the true worth of any startup ecosystem lies in its exit opportunities, and here, the world’s top ecosystems shine. In 2016, 2.3 per cent to 2.4 per cent of Israel’s and America’s startups found an exit. Singapore, a fast growing but still relatively young ecosystem only saw less than 1 per cent of it’s startups exit, and China and Thailand’s exit opportunities were only a third of Singapore’s. Startups in Israel and the U.S. were 8x as likely to exit than counterparts in Thailand.

Why does Thailand suffer from such an outsized lack of entrepreneurs & startups?

I’m sure there are a variety of factors to contribute to this, but there are two indicators worth considering:

1. Thailand woefully underinvests in its human capital, as well as its knowledge base. The percentage of the working age population with any sort of tertiary education is only 12 per cent, compared to 30-45 per cent for the other three countries.

2. Likewise, while the other four countries are investing 2-4 per cent of their GDP in civilian R&D, Thailand’s expenditures amount to less than half of a percent. Consequently, the number of international patents filed (under the Patent Cooperation Treaty) amount to only 1 for every US$34 million dollars spent in civilian R&D, compared to one patent for every US$8 to 9 million in R&D spending in tech powerhouses Israel and the United States, and US$12 to 16 million in emerging tech hubs Singapore and China.

See also  We fought against an AirAsia venture and won; Here are some important lessons we learned

Transforming Thailand into an innovation economy and startup hub is certainly a monumental task, and it would be a gross oversimplification to break down all of its challenges to a single factor, but if I had to point to the lowest hanging fruit, I would look no further than education.

This isn’t simply pumping more dollars (or in this case, Thai Baht) into the education system, but rather revamping the system to include more creative thinking, more experimentation, more problem solving, and certainly more emphasis on STEAM (science, technology, engineering , arts & mathematics) curricula. Introduce coding and maker spaces to students at an early age, and shift emphasis from tests and scores to more experiential education.

There are no quick fixes to creating a sustainable startup ecosystem, but to quote a Chinese proverb, a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

—-

This post was originally published here.

Want to be part of the ecosystem?

Register for your Echelon Asia Summit access pass now! Enjoy +10% off Echelon Asia Summit Startup, Investor and Corporate passes just for being our favourite e27 reader.

The views expressed here are of the author’s, and e27 may not necessarily subscribe to them. e27 invites members from Asia’s tech industry and startup community to share their honest opinions and expert knowledge with our readers. If you are interested in sharing your point of view, submit your post here.

Featured Image  Copyright: jgroup / 123RF Stock Photo

The post The long road ahead for the Thailand startup ecosystem appeared first on e27.

Source: e27