Low Minmin, CNA’s China Correspondent, was live on air from Beijing when something completely unexpected happened. While she was live, a Caucasian man and an Asian man passionately made out behind her. To top things off, the asian man clad in a black shirt stared at the camera after having locked lips with his partner.
Having watched the video a few times, we’re convinced that the man in the black shirt knew exactly what he was doing. Before that, watch the video for yourself first and keep your eye peeled on the right corner of the video.
@sidachh they can’t censor the ending pose 😍🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🌈#singapore #channelnewsasia #cna #lgbt #lgbtq #gay #gaykiss #slay #beijing2022 #winterolympics
♬ Unstoppable (I put my armor on, show you how strong I am) – Sia
Now, we commence our play-by-play account of why we think this kissed was planned, albeit within a very short span of time.
1s
Here, at the start of the video, you can see the two men at the bar. The Caucasian man who is decked in a vest and a long-sleeved navy blue shirt notices the live broadcast behind them. He then speaks to his partner before walking off screen, in the general direction of the camera.
2s
The Asian man leaves the bar and trails behind his partner, but for a few seconds he looks squarely at the camera with a ice cold bottle of pint in his hand. We think that it was at this very moment that he hatched his plan.
5s
Now, here’s the blink and you’ll miss it moment. Between the 5s and 6s mark, you will witness more character development than a 2 hour Jack Neo movie.
As the man walks, with one hand in his pocket and one hand around his trusted lager, he does a little nod to his partner. If you didn’t catch the nod, which occurs just before the man disappears from the screen for a split second, go watch the video again. This is that same nod that you give or your family, when you have been visiting for a little too long. This is that same subtle nod you give a friend when it is time to roll.
As soon as he nodded, fear ceased to exist. In its place was a newfound bold resolve. Here, we see a man on a mission who is about to make history.
The best part? He was probably the only one who knew that he was going to make history.
8 – 12s
History was made as they locked lips for a few seconds in full view of a live audience. IMDA was shell-shocked.
12s
The Look. In the words of Roxette, he’s got the look!
Just take a minute to let all of that sass sink in.
That is the look of someone who knew exactly what he was doing, and he couldn’t be prouder. Many users on TikTok also took notice of “The Look”.
The user who published the video on TikTok also noted in thier caption that “they can’t censor the ending pose“.
IMDA regulations on portrayals of homosexuality
One of the reasons why the video became so viral, notwithstanding the courageous spontaneity of the 2 men, was the sheer novelty of seeing a same-sex expression of love on national television. The reason for this may be found in IMDA’ archaic internet code of practice.
Yes, they really did lump homosexuality together with pedophiliac, bestiality and necrophilia. This Internet Code of Practice is still in force today. Less than 2 years ago, the Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong stated that members of the LGBTQ community are “valued members of society“ and welcome in Singapore. Take a moment to try reconciling that. This dissonance is not inconsistent with the Government’s general paradoxical approach on the issue.
As you can see from the above extract of the IMDA’s Internet Code of Practice, material that advocates homosexuality is prohibited. This is not a prohibition that exists only on paper. In 2008, Channel 5 received a fine of $15,000 from the IMDA for “normalising and promoting a gay lifestyle“. In a statement dated 24 April 2008, IMDA said:
“MDA also consulted the Programme Advisory Committee for English Programmes (PACE) and the Committee was also of the view that a gay relationship should not be presented as an acceptable family unit. As the programme was shown on a Sunday morning, PACE felt that this was inappropriate as such a timeslot was within family viewing hours.
Taking into account the severity of the breach, the telecast time of the programme and the fact that this was a second breach for MediaCorp TV, MDA found that a financial penalty was warranted and issued MediaCorp TV a fine of $15,000.”
The IMDA’s Internet Code of Practice is just the tip of the iceberg in the erasure of LGBTQ representation in Singapore. Heckin’ Unicorn, a local LGBTQ activist group, have compiled a comprehensive summary of how LGBTQ representation is “systematically, actively, and pervasively erased” in Singapore. We attach a snippet from their article below that highlights the mind-boggling absurdity of the gamut of regulations:
Depictions of kissing or hugging of LGBTQ+ couples give films an instant M18 rating (the same for straight couples get a PG rating). Brief, non-detailed depictions of sexual acts between LGBTQ+ people gets the highest R21 rating, while a similar one for straight couples gets NC16.
And what about more detailed depictions of sex? Such scenes involving straight couples might get an R21 rating, but the same for LGBTQ+ couples are simply left out of the rating system. They might be censored away or refused classification (i.e. outright banned from distribution).
Now that CNA has (unintentionally) aired its first homosexual kissing scene, the time is ripe for us to re-examine some of these broadcast regulations involving LGBTQ representation. If the regulations are inconsistent with our Prime Minister’s stance that LGBTQ persons are valued and represented, then they should be consigned to history.
This article first appeared on Wake Up Singapore