// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Monday, August 3, 2026
30 C
Singapore

Customer who got charged $6 instead of $1.50 for side order wonders, “If no one checks, how many “mistakes” does the stall make in one day?”

SINGAPORE: A man took to social media, sounding somewhat frustrated after being overcharged for a meal and told that it would take a while for his refund to be given to him.

He ordered lontong topped with tempeh ikan bilis and was charged S$11 for a total of S$19, including S$0.50 for a takeaway container. “Wow, seriously, the lontong cost more than the rice set?” he wrote.

In a Nov 18 (Monday) post on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page, Mohammed Fauzi Mokhtar wrote that at Hajah Maimunah MINI at Tampines, he had ordered a rice meal with sambal goreng pengantin, sambal kentang, ikan bilis & Telor dadar that cost S$7.50.

Screenshot 2024 11 18 at 12.29.50%E2%80%AFPM

466106172 9552516958097601 2585281363383576103 n

After Googling the store’s phone number, he called them to inquire about the prices since his ikan bilis was just a side order, not an a la carte one.

A staff member requested that he send a photo of the food and the receipt given to him via WhatsApp and said she would check with the outlet manager about it.

Upon doing so, she told Mr Mohammed that they realized a mistake had been made and that he should only have been charged S$1.50 for the ikan bilis, not S$6.

467521662 9552517304764233 6722314955172283079 n

What appeared to trouble the customer was that the stall could only issue a refund on Thursday since the company’s finance department would only do so on that date.

“I was pondering if no one checks (s) & (gives) feedback, one day, one outlet staff may make how many mistakes x how many outlets (in their) daily operation,” he added.

While some commenters on Mr Mohammed agreed that the store could have refunded his money more timely, others said that the fact that the company admitted the mistake and promised to refund him was enough “service recovery.”

One wrote that since the outlet belongs to a chain of stores, processing a refund may take some time.

“They have a system to do things; as long as they refund you in the end, then it’s good enough,” the commenter wrote.

The Independent Singapore has contacted the customer and HJH Maimunah for further comments or updates. /TISG

Read also: S$17.50 meal at hot pot stall shocks diner; she regrets not reading the food reviews first before ordering

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

Man draws out a kitchen knife because his neighbor was making a phone call in public corridor

A man, angered by his neighbor's loud phone call outside his home, not only hurled insults at the neighbor but also went home to grab a kitchen knife and stormed towards him.

Why hurt an elderly? Man punched a 70-year-old man three times after declining to share a table

A man occupied a four-person table in a coffee shop. When the man refused to share the table, he got into an argument with a 77-year-old man and punched him three times in the head, causing the old...

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks