// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Sunday, June 7, 2026
28.9 C
Singapore

Netizens stand behind Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Suet Fern: “Simple logic, Mr LKY knew what he was doing”

While the Law Society (LawSoc) on Thursday (Aug 13) moved to have lawyer Lee Suet Fern struck off the roll for professional misconduct over the handling of the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s final will, both her lawyers and netizens pushed that the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew was not coerced in any way.

Mrs Lee’s lawyers, Senior Counsels Kenneth Tan and former Attorney-General Walter Woon, urged the court to dismiss all the charges against her, arguing that Mr Lee Kuan Yew knew what he was doing.

Referring to Lee Kuan Yew as MM or Minister Mentor, Prof Woon said: “(Even if there’s a) technical breach … it still goes back to the question, in that case, is there any meaningful sanction? MM was himself a lawyer. He was a brilliant lawyer. A will is not a complex document. He read it, he understood it.”

“It’s quite clear MM knew what he was doing. There is no reason for imposition of sanctions of any sort under the Legal Profession Act,” said Prof Woon.

Prof Woon said that the inference that Lee Kuan Yew had been tricked was “improbable in the extreme”, saying it was unacceptable for the tribunal to criticise Mrs Lee and her husband’s integrity without clear evidence to support its conclusions.

“He read the will, he signed the will, initialled on every page, called for it the following day, told his personal assistant to send it to (Ms Kwa) and tell her it’s the agreement among the siblings,” said Prof Woon.

“The inescapable inference is that this is exactly what MM wants”, he said.

Similarly, netizens too found it hard to believe that Mr Lee was not able to make his own decisions.

Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 1.51.14 PM Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 2.02.31 PM Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 2.02.56 PM Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 2.03.35 PM Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 2.04.14 PM Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 2.05.10 PM Screen Shot 2020 08 15 at 2.05.20 PM

The Court of Three Judges, the highest disciplinary body dealing with lawyers’ misconduct, heard arguments from both sides for five hours on Thursday before reserving judgment. The Court of Three Judges which comprises of Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, Judge of Appeal Judith Prakash and Justice Woo Bih Li will unveil its decision at a later date. /TISG

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

SG job analyst: Singapore fresh grads need to ‘taper down’ their salary expectations or risk delaying their entry into the workforce

New graduates are earning less than expected, but analysts warn that holding out for higher pay could mean a longer wait for work

Maid steals S$17K from employer’s kids’ ang pao & savings

A domestic helper from Myanmar was slapped with a jail sentence of 10 months after pleading guilty to the charge of theft. She stole a total of S$17,000 from the children of her employer to fund he...

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks