// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Wednesday, May 20, 2026
28.4 C
Singapore

Netizens suggest employers be penalised for contacting workers on leave to avoid burnout

Singapore – In response to a mainstream media commentary regarding workplace burnout, members of the public suggested it should be the employers who get penalised for contacting workers on leave and not the workers for being contactable.

A channelnewsasia.com commentary written by Grace Yeoh wrote about the issue of burning out in one’s career or profession. The author provided helpful tips for those experiencing burnout on how to recharge. It has been increasingly challenging for one to take mindful rest and to hit pause amid a burnout, only to enter a vicious cycle of functioning with low motivation and productivity.

“Perhaps the most effective solution to combat the culture of overwork is to turn rest into another goal we actively pursue, another item on the to-do list, another intentionally scheduled activity,” wrote Ms Yeoh.

Senior clinical psychologist at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) Shivasangarey Kanthasamy was also consulted for probable approaches to combatting burnout in a local context. Ms Kanthasamy highlighted that societal and cultural factors play a role in defining what “meaningful work” entails.

Furthermore, there is a huge internal motivating factor for chasing productivity which is the thought of getting a rewarding end result, said Ms Kanthasamy. This pushes individuals to attain concrete outcomes.

A suggestion was to adopt a system of punishment, which Singaporeans seem naturally attuned to, as Ms Yeoh pointed out. “If someone were remotely contactable during their leave, they should get penalised rather than commended.” The system complements the introduction of a “rest KPI (Key Performance Indicators)” wherein workers are graded on how well they can unwind or unplug and be as unproductive as possible during rest.

Responding to the commentary, members from the online community questioned why the focus must be on the employees and suggested it should be the employers who are penalised for reaching out to staff on leave. “Maybe the government should start to penalise the employers first,” said Facebook user Woofie Al who noted it is not the fault of the employee in most cases.

Screen Shot 2020 10 06 at 2.13.02 PM
Photo: FB screengrab
Screen Shot 2020 10 06 at 2.12.37 PM
Photo: FB screengrab
Screen Shot 2020 10 06 at 2.12.14 PM
Photo: FB screengrab
Screen Shot 2020 10 06 at 2.12.52 PM
Photo: FB screengrab

Facebook user Vanessa Yeo used France as an example where contacting employees after 7 pm was generally against the law. Workers in France acquired a “right to disconnect” after a law which became effective on January 1, 2017, permitted staff in companies with more than 50 people to ignore their emails after work hours.

Screen Shot 2020 10 06 at 2.12.45 PM
Photo: FB screengrab

A conversation among netizens also covered the approach but on those with demanding jobs such as nurses. “It’s fine if a nurse is not contactable because there are multiple stand-by doctors, nurses and specialists at the hospital,” said Facebook user Lavi Singh. “Everyone needs their rest days undisturbed, especially nurses.” Others pointed out that nurses should only be contacted for “life or death matters” on their days off.

Screen Shot 2020 10 06 at 2.15.11 PM
Photo: FB screengrab

Read related: More than 1/3 of WFH and firstline workers in Singapore “face increased burnout”

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

Employee gets awarded over S$17,000 as compensation from her company for wrongful dismissals involving medical claims

A tribunal found the company failed to prove employee dishonesty after six workers were dismissed over disputed medical claims

White spots on chocolates? Shopper wants others to be careful even if expiry year is 2027, netizens share their thoughts

The netizen shared that the product had an expiry year of 2027, but with white dots very noticeable on the chocolates’ surface, she had doubts about whether it was safe to consume or not.

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks