Home News Featured News Low Thia Khiang says real aim of fake news law is to...

Low Thia Khiang says real aim of fake news law is to help PAP achieve “political monopoly”

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

Veteran opposition leader Low Thia Khiang asserted in parliament yesterday (May 7) that the “real aim” of the government in proposing legislation such as the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) “is to protect the ruling party and achieve political monopoly.”

Asserting that the proposed law seems to come with a hidden agenda and that it is a ploy by the government to solidify its grip on “absolute ,” the Workers’ Party’s (WP) former chief said in Mandarin:

“The real aim of the Government through this Bill is to protect the ruling party and achieve political monopoly.
“To introduce such a bill is not what the government claims to defend democracy and public interest, it is more like the actions of a dictatorial government that will resort to any means to hold on to absolute power.”

POFMA, which aims to provide the government with powers to act against online falsehoods to protect public interest, intends to give ministers the authority to determine what is an online falsehood and how to act against what they deem to be online falsehoods. Earlier, the government had confirmed that the law would also apply to private WhatsApp chats and social groups.

Low acknowledges that regulation is needed to tackle online falsehoods which could undermine society, racial harmony and the outcome of elections but says that he is “surprised and disappointed” with POFMA since it could also be used against the government’s critics.

- Advertisement -

Echoing concerns from academics, journalists and industry organisations that the bill asks for wide powers to be vested in ministers, Low says that this is akin to making a minister both a player and a referee during a sports match.

The seasoned politician, who is the MP for Aljunied GRC, also expresses concerns with the vague definition of online falsehoods in the law and said that this could be manipulated to suit the government. Asserting that he has no faith in the government to handle such matters impartially, he asks:

“How can we be sure that the ministers from the ruling party will not manipulate opinions and spread falsehoods in order to win elections?”
“Will the government show its true colours (after the law is passed)? For example, if I say the and Merdeka Generations packages are to buy votes, is this opinion or information?”

Citing a certain section of the government’s oft-repeated sentiment that “the older generation cannot accept a non-Chinese prime minister,” Low notes: “If this were to come from the minister himself or his supporters, the minister may say this is a personal opinion.

“However, if this were to come from the minister’s political opponents on social media, the minister may say that spreading such falsehoods will create racial conflicts, endangering national security.”

- Advertisement -

Noting that social media has empowered citizens to express their opinions on socio-political matters online, beyond just private conversations at coffeeshops, and that the internet has removed some of the people’s fear of being detained without trial, Low said that POFMA could have the chilling effect of curbing freedom of expression and compelling Singaporeans to practice self-censorship to protect themselves.

Referring to the Chinese proverb 杀鸡儆猴, he said: “The government can selectively punish a few offenders to achieve a chilling effect, to scare the monkey by slaughtering the chicken.”

Instead of enacting such legislation, Low suggests that it would be more acceptable for ministers to take their to court and prove that the information published online is indeed fake news.

He also said that, compared to legislation, civic education would be more beneficial in the fight against fake news:

- Advertisement -

“The Internet is an open . Netizens can rebut irrational, extreme and unfair online remarks. Relevant government agencies and ministers can also clarify and state their stance. By doing so, the true nature of online rumours, fake news and misleading remarks will be known, netizens can also be educated and their ability to judge enhanced.”

https://theindependent.sg.sg/sylvia-lim-grills--mp-who-suggested-alternate-way-to-tackle-new-crime-trends-without-parliaments-involvement/Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

- Advertisement -

81-year-old man unable to use MediSave for S$128 A&E bill, questions if it can be used to buy his coffin

Singapore — After being unable to use the S$46,000 in his MediSave account for a S$128 A&E bill, an 81-year-old man questioned if he would be able to even use the money to buy a coffin after he dies. In a Facebook...

Man says no need for mask after vaccination, spotted spitting near car

Singapore – A man was spotted spitting near a car and informing the owner that he did not need to wear a mask as he was vaccinated against Covid-19. An argument ensued between two members of the public at 205 Sims Avenue...

Confirmed Covid case of a woman from Jurong Fishery Port also reportedly worked part-time at KTV lounge

Singapore — A woman who allegedly works at Jurong Fishery Port also does part-time work in the evenings at a KTV lounge, according to a media report. Health Minister Ong Ye Kung said in a Facebook post on Monday (Jul 19) that...
Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

Theindependent