Home News Featured News Here is why there should be no fare increase

Here is why there should be no fare increase

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

By Eric Tan
I thought it would be fun to use our fearless leaders’ words to describe how we will react to a public transport .
However, I seriously believe that the government, , …etc should NOT grant the transport operators’ request for a fare rise for the following reasons:

  1. The operators received a subsidy or gift of S$1.1 billion from the government to buy buses
  2. The continues to be plagued with operating problems such as breakdowns and delays. They cannot claim that the reason for the problems is that the trains are aging as even the new Circle line and recently opened Downtown lines have experienced break downs and delays.
  3. Commuters continue to suffer overcrowding and delays
  4. The had many good years of rising profits in the past eight years, which we now know came about at the expense of maintenance. During those good years, they also had the good fortune of experiencing increased ridership due to our government’s liberal immigration policies.
    However, the commuters did not benefit from this increased revenue as the formula for fare increase then only took into account increases in the operating costs, not revenues. At the very least, we could have expected that when the commuters suffered overcrowding, they could have enjoyed the comfort of no fare increases. Since the operators now have to catch up with their maintenance costs, why should commuters have to pay for it again through the proposed fare increase? Operators should be accountable for their past mistakes and should not again be allowed a fare increase until they have sort out their current problems

I checked the latest quarterly financial statements of SBS Transit and and both companies reported increased revenues from their operations. SBS recorded a 7.4% increase in revenues with buses and rail recording 8.7% and 8.3% respectively. reported 5.3 % overall increase in revenues with trains and buses showing 3.9% and 2.9% respectively.
Both companies attributed the increase in revenues to increased ridership- what a great business to be in. However, both companies suffered from costs increasing more than revenues, resulting in a fall in profits. The good news is that there is still a profit. In their latest quarterly results, SBS made S$5.3 million operating profit while SMRT recorded $20 million operating profits ( to estimate annual operating profit multiply by 4 ). The absolute increase in costs was mostly from staff and maintenance which is within their control. Furthermore, we have not included the revenues from advertising and rentals of retail space, which is the icing on the cake.  In view of these facts, do you think they are entitled to a fare increase?

Whatever the conclusions you may arrive at, you would realise that there is a fundamental conflict with the current public transport system. When I was in the Workers’ Party, we had advocated nationalising the system since 2006 and I still maintain that belief more so now because of the evidence. Whatever way we want to debate this issue, it is quite clear that the current system is not working. Therefore let us ” fix” it by nationalising it so the government is in full control of it. They should take ownership and make it the best in the world again. After which we can figure out how best we can restructure it.
Eric Tan was the treasures of the Workers’ Party
 
 

Please follow and like us:
Tweet
Share
- Advertisement -

Biden will be nicer to China than Trump

Joseph Biden, the presumptive next US President, will be friendlier to than US President , judging by Biden’s statements and cabinet selections. Biden’s more harmonious posture towards China will please leaders of various Asian countries including Singapore Prime Minister...

K Shanmugam: In Singapore, the right to speak freely goes with the duty to act responsibly

Singapore—Speaking at the 16th Religious Rehabilitation Group Seminar at Khadijah Mosque on Monday (Nov 24), K Shanmugam, the Minister for Law and Home Affairs, said that the threat of terrorism has not gone away though its “shape and nature” have changed. Citing...

Parliament receives 61 NMP proposal forms from the general public, groups

The Office of the Clerk of Parliament said yesterday (24 Nov) that Parliament has received 61 Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) proposal forms. This is higher than the 48, 41 and 36 proposal forms that Parliament received in 2018, 2016 and...
Please follow and like us:
Tweet
Share
Follow Me
Tweet