Home News SG Politics Govt’s response to Dr Tan Cheng Bock is – do not require...

Govt’s response to Dr Tan Cheng Bock is – do not require a response?




- Advertisement -

By: Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “Tan Cheng Bock calls for Presidential Election to be open election” (Channel NewsAsia, Mar 31).

It states that “Speaking on behalf of the Government, a spokesman from the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) said Dr Tan “has not raised any new points that require response”.

The MCI spokesman added for more than a year, the matter has been considered and debated extensively, including the forming of a Consitutional Commission chaired by the Chief Justice which undertook extensive consultations and public hearings on the Elected Presidency.

- Advertisement -

“Dr Tan did not participate in those hearings or give his views to the Commission. The Government gave its response to the Commission’s report in a White Paper, and Parliament debated the matter over three days, before passing amendments to the Constitution,” said the spokesman.”

I think most Singaporeans who read the above may be even more confused like I was when I read it.

What does the Government expect Singaporeans to do? – Individually try to research what actually transpired in the “extensive consultations and public hearings on the Elected Presidency”, find and read the Government’s “response to the Commission’s report in a White Paper”, and search Hansard to read what transpired when “Parliament debated the matter over three days”?

Why can’t the Government just respond to Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s questions and remarks – so that Singaporeans can understand and accept this arguably, contentious matter better?

As an analogy – if you go to school and ask your teacher a simple question and the response is “you are not raising any new points that require a response” – what do you think the whole class of students may think or feel?

Specifically, if I may cite just one example – I would like to ask whether Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s question – “to explain whether the AGC’s interpretation is correct, or to check with the courts to verify its accuracy” was ever asked, debated or answered by anyone?

- Advertisement -

Ex-NMP Anthea Ong among those disappointed there is no Arts NMP

Singapore -- Members of the local arts community have expressed disappointment that the list of nine Nominated Members of Parliament (NMPs) for the 2021-2023 term does not include a representative of the art sector and local artists. Since 2009, arts workers, practitioners...

Tissue paper seller uses knife to threaten retiree outside betting shop

Singapore -- A tissue paper seller who has a history of behaving aggressively towards  members of the public was arrested on Wednesday (Jan 13) after he used a knife to threaten an elderly man. The 50-year-old, who hawks packets of tissue paper...

Netizens up in arms after Tesla SG looks to hire Logistics Analyst who must be fluent in Hindi

In a job placement that has since been edited, Tesla looked to hire a Logistics Analyst who was fluent in English and Hindi. The electric car company headed by Elon Musk is hiring and recruitment notices have been put up. The advertisement said...