Home News SG Politics Govt’s response to Dr Tan Cheng Bock is – do not require...

Govt’s response to Dr Tan Cheng Bock is – do not require a response?

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

By: Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “Tan Cheng Bock calls for Presidential Election to be open election” (Channel NewsAsia, Mar 31).

It states that “Speaking on behalf of the Government, a spokesman from the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) said Dr Tan “has not raised any new points that require response”.

The MCI spokesman added for more than a year, the matter has been considered and debated extensively, including the forming of a Consitutional Commission chaired by the Chief Justice which undertook extensive consultations and public hearings on the Elected Presidency.

- Advertisement -

“Dr Tan did not participate in those hearings or give his views to the Commission. The Government gave its response to the Commission’s report in a White Paper, and Parliament debated the matter over three days, before passing amendments to the Constitution,” said the spokesman.”

I think most Singaporeans who read the above may be even more confused like I was when I read it.

What does the Government expect Singaporeans to do? – Individually try to research what actually transpired in the “extensive consultations and public hearings on the Elected Presidency”, find and read the Government’s “response to the Commission’s report in a White Paper”, and search Hansard to read what transpired when “Parliament debated the matter over three days”?

Why can’t the Government just respond to Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s questions and remarks – so that Singaporeans can understand and accept this arguably, contentious matter better?

As an analogy – if you go to school and ask your teacher a simple question and the response is “you are not raising any new points that require a response” – what do you think the whole class of students may think or feel?

Specifically, if I may cite just one example – I would like to ask whether Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s question – “to explain whether the AGC’s interpretation is correct, or to check with the courts to verify its accuracy” was ever asked, debated or answered by anyone?Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

- Advertisement -

KF Seetoh on errant cyclists: “You need rules la, that’s common sense”

Singapore -- Recent reports of reckless cyclists on the road have prompted  street food guru KF Seetoh to come up with his own recipe for road safety. "Implement road safety for cyclist too, just like how (bike) riders (and) drivers are strictly...

Unpopular opinion: Libel damages should be increased for those who crowdfund, says Calvin Cheng

Singapore -- Courts should take into consideration that libel damages can be crowdfunded and the amounts should be increased accordingly, says Mr Calvin Cheng. In a Facebook post on Saturday (Apr 17), the former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) contended that courts...

Migrant worker helps visually impaired senior cross the street at AMK

Singapore—In today’s jaded world, it’s easy to find news that angers or upsets us, and therefore good news of people’s kind acts never fails to bring joy. One such recent act of kindness was shown by a migrant worker who took the...
Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

Theindependent