Home News SG Politics Did Singapore Ambassador to US only tell half the story in his...

Did Singapore Ambassador to US only tell half the story in his official reply to New York Times?

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

It was reported in Straits Times on 11 July that the Singapore Ambassador to US had find fault with an article published by New York Times (NYT), “Family dispute over house of Singapore’s founder erupts as national crisis“.

In his reply to NYT, the Singapore Ambassador noted that “no Member of Parliament made any allegations of impropriety or wrongdoing against the prime minister during the debate”.

“Nor has anyone else produced specific evidence to back the siblings’ vague allegations,” he added. “There is no national crisis in Singapore.”

- Advertisement -

So, in his reply, our good Ambassador gave the readers of NYT an impression that all MPs in Parliament were supportive of PM Lee over the Oxley House episode.

Leader of opposition not convinced

However, the Ambassador did not tell the whole story of what had happened in Parliament during the debate on 4 July. He neglected to tell New York Times that the leader of opposition, Low Thia Khiang, had informed Parliament that he would not be convinced until the entire allegations are given a conclusive airing.

“Madam Speaker, the Workers’ Party has not gone through the due process to decide whether or not, to conclude whether the allegations made by the Lee siblings (against PM) are baseless,” Low said.

“For me personally, I will not be convinced until the entire allegations are given a conclusive airing. We should know what else do they (the siblings) have.”

“This episode, there are no investigations done, it’s ownself defend ownself in parliament with the PAP MPs,” he further added. “I mean I wonder how you would want to convince me and my party and Singaporeans that it is conclusive, and it is something that we can all be convinced entirely.”

Low also raised the question why PM Lee didn’t sue his siblings over the accusations leveled by them against the PM.

“I hope he would clarify the doubts I have this question, this nagging question that why he didn’t sue (his siblings),” Low said. “First, does he not agree that his family is not any ordinary Singapore family. And the person at the centre of the issue is the Prime Minister of Singapore, not any other person.”
All these were conveniently sidestepped by our good Ambassador in his reply to NYT.

Source: WWMGFTR

Send in your scoop to news@theindependent.sg 

- Advertisement -

JTC issues stop-work order on contractor that ‘erroneously’ cleared Kranji woodlands

Singapore – The contractor that “erroneously” cleared a forested area at Kranji has announced it has been issued a stop-work order by JTC and is assisting the developer with investigations on the issue. On Feb 16, state-owned industrial property developer JTC responded...

Clementi, Dover, Kranji: Singapore’s grand conservation plan is to plant trees and destroy forests

Yes, we love to plant trees. Since Lee Kuan Yew started the whole ritual, at least 10,000 saplings are planted every year since 1963 as part of the Tree Planting campaign. Impressive indeed. Singapore Clean and Green. At the same time,...

Ex-UOB vice-president charged with mishandling over S$5.4 million

Singapore—Sixty-five-year-old Ling Shek Lun, who used to be a  vice-president at UOB, has been charged with mishandling millions of dollars, reported straitstimes.com (ST) on Friday (Feb 19). Ling, a Singaporean who was charged in district court on Feb 10, faces two charges...

Send in your scoop to news@theindependent.sg 

Theindependent