// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Friday, August 14, 2026
32.2 C
Singapore

Coffee aficionados vs. Starbucks in California

Coffee aficionados

In a brewing legal battle that has Californians buzzing, a trio of coffee aficionados has taken on java giant Starbucks, alleging discrimination against lactose-intolerant customers.

Maria Bolliger, Dawn Miller, and Shunda Smith are leading the charge, claiming that Starbucks’ milk surcharges for non-dairy options are a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit sheds light on the hefty price lactose-intolerant patrons pay for their coffee fix. With alternatives like oat, almond, coconut, and soy milk tacking on up to an additional 90 cents per cup, the plaintiffs argue that Starbucks unfairly inflates prices for those seeking dairy-free options, despite comparable costs.

For Bolliger, Miller, and Smith, it’s not just about the extra pocket change—it’s a matter of principle. Substituting 2% milk for a lactose-free alternative can hike up their bills by anywhere from 50 to 80 cents per order.

Coffee aficionados to court

Behind the scenes, the lawsuit points fingers at Starbucks’ pricing strategies, highlighting the stark difference in cost between traditional dairy and non-dairy options. While dairy products hover between 3 and 32 cents per fluid ounce, alternatives like soy, coconut, almond, and oat milk range from 4 to 7 cents per ounce.

With Starbucks reportedly raking in over $1 billion in the United States from these alleged discriminatory practices, the lawsuit aims to bring justice not just to California, but to lactose-intolerant coffee drinkers nationwide.

Keith Gibson, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, stated that Starbucks’ decision to offer non-dairy alternatives but impose surcharges amounts to discrimination against those with dietary restrictions. He emphasized that for many, the choice is not a matter of preference but a necessity dictated by their inability to consume regular dairy.

As the legal caffeine kicks in, all eyes are on Starbucks as this case percolates through the courts, stirring up discussions about inclusivity and corporate responsibility in the coffee industry.

Cover Photo: Depositphotos

Read More News

Former President Trump calls out Biden’s falsehoods on immigration plan

The post Coffee aficionados vs. Starbucks in California appeared first on The Independent News.

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

Malaysian man caught at Woodlands with fake Supreme Court and MHA passes and inking instruments, charged for forgery

The items included passes bearing the emblems of the Supreme Court and Ministry of Home Affairs, along with inking instruments designed to resemble official tools.

Bomb threat causes evacuation of Xinmin Secondary School

The school started evacuating students and staff at 8:30 am on Aug 13. Fortunately, it turned out to be a hoax.

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks