// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Monday, June 8, 2026
28.9 C
Singapore

Amid Agoda retrenchments, Leong Mun Wai calls for better protection for affected workers

SINGAPORE: News broke earlier this week that the travel company Agoda had recently laid off employees in customer support roles in Singapore, Shanghai, and Budapest and would be hiring workers for the same roles in Foshan, China; Gurgaon, India; and Cairo, Egypt.

Around 50 employees in Singapore were affected by these retrenchments, which took place in an unannounced town hall on Aug 4. What made matters worse is that for Agoda’s retrenched employees to receive a severance package, they were told that they could not file reports with government agencies, including the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).

The severance document has been seen by several local media outlets.

Agoda denies allegations

A representative from Agoda, however, has denied warning the employees affected by the retrenchments against reporting the company to government agencies.

According to a report in Mothership, the spokesman said that “employees were free to seek alternative legal options or engage with local authorities if they so wished”.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM), as well as the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and Singapore Industrial and Services Employees’ Union (SISEU), have all spoken up on the matter. The joint statement from NTUC and SISEU was published on the social media pages of NTUC chief Ng Chee Meng and SISEU Executive Secretary Desmond Tan.

Statement from PSP Chief

For former Non-constituency Member of Parliament Leong Mun Wai, it appears that the government’s response is not enough.

Mr Leong, the secretary-general of Progress Singapore Party (PSP), wrote in a social media post that the time has come to implement legally binding retrenchment benefits.

“I was shocked to learn that Agoda allegedly [instructed] retrenched staff not to report the retrenchment to government agencies, statutory bodies, and trade unions and [threatened] to revoke the severance benefits of those who do so,” he wrote in a Sep 17 post.

Mr Leong added that for the government and the NTUC to express concern and look into “Agoda’s egregious conduct” is “not enough” and that more should be done for the protection of retrenched workers’ rights.

He wrote: “In our GE2025 manifesto, PSP called for the creation of statutory retrenchment benefits that are legally binding. This would be a stronger legal protection for retrenched workers than the current Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment.”

Given that the Manpower Ministry has said that it will be reviewing the Employment Act, “I call on MOM to include legally binding retrenchment benefits in the Employment Act, to better protect all Singaporean workers,” added Mr Leong in his post.

Last month, the Tripartite Workgroup held its first meeting to develop recommendations for the review of the Employment Act, Singapore’s main labour law. The act provides for the basic terms and working conditions for nearly all employees in the city-state. /TISG

Read also: ‘This is terrible,’ S’poreans condemn Agoda’s dismissal of SG employees, told not to report to gov’t agencies

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

‘I’m not your lifetime meal ticket’: Man wants to cut mum’s allowance after nearly 20 years to focus on marriage

SINGAPORE: A Singaporean man who has spent almost two decades financially supporting his mother has turned to Reddit to ask whether he is wrong for wanting to reduce her allowance so he can focus o...

‘If you are hoping for a job, they only increased it by 25%’: Manager shares salary negotiation insight in Malaysia

The story looks at how “competitive salary” in Malaysia’s job market is understood in different ways depending on experience, industry, and company type, with varying expectations among employers a...

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks