MALAYSIA: The Malaysian government’s decision to terminate the contracts of 30,000 public sector employees who lack the Malaysian Certificate of Education (SPM) has sparked controversy. The Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services of Malaysia (CUEPACS) has criticised the move, arguing that it disregards the years of experience these workers have accumulated.
According to Utusan Malaysia in an article published by SAYS, CUEPACS president Datuk Dr Adnan Mat described the decision as “unfair and burdensome,” mainly since many of these employees have served the public sector for up to six years. He further asserted, “CUEPACS urges the government to adopt a more compassionate and fair approach towards the fate of contract staff who have long served in the public sector.”
This situation highlights a broader debate in Malaysia’s employment policies: should practical experience be considered equivalent to formal qualifications? While academic credentials ensure a standardised level of knowledge, experience fosters hands-on expertise invaluable to service delivery.
Lack of consideration for long-term contributions
One of CUEPACS’s key criticisms is that the affected workers were not given due recognition for their contributions. Many had been employed under contract for several years, yet their experience was not factored into the renewal process.
Dr Adnan pointed out that these workers have effectively performed their duties under grade 1 of the Public Service Salary Scheme (SSPA), a level similar to that of permanent employees. “They have contributed to public service with dedication and should not be treated as temporary workers who can be dismissed at will,” he said, as quoted by SAYS, citing the New Straits Times.
By abruptly ending their contracts, the government risks creating an impression that long-term service is undervalued, potentially discouraging future contract workers from committing to public sector roles.
Impact on workforce stability and economic security
Beyond the immediate job losses, the decision raises concerns about workforce stability and the broader economic impact. CUEPACS has highlighted six key challenges that affected workers will now face, including job insecurity, confusion due to inconsistent contract terms, and significant emotional distress.
Dr Adnan noted that many workers have dedicated over a decade to their roles, only to be left struggling to find new employment. “We have found individuals who have served as contract staff for over 15 years, now facing sudden job loss, making it difficult for them to find new employment,” he said, as reported by SAYS.
The sudden termination of thousands of contracts also risks exacerbating unemployment levels, particularly among lower-income groups who may struggle to secure alternative work. This could have ripple effects on consumer spending and overall economic stability.
A divided public opinion
The decision to terminate 30,000 contract workers without SPM has sparked a heated debate among Malaysians. Public opinion is divided on whether experience should outweigh formal qualifications.
Some argue that the move sends the wrong message about education standards. One Facebook commenter questioned, “So what message are we giving to those kids who fail to sit for their SPM exam?” This reflects concerns that allowing contract renewals without academic qualifications could undermine the importance of formal education.
Others support the government’s stance, believing that qualifications ensure competency. One person stated, “I prefer a contractor who has the proper knowledge,” suggesting that educational credentials provide a necessary foundation for public service roles.
However, there are also calls for prioritising local workers in policy decisions. One commenter remarked, “That’s what we Malaysians have been saying, take care of your country people and country first, then, you can help other countries [after].” This sentiment reflects broader anxieties about job security and national workforce priorities.
Fairness and financial accountability are also key concerns. One individual pointed out the implications for taxpayers, stating, “It involves public funds contributed via various tax payments, and the government must act fairly towards the contributors, too. Defending one party and not taking into consideration of the other group’s hard-earned money contribution is certainly a practise of discrimination.”
These mixed reactions highlight the complexity of balancing workforce stability, education standards, and fiscal responsibility in public sector employment policies.
A call for fair negotiations: Meritocracy versus qualifications
CUEPACS has urged the government to engage in discussions to find a more balanced solution. “We hope the government will negotiate with us to find a fair solution that protects the welfare of contract employees in the public sector,” Dr Adnan told Buletin TV3, as quoted by SAYS.
A more measured approach could involve reassessing contract terms, offering transitional support, or recognising long-term experience as an alternative to formal qualifications in specific roles. By doing so, the government can demonstrate a commitment to fairness while maintaining an efficient public workforce.
Ultimately, this situation underscores the need for policies that balance merit-based employment standards with recognition of practical expertise. A rigid focus on formal qualifications without accounting for experience may lead to unintended consequences for individual workers and the broader economy.
Read also: Anwar’s push for protest rights: What the Peaceful Assembly Act amendment means for Malaysians
Featured image by Freepik (for illustration purposes only)