Home News SG Economy Singapore should be governed with courage

Singapore should be governed with courage

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

By: Respect Singapore
Increasingly, conflicts between religious conservatives and the rest of secular society are being resolved by the authorities using some “give and take” policy of balancing interests and mutual appeasement.
Don’t like Adam Lambert? Ok, we’ll allow the concert but he won’t perform gay-friendly material. Don’t like Madonna and her Rebel Heart Tour? Ok, we’ll allow the concert but will rate and censor it. Against the “gay agenda”? Ok, we’ll keep ‪#‎s377A‬ but won’t “pro-actively enforce it”.
I don’t think that addresses the problem. It’s just negotiating away the problem, sweeping it under the carpet.
The approach should not be about giving and taking. The approach should be about principle.
Religious groups have the right to comment on, influence and criticize our conduct and values. Some may dismiss their comments as hypocritical, but that’s besides the point. It is their right, their freedom of speech.
But no religious group can be allowed to dictate our conduct or values by banning books, taking over civil organizations, criminalizing private consensual conduct. Or determining the content of secular shows because, well, it otherwise offends them.
In other words, you have the freedom to practice and propagate your religion. But you cannot abuse that freedom to impinge on other’s rights.
And that’s fair to everybody. If you are Christian, and you don’t want to live in a society dictated by say Muslim values, it is only fair that you likewise don’t get to impose your Christian values on the rest of society. Same goes for all other groups, religious or otherwise.
That’s what diversity, tolerance, inclusivity is. That’s what real balance is.
To the authorities, I say take a stand. Don’t take the practical but cowardly way out. Govern by fair, reasoned and clear principle. Govern with courage. Not by always arbitrarily mediating out some ad-hoc compromise on a case-by-case basis to pacify one or both sides, coming up with some temporary reprieve to a problem you and I both know will never go away.

Republished from Respect Singapore’s Facebook.Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

No tags for this post.
- Advertisement -

Ho Ching explains to Calvin Cheng why S’pore is vaccinating slowly

Singapore – Information on why Singapore has not been able to vaccinate fast enough was highlighted by former Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng on social media. Mr Cheng took to Facebook on Sunday (May 9) to share screenshots of a Facebook...

Nearly 10,000 take umbrage at Ng Yat Chung and sign petition calling for his dismissal

Singapore -- Almost 10,000 people have taken umbrage at SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung’s “boorish behaviour” and have signed a petition calling for his dismissal. Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Ng Yat Chung took “umbrage” at a reporter's questions...

K Shanmugam: Ng Yat Chung’s reaction, and the way he answered the question was very unfortunate

Singapore – Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam took to social media to point out his views on the Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) restructuring, and added that SPH Ceo Ng Yat Chung's reaction to a reporter was "very unfortunate". Speaking at...
Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

No tags for this post.
Theindependent