// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Tuesday, August 18, 2026
33.4 C
Singapore

“Schedule F”: Trump’s plan towards authoritarianism?

Depositphotos 697498960 L

Donald Trump is championing a controversial plan to overhaul the civil service system. A move that critics warn could lead to unprecedented government control and pave the way for authoritarianism. At the heart of the plan is Schedule F.

This proposed classification would make firing tens of thousands of federal employees significantly easier.

This sweeping change could fundamentally alter the federal government’s landscape, stripping job protections from civil servants who currently enjoy merit-based safeguards and the right to appeal disciplinary actions.

Schedule F – what it is

Conservatives, including Trump, argue that the president should have more control over the federal bureaucracy. Trump has been particularly vocal, insisting it needs to be “brought to heel.” To this end, he created Schedule F through an executive order in October 2020.

The order aimed to reclassify federal workers in “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, and policy-advocating positions” as “at-will” employees, stripping them of civil service protections and making them vulnerable to being fired for any reason or none at all.

Trump has made it clear that, if re-elected, he will revive Schedule F. In a campaign video last year, he pledged to “remove rogue bureaucrats,” promising to wield this power “very aggressively.”

Potential impact sparks alarm

The potential impact of Schedule F has sparked alarm among federal employees, political scientists, union leaders, and watchdog groups. They fear that at-will employment would stifle dissent, making government workers hesitant to raise concerns that conflict with their superiors’ political agendas.

“You can see where it can grind work to a halt,” said Joe Spielberger, policy counsel at the Project on Government Oversight. “Even people trying to do the right thing [would] be afraid that if they do something wrong, they’ll be out of a job.”

Critics like Donald Moynihan, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University, argue it would invite “politicization and patronage throughout the federal workforce.” He believes that under a president not committed to democratic norms, seizing control of the bureaucracy is a classic strategy for advancing authoritarian governance.

As Trump campaigns on the promise of enacting Schedule F, the nation faces a crucial question: will this proposed restructuring ensure a more accountable and efficient government, or will it erode the democratic principles on which the United States was built? The answer could shape the future of American democracy.

Sources:

Trump plan to gut civil service triggers pushback

Trump’s plan to gut civil service protections was harsher than estimated

The ‘Chilling’ Trump Plan That Could Pave the Way for Authoritarianism

Related Stories

Trump is greatest threat to democracy: Joe Biden

Trump says will jail opponents and this has some hotshots worried

Election Fears: Will Trump accept defeat in 2024?

The post “Schedule F”: Trump’s plan towards authoritarianism? appeared first on The Independent News.

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

‘Technical assessment’ was malware: SPF and CSA warn of S$15 million LinkedIn crypto scam targeting tech workers

SPF and CSA have issued a joint advisory after a fake LinkedIn recruiter scam drained USD11.8 million in cryptocurrency by tricking a victim into downloading malware during a fake coding assessment...

Singapore’s founding PM Lee Kuan Yew’s Montblanc sterling silver pen sells for more than S$461K in SG auction; 10X its highest valuation

The ‘SM Lee Kuan Yew’ engraved writing instrument was first sold for S$52,000 in 2003 and returned to auction more than two decades later, drawing 111 bids

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks