// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Monday, June 15, 2026
30.5 C
Singapore

Netizens: Edwin Tong’s manner of questioning Pritam Singh reflects badly on himself

Singapore —Over the weekend, videos were released from the Committee of Privileges Hearing showcasing a tense stand-off between Culture, Community, and Youth Minister Edwin Tong and Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh. The highly scrutinized Edwin Tong vs Pritam Singh interaction occurred on Friday (Dec 10), with netizens commenting extensively on Mr. Edwin Tong‘s style of questioning.

And while the Workers’ Party has been criticized for not immediately coming forward upon finding out that former MP Raeesah Khan had lied in a speech she made in Parliament on Aug 3, some netizens have also expressed disapproval with the way Mr. Edwin Tong questioned Mr. Pritam Singh.

Mr. Edwin Tong asked the WP leader questions concerning some topics ranging from the impact of Ms. Khan’s falsehoods on the police, whether he had approved a statement she made, and why he did not direct the former MP to respond to the police.

The exchanges between Messrs Edwin Tong and Pritam Singh grew tense at times within the nearly nine hours that the WP head was questioned. Mr.Pritam Singh disagreed with a number of key assertions that Mr. Edwin Tong was making.

In one part of the questioning, Mr. Pritam Singh disagreed that allowing a lie to remain on record when one is aware that it is a lie is possibly a criminal offense.

He said, “It is for Parliament to address… the Parliament Act, Section 5, I believe covers freedom of speech. Whatever a Member of Parliament says in Parliament is for Parliament to take action. It cannot be questioned in a Committee of Inquiry… or any other place outside of Parliament. So I disagree with that point.”

Mr. Edwin Tong then told him, “You appear to know your positions very well.”

Many netizens, commenting on the Facebook page of The Straits Times, did not take kindly to how Mr Edwin Tong conducted himself during the hearing.

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.08.13 AM

“He’s finger-pointing in all the wrong areas… He is clearly trying to shift the case of Raeesah Khan to exposing WP competency,” one wrote.

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.00.42 AM

“Mr Edwin Tong, stop trying to force people to say what you want to hear,” another netizen opined.

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.01.36 AM

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.05.24 AM

One commenter observed, “Mr Tong is very good asking very confusing questions, leading people to agree with his point, twisting people’s answer into questions…”

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.03.12 AM

“Now Minister also can become judge is it? Where is the fairness to this never end ‘probe’?” wrote another netizen.

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.03.54 AM

Others seemed surprised to discover this side of Mr Edwin Tong.
Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.04.54 AM Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.05.45 AM

One commenter wrote that the proceedings were “becoming a political witchhunt.”

Screen Shot 2021 12 13 at 8.06.40 AM

/TISG

Read also: Netizens: Waste of time & taxpayers money on Raeesah Khan’s lie; case closed—move on—bigger issues need focus e.g. reduce cost of living for citizens

Netizens: Waste of time & taxpayers money on Raeesah Khan’s lie; case closed—move on—bigger issues need focus e.g. reduce cost of living for citizens

- Advertisement -

Hot this week

‘You wore long pants for the dentist but shorts for me’: Anniversary dinner dispute exposes deeper relationship issue

SINGAPORE: A man is now wondering what the “acceptable standards” are when it comes to dressing up for your partner after his girlfriend snapped at him when he said he planned to “wear shorts” to t...

Singapore is still a powerhouse in global semiconductor race by ‘being indispensable’

“We compete in the right lanes, not so much by copying… but by being indispensable.” — Singapore Semiconductor Industry Association

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks