Home News SG Politics High Court accepts Tan Cheng Bock's application challenging reserved Presidential Election

High Court accepts Tan Cheng Bock’s application challenging reserved Presidential Election

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

The following is a press release by Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

COURT APPLICATION ACCEPTED

I would like to announce that this morning, the High Court accepted my application (HC/OS 495/2017), which seeks the Court’s determination on whether a piece of legislation (section 22 Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act 6 of 2017 which counted President Wee Kim Wee as the first Elected Presidency term for the purposes of calling a Reserved Election), is consistent with our Constitution (Articles 19B(1) and 164(1) which introduced the mechanism of a Reserved Election into our Constitution).

- Advertisement -

I am the Plaintiff and for the purposes of serving Court papers on the Government, the Defendant is the Attorney General.

The application was filed on 5 May 2017. The Court accepted my application this morning, and has fixed a pre-trial conference on 22 May 2017.

To recap, on 31 March 2017, I held a press conference explaining why in my layman’s opinion, starting the count from President Wee’s term appeared to be inconsistent with the spirit and purpose for reserved elections. I then invited the Government or AG to explain the legal reasons for their count.

On 1 April 2017 the Government through MCI said I raised no new points that require a response. I responded to say the MCI missed my point. Nothing further was heard on this issue.

- Advertisement -

Since this is a matter of national importance, I sought to find the legal answer and consulted the best constitutional lawyer I could find. He is Queen’s Counsel Lord David Pannick. I gave Lord Pannick the Commission Report, White Paper, all relevant Hansard parliamentary reports from 7 Nov 2016 to 6 February 2017, our Constitution and all related statutes on this issue. I asked him one question: whether the AG correctly advised the Government to specify President Wee’s term as the first to be counted on the basis that he was the first President to exercise elected powers.

Lord Pannick has advised that he disagrees with the AG’s advice, and that section 22 Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act 6 of 2017 as stands is unconstitutional. After receiving Lord Pannick’s reply, I felt I could not keep his legal opinion to myself. It would be in to have the Court decide which legal view is correct – Lord Pannick or the AG.

On 28 April 2017, I engaged M/s Tan, Rajah & Cheah to make the necessary application, and to produce in my affidavit Lord Pannick’s written opinion before the Court. I believe this question can be answered without confrontation or hostility. Both the Government and I have the nation’s best interest at heart. It is in nobody’s interest to have a Reserved Election that is unconstitutional.

I am satisfied that I have, to the best of my ability and capacity, done my part to do what is right in the circumstances, which is to bring to this Court’s attention Lord Pannick’s opinion. Since the matter is now before the Court, it is only right that I refrain from making any further public comment until this case is decided.Follow us on Social Media

- Advertisement -

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

- Advertisement -

Man comments in FB group ‘Indians In Singapore’ that a S$7200 salary may not be enough to ‘live comfortable’

Singapore — A Facebook post where a man commented that a S$7200 salary may not be enough to live comfortably in Singapore has drawn the ire of many netizens. The comment, which seems to have first been posted in March has once...

Parti Liyani’s application for S$10,000 compensation against the AGC dismissed

Singapore — Former domestic worker Parti Liyani had her application for compensation of S$10,000 against the Attorney-General's Chambers () dismissed by the High Court on Monday (Jun 21). Ms Parti was initially found guilty in March 2019 of stealing more than S$30,000 worth...

Preetipls tells racists to ‘Buck it up’ in new rap song because ‘Shanmugam asked for our views’

Singapore — Coming back with another rap video to the same tune as the 'F*ck It Up' one they received a conditional warning for, YouTuber Preeti Nair and her brother, rapper Subhas Nair, took stock of the recent slew of racist...
Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

Theindependent