// Adds dimensions UUID, Author and Topic into GA4
Monday, September 7, 2026
28.8 C
Singapore

Fake Singtel telephone bill and attempted scam for $8.35 or just misinformed staff?

Facebook user Clarence Tan posted on Tuesday, 22 May, about a fake Singtel telephone bill that was mailed to him.

The bill was delivered enclosed within a generic Singtel envelope. When Tan called in to Singtel, they said, “that they had been receiving countless calls about this and was told that it was a phishing mail and had been ongoing for quite some time”.

While Singtel staff told Clarence that there was no such account number as printed on the letter, another supposed member of Singtel’s staff approached him claiming that the bill ID was indeed valid. That led to speculation of a possible data leak with Singtel.

Clarence Tan said in his post, “Update: When i called Singtel, I did asked them to check the account number and they told me that there was no such account number and was told to ignore it. But then, a Singtel staff(not entirely sure legit or not) approached me and told me that he had checked the bill ID and it was valid(weird huh? Data leak?)”.

He added, “Some of you might think that since there is no “-” before the amount, Singtel might me owing me $8.35 instead(I wish). Which is one of the reason why i called them to enquire in the first place(Free money right? Who don’t want?)”.

Clarence Tan’s lengthy Facebook post opened up a possibility of an attempted scam using Singtel telephone bills as a front.

There were also other netizens who apparently received similar letters that were also allegedly fake.

Screen Shot 2018 05 23 at 1.00.18 am Screen Shot 2018 05 23 at 12.59.56 am Screen Shot 2018 05 23 at 1.00.08 am

However, some netizens said otherwise, explaining that Singtel’s staff were unsure that a balance amount was in face owed to Clarence, as indicated by the ‘-‘ before the amount.

Screen Shot 2018 05 23 at 1.27.35 am Screen Shot 2018 05 23 at 1.29.00 am

A third group of netizens said that the scam was not involving money directly at all, but was most likely a way to acquire bank details of victims.

Screen Shot 2018 05 23 at 1.28.54 amScreen Shot 2018 05 23 at 1.29.19 am

So, which is it?

Singtel has not shed any light on these incidents.


[email protected]

Hot this week

Chinese national man, 47, gets S$560K fine in Singapore for evading over S$60K in customs duty on more than 28K bottles of duty-unpaid beer

The 47-year-old man faces 164 days in jail after failing to pay the penalty for false declarations of bringing thousands of beer bottles into Singapore

Air quality in Singapore reaches unhealthy range in central region due to transboundary haze from Indonesia fires

Dry weather and smoke from fires in Sumatra and Kalimantan pushed haze levels higher, prompting daily advisories from Singapore’s environment agency

Popular Categories

document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => { const trigger = document.getElementById("ads-trigger"); if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { entries.forEach(entry => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here observer.unobserve(entry.target); // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); observer.observe(trigger); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
// //
Enable Notifications OK No thanks