Home News Featured News Tan Kin Lian says voyeur and his parents are the victims of...

Tan Kin Lian says voyeur and his parents are the victims of NUS sexual misconduct case

Tan suggests Baey could have raised the matter without having to directly expose Lim, since there had already been several sexual misconduct cases on campus.

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

Former NTUC Income chief executive officer has commented that Nicholas Lim and his parents are the victims, as he weighed in on the National University of Singapore (NUS) case. Tan is an ex-presidential election candidate who may contest the upcoming general election as an opposition candidate.

Last week, NUS student Monica Baey revealed that a voyeur filmed her without her consent and knowledge while she was taking a at NUS’ residential Eusoff Hall. The perpetrator, 23-year-old student Nicholas Lim Jun Kai, was given a one-term suspension, a 12-month conditional (sentence) warning and ordered to make a written apology to the victim.

The way the case was handled drew intense flak on social media. Several called on the authorities to mete out stiffer punishments against Lim, especially since another voyeur who recorded showering at Republic Polytechnic in 2016 received a ten-week jail term.

Tan, however, feels differently. He wrote on his blog today (Apr 23) that he feels the real victims of the case are Lim and his parents.

- Advertisement -

Acknowledging that his statement “will appear to be controversial,” Tan said that Nicholas has “paid the price for his foolish act” and that his “future looks uncertain.”. He asserted: “I consider that Nicholas Lim and his parents are now the victims of this episode. Some people might say – he deserve it.

“I disagree. As a society, we have to be fair to everybody. Nicholas has already paid the price which was considered to be appropriate at that time. Our society cannot be so vindictive and punitive. We cannot continue to punish a person repeatedly for the same offense. We cannot condemn him for a lifetime.”

Although he commended communications major Baey for bringing the matter up, Tan suggested that she could have highlighted the matter more generally, without having directly exposed chemical engineering major Nicholas Lim. He wrote:

“I commend Monica for her in bringing this matter up. But she could have raised this issue in a more general way, and not involve Nicholas Lim directly, as I understand there were several incidents of this nature in NUS.”

- Advertisement -

Clarifying that he has no personal connection with Nicholas Lim or his parents, Tan said that in spite of this, he “feel[s] their anguish. I am quite sad that as a society we are do not understand compassion. We do not know when it is enough.”

He asked: “By all means, NUS should its penalty for this kind of offense. Maybe the police should have charged Nicholas Lim in court for the offense. Do not make Nicholas Lim the victim of wrong decisions taken (sic) the Police and NUS.”

Tan asked his readers whether they agree that Lim and his parents are now the victims of this episode. Fifty-four readers disagreed while 39 individuals agreed with his views.Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

No tags for this post.
- Advertisement -
Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg 

No tags for this post.
Theindependent