Siblings says they have no confidence in the Prime Minister


Two siblings of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong are at it again, spilling the beans of their discontent over his rule and saying they are “disturbed by the character, conduct, motives and leadership of their brother.”

In a scathing statement, they said they have seen a different face of their brother, one that ‘deeply troubles’ them.

Lee Wei Ling and Lee Hsien Yang, the younger children of Singapore’s founding prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew also questioned the role of the Prime Minister’s wife, Ho Ching.

About their brother, they said they felt threatened by what they perceived as the Prime Minister’s misuse of his position and influence over the Singapore government to drive his personal agenda.

“We are concerned that the system has few checks and balances to prevent the abuse of government.

“We feel big brother omnipresent. We fear the use of the organs of state against us and Hsien Yang’s wife, Suet Fern,” reads a statement to the media by the two siblings.

Wei Ling and Hsien Yang have also stated that they feel extremely sad that they are pushed to this position.

Lee Kuan Yew served as Singapore’s prime minister from 1959 to 1990 while Lee Hsien Loong is Singapore’s current prime minister.

In their statement, they said they are also the executors and trustees of Lee Kuan Yew’s estate; and that Hsien Loong was removed in 2011.

Wei Ling and Hsien Yang stated the following: “We have seen a completely different face to our brother Hsien Loong, one that deeply troubles us.

“Since the passing of Lee Kuan Yew, on 23 March 2015, we have felt threatened by Hsien Loong’s misuse of his position and influence over the Singapore government to drive his personal agenda.

“If Hsien Loong is prepared to act thus against his younger sister and brother, both contributing members of Singapore’s establishment, to advance his personal agenda, Wei Ling and Hsien Yang worry for Singapore,” said the statement.

Leaving Singapore with a heavy heart

The situation is such that Hsien Yang feels compelled to leave Singapore.

“It is with a very heavy heart that I will leave Singapore for the foreseeable future. This is the country that my father, Lee Kuan Yew, loved and built. It has been home for my entire life. Singapore is and remains my country. I have no desire to leave. Hsien Loong is the only reason for my departure,” said the statement.

Wei Ling and Hsien Yang questioned whether able leaders with independent political legitimacy will be side-lined to ensure Hsien Loong’s grip on power remains unchallenged.

The siblings said they were at pains to state that they are by no means criticizing the Government of Singapore.

They see many upright leaders of quality and integrity throughout the public service who are constrained by what they said were Hsien Loong’s misuse of power at the very top.

They then list a series of changes that took place in Singapore since Lee Kuan Yew’s death in March 2015.

These changes do not reflect what Lee Kuan Yew stood for, they said.

“Nobody ever doubted that Lee Kuan Yew always held the best interests of Singapore and Singaporeans at heart. He was authentic and spoke his mind.

“The same cannot be said for our brother, Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching.

“We believe, unfortunately, that Hsien Loong is driven by a desire for power and personal popularity. His popularity is inextricably linked to Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy.

Damning statement

The two siblings did not munch their words in their criticism of their brother, saying he drew his political power from being Lee Kuan Yew’s son, which is even more damning.

“His political power is drawn from his being Lee Kuan Yew’s son.

We have observed that Hsien Loong and Ho Ching want to milk Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy for their own political purposes.

“We also believe, based on our interactions, that they harbour political ambitions for their son, Li Hongyi.”

According to the two siblings, Lee Kuan Yew made clear in public and private that he wished that his home at 38 Oxley Road be demolished upon his passing.

In his last will and testament of 17 December 2013, he again reiterated his wish and directed his three children to ensure that it be fulfilled.

He also made clear that even if the house were to be gazetted by the Singapore government as a monument against his wishes then it should only be open to his children and their descendants.

Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, have opposed Lee Kuan Yew’s wish to demolish his house, even when Lee Kuan Yew was alive, they stated.

“Hsien Loong’s political power is related to being Lee Kuan Yew’s son and thus he has every incentive to preserve Lee Kuan Yew’s house to inherit his credibility.

Expressing their deep sadness, Wei Ling and Hsien Yang state said:

“We are private citizens with no political ambitions. We have nothing to gain from the demolition of 38 Oxley Road, other than the knowledge that we have honoured our father’s last wish.

“Hsien Loong has everything to gain from preserving 38 Oxley Road – he need only ignore his father’s will and values.”

“The values of Lee Kuan Yew are being eroded by his own son. Our father placed our country and his people first, not his personal popularity or private agendas.

“We are very sad that we have been pushed to this. We feel hugely uncomfortable and closely monitored in our own country. We do not trust Hsien Loong as a brother or as a leader. We have lost confidence in him.”

In a note to Editors, the siblings said this news release should be read in conjunction with the attached statement, adding that it was issued by Dr Lee Wei Ling and Lee Hsien Yang on 14 Jun 2017.


    • Not easy for anyone to challenge. LKY built up a system like China’s. Only those risking their lives will try. It is literally a life and death struggle. You try?

    • She is already risking her comfortable life to battle her brother! She could just enjoy the money from the family trust. Not easy, just look at the example of one of the best lawyer in Spore, Francis Seow. End up dead in US exile.

    • Sporeans needs to realise Spore is easier to run than neighbours with lots of historical, racial, religious issues. Plus, LKY’s team has already built up more than usd500bn (told this is understatement, closer to usd1trillion), enough to cover faults of current team for a long long time. Unless Sporeans takes a risk, no change possible!

    • No. I don’t think she is helping her brother in her remarks. If she is not then I will say she has courage in speaking out. So far has LHL directly challenge her? Ho Jinx can only put up a picture of monkey in protest. And she was forced to issue a diluted explanation for it. If she is not helping the dumb 70% then support her regardless of her status. I Paul Larry Ong fully support the sister and brother of LHL.

  1. Current Spore situation not suitable for today’s globalisation, fast tech innovation, shifting superpower world order, fast moving world. In fact, not suitable for Spore scholar classes. Best to open up Spore so all street smart, well educated Sporeans can find their niches in life. Scholars only hinder the process by focussing on theories. Time for Spore’s natural talents to go out and compete. Spore govt role as always, provide the basic needs and support to nurture those talents.
    At the moment, fat salaried scholars like the status quo and are stifling innovation. Spore market may be small but there is plenty of room in the world for talented, innovative and street smart young Sporeans.

    • Kam Yong Eun Most of their qualifications from top US/UK colleges. Not the point here! Nowadays, successful people in the world are not academically the most brilliant. Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Jack Ma and Steve Jobs are all not brilliant scholars. In fact, people who study too much are not street smart and too risk adverse! Unlikely to be effective in a fast changing world.

    • Lim Siong Boon No problem with top and honest scholars for political and adminstrative leadership only. No dynasty rule though. DengXiaoping put in system so no one consolidate power like Mao again is reason for China later success. Dynasty rule is anti meritocracy and looking at China’s history, after generations, collapse.

      Divest most GLCs except real infrastructure, like HDB, roads, water and electricity. Temasek appoint generals and scholars as CEOs of GLC only stifle innovations at business levels. Govt role should be just assist Sporeans with talents to develop and compete. World moving too fast for academics, scholars and generals who are generalists. You need street smart specialists to succeed. Divesting to Sporeans, as oppose to selling to foreign companies for best returns, give local talents a chance to develop

      Also Temasek CEOs continue even after disastrous performance, eg ex NOL CEO. That sends message political correctness more important than performance. Spore should be led by CEOs based on measured performance, profits or sales growth, not political correctness.

      As you notice, all this means Sporeans first. Better to use LKY’s team reserves, estimated above usd700bn to develop Sporean talents. At moment, these reserves help Temasek appointed CEOs, including foreigners look good only.

    • Lim Siong Boon You asked and I offered my comment, nothing to say? LKY times had no globalisation, lots of infrastructure to build up and a clear rich West, technology also moving at slower pace. Times have changed!

  2. They are right. Singapore is on a downward trajectory. Just look at the whole bunch of mediocre fumbling around. Mistakes galore. Mistakes everyday. How not to fail ?

  3. Singapore has been pawn in matter of time we Natives will be screwed big time … the rich Gona pack n go n we’ll be left with all the rubbish FT’s ….. it’s not too late to act now ….

  4. Any stupid fellas knows that he is there bcos of his father and through his own merits. See what he has done to sgp in the last 10 years….destroying it by the days…..all his ministers and paper general are only parroting unwelcome and disgusting remarks and it is about time the whole lots of them get flush away except for “some” good ones….

Comments are closed.