Should PM Lee lead beyond 70?

If he does so, the fourth-generation younger leaders will have more time to pick a successor


By Elgin Toh

A rare public difference of opinion within the People’s Action Party (PAP) has brought into the open a dilemma over its leadership succession plans.

Last week, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was asked about a timeline that Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong broached last December.

Mr Goh said in a Facebook post that he hoped to see a new leader chosen from among the fourth-generation ministers in six to nine months, and to see that person designated PM Lee’s potential successor before the end of this year.

PM Lee told the Singapore media at the end of his visit to India last Friday that he thinks it will take a “little bit longer” than that.

“ESM (Goh) is speaking with the privilege of watching things rather than being responsible to make it happen,” he said, in a gentle pushback.

It was a comment that raised eyebrows and strongly suggested that Mr Goh made the post without consulting PM Lee.

The PAP’s dilemma is encapsulated in the two differing views. Having laid down a timeline of not staying on as prime minister beyond age 70, PM Lee – who was born in February 1952 and turns 70 in 2022 – now has about four years to hand over to a successor.

Observers say the front runners to be Singapore’s fourth PM are Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat, 56; Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Chan Chun Sing, 48; and Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung, 48.

Is a 70-year-old too old to run a country? Mr Ronald Reagan was days short of his 78th birthday when he left the White House. Sir Winston Churchill stepped down as Britain’s PM at 80. Both were elected by their electorates well after they were 70, and stayed effective.

Four years for a successor PM to emerge might seem like eternity in most political systems. But in Singapore, it is a very short period.

Politics here has long favoured lengthy apprenticeships to ensure stable and seamless transitions.

PM Lee himself was Deputy Prime Minister – and de facto PM-designate – for 14 years before he stepped into the PM role in 2004.

Mr Goh was the official next-in-the-line for nearly six years before taking over in 1990.

The question now is, how soon within the four-year period should an heir apparent be identified and made, well, apparent to the public?

The first view – that of PM Lee – is that the party can afford to wait.

He explained last week why more time is needed: “(The younger leaders) need a bit of time for Singaporeans to get a feel of them… not just to be known as public figures, but to be responsible for significant policies, carrying them, justifying them, defending them, adapting them, making them work, and showing that they deserve to lead. That will be done in good time.”

He added that the ministers were also working out among them the team dynamics and “learning to work together”.

A hint that more time may be needed was in fact first given by 16 members of the fourth-generation leadership, who issued an unusual joint statement after Mr Goh put up his Facebook post.

In it, they conspicuously avoided addressing Mr Goh’s timeline.

They said they were “keenly aware that leadership succession is a pressing issue”, adding: “We are conscious of our responsibility, are working closely together as a team, and will settle on a leader from among us in good time.”

The second view – Mr Goh’s – is that the anointing should take place sooner, rather than later. He did not elaborate on why he thought so, saying only that the task is urgent.


To be sure, identifying someone early has its advantages. The PM-designate can be given more significant tasks – to the extent of running the Government day to day, as was the case for Mr Goh, when he was First DPM from 1985 to 1990. With the added responsibility, he shows his colleagues that he can hold his own when placed in the hot seat.

With the national spotlight on this person, Singaporeans will have a chance to size him up and decide if he is someone they can follow.

Acting early also ensures room for manoeuvre. If he doesn’t pass muster, there is time to explore alternatives.

If there are two views here, who is right – PM Lee or Mr Goh?

The argument for less haste stresses the need for the younger leaders to earn their stripes, and to work through intra-group dynamics, as one among them emerges organically as the leader.

The argument for haste is that the new leader needs time to prove himself in the role of PM-designate – both to his colleagues and to the people. Designate a leader, and then he can form his team and establish his ties with Singaporeans.

In practice, both are important: for a leader to emerge from within the group; and for that leader to then have time to prove himself to the nation. Because PM Lee has said that he wants to step down by the age of 70, there is very limited time to complete both of these significant tasks.

Some believe there is a third option when it comes to selecting the next PM: for PM Lee to pass the baton to one of the DPMs – Mr Teo Chee Hean, 63, or Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, 60 – who can be PM for, say, one term, while a younger minister takes more time to prepare to become Singapore’s fifth PM.

I would argue that this introduces more transitions unnecessarily. The Cabinet and civil service would have to get used to a different style of leadership and potentially different policy direction in some areas – only to start the process afresh in a few years’ time.


If the purpose is to entrust the mantle of leadership to the next generation, then a more sensible third option is to give the younger ones more time by having PM Lee stay on as PM for slightly longer, beyond the original timeline. This ensures continuity, while the succession issue is worked out.

In my view, this is a viable option.

PM Lee was asked in a 2012 interview – when he was 60 – if he saw himself as PM beyond age 70. He replied: “I hope not.”

He added: “Seventy is already a long time more. And Singapore needs a prime minister who is younger, who’s got that energy, and who is in tune with that very much younger and very much different generation.”

Hoping not is different from saying never.

If called on by circumstances to do so, one hopes PM Lee would not refuse to stay on for perhaps a few more years after 70.

Is a 70-year-old too old to run a country? Mr Ronald Reagan was days short of his 78th birthday when he left the White House. Sir Winston Churchill stepped down as Britain’s PM at 80. Both were elected by their electorates well after they were 70, and stayed effective.

Will his health allow it? PM Lee has had health scares in recent years but appears to have recovered fully and has shown no public signs of ill health since. Of course, if health becomes an issue, the transition can be brought forward.

Having PM Lee lead beyond 70 presents a neat solution to the succession dilemma. It gives enough time for the changing of the guard to happen smoothly and uneventfully. It is an option that merits serious consideration.



  1. When respect cannot be earn and become force, whats the use of making millions and be famed? O yes fame for generation where people spit upon the mention of the name, the misleading policies and mostly how people suffer

  2. Aiya no matter what opinion we gives in the end they will choose the one they preferred and the one is not abt the tracks record, it will be the one that is related to their family

  3. Step down with immediate effect and stop giving the impression that it will be all doom and gloom if you go. Fact of the matter is, there cannot be more doom and gloom for the people than you still being around. Enough of you enjoying your own pink skies until now like a God. Give the people of Singapore back the blue skies and a human PM we are entitled to as humans.

  4. Belief me Tharman will be the next PM . Nobody can judge their ending would come when . Just because his father lived till machine needed to stop at 91 .that doesn’t mean he also would live that long. Singapore and Singaporeans cannot be held hostage by one man .This power greedy man didn’t want anyone and didn’t prepare any capable ones to take over .

  5. Age is not an issue if the person is still healthy and strong at 70. 70 is the new 60. The real problem is one-man dictatorship in this country. It does not matter who rules but if this dictatorship system is not changed, then Singapore’s future will not be great.

  6. Husband & wife should both humbly retire and let others bring Spore forward. No leaders especially incompetent ones are indispensable. Spore must not become a fake dynastic democracy.

  7. He may risk overstaying his welcome. Already not the most stellar record in governance, his issues with his siblings and general unhappiness against how the presidential “election” (more like a selection) probably did not win him more fans.

    Once again ST shows that it is always willing to bend over backwards several times over to keep in the good books of the powers that be. Not sure what it serves other than PM Lee’s ego to create this impression of his indepensability.

    If this is the course we are heading, it is finally time for voters to do the right thing to show just what we think about the prospects of PM Lee extending his premiership. However, I am not optimistic at all that Singaporeans in general have the courage to do this.

  8. Singapore is fading and we need a bright spark and so far Tharman is the right candidate. Otherwise I would like George Yeo, a well respectable and a world renowned person too who I think can lead this nation.

  9. If he retired after 2015, Tharman can be the next PM for 10years plus (keep the term of PM around 15years). Why must only Chinese PM? Are you still scheming to make the 5G PM? You now have more skeletons in your closet?

  10. On and of its own, age probably is not an issue. What is worrisome is he is backtracking after recent years of missteps and bungling in several areas and the questions that he creates himself about his own credibility (like the affidavit against his siblings which is still hanging in the air) including the conflict represented by his dogsbody at TH. Personally I cannot help thinking that his only objective is to make sure the successor he chooses (forget about consensus of the 4G ministers, that’s just another bull) will not betray him over what he wants hidden, learning a lesson from the British gov declassifying documents of past events here that contradict the gov-sg version. So, yes, my default view is he’ll serve till past 70.

  11. He should step down immediately and let PM Tharman lead the team …. the 3 current 4G candidates not good enough …. better start looking for new unbiased potential candidates … !

Comments are closed.