International Far-right surge rattles guardians of Nazi era remembrance

Far-right surge rattles guardians of Nazi era remembrance

Author

Date

Category

- Advertisement -

AFP is republishing this feature which has been selected by the agency’s chief editors as one of the best of the week.

by Deborah COLE

A tour group handpicked by the far-right party Alternative for Germany touched off a scandal last summer while visiting the former Nazi concentration camp Sachsenhausen north of Berlin.

A few members of the delegation began asking the guide pointed questions about Allied bombing at the end of World War II, implying its impact on the civilian population was comparable to the Nazis’ atrocities.

- Advertisement -

“As our horrified colleague told me, the comments by obviously rhetorically trained people culminated in them questioning the existence of the gas chambers and the mass murders in them,” the director of the camp’s memorial, Axel Drecoll, told AFP.

The guide broke off the tour and Sachsenhausen staff threw the group out. Drecoll, 45, demanded an apology from leading AfD figure Alice Weidel, who had organised the visit, but is still waiting for a response.

This month authorities in Brandenburg state indicted a 69-year-old member of the group on charges including inciting racial hatred.

Defenders of Germany’s sacrosanct atonement for the Nazis’ crimes — the foundation of its Basic Law and political culture — warn it is coming under calculated assault from right-wing extremists.

And ahead of three state elections in the coming weeks in which the AfD is set to do well, Germans like Drecoll are growing nervous about erosion of the country’s culture of remembrance, which many experts argue is unique in the world.

The anti-migrant, anti-Muslim AfD could come in first in Brandenburg as well as neighbouring Saxony — which both head to the ballot box on September 1 — and is polling strongly ahead of an October election in Thuringia.

‘Tears don’t educate’
On a walk around the vast windswept grounds, Drecoll said memorials like Sachsenhausen need to evolve to defend their mission and prepare for a time in which there are no more Holocaust survivors alive to bear witness.

“That means interactive media in the exhibitions, tablets in the seminar rooms, an up-to-date website and audioguides for visitors which may become multimedia guides,” he said.

However he said overemphasis on digital tools or a pivot to gadgets like virtual reality goggles undermined efforts to teach the lessons of the past and the duty to pay respect to the dead.

“We are also a cemetery. We need dignified remembrance and not pure emotion — tears don’t educate.”

Drecoll was similarly circumspect about calls for compulsory visits for Germans to the former camps.

“I really believe in intrinsic motivation — we want to have a conversation among equals,” he said.

“Also some young people are simply overwhelmed by the images they’re confronted with at the place where the crimes were committed — you have to respect that.”

Around 200,000 people — Jews, dissidents from across Europe, gay men and other groups targeted by the Nazis — were held at Sachsenhausen between 1936 and 1945.

At least 40,000 were killed or died under brutal conditions.

The memorial draws about 700,000 visitors each year from around the world — double the number a decade ago. The vast majority, Drecoll said, are “respectful”.

‘Playing with fire’
Leading AfD politicians, however, have more and more openly challenged Germany’s unflinching reckoning with the legacy of the Nazi terror regime.

Party co-leader Alexander Gauland has called the 12-year Third Reich a “speck of bird poop” in an otherwise glorious German past.

Bjoern Hoecke, who represents the AfD’s extreme right wing, has criticised Berlin’s sprawling Holocaust memorial as a “monument of shame”.

And, after a series of provocations, the former Buchenwald camp banned AfD politicians from memorial ceremonies “as long as they do not credibly distance themselves from historically revisionist positions”.

Even if the AfD comes in first place in Brandenburg, mainstream parties are expected to band together to keep it from taking over the state government.

However Drecoll called the cultural damage wrought by the far right highly dangerous.

“What really, really concerns me is the breaking of verbal taboos. You can’t forget that words create reality, and the use of language stretches the realm of the possible — we learned that in the Nazi period,” he said.

“When you begin to talk about certain groups to say ‘they are like this or like that’, you’re playing with fire.”

The AfD’s main candidate in Brandenburg, Andreas Kalbitz, who frequently rails against “hordes of young Muslim men”, dismissed Drecoll’s concerns as “unjustified”.

Kalbitz, 46, told reporters his party had no plans “to close the memorials or somehow sideline remembrance of the Nazi crimes”, adding: “I think this kind of hysteria with regard to the AfD will dissolve, especially after the (state) elections.”

Back at Sachsenhausen, Dutch hairdresser Lola Rohde, 19, said as she toured former barracks for Jewish prisoners that the lessons of history were clear.

“I think a lot of politicians today use cruel language,” she said.

“They should all come to memorials like this to see what effect they can have with their words, what can happen if they’re turned into action.”

© Agence France-Presse

- Advertisement -
72,000FansLike
1,000FollowersFollow
4,000FollowersFollow
1,000SubscribersSubscribe